> I get something like this 1/3 of the time -- but it does not reproduce:
> [junit4] > Throwable #1: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:
> Did not successfully delete healthcheck file:'server-enabled'
Looks like a file is open during an attempt to delete it? This could
be a suite dependenc
Sainik Dasgupta created SOLR-3404:
-
Summary: solr in websphere
Key: SOLR-3404
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3404
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Wish
Reporter: Sainik
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated SOLR-3402:
-
Attachment: SOLR-3402.patch
Finished moving the Version guideline stuff around. Ready for commit in a few
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260351#comment-13260351
]
Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-3360:
James,
I checked the commit
http://svn.a
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13442/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandlerTest.testPing
Error Message:
Unknown action: ping
Stack Trace:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unknown action: ping
at
__randomizedtestin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-4016:
Description:
Diff the output artifacts compared to what was produced by ant 1.7.
{noformat}
Target
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13443/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandlerTest.testPing
Error Message:
Unknown action: ping
Stack Trace:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unknown action: ping
at
__randomizedtesting.Se
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) reopened SOLR-3301:
-
https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13442/testReport/ju
I'm sorry - this one is my fault, i've committed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3301 yesterday - but i didn't
realize that the test is failing :/
But right know, i don't have enough knowledge to fix the test .. will someone
else be able to have a look into it?
On Tuesday, April 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260422#comment-13260422
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3892:
Hi Billy, I'm very excited your
I think I see the problem Stefan, hold tight.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Stefan Matheis <
matheis.ste...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I'm sorry - this one is my fault, i've committed
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3301 yesterday - but i didn't
> realize that the test is failing :
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) updated SOLR-3301:
Attachment: SOLR-3301-tests.patch
> Migrate enable/disable Ping from JSP
I had another Look at this Test .. couldn't be _that_ hard .. so in the end, it
looks really simple:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12523955/SOLR-3301-tests.patch
Is this correct? Then i'll go ahead and commit this.
On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Stefan Matheis wrot
Just found and committed the same thing in r1329634.
Cheers
Chris
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Stefan Matheis <
matheis.ste...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I had another Look at this Test .. couldn't be _that_ hard .. so in the
> end, it looks really simple:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/sec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260426#comment-13260426
]
Chris Male commented on SOLR-3301:
--
As Stefan found out, the problem was that a locale was
Thanks for Confirmation Chris
On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Chris Male wrote:
> Just found and committed the same thing in r1329634.
>
> Cheers
> Chris
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Stefan Matheis
> mailto:matheis.ste...@googlemail.com)> wrote:
> > I had another Look at thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) resolved SOLR-3301.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Migrate enable/disable Ping from JSP to PingReques
This thread is impossible for me to keep up with! Some responses:
> In fact, I expect if there is real demand, a downstream contributor
> would easily pick this up.
Exactly: just like the numerous useful Linux repositories... it's
clearly not this PMC's job to push to all of those repositories.
Robert Muir created LUCENE-4017:
---
Summary: fail the build on unused third party jars
Key: LUCENE-4017
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4017
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tommaso Teofili resolved SOLR-3396.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Tommaso Teofili
fixed in r1329640
> ClientU
Renaud Delbru created LUCENE-4018:
-
Summary: Make accessible subenums in MappingMultiDocsEnum
Key: LUCENE-4018
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4018
Project: Lucene - Java
Is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Renaud Delbru updated LUCENE-4018:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-4018.patch
> Make accessible subenums in MappingMultiDocsEnum
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-3887.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
This is fixed: but it would be good to fix it at cla
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> This thread is impossible for me to keep up with!
It's a very complex topic, and I wish I could find more concise ways
to talk about it.
Anyhow, since you all seem to have a consensus not to push the rewind
button back to the days of '
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luca Cavanna updated LUCENE-3976:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-3976.patch
First draft patch: I added a check for that specific problem with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260490#comment-13260490
]
Luca Cavanna commented on LUCENE-3976:
--
We found out that some recent dutch dictiona
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13449/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.test
Error Message:
Backup success not detected:
0121,58
KB/usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/checkout/solr/bui
Le 24 avr. 2012 à 03:10, Benson Margulies a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Chris Male wrote:
>> I'm with Steve here, -1. I think the arguments have already been well
>> articulated and the issue seems to be about dependency management in general
>> not just about Maven. However I a
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Nicolas Lalevée
wrote:
>> The rule we are dealing with goes as follows, stated pseudo-biblically:
>>
>> * No PMC shall publish a JAR file containing modified versions of some
>> other PMC's output unless you change the package names.
>
> Does this apply to any bin
Luca Cavanna created LUCENE-4019:
Summary: Parsing Hunspell affix rules without regexp condition
Key: LUCENE-4019
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4019
Project: Lucene - Java
>
> Putting someone's jar inside a lib/ folder or war as a dependency is
> hardly 'publishing'.
