Re: [jira] [Created] (SOLR-2580) Create a new Search Component to alter queries based on business rules.

queryHandler 2011/6/8 Tomás Fernández Löbbe (JIRA) j...@apache.org Create a new Search Component to alter queries based on business rules. Key: SOLR-2580 URL: https://issues.apache.org

Re: version checkout

Hi, currently the trunk is going to be the version 5.0. The version 4.0 hasn't been released yet, but there is a branch (branch_4x) created for it. There is also a branch for 3.6.1 (lucene_solr_3_6 I think) that's only for bug fixes. The general way of working is providing patches for the

Service Unavailable exceptions not logged

Why are service unavailable exceptions not logged? In the SolrException class, these error codes are specifically skipped from logging, but I don't understand why. This is the 'log' method of the SolrException class: public static void log(Logger log, Throwable e) { if (e instanceof

Re: Service Unavailable exceptions not logged

as this is not really an error condition. So if you use PingRequestHandler to take nodes out of a load balancer rotation, it won't create huge logs. ** ** *James Dyer* E-Commerce Systems Ingram Content Group (615) 213-4311 ** ** *From:* Tomás Fernández Löbbe [mailto:tomasflo

Re: Service Unavailable exceptions not logged

I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4019 On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote: : Possibly better is introduce yet one more overloaded constructor with a : boolean that suppresses logging and change PRH to use it. The crux of the

Re: New-style solr.xml

It would be useful to have in the core.properties description, which of those properties are required in which situation (e.g. required when using SolrCloud), and all the default values. On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote: Could you remove sharedLib and

Re: How to set HTTP header on Solr response?

I don't think that's possible now. I recently had a need to access the request headers and there was no way to do it. I added a change to make the original http request to be added to the SolrQueryRequest context (SOLR-2079), but I don't think there is an option to do something similar with the

Re: How to set HTTP header on Solr response?

/3/2013 3:22 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: I don't think that's possible now. I recently had a need to access the request headers and there was no way to do it. I added a change to make the original http request to be added to the SolrQueryRequest context (SOLR-2079), but I don't think

Lucene site has a wrong link to commit ML archive

It currently points to http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev-commits/ where it should be http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-commits/ Tomás

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.7.0 RC3

Question here. Shouldn't SOLR-5762 be fixed before 4.7? My understanding is that if not, Solr 4.7 won't be able to work with SolrJ from 4.6.1 or earlier? On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: And I think it should be under optimizations not changes in behavior.

Re: Simple unit test doco?

Many times cloud-related/distrib tests fail due to timeouts, this could be related to the overall load of your computer (probably generated by the tests itself). I don’t know if this is the correct way, but I found it that it’s much less probable for them to fail if I use less JVMs to run the

Re: VOTE: Solr Reference Guide for 4.10

+1 On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Anshum Gupta ans...@anshumgupta.net wrote: +1 On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Cassandra Targett ctarg...@apache.org wrote: Please vote to release the PDF of the Apache Solr Reference Guide for Solr 4.10.

Re: svn commit: r1624091 - in /lucene/dev/trunk/solr/core/src: java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/ java/org/apache/solr/request/ test/org/apache/solr/handler/component/

Forgot to add the CHANGES entry. Will do that now On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:36 AM, tflo...@apache.org wrote: Author: tflobbe Date: Wed Sep 10 18:36:27 2014 New Revision: 1624091 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1624091 Log: SOLR-6452: StatsComponent's stat 'missing' will work on fields with

Re: Welcome Tomás Fernández Löbbe as Lucene/Solr committer!

