> > I'm terrible with social media- is there any way to have tweets directed
>>> > at @LuceneDotNet sent to one of our mailing lists? Or should I just get on
>>> > top of monitoring it more often?
>>> >
>>> > > From: casper...@casp
gt;
>
>
> On Aug 20, 2012, at 10:18 AM, "Michael Herndon"
> wrote:
>
>> I went to update the twitter feed and saw these questions in case
>> anyone wants to answer these:
>>
>> @Nick_Craver
>> @LuceneDotNet - is anyone already working on a NIOF
I went to update the twitter feed and saw these questions in case
anyone wants to answer these:
@Nick_Craver
@LuceneDotNet - is anyone already working on a NIOFSDirectory port?
Unless I misunderstand, it would be a huge boost to our SSD
environment'
@intelligibabble
would love it if some #lucene
if you do rename stuff other than poorly named signature parameters, its
helpful to document the java version's name and the reason for the rename.
Even for java, some of the internal naming makes the code that much harder
to understand and follow.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Prescott Nasser
+1
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Christopher Currens wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Frank Yu wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Petersen, Robert
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > On Jul 8, 2012, at 12:22 PM, "Stef
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13400493#comment-13400493
]
michael herndon commented on LUCENENET-456:
---
taking i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael herndon reassigned LUCENENET-456:
-
Assignee: michael herndon
> Create a Build Target that outputs compi
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
>
> > -- Task 470, a non-serious one, is listed only because it's mostly done
> and
> > just need a few loose ends tied up. I'll hopefully have time to take care
> > of that this weekend.
>
>
> How many GetX/SetX are left? I did a quick sea
In case you are using git-svn and see the following error after running
"git svn rebase" on a brach:
Author: [name] not defined in .git/authors.txt file
just cd into the .git directory and add the user to the /authors.txt file
where [name] is the apache user name.
[name] = Full Name <[name]@apac
if you're using git bash from msys
$ git gui
will give you a visual tool for seeing diffs for the current changes of
your current branch.
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> Itamar - I'm terrible with git, the last two weekends I tried cutting out
> and making a patch
Do you all think we're at a point to do a -pre nuget package that users can
tinker with and provide feedback? The -pre flag means that it is only
meant to be a pre release in order to get feedback. We might get more
feedback if we package the binaries.
Those that pushed the last package, what do
There seems to be an overall theme of the concern of number of committers.
I do agree with this. I'm going throw out some suggestions. We could use
implementing any number of these as our graduation or maybe work towards
obtaining a certain number of new committers for 2012.
* Throw up a step by
asked how do we put documentation
> online with the new system there were crickets.
>
>
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ____________
> From: Michael Herndon
> Sent: 1/25/2012 8:26 AM
> To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.ap
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2012-01-25, Michael Herndon wrote:
>
> > Stefan what did you use to check the eof of files for svn?
>
> Pretty much a long and boring manual process. I did something like
>
> find . -name \*.cs -print0 | xargs -0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13192704#comment-13192704
]
michael herndon commented on LUCENENET-445:
---
I've seen this one. I
You can. I've used it extensively on the 4.0 branch. painful for any
Javascript coding or projects, but it has been extremely helpful with
writing C# code and testing.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> fyi, I believe you can request a free resharper license for being an
>From my very limited understanding of the Java version of Lucene, the Java
version seems to have breaking changes between major versions. This
includes index format and as such requires an updater. So if we are
talking about breaking this in 3.0.3, then I'd vote yes. The thought is
that those ki
@Prescott, Thank you for the page. I should be get around to poking
through it in the next 24 hours or so.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> I've created a wiki page with the checklist:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Release+Checklist+and+steps+
2012 06:37:58 +0100
> > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene-2.9.4g-incubating-RC1
> > Release (take 2)
> > >
> > > On 2012-01-18, Michael Herndon wrote:
> > >
> > > > Not be a miser, but I'm abstaining till we get a checklist
Might I suggest that we all approach this as a business owners, community
builders, startup entrepreneurs instead of developers for a second.
You have limited resources: time, budget, personnel, etc.
What is our two biggest metrics of success for this product?
My guess is adoption and customer i
+1 I believe you tagged the latest during release. Code be reverted or a
new branch to create a patch for 2.9.4 if something major happens since we
have scm in place, so I think merging it would not be damaging in any way.
for the 2.9.4g branch, I would do a quick scan to see if there are any
out
if it was also somewhere in the public site.
> > > For this version I think it's ok to leave it there, but maybe for a
> next
> > > release it would be good to publish it in the website.
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > I did a few changes: do I create a diff f
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Simone Chiaretta wrote:
> You mean a different impersonal Nuget account?
>
yes. the goal of the impersonal account was to allow committers to push
nuget packages in an automated way without the need of having their own
account. there was some preliminary work of b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13152934#comment-13152934
]
michael herndon commented on LUCENENET-455:
---
"now it points to r
nothing definite. we have a nuget account setup, a way to package the files
as nupkg.
