[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows (64bit/jdk-10.0.1) - Build # 13 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows/13/ Java: 64bit/jdk-10.0.1 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.common.util.TestTimeSource.testEpochTime Error Message: SimTimeSource:50.0 time diff=19405000 Stack Trace

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.4-Linux (64bit/jdk-10) - Build # 36 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.4-Linux/36/ Java: 64bit/jdk-10 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 2 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudRecovery.leaderRecoverFromLogOnStartupTest Error Message: expected:<4> but was:<2>

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows (32bit/jdk1.8.0_172) - Build # 11 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows/11/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_172 -client -XX:+UseParallelGC 2 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.common.util.TestTimeSource.testEpochTime Error Message: SimTimeSource:50.0 time diff=3957 Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

t" instead. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cassandra >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:24 PM Adrien Grand >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Since artifacts are available, I'll start

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

nce artifacts are available, I'll start a vote. I'm happy to respin >>>>>> if we decide to. >>>>>> >>>>>> Le lun. 18 juin 2018 à 19:52, Uwe Schindler a >>>>>> écrit : >>>>>> >>>

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

Thanks David. Le ven. 22 juin 2018 à 16:17, David Smiley a écrit : > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 5:31 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> I wrote some release notes for Lucene[1] and just a skeleton for Solr[2]. >> Can someone help me with the Solr release notes? Also feel free to add >> items to the

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 5:31 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > I wrote some release notes for Lucene[1] and just a skeleton for Solr[2]. > Can someone help me with the Solr release notes? Also feel free to add > items to the Lucene release notes if you think that they are > release-notes-worthy. Thanks!

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

gt; >>>>> Le lun. 18 juin 2018 à 19:52, Uwe Schindler a >>>>> écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Anshum, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I was talking about **source** artifacts. Thos

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

artifacts. Those will miss the commit, >>>>> because it’s a tar.gz of whole source tree (lucene+solr+refguide)! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Uwe >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

ecause it’s a tar.gz of whole source tree (lucene+solr+refguide)! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Uwe >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - >>>> >>>> Uwe Schindler >>>> >>>> Achterdie

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

refguide)! >>> >>> >>> >>> Uwe >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> >>> Uwe Schindler >>> >>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Achterdiek+19,+D-28357+Bremen=gmai

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows (64bit/jdk-11-ea+14) - Build # 10 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows/10/ Java: 64bit/jdk-11-ea+14 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC 8 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.doTestStressReplication Error Message: found:2[index.20180622065634843, index

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.4-Linux (64bit/jdk-10.0.1) - Build # 24 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.4-Linux/24/ Java: 64bit/jdk-10.0.1 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.cdcr.CdcrBidirectionalTest.testBiDir Error Message: Captured an uncaught exception in thread: Thread[id=12576, name

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows (64bit/jdk-9.0.4) - Build # 9 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows/9/ Java: 64bit/jdk-9.0.4 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 2 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.common.util.TestTimeSource.testEpochTime Error Message: SimTimeSource:50.0 time diff=41105000 Stack Trace

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows (64bit/jdk-9.0.4) - Build # 8 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows/8/ Java: 64bit/jdk-9.0.4 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.ActionThrottleTest.testBasics Error Message: 993ms Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError: 993ms

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.4-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_172) - Build # 20 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.4-Linux/20/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_172 -client -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.DeleteReplicaTest.deleteReplicaFromClusterState Error Message: Collection not found: deleteFromClusterState_false Stack Trace

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows (64bit/jdk-9.0.4) - Build # 7 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows/7/ Java: 64bit/jdk-9.0.4 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 7 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.core.ConfigureRecoveryStrategyTest Error Message: Could not remove the following files

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows (64bit/jdk-10) - Build # 6 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows/6/ Java: 64bit/jdk-10 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 7 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.doTestStressReplication Error Message: found:2[index.20180619231939366, index.20180619232004642

