Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-23 Thread Robert Muir
This vote passes. Thanks everyone for testing. Will load the artifacts into santa's sleigh later today. On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > Hello everyone, given the bug Mike fixed in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4635, I think we should > push out a 3.6.2 bugf

RE: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-23 Thread Uwe Schindler
Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:37 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: VOTE: release 3.6.2 > &g

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-21 Thread Sanne Grinovero
+1 tested the Maven artifacts with the testsuites from Infinispan and Hibernate Search On 21 December 2012 13:22, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > +1 > Tommaso > > > 2012/12/21 Simon Willnauer >> >> same here +1 >> >> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Martijn v Groningen >> wrote: >> > Besides the ment

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-21 Thread Tommaso Teofili
+1 Tommaso 2012/12/21 Simon Willnauer > same here +1 > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Martijn v Groningen > wrote: > > Besides the mentioned jdoc warnings the smoke tester ran fine. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsu

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-21 Thread Simon Willnauer
same here +1 On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Martijn v Groningen wrote: > Besides the mentioned jdoc warnings the smoke tester ran fine. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mai

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-21 Thread Martijn v Groningen
+1 Besides the mentioned jdoc warnings the smoke tester ran fine. On 21 December 2012 01:07, Steve Rowe wrote: > +1 > > On OS X 10.8.2, the smoke tester passes for me, except for the same javadoc > errors Mike reported, under Oracle Java 1.7.0_10. (I commented out the Java7 > javadocs run aft

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-20 Thread Steve Rowe
+1 On OS X 10.8.2, the smoke tester passes for me, except for the same javadoc errors Mike reported, under Oracle Java 1.7.0_10. (I commented out the Java7 javadocs run after it failed for me.) I first had to install Java 5 using the manual instructions here (the linked script didn't work for

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-19 Thread Andi Vajda
+1 I prepared a PyLucene 3.6.2 release from the tip of the lucene_solr_3_6 branch and all tests passed. Andi.. On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Robert Muir wrote: Hello everyone, given the bug Mike fixed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4635, I think we should push out a 3.6.2 bugfix re

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-19 Thread Michael McCandless
I don't think these javadocs warnings require a re-spin so +1 to release current artifacts. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Robert Muir wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Micha

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-19 Thread Tom Burton-West
Thanks Robert, Ok, I can see that logic. People who want the "new feature" can just apply the patch. Tom On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Tom Burton-West > wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > > > Would it be possible to fold in also LUCENE-4286? >

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-19 Thread Robert Muir
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Tom Burton-West wrote: > Hi Robert, > > Would it be possible to fold in also LUCENE-4286? > I don't see the 3.6 backport listed in the JIRA issue, but it would be nice > to have that flag available for people still on the 3.6.x branch. > I think i would prefer not

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-19 Thread Tom Burton-West
Hi Robert, Would it be possible to fold in also LUCENE-4286? I don't see the 3.6 backport listed in the JIRA issue, but it would be nice to have that flag available for people still on the 3.6.x branch. Tom On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-19 Thread Michael McCandless
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Michael McCandless > wrote: >> Hmm my smoke test run was angry about this javadocs warning: >> >> [javadoc] >> /l/36x/tmp/unpack/apache-solr-3.6.2/lucene/contrib/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxono

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-19 Thread Robert Muir
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: > Hmm my smoke test run was angry about this javadocs warning: > > [javadoc] > /l/36x/tmp/unpack/apache-solr-3.6.2/lucene/contrib/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/writercache/lru/NameIntCacheLRU.java:76: > warning - @retu

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-19 Thread Michael McCandless
Hmm my smoke test run was angry about this javadocs warning: [javadoc] /l/36x/tmp/unpack/apache-solr-3.6.2/lucene/contrib/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/writercache/lru/NameIntCacheLRU.java:76: warning - @return tag has no arguments. It hit this when running javadocs with 1.7.

VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-19 Thread Robert Muir
Hello everyone, given the bug Mike fixed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4635, I think we should push out a 3.6.2 bugfix release with the fix. Tom (the reporter of the bug) confirmed his checkindex passed successfully last night, and besides that we have a few other nice bugfixes th