>
> Its maven that requires 'publishing' and that causes all the fuss.
>
> I've tried to explain this over and over again, but maven supporters
> just get defensive and claim its not a maven problem: but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260566#comment-13260566
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4019:
-
I dont know if there is a real spec, more just
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Maven is guilty as charged that the simple, obvious, way of dealing
> with this requires publication. In the pressurized circumstances of
> 3.6.0, no one was going to get past that. Now, we can if you want.
>
well FWIW: we got past it fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Per Steffensen updated SOLR-3178:
-
Attachment: SOLR_3173_3178_3382_plus.patch
Find attached SOLR_3173_3178_3382_plus.patch which shou
Robert Muir created SOLR-3405:
-
Summary: maven artifacts should be equivalent to binary packaging
Key: SOLR-3405
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Tas
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Maven does not, in fact, require publication in this case. An
> ephemeral jar can travel into a war or an assembly without ever being
> published.
>
OK, I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405: maven
artifacts should mat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260595#comment-13260595
]
Benson Margulies commented on SOLR-3405:
What you did is perfect in every way if yo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260595#comment-13260595
]
Benson Margulies edited comment on SOLR-3405 at 4/24/12 2:16 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260598#comment-13260598
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-3405:
-
I dont understand this issue and I don't want to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260600#comment-13260600
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3405:
---
I don't think we have to attack the patched binaries
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260598#comment-13260598
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on SOLR-3405 at 4/24/12 2:20 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260603#comment-13260603
]
Benson Margulies commented on SOLR-3405:
Oh, drat. I thought I was cleverly reducin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260606#comment-13260606
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-3405:
-
How does it differ? I dont understand it, sorry!
Do you all think we're at a point to do a -pre nuget package that users can
tinker with and provide feedback? The -pre flag means that it is only
meant to be a pre release in order to get feedback. We might get more
feedback if we package the binaries.
Those that pushed the last package, what do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260609#comment-13260609
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3405:
---
{noformat}
$ unzip -l apache-solr-3.5.0.zip | grep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260612#comment-13260612
]
Luca Cavanna commented on LUCENE-4019:
--
Robert, with "spec" I meant exactly your lin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260616#comment-13260616
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-3405:
-
OK, that explains :-)
In my opinion, Solr shoul
Responding to the thread as a whole, having read it with great interest.
I'd be interested to know what packagers for distributions such as
debian and fedora do with systems that patch 3rd party dependencies.
I'll guess that if it is internalized as mentioned below that there is
no problem.
Hi,
> BTW, fedora 16 has lucene 2.9.4 and does not have solr. Looks like F17 will
> have the same. I'd also be interested to know why they don't have 3.x or solr.
I think that unrelated here, but the answer is simple: Those distributions
don't have Lucene JARS to provide "Lucene" as a library to
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> BTW, fedora 16 has lucene 2.9.4 and does not have solr. Looks like F17 will
>> have the same. I'd also be interested to know why they don't have 3.x or
>> solr.
>
> I think that unrelated here, but the answer is simple: Those distr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260638#comment-13260638
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4019:
-
its tough to know for sure. in general a lot o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260657#comment-13260657
]
Christian Groschupp commented on SOLR-3398:
---
I have the same Problem.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260669#comment-13260669
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-3405:
--
+1
> maven artifacts
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260657#comment-13260657
]
Christian Groschupp edited comment on SOLR-3398 at 4/24/12 3:45 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260674#comment-13260674
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-3398:
It appears based on the bug report that you have modified
Marek,
This exception is caused by QueryElevationComponent. I had the same issue
and solved it by
commenting out all query tags in elevate.xml. The example file contains
something like
which will cause the exception.
Regards,
Reinhold
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir reassigned LUCENE-2946:
---
Assignee: Robert Muir
> change file format documentation from "bit-for-bit" to highlevel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260689#comment-13260689
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-3405:
-
wasn't this solved in 3.6?
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-2690.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
Committed revision 1329837.
> Date Math should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260694#comment-13260694
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3405:
---
Not at all!
Look at the issue title: apache-solr-3.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-4016:
Description:
Diff the output artifacts compared to what was produced by ant 1.7.
{noformat}
Target
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260708#comment-13260708
]
Christopher Currens commented on LUCENENET-486:
---
I think this affects oth
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2324/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.util.TimeZoneUtilsTest.testRandom
Error Message:
GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
at
__randomizedtesting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260713#comment-13260713
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-3405:
-
why would we distribute guava.jar? Seems like w
Oh, nice ;) Apparently time zone -00:00 is different from +00:00...
Depends on which side of the Greenwich your feet are on, he, he.
Dawid
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2324/
>
> 1 tests fai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260717#comment-13260717
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3405:
---
OK i'll go change it to use a patched guava jar. Now
: Oh, nice ;) Apparently time zone -00:00 is different from +00:00...
