On Apr 20, 2013, at 7:03 AM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
I think another smoke test might be useful: compare the claimed svn revision
against the revision in the manifest of each archive to be
On Apr 19, 2013, at 6:44 PM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: OK I think a WARNING in smokeTester makes sense ...
:
: But as Hoss said ... figuring out the release branch from smokeTester
On Apr 19, 2013, at 6:16 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
I think, maybe Smoketester should compare the revision from the URL in the RC
vote with the one recorded in the JAR files? Everything else makes no sense
as the:
a) The SVN server always replies with the latest committed
, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Steve Rowe [mailto:sar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 9:11 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.3 RC1
On Apr 19, 2013, at 6:16 PM, Uwe Schindler u
Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Steve Rowe [mailto:sar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 8:43 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.3 RC1
On Apr 19, 2013, at 6:44 PM, Michael McCandless
luc
Cool, 'svnrevision -c' is recursive and provides a single result, unlike svn
info when run recursively.
On Apr 20, 2013, at 3:29 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
svnversion -c
Prints the last changed version after the :, e.g. compare these outputs:
C:\Users\Uwe
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 19, 2013, at 6:44 PM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: OK I think a WARNING in smokeTester makes sense ...
:
:
http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.3.0-RC1-rev1469340/
Thanks everybody for the hard work!
Smoke tester says: SUCCESS!
Integration into ES is successful!
there is my +1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1 The smoker tester ran successful!
On 19 April 2013 08:18, Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@gmail.com wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.3.0-RC1-rev1469340/
Thanks everybody for the hard work!
Smoke tester says: SUCCESS!
Integration into ES is successful!
-
From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 8:18 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.3 RC1
http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.3.0-RC1-
rev1469340/
Thanks everybody for the hard work!
Smoke tester
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Hi,
I am still reviewing. I have one note about the changes.txt where we miss
a backwards break:
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4877 made the
AnalysisFactories require to have a non-default ctor,
...@thetaphi.de
From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 2:45 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: simon.willna...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.3 RC1
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Hi,
I am still reviewing. I have
Thanks Simon! Getting my smoke tester ready…
- Mark
On Apr 19, 2013, at 2:18 AM, Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@gmail.com wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.3.0-RC1-rev1469340/
Thanks everybody for the hard work!
Smoke tester says: SUCCESS!
Integration
+1 - somke tester passes for me.
On Apr 19, 2013, at 2:18 AM, Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@gmail.com wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.3.0-RC1-rev1469340/
Thanks everybody for the hard work!
Smoke tester says: SUCCESS!
Integration into ES is successful!
:
http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.3.0-RC1-rev1469340/
Hmmm? ... r1469340 is from Thu Apr 18 14:20:33 2013 UTC
FWIW: There were several changes made after r1469340 (but well before the
proposed Friday 36 hours from now) to try and clean up the release notes
and fix
ah man, good call! that is my fault. I know what went wrong here. Damned!
ok that means I need to respin that one. This might take a while on my end.
sorry about that.
simon
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote:
:
Can we fix changes.txt before that?
Uwe
Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@gmail.com schrieb:
ah man, good call! that is my fault. I know what went wrong here.
Damned!
ok that means I need to respin that one. This might take a while on my
end.
sorry about that.
simon
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at
@uwe sure!
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Can we fix changes.txt before that?
Uwe
Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@gmail.com schrieb:
ah man, good call! that is my fault. I know what went wrong here. Damned!
ok that means I need to respin that
Will fix soon!
Uwe
Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@gmail.com schrieb:
@uwe sure!
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de
wrote:
Can we fix changes.txt before that?
Uwe
Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@gmail.com schrieb:
ah man, good call! that is my fault.
thanks uwe... let me know I will run a new RC once you are done
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Will fix soon!
Uwe
Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@gmail.com schrieb:
@uwe sure!
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de
Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 11:24 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.3 RC1
thanks uwe... let me know I will run a new RC once you are done
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote
.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 11:24 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.3 RC1
thanks uwe... let me know I will run a new
.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 11:24 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.3 RC1
thanks uwe... let me
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm @hoss did you check this manually, I mean the revision?
I think our smoketester should check the revision of the release branch and
the revision of the RC to make sure this doesn't happen?
SmokeTester might
To: dev@lucene.apache.org; simon.willna...@gmail.com
Cc: Uwe Schindler
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.3 RC1
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm @hoss did you check this manually, I mean the revision?
I think our smoketester should check
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm @hoss did you check this manually, I mean the revision?
I think our smoketester should check the revision of the release
://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 12:12 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org; simon.willna...@gmail.com
Cc: Uwe Schindler
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Lucene/Solr 4.3 RC1
On Fri, Apr 19
: Hmm @hoss did you check this manually, I mean the revision?
ironically, i noticed because i initially tried running the 4x version of
the smoke tester again the RC, and it complained about the duplicated
changes sections. At which point i starting thinking that it was my fault
for using the
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
I think, maybe Smoketester should compare the revision from the URL in the RC
vote with the one recorded in the JAR files?
Hmmm OK ... though, buildAndPushRelease computed that URL from the svn
checkout it build the release
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
keep in mind there may not be one in the URL.
Its nice to smoke-test before uploading to your home directory.
also its useful to run 'ant nightly-smoke' and run a smoke test, and if
someone commits something while this is
: OK I think a WARNING in smokeTester makes sense ...
:
: But as Hoss said ... figuring out the release branch from smokeTester
: ... isn't easy. Hmm.
At a certain point, too much automation is too much. I already think
the snoke tester is too complicated -- what tests the tester?
It's
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: OK I think a WARNING in smokeTester makes sense ...
:
: But as Hoss said ... figuring out the release branch from smokeTester
: ... isn't easy. Hmm.
At a certain point, too much automation is too much. I
32 matches
Mail list logo