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.4-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_172) - Build # 13 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.4-Linux/13/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_172 -server -XX:+UseSerialGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.cdcr.CdcrBidirectionalTest.testBiDir Error Message: Captured an uncaught exception in thread: Thread[id=11912, name=cdcr-replicator

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows (32bit/jdk1.8.0_172) - Build # 4 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows/4/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_172 -server -XX:+UseSerialGC 4 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudRecovery.leaderRecoverFromLogOnStartupTest Error Message: expected:<4> but was:<2> Stack Trace: java.lang.As

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

=gmail=g> >> >> http://www.thetaphi.de >> >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> >> >> *From:* Anshum Gupta >> *Sent:* Monday, June 18, 2018 7:35 PM >> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org >> *Subject:* Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4 >> >> >> &

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

gt; > > *From:* Anshum Gupta > *Sent:* Monday, June 18, 2018 7:35 PM > *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4 > > > > The release binaries would miss the commit, but I don't think that we > package the ref guide with they binaries so it shoul

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-7.4-Linux (64bit/jdk-11-ea+14) - Build # 8 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.4-Linux/8/ Java: 64bit/jdk-11-ea+14 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudConsistency.testOutOfSyncReplicasCannotBecomeLeader Error Message: Doc with id=4 not found in https

RE: Lucene/Solr 7.4

phi.de From: Anshum Gupta Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 7:35 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4 The release binaries would miss the commit, but I don't think that we package the ref guide with they binaries so it should be ok. I'll push this to master for now an

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

The release binaries would miss the commit, but I don't think that we package the ref guide with they binaries so it should be ok. I'll push this to master for now and wait for Cassandra to confirm (or if someone else knows). On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:18 AM Uwe Schindler wrote: > I think the

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

I think the source artifacts may miss the commit then. But that's not urgent, isn't it? Uwe Am June 18, 2018 5:09:02 PM UTC schrieb Adrien Grand : >Hi Anshum, > >I am in the process of uploading artifacts that passed precommit >locally. >Your changes seem to be only about the reference guide,

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

Hi Anshum, I am in the process of uploading artifacts that passed precommit locally. Your changes seem to be only about the reference guide, which I think is built separately? I think that means that I could proceed with the current artifacts that I have, let you push your commit, and then we

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

Hi Adrien, Is it ok for my to commit the documentation patch for SOLR-11277? Anshum On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 2:24 AM Alan Woodward wrote: > LUCENE-8360 is committed. > > > On 18 Jun 2018, at 08:38, Adrien Grand wrote: > > The fix looks good to me, let's get it in before building the first RC?

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows (64bit/jdk-10.0.1) - Build # 3 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows/3/ Java: 64bit/jdk-10.0.1 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 3 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.common.util.TestTimeSource.testEpochTime Error Message: SimTimeSource:50.0 time diff=15645000 Stack Trace

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

LUCENE-8360 is committed. > On 18 Jun 2018, at 08:38, Adrien Grand wrote: > > The fix looks good to me, let's get it in before building the first RC? > > Le dim. 17 juin 2018 à 22:39, Alan Woodward > a écrit : > I’m still debugging RandomChains failures, and found

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

The fix looks good to me, let's get it in before building the first RC? Le dim. 17 juin 2018 à 22:39, Alan Woodward a écrit : > I’m still debugging RandomChains failures, and found > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8360. I don’t think it’s a > Blocker though, and there will

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

I’m still debugging RandomChains failures, and found https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8360 . I don’t think it’s a Blocker though, and there will probably be more odd corners that ConditionalTokenFilter has exposed which can wait

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows (64bit/jdk-10) - Build # 1 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-7.4-Windows/1/ Java: 64bit/jdk-10 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 12 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.autoscaling.IndexSizeTriggerTest.testMergeIntegration Error Message: did not finish processing in time Stack Trace

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

this issue is fixed On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote: > our CI found a failure, I opened a blocker and attached a patch: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8358 > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Simon Willnauer > wrote: >> +1 for a first RC >> >> On Fri,

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

our CI found a failure, I opened a blocker and attached a patch: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8358 On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote: > +1 for a first RC > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: >> It looks like blockers are all resolved,