However the packages names are taken by others who jumped the gun and
generated nuget packages under Lucene & Lucene.Net, the latter being the
ideal main package that the we would want to use.
We also need to wa
our suggestion commit the
smaller chunks of html then.
I'll do it manually this time and see if I can't write a script that
automates it in the future.
@Chris, thanks for the fixes to the build scripts this weekend.
- Michael
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
+1
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-11-02, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> > http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC2/
>
> As usual, no technical opinion at all, I leave that to others.
>
> Sigs and hashes look good. NOTICE and LICENSE are fine
Yep, that folder was missing about 10 mb of files. Pushed as of r1196183.
Can you update and confirm when you have a chance Prescott?
- Michael
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Michael Herndon wrote:
> I'll have to look. RapidSVN's GUI froze when pushing that many files up.
>
If no one else beats me to it, I can probably have it in trunk by wednesday.
- Michael
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-10-31, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> > I have to re tag the trunk because of the additional bug fix I put in
> > this evening. So feel free to upd
if thats the case, then well need conditional statements for including
ThreadLocal
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> I thought this was after 2.9.4
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Herndon
> Sent: Wednesda
@Robert,
I believe the overwhelming consensus on the mailing list vote was to move to
.NET 4.0 and drop support for previous versions.
I'll take care of build scripts issue while they being refactored into
smaller chunks this week.
@Troy, Agreed.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Robert Jordan
"The granular approach can cause dependency issues as well. FubuMVC is
running into this with their granularity had to invent their own build chain
for "ripples" of changes.
I would say do two packages Lucene and Contrib and when one of the pieces of
Contrib gets awesome enough to warrant it's ow
We should probably fix the ClsCompliance warnings if they have not already
been fixed & find a place to put the generated documentation.
I remember someone mentioning he/she was unable to access a class from
VB.NET. The class had public fields & properties with the same names but
different casing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13105288#comment-13105288
]
michael herndon commented on LUCENENET-443:
---
Is there a good reason to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13090345#comment-13090345
]
michael herndon commented on LUCENENET-407:
---
It could have been created
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-08-10, Michael Herndon wrote:
>
> > Updated: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2011: anyone looking
> into
> > this thread feel free to tweak.
>
> Thanks a lot, looks good to me but I have a few que
: Improvement
Components: Lucene.Net Contrib, Lucene.Net Core
Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Environment: all
Reporter: michael herndon
The are a ton of java doc style notations inside the xml code comments, i.e.
{@link #IncrementToken}
These need to use the
I don't know if anyone has gotten in touch, but I have noticed that Troy
made a ticket out of this and applied a patch.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-437
I know that isn't a direct answer to your response, but you could do a diff
and see what was changed/ported/patched to answer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13060892#comment-13060892
]
michael herndon commented on LUCENENET-418:
---
The last commit may or may
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13058781#comment-13058781
]
michael herndon commented on LUCENENET-418:
---
r1132085 under
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael herndon updated LUCENENET-400:
--
Due Date: 30/Sep/11 (was: 28/Feb/11)
> Evaluate tooling for continuous integrat
:
> @Michael -
>
> Should that list be in JIRA? It would be easier to manage, I think...
>
> If yes, I'll happily do it.
>
> -r
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Michael Herndon <
> mhern...@wickedsoftware.net
> > wrote:
>
> > * need to document what
* need to document what the build script does. whut grammerz?
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Michael Herndon <
mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> @Rory, @All,
>
> The only tickets I currently have for those is LUCENE-419, LUCENE-418
>
> 418, I should be able to push i
quot;
> > is
> > > > so
> > > > important. It allows us to build consensus, so that we can settle on
> a
> > > > direction and structure our work.
> > > >
> > > > Until we accomplish that, it really is "whoever commits code wins
I'd say that is all the more reasons that we need to work smarter and not
harder. I'd also say thats a good reason to make sure we build consensus
rather than just saying whoever commits code wins.
And its a damn good reason to focus on the effort of growing the number of
contributors and lowing t
For the sake of continued conversation, Scott could you define what you mean
by line-by-line port vs non-line-by-line port since technically your the
thread starter?
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Digy wrote:
> As a Lucene.Net user I wouldn't care whether it is line-by-line port or
> not
[Month Updates & Blogging]
As part of the effort to grow the lucene.net community, I'm going to start
blog monthly updates as well as any future votes like the one moving to .NET
4.0. The first one is here,
http://wickedsoftware.net/lucene-net/may-2011-update. Any feed back is
welcome. Please cor
t have access until just the other day, and Chris
> Currens doesn't have access now (I had to add him to the page
> manually).
>
> Can we open up the permissions on our wiki?
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Michael Herndon
> wro
if anyone can join in for that, it might be wise to push out some tweets
about it this week.
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Troy Howard wrote:
> All,
>
> I'll be attending the Apache Retreat in Knockree next week (5/13-5/16). I
> was thinking it would be fun to arrange a Lucene.Net Hackathon fo
Is there any reason not to replace the old mirror with the newly created
one?