: Depends on which side of the Greenwich your feet are on, he, he.
Fuck ... i even busted out test.iters=1000 looking for crap like this,
and i still missed this case -- but of course Jenkins finds it first try.
The crazythin
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : Oh, nice ;) Apparently time zone -00:00 is different from +00:00...
> : Depends on which side of the Greenwich your feet are on, he, he.
>
> Fuck ... i even busted out test.iters=1000 looking for crap like this,
> and i still missed thi
>> Fuck ... i even busted out test.iters=1000 looking for crap like this,
>> and i still missed this case -- but of course Jenkins finds it first try.
LOL :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additio
If it is known to be stable for actual use, we RavenDB dev team will update
to it in a branch and provide feedback. A -Pre nuget package released for
every RC can definitely help here.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Michael Herndon <
mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> Do you all think we're
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13455/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.test
Error Message:
expected:<1> but was:<0>
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
at
__randomizedtesting.SeedIn
Uhm.. I was referring to the .NET port, which I can see DIGY ported
Nevermind I will get it from the original commit
@Prescott any idea re " CartesianPolyFilterBuilder.GetBoxShape() is not an
exact port - do you remember why? "?
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Christopher Currens <
currens.ch.
: The crazything: unless i have a serious bug in the test, both of those
: TimeZone objects came from calling TimeZone.getTimeZone("GMT-00") ... the
: only difference is that the "actual" call went through some string
: validation first to ensure it matcheda regex.
:
: spooky fucking shit.
FW
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260741#comment-13260741
]
Per Steffensen commented on SOLR-3173:
--
See patch attached to SOLR-3178
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260742#comment-13260742
]
Per Steffensen commented on SOLR-3382:
--
See patch attached to SOLR-3178
: FWIW: I can not reproduce this using hte specified seed...
Even when i added explicit checks for the input that the test complained
about ("GMT-00") i still can't reproduce ... but i'm using Java6 and i
don't have Java7.
I double checked the code, and i seriously don't understand how this
f
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13456/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.util.TimeZoneUtilsTest.testRandom
Error Message:
GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
at
__randomizedtesting.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-3393:
---
Attachment: SOLR-3393.patch
Patch for new LFUCache implementation. It should be pretty close to O(1).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260754#comment-13260754
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-3405:
---
So under this proposal, which of these would NOT be
David created SOLR-3406:
---
Summary: Compute facet queries over grouped docsets
Key: SOLR-3406
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3406
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Repor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260762#comment-13260762
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3405:
---
I think the contribs are actually in our package (al
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260763#comment-13260763
]
David commented on SOLR-2898:
-
I just realized that computing stats on an ungrouped docset stil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260763#comment-13260763
]
David edited comment on SOLR-2898 at 4/24/12 6:03 PM:
--
I just realized
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David updated SOLR-3406:
Description: Need the ability to support grouped range and query facets.
Grouped facet fields have already been impl
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13457/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.util.TimeZoneUtilsTest.testRandom
Error Message:
GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
at
__randomizedtesting.Seed
: Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13457/
: Error Message: GMT-00
:
expected:
: but
:
was:
This build contained my changes to "testCustom" in the same class that
explicitly called the exact same methods on "GMT-00"...
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260789#comment-13260789
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-3405:
---
bq. But the maven artifacts expose these inner detai
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13458/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.util.TimeZoneUtilsTest.testCustom
Error Message:
GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
at
__randomizedtesting.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260579#comment-13260579
]
Per Steffensen edited comment on SOLR-3178 at 4/24/12 6:38 PM:
--
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13459/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.util.TimeZoneUtilsTest.testRandom
Error Message:
GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
at
__randomizedtesting.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260814#comment-13260814
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3405:
---
yeah: i mean we can look at this two ways:
1) that t
Robert Chapman ported Spatial to Lucene.NET, shown here in this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-199. DIGY only committed
the patch, and the only thing I've seen Prescott do was to
modify/apply LUCENENET-431 to trunk from 2.9.4g. Spatial, along with the
rest of Contrib, was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260819#comment-13260819
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3405:
---
Or just said another way, we are currently releasing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260825#comment-13260825
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-3405:
---
bq. the fact that they are different I think is the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-3393:
---
Attachment: SOLR-3393.patch
New patch that does not touch SolrInfoMBeanTest. I figured out what
Fast
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260828#comment-13260828
]
Shawn Heisey edited comment on SOLR-3393 at 4/24/12 6:59 PM:
-
N
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260831#comment-13260831
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-3405:
---
bq. 2. with its "guts exposed" on maven
hmm, by "gu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260832#comment-13260832
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3405:
---
Well i think so, I mean the way maven publishes solr
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2325/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.util.TimeZoneUtilsTest.testCustom
Error Message:
GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
at
__randomizedtes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260841#comment-13260841
]
Benson Margulies commented on SOLR-3405:
It might be helpful to note the following:
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