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

+1 for a first RC On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > It looks like blockers are all resolved, please let me know if I am missing > something. I will build a first RC on Monday. > > Le jeu. 14 juin 2018 à 15:02, Alan Woodward a écrit : >> >> LUCENE-8357 is in. >> >> On 14 Jun

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

It looks like blockers are all resolved, please let me know if I am missing something. I will build a first RC on Monday. Le jeu. 14 juin 2018 à 15:02, Alan Woodward a écrit : > LUCENE-8357 is in. > > On 14 Jun 2018, at 09:27, Adrien Grand wrote: > > +1 > > Le jeu. 14 juin 2018 à 10:02, Alan

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

LUCENE-8357 is in. > On 14 Jun 2018, at 09:27, Adrien Grand wrote: > > +1 > > Le jeu. 14 juin 2018 à 10:02, Alan Woodward > a écrit : > Hi Adrien, > > If possible I’d like to get LUCENE-8357 in, which fixes a regression in > Explanations for Solr’s boost

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

+1 Le jeu. 14 juin 2018 à 10:02, Alan Woodward a écrit : > Hi Adrien, > > If possible I’d like to get LUCENE-8357 in, which fixes a regression in > Explanations for Solr’s boost queries. > > Alan > > > On 13 Jun 2018, at 20:42, Adrien Grand wrote: > > It is. In general I trust your judgement

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

Hi Adrien, If possible I’d like to get LUCENE-8357 in, which fixes a regression in Explanations for Solr’s boost queries. Alan > On 13 Jun 2018, at 20:42, Adrien Grand > wrote: > > It is. In general I trust your judgement to only backport low-risk fixes. > > Le

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

It is. In general I trust your judgement to only backport low-risk fixes. Le mer. 13 juin 2018 à 21:03, Steve Rowe a écrit : > Crap, I forgot to ask for inclusion of SOLR-12481, a doc-only fix related > to SOLR-12434. I’m going to assume that it’s okay to backport as well, > I’ll go do that

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

Crap, I forgot to ask for inclusion of SOLR-12481, a doc-only fix related to SOLR-12434. I’m going to assume that it’s okay to backport as well, I’ll go do that now. Sorry for the churn. -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Jun 13, 2018, at 1:49 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > > Thanks, done. > > --

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

Thanks, done. -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Jun 13, 2018, at 1:08 PM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > OK to backport SOLR-12434. > > Le mer. 13 juin 2018 à 18:41, Steve Rowe a écrit : > Adrien, > > Are you okay with backporting SOLR-12434 to 7.4? > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > > > On

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

> On 13 Jun 2018, at 19:41, Andrzej Białecki > wrote: > > Hi, > > I’d like to also commit a minor patch that reduces logging from > MetricsHistoryHandler and fixes incorrect index size conversion there (this > is a follow-up to SOLR-12438). Make that SOLR-11779, that’s where the problem

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

+1 Le mer. 13 juin 2018 à 19:42, Andrzej Białecki < andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> a écrit : > Hi, > > I’d like to also commit a minor patch that reduces logging from > MetricsHistoryHandler and fixes incorrect index size conversion there (this > is a follow-up to SOLR-12438). > > > On 13 Jun

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

Hi, I’d like to also commit a minor patch that reduces logging from MetricsHistoryHandler and fixes incorrect index size conversion there (this is a follow-up to SOLR-12438). > On 13 Jun 2018, at 19:08, Adrien Grand wrote: > > OK to backport SOLR-12434. > > Le mer. 13 juin 2018 à 18:41,

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

OK to backport SOLR-12434. Le mer. 13 juin 2018 à 18:41, Steve Rowe a écrit : > Adrien, > > Are you okay with backporting SOLR-12434 to 7.4? > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > > > On Jun 12, 2018, at 9:37 AM, Steve Rowe wrote: > > > > Done, thanks Adrien. > > > > -- > > Steve > >

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

Adrien, Are you okay with backporting SOLR-12434 to 7.4? -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Jun 12, 2018, at 9:37 AM, Steve Rowe wrote: > > Done, thanks Adrien. > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > >> On Jun 12, 2018, at 9:23 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: >> >> +1 to backport LUCENE-8278 to 7.4.

