Would it be possible to have an optional node that can dynamically assume a
leadership position?
There has been some small amount of discussion here about whether we could
have a 'search node' join a cluster and give it an empty/null (or zero
length) hash range on the clusterstate file and it woul
Not fired up about approaches that have “some nodes more equal than others”,
whether it is zk-only or replica-only. That is the opposite of autoscaling.
Getting our Solr Cloud cluster running in test and in prod was surprisingly
difficult and unfortunately mysterious. I started with Solr 1.1, so
Right, that "bin/solr zk start" is sort of how one could present that to
users. I took the liberty of creating
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10573 after not being able to
find any such issues (yet hearing about such ideas at Lucene Revolution).
Ishan & Co, you may want to link other
On Wed, 26 Apr 2017, at 10:06 PM, David Smiley wrote:
>
>> On Apr 26, 2017, at 4:35 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>
>> I have done a *lot* of automating this. Redoing it recently it was
>> quite embarrassing to realise how much complexity there is involved
>> in it - it is crazy hard to get a basic,
> On Apr 26, 2017, at 4:35 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>
> I have done a *lot* of automating this. Redoing it recently it was quite
> embarrassing to realise how much complexity there is involved in it - it is
> crazy hard to get a basic, production ready SolrCloud setup running.
Would you mind enum
I have done a *lot* of automating this. Redoing it recently it was quite
embarrassing to realise how much complexity there is involved in it - it
is crazy hard to get a basic, production ready SolrCloud setup running.
One thing that is hard is getting a ZooKeeper ensemble going - using
Exhibitor ma
Could the zk role also be guaranteed to run the Overseer (and no
collections)? If we already have that separated out, it would make sense to
put it with the embedded zk. I think you can already configure and place
things manually this way, but it would be a huge win to package it all up
nicely for
There have been suggestions to add a “node controller” process which again
could start Solr and perhaps ZK on a node.
But adding a new “zk” role which would let that node start (embedded) ZK I
cannot recall. It would of course make a deploy simpler if ZK was hidden as a
solr role/feature and pe
Hi Otis,
I've been working on, and shall be working on, a few issues on the lines of
"hide ZK".
SOLR-6736: Uploading configsets can now be done through Solr nodes instead
of uploading them to ZK.
SOLR-10272: Use a _default configset, with the intention of not needing the
user to bother about the c
Hi,
This thread about Solr master-slave vs. SolrCloud deployment poll seems to
point out people find SolrCloud (the ZK part of it) deployment complex:
http://search-lucene.com/m/Solr/eHNlfm4WpJPVR92?subj=Re+Poll+Master+Slave+or+SolrCloud+
It could be just how information is presented...
... or h
10 matches
Mail list logo
