RE: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-23 Thread Uwe Schindler
Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:37 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: VOTE: release 3.6.2 Hello everyone, given the bug

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-23 Thread Robert Muir
This vote passes. Thanks everyone for testing. Will load the artifacts into santa's sleigh later today. On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, given the bug Mike fixed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4635, I think we should push

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-21 Thread Martijn v Groningen
+1 Besides the mentioned jdoc warnings the smoke tester ran fine. On 21 December 2012 01:07, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On OS X 10.8.2, the smoke tester passes for me, except for the same javadoc errors Mike reported, under Oracle Java 1.7.0_10. (I commented out the Java7

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-21 Thread Simon Willnauer
same here +1 On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Martijn v Groningen martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com wrote: Besides the mentioned jdoc warnings the smoke tester ran fine. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-21 Thread Tommaso Teofili
+1 Tommaso 2012/12/21 Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@gmail.com same here +1 On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Martijn v Groningen martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com wrote: Besides the mentioned jdoc warnings the smoke tester ran fine.

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-21 Thread Sanne Grinovero
+1 tested the Maven artifacts with the testsuites from Infinispan and Hibernate Search On 21 December 2012 13:22, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Tommaso 2012/12/21 Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@gmail.com same here +1 On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Martijn v

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-20 Thread Steve Rowe
+1 On OS X 10.8.2, the smoke tester passes for me, except for the same javadoc errors Mike reported, under Oracle Java 1.7.0_10. (I commented out the Java7 javadocs run after it failed for me.) I first had to install Java 5 using the manual instructions here (the linked script didn't work

VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-19 Thread Robert Muir
Hello everyone, given the bug Mike fixed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4635, I think we should push out a 3.6.2 bugfix release with the fix. Tom (the reporter of the bug) confirmed his checkindex passed successfully last night, and besides that we have a few other nice bugfixes

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-19 Thread Michael McCandless
Hmm my smoke test run was angry about this javadocs warning: [javadoc] /l/36x/tmp/unpack/apache-solr-3.6.2/lucene/contrib/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/writercache/lru/NameIntCacheLRU.java:76: warning - @return tag has no arguments. It hit this when running javadocs with

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-19 Thread Robert Muir
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: Hmm my smoke test run was angry about this javadocs warning: [javadoc]

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-19 Thread Michael McCandless
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: Hmm my smoke test run was angry about this javadocs warning: [javadoc]

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-19 Thread Tom Burton-West
Hi Robert, Would it be possible to fold in also LUCENE-4286? I don't see the 3.6 backport listed in the JIRA issue, but it would be nice to have that flag available for people still on the 3.6.x branch. Tom On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-19 Thread Robert Muir
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Tom Burton-West tburt...@umich.edu wrote: Hi Robert, Would it be possible to fold in also LUCENE-4286? I don't see the 3.6 backport listed in the JIRA issue, but it would be nice to have that flag available for people still on the 3.6.x branch. I think i

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-19 Thread Tom Burton-West
Thanks Robert, Ok, I can see that logic. People who want the new feature can just apply the patch. Tom On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Tom Burton-West tburt...@umich.edu wrote: Hi Robert, Would it be possible to

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-19 Thread Michael McCandless
I don't think these javadocs warnings require a re-spin so +1 to release current artifacts. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: VOTE: release 3.6.2

2012-12-19 Thread Andi Vajda
+1 I prepared a PyLucene 3.6.2 release from the tip of the lucene_solr_3_6 branch and all tests passed. Andi.. On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Robert Muir wrote: Hello everyone, given the bug Mike fixed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4635, I think we should push out a 3.6.2 bugfix