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

Done, thanks Adrien. -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Jun 12, 2018, at 9:23 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > +1 to backport LUCENE-8278 to 7.4. Thanks Steve. > > Le lun. 11 juin 2018 à 23:21, Steve Rowe a écrit : > Adrien, > > Are you okay with including the fix on LUCENE-8278 in 7.4? > > -- >

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

+1 to backport LUCENE-8278 to 7.4. Thanks Steve. Le lun. 11 juin 2018 à 23:21, Steve Rowe a écrit : > Adrien, > > Are you okay with including the fix on LUCENE-8278 in 7.4? > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > > > On Jun 11, 2018, at 11:24 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > > > No worries Uwe, we'll

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

Adrien, Are you okay with including the fix on LUCENE-8278 in 7.4? -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Jun 11, 2018, at 11:24 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > No worries Uwe, we'll wait. Enjoy Buzzwords! > > Le lun. 11 juin 2018 à 17:08, Uwe Schindler a écrit : > I still have this new security

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

No worries Uwe, we'll wait. Enjoy Buzzwords! Le lun. 11 juin 2018 à 17:08, Uwe Schindler a écrit : > I still have this new security issue and to fix it finally everywhere, it > requires API changes. So please wait, I am working but buzzwords is so > interesting! 勞 > > Uwe > > > Am June 11, 2018

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

I still have this new security issue and to fix it finally everywhere, it requires API changes. So please wait, I am working but buzzwords is so interesting! 勞 Uwe Am June 11, 2018 2:45:54 PM UTC schrieb David Smiley : >It'd be nice to get in this bug

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

It'd be nice to get in this bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8344 but is pending a review. On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:24 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > Hi all, > > We released 7.3 two months ago on April 4th and we accumulated quite a > number of features, enhancements and fixes that

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

> On 7 Jun 2018, at 14:27, Adrien Grand wrote: > > I read quickly and assumed there was still work left since it was still open, > but if it's merged already it's perfect. I don't have enough background to > know whether SOLR-12438 is safe but I'll trust your judgement. I left it open

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

I read quickly and assumed there was still work left since it was still open, but if it's merged already it's perfect. I don't have enough background to know whether SOLR-12438 is safe but I'll trust your judgement. Le jeu. 7 juin 2018 à 14:25, Andrzej Białecki < andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com>

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

Hi Adrien, Did you mean SOLR-12438? I pushed SOLR-12445 just before you created a branch, so it’s already there. However, I upgraded SOLR-12438 to a Bug, because accidentally some of the responses from that handler were improperly serialised (as arrays instead of maps). Since this is a fix for

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

I just created jobs for 7.4 on the ASF Jenkins: https://builds.apache.org/view/L/view/Lucene/ Le jeu. 7 juin 2018 à 10:32, Adrien Grand a écrit : > Sorry, I meant branch_7_4, not branch_6_4. > > Le jeu. 7 juin 2018 à 10:31, Adrien Grand a écrit : > >> Hello, >> >> I just pushed a branch_7_4.

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

Sorry, I meant branch_7_4, not branch_6_4. Le jeu. 7 juin 2018 à 10:31, Adrien Grand a écrit : > Hello, > > I just pushed a branch_7_4. Please do not push features or enhancements to > this branch, however it's totally fine to keep pushing bugfixes to it, > though we should be careful if these

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

Hello, I just pushed a branch_7_4. Please do not push features or enhancements to this branch, however it's totally fine to keep pushing bugfixes to it, though we should be careful if these fixes are not unlikely to introduce other bugs. Andrzej, I see SOLR-12445 is marked as an enhancement in

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

Oh, OK, I see our disconnect. This week is fine, even if it's on the larger side. I just meant if someone *does* have big changes, they should start sooner rather than later. IOW, don't wait until next week or later. (Part of what motivated my message is I saw a comment in an issue earlier that