- Michael
--
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Michael Herndon
wrote:
> Would it be possible to get the git mirror to reflect that or at least
> cr
t;
> Otherwise, everything else sounds great.
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Michael Herndon <
> mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
>
> > If you think it would be beneficial to have the scripts in the branch, I
> > can
> &
I'm going to move ahead with this stuff this weekend unless anyone objects.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Michael Herndon <
mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> if you celebrate Easter, Happy Easter, if not, then Happy lucene.net clean
> up day.
>
>
> couple of ques
could you give a shout to the list when that gets stabilized?
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Troy Howard wrote:
> Sounds good. I'll make a tag prior to starting the directory changes,
> but I'll commit changes to trunk.
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:55 AM, digy digy wrot
Is Jira not currently setup to track the commit messages with the referenced
ticket number in them?
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Digy wrote:
> I don't know what others think, but I find it more trackable to see the
> issues and related patches in one place(JIRA)
> (especially, while trying
http://na11.apachecon.com/
I know its not till November, but submissions for presenting is 29 April
2011 at midnight Pacific Time
Are any Lucene.Net developers going to this and wish to do a collaborative
presentation/training?
- Michael
+1
just a question though. for cmd/bat//sh files for letting people executing
the build or just executing other tools from the command line, would those
have a place in /bin or somewhere els? This is that someone can just export
PATH = / SET PATH= to that one folder and then be able to execute
Does the following violate any of the rules put forth by apache or
give anyone pause?
---
Hello
We're always happy to sponsor OSS project.
If you could put our Powered by NDepend logo on your OSS project
website we'd be happy to sponsor Apache Luc
they do outside of this list, etc). Interacting with people who might
never subscribe to the list, but need help all the same.
- Michael
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-03-04, Michael Herndon wrote:
>
>> Anything that should be on the mailing lis
in
> svn anyhow. Sidebar advantages here are it is much easier to debug the
> build scrips since you have no environmental dependencies and you've
> got all the toys in one download.
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Michael Herndon
> wrote:
> > Sorry I've be
Sorry I've been just reading through the list & wiki (
http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson)
I subscribed to the list last night and haven't received the usual message
for activating subscriptions, I'll try again today and get on the list to
see what is already on the windows slave.
We also have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12999512#comment-12999512
]
michael herndon commented on LUCENENET-377:
---
I would suggestion
I'm curious about the practice of putting license information into all
files. The reasoning and etc.
Is due to legal reasons or is it due to good practices? would providing
short copyright info and relative path to the license suffice or is the full
license required?
Has not doing so cause issues
and maintain a healthy forward-moving pace with plenty of
> > time allotted for discussion, group decision making and voting. The
> > Apache Way is the way this project will succeed and thrive, and that
> > requires all of us.
> >
> >
> > So, that said, the outst
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12995283#comment-12995283
]
michael herndon edited comment on LUCENENET-379 at 2/16/11 1:2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12995283#comment-12995283
]
michael herndon commented on LUCENENET-379:
---
I think anything woul
Morning Stefan (or afternoon),
I can help with this. Would we need to create an account name or any of the
instances, like maven per say?
- Michael
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> in order to set up the new wiki we need a few people who help out with
> ad
I'm taking these last few comments and copying them over to the "Build & CI
Considerations" thread that Wyatt kindly started.
I'll reply there.
- Michael.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Robert Jordan wrote:
> Michael,
>
>
> On 26.01.2011 19:18, Michael He
ues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-377) ; I just need
> some direction from the committers as to what I should target and what
> the operational goals are.
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Michael Herndon
> wrote:
> > supposedly the wiki used to be:http://wiki.apac
Welcome =)
- Michael
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm in the process of signing up as mentor on the Incubator wiki and
> thought I'd better introduce myself since I don't expect anybody around
> here to know me.
>
> Like many people I came to the ASF
>
> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
> >
> >
> > For each of those goals:
> >
> > Build Initial Committers List
> > ---
> >
> > I have updated the proposal to reflect the current
uate Sharpen as a port tool for Lucene.Net.
> > The files to be evaluated are attached. We need to run those files
> (which are off Java Lucene 2.9.2) against Sharpen and compare the result
> against JLCA result.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
that the proposal is inline with community interest
> >>
> >> The current draft of the proposal is located at:
> >>
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
> >>
> >>
> >> For each of those goals:
> >>
>
chable getting started guides. In all honesty, the
> only "how do I start using Lucene" stuff I found when I started using
> lucene six or so months ago was in Simone Chiaretta's blog plus the
> subtext source. This could perhaps include some DimeCasts.NET style
> stuf
as improperly used beforehand does not
> mean
> >> it is legally owned by some other entity. The Lucene name has been at
> the
> >> ASF since 2001 and Lucene.NET is also now a part of the ASF. (If your
> >> interested, go look at the discussions around iBatis and the
74 matches
Mail list logo