Thanks everyone, I’m really happy to join this great team! I was born and raised in Argentina, mostly in Buenos Aires but also moved through other cities. I studied engineering at the Buenos Aires University. I started looking at Solr while working for a healthcare company in Argentina, building

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.10.3 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:24:58.974047] On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Anshum Gupta ans...@anshumgupta.net wrote: +1 SUCCESS! [0:39:53.649648] On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote: Please review and vote for the following RC: Artifacts:

Re: svn commit: r1629624 - /lucene/dev/trunk/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/admin/InfoHandler.java

Noble, SolrExampleTests.testExampleConfig() is still being ignored. See SOLR-6589. On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 5:16 AM, no...@apache.org wrote: Author: noble Date: Mon Oct 6 12:16:42 2014 New Revision: 1629624 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1629624 Log: SOLR_-6590 Modified:

SolrIndexSearcher’s leafReader

Lucene has discourage the use of the “AtomicReader” since 4.0. In fact, the way of generating it since then is by using the class *Slow*CompositeReaderWrapper, which has warnings about performance everywhere, however, SolrIndexSearcher still uses this class and with no warnings to users. Is there

Re: [VOTE] 4.10.0 RC0

+1 SUCCESS! [0:57:03.919594] On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: Hi, - Smoke tester is happy: SUCCESS! [2:08:29.941569] - Solr contains the security fixes to Apache POI - The Solr NOTICE.txt file contains some outdated garbage, I removed that yesterday

Re: [VOTE] 4.10.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:58:22.308393] On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: SUCCESS! [1:38:19.450540] I also checked the other stuff. Notice.txt now looks fine! +1 from me! - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail:

Can't assign jiras to myself

May I be missing the committer role in Jira? https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/CommittersResources Tomás

Re: Can't assign jiras to myself

/Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com wrote: May I be missing the committer role in Jira? https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/CommittersResources Tomás

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_11) - Build # 4145 - Failure!

I think the problem may be with a {@link } to a private field on a public method? On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: I’ve seen this kind of error before, it’s the rough equivalent to Java’s NullPointerException: calling a method on a variable that has value

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_11) - Build # 4145 - Failure!

. Tommaso 2014-08-08 19:00 GMT+02:00 Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com : I think the problem may be with a {@link } to a private field on a public method? On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: I’ve seen this kind of error before, it’s

Re: queryResultMaxDocsCached vs. queryResultWindowSize

I think you are right. I think the name is this because it’s considering a series of queries paging a result. The first X pages are going to be cached, but once the limit is reached, no further pages are and the last superset that fitted remains in cache. At least that’s my understanding. After a

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.10.1 RC0

+1 SUCCESS! [1:28:07.642974] On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:56.295681] Steve On Sep 24, 2014, at 9:42 AM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: Artifacts here:

Re: An experience and some thoughts about solr/example - solr/server

My understanding is that you can run the examples, but you have to specifically ask for one using the -e argument, like: ./solr start -e techproducts That said, I'm trying it right now and It's failing and giving confusing messages (Errors followed by success): a82066179bf9:bin tflobbe$ ./solr

Re: Is there going to be Lucene/Solr 4.11?

Most likely no. Those jiras were merged before LUCENE-5944. They will be in 5.0.0. As you said, there was some discussion about this, see the comments in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5944 for more details. Tomás On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch

precommit/validate failing in lucene_solr_4_10 branch?

I just ran ant precommit and ant validate in lucene_solr_4_10 branch and both are failing to me, is it the same for everyone? There is no jenkins job running on this branch, right? ... check-lib-versions: [echo] Lib versions check under:

Re: Welcome Ryan Ernst to the PMC

Congrats Ryan! On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: Welcome Ryan! On Wednesday, December 24, 2014, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote: I'm pleased to announce that Ryan Ernst has accepted the PMC's invitation to join. Welcome Ryan! -- Adrien

Re: VOTE: RC1 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-5.0.pdf

+1 Looks good On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote: Here’s my +1 to RC1 of the Solr 5.0 Ref Guide I reviewed the PDF artifact and have the following feedback: - p. 6: The stop command requires you to specify the port Solr is listening on or you can use

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.0. RC3

I don't think this worth a respin, but I noticed that in the introduction of solr/CHANGES.txt it says ...It runs in a Java servlet container such as Jetty., which is not correct since 5.0 On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote: On 2/15/2015 3:43 PM, Anshum Gupta

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.0. RC3

+1 SUCCESS! [2:09:21.565607] On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: Probably not worthy of a respin: I just noticed that Lucene’s CHANGES.txt has a section for unreleased 4.10.4. Steve On Feb 15, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Anshum Gupta ans...@anshumgupta.net wrote:

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:46:17.627920] On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Ryan Ernst r...@iernst.net wrote: I'm pretty sure Ryan's initial diagnoses was wrong Entirely possible. I just quickly looked at the script and saw ant test being invoked. It would make sense on second though that it is running

Re: VOTE: RC0 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-5.0.pdf

In suggesters, it says that the field needs to be indexed, but really it needs to be stored. I'll change that. I would also like to warn users that when using buildOnCommit or buildOnOptimize, the suggester build may take a long time, making the commit itself take too long. This definitely doesn't

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.10.4 RC0

+1 SUCCESS! [1:32:40.270547] On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com wrote: +1 -Yonik On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: Artifacts:

Re: Welcome Ramkumar Aiyengar as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Ramkumar! On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Ryan Ernst r...@iernst.net wrote: Welcome! On Mar 1, 2015 8:40 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: I'm pleased to announce that Ramkumar Aiyengar has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer. Ramkumar, it's

Re: Welcome Anshum Gupta to the PMC

Congratulations Anshum! On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com wrote: Congrats Anshum! -Yonik On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: I'm pleased to announce that Anshum Gupta has accepted the PMC’s invitation to join. Welcome

Re: Welcome Varun Thacker as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Varun! On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Alan Woodward a...@flax.co.uk wrote: Welcome, Varun! Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 23 Feb 2015, at 18:38, Shawn Heisey wrote: On 2/23/2015 10:51 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: Please join me in welcoming Varun Thacker as the latest

Re: Configsets and Config APIs in Solr

store the configoverlay.json, params.json in the collection's conf directory and inherit the rest from the template On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com wrote: I think the concept of ConfigSets has become a bit confusing with the Config APIs (I'm

Configsets and Config APIs in Solr

I think the concept of ConfigSets has become a bit confusing with the Config APIs (I'm thinking in SolrCloud mode here). Solr requires that a configset is pushed to ZooKeeper before creating a collection that uses it. It supports multiple collections using the same configset, which I think is

Re: Configsets and Config APIs in Solr

two conf dirs configs/schemaless and configs/x all the mutable stuff goes to configs/x and config/schemaless remains immutable On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com wrote: I think this is fine.I don't think we need a new concept of config

Re: VOTE: RC0 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-5.1.pdf

+1 Went through some of the sections. I didn't find any blockers. One thing I saw were some strange snippets (empty, or with huge empty spaces) in pages 203, 297 and 527. Another trivial thing is that in many pages, the title of a section falls on a different page than the actual section. Tomás

Re: Welcome Upayavira as Lucene/Solr committer

Congrats Upayavira!! On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com wrote: Congrats Upayavira! Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Ramkumar R. Aiyengar andyetitmo...@gmail.com wrote: Welcome Upayavira! On 22 Jun 2015 20:02,

Re: [VOTE] 5.2.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:58:36.433087] On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya ichattopadhy...@gmail.com wrote: +1 SUCCESS! [2:32:19.821088] On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote: +1 SUCCESS! [0:42:56.088057] On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 5:29 PM

Re: [VOTE] 5.2.0 RC2

Unfortunately I imported log4j Logger instead of slf4j in SOLR-7406. I'll fix this and merge it in the 5.2 branch. I think this should be a blocker since it would require people to have the log4j jars. On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Timothy Potter thelabd...@gmail.com wrote: +1 SUCCESS!

Re: Configsets and Config APIs in Solr

think about this as configset base vs per-collection diff, not as immutable base vs per-collection mutable. Thoughts? Greg On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com wrote: I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7570 On Fri, May

Re: Configsets and Config APIs in Solr

first, and then under configs/, and we could add a writeResource() method that writes to the collection-specific node as well. Then all config I/O goes via the resource loader, and we have a way of keeping certain parts immutable. On 15 May 2015, at 17:39, Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo

Re: Configsets and Config APIs in Solr

, May 22, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com wrote: TLDR: we should think about this as configset base vs per-collection diff, not as immutable base vs per-collection mutable. Makes sense, I was mostly thinking of it being immutable from the current Config APIs

Re: Welcome Timothy Potter to the PMC

Congratulations Tim! On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote: Congrats! - Mark On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:10 AM Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: I'm pleased to announce that Timothy Potter has accepted the PMC’s invitation to join. Welcome Tim!