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

Roger; but I don't think this simultaneous release means that ref guide edits this week are not welcome? Risky/big changes are not welcome I assume. On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:35 PM Cassandra Targett wrote: > Well, I know some people don't update docs with their code changes for > whatever their

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

Well, I know some people don't update docs with their code changes for whatever their reasons are, so I just wanted to remind folks that for 7.2 the Ref Guide was released at the same time, and I intend this one to be too. Not sure if the goal of merging these release processes was widely

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

> I'd suggest to anyone holding off on doc edits to try to make some time in the next few days, if possible. What's the concern? On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 9:57 AM Cassandra Targett wrote: > +1, thanks Adrien. > > As with the last release, I plan to produce the Solr Ref Guide RC on the > same day

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

+1, thanks Adrien. As with the last release, I plan to produce the Solr Ref Guide RC on the same day the 7.4 RC is available, so I'd suggest to anyone holding off on doc edits to try to make some time in the next few days, if possible. On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 4:59 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > +1 >

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

+1 Le mer. 6 juin 2018 à 11:53, Andrzej Białecki < andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> a écrit : > Hi Adrien, > > I would like to upgrade the metrics library to 3.2.6, which fixes an > important bug affecting histograms (SOLR-12445). > > > On 6 Jun 2018, at 08:01, Dawid Weiss wrote: > > +1. Thanks

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

Hi Adrien, I would like to upgrade the metrics library to 3.2.6, which fixes an important bug affecting histograms (SOLR-12445). > On 6 Jun 2018, at 08:01, Dawid Weiss wrote: > > +1. Thanks Adrien. > > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 12:01 AM, Varun Thacker wrote: >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

+1. Thanks Adrien. On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 12:01 AM, Varun Thacker wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:24 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> We released 7.3 two months ago on April 4th and we accumulated quite a >> number of features, enhancements and fixes that are not released

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

+1 On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:24 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > Hi all, > > We released 7.3 two months ago on April 4th and we accumulated quite a > number of features, enhancements and fixes that are not released yet, so > I'd like to start working on releasing Lucene/Solr 7.4.0. > > I propose to

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

+1 On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Christian Moen wrote: > +1 > > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 5:24 PM Adrien Grand wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> We released 7.3 two months ago on April 4th and we accumulated quite a >> number of features, enhancements and fixes that are not released yet, so I'd >>

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

+1 On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 5:24 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > Hi all, > > We released 7.3 two months ago on April 4th and we accumulated quite a > number of features, enhancements and fixes that are not released yet, so > I'd like to start working on releasing Lucene/Solr 7.4.0. > > I propose to

RE: Lucene/Solr 7.4

Lucene Dev Subject: Lucene/Solr 7.4 Hi all, We released 7.3 two months ago on April 4th and we accumulated quite a number of features, enhancements and fixes that are not released yet, so I'd like to start working on releasing Lucene/Solr 7.4.0. I propose to create the 7.4 branch later thi

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

+1 Tommaso Il giorno mar 5 giu 2018 alle ore 14:53 Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> ha scritto: > +1 > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:24 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We released 7.3 two months ago on April 4th and

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

+1 Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:24 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > Hi all, > > We released 7.3 two months ago on April 4th and we accumulated quite a > number of features, enhancements and fixes that are not released yet, so > I'd like to start working on

Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4

+1 2018-06-05 10:24 GMT+02:00 Adrien Grand : > Hi all, > > We released 7.3 two months ago on April 4th and we accumulated quite a > number of features, enhancements and fixes that are not released yet, so > I'd like to start working on releasing Lucene/Solr 7.4.0. > > I propose to create the 7.4

Lucene/Solr 7.4

Hi all, We released 7.3 two months ago on April 4th and we accumulated quite a number of features, enhancements and fixes that are not released yet, so I'd like to start working on releasing Lucene/Solr 7.4.0. I propose to create the 7.4 branch later this week and build the first RC early next