Re: Understanding performance degradation in range queries between Solr 5.2.1 and 4.10.4

was wrong. :) They seem to point to ExitableDirectoryReader$ExitableTermsEnum.next, which checks whether the time is out before delegating. On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Adrien, I'll run the tests with 5.3 snapshot and post

Re: Understanding performance degradation in range queries between Solr 5.2.1 and 4.10.4

the case, we should just initialize the timeout to Long.MAX_VALUE and check for that to short-circuit? On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I saw that, but thought it could be the underlying implementation, not the ExitableTermsEnum wrapper

Understanding performance degradation in range queries between Solr 5.2.1 and 4.10.4

Hi, I'm seeing some query performance degradation between 4.10.4 and 5.2.1. It doesn't happen with all the queries, but for queries like range queries on fields with many different values the average time in 5.2.1 is worse than in 4.10.4. Is anyone seeing something similar? Test Details: * Single

Re: Understanding performance degradation in range queries between Solr 5.2.1 and 4.10.4

= Boolean.getBoolean(solr.disableQueryTimeout); if (disableExitableDirectory) { return wrapped; } return ExitableDirectoryReader.wrap(wrapped, SolrQueryTimeoutImpl.getInstance()); } On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com wrote

Re: Understanding performance degradation in range queries between Solr 5.2.1 and 4.10.4

? On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm seeing some query performance degradation between 4.10.4 and 5.2.1. It doesn't happen with all the queries, but for queries like range queries on fields with many different values the average

Re: Understanding performance degradation in range queries between Solr 5.2.1 and 4.10.4

: Thanks for sharing the traces, it looks like my intuition was wrong. :) They seem to point to ExitableDirectoryReader$ExitableTermsEnum.next, which checks whether the time is out before delegating. On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com wrote

Re: Welcome Christine Poerschke as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Christine! On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote: Your account is not entirely ready yet. We will let you know when it is created and karma has been granted so

Re: Welcome Areek Zillur to the Lucene / Solr PMC

Congratulations Areek!! On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Welcome Areek! > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Simon Willnauer > wrote: > > I'm pleased to

Re: Welcome Dennis Gove as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Dennis! On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote: > Welcome Dennis! > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > >

Re: Welcome Tomás Fernández Löbbe to the PMC

Thanks everyone! On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Ramkumar R. Aiyengar < andyetitmo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Congratulations Tomas :) > On 6 Nov 2015 09:53, "Anshum Gupta" <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote: > >> I'm pleased to announce that Tomás Fernández Löbbe

Re: Welcome Nick Knize as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Nick! On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Alan Woodward wrote: > Welcome Nick! > > > On 20 Oct 2015, at 18:41, Steve Rowe wrote: > > > > Welcome Nick! > > > > Steve > > > >> On Oct 20, 2015, at 12:50 PM, Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.4.0-RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:22:46.915162] On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:48:51.911862] > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > >> +1 >> SUCCESS!

Re: VOTE: RC1 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-5.4.pdf

+1. Looks good. Thanks! On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Anshum Gupta wrote: > +1 to release. > > Thanks Cassandra. > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Cassandra Targett > wrote: > >> Please VOTE to release the Apache Solr Ref Guide for Solr 5.4: >>

Re: Welcome Cassandra Targett to the Lucene / Solr PMC

Congrats Cassandra! On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote: > Welcome Cassandra! > > Koji > > > On 2015/12/25 0:54, Steve Rowe wrote: > >> I'm pleased to announce that Cassandra has accepted the PMC's invitation >> to join. >> >> Welcome Cassandra!

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.3.2-RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:13:10.001165] On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Anshum Gupta wrote: > Thanks Shalin! > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < > shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Upayavira made some fixes to the smoke tester on the 5.4 branch to >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [1:13:52.067157] On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Thanks Steve. > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > >> >> > On May 25, 2016, at

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.3.2-RC2

SUCCESS! [1:16:42.067861] +1 On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:30:48.710775] > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Anshum Gupta > wrote: >

Re: FYI: Lucene website publishing is stuck; 5.5.2 news items aren't in production yet

I can see 5.5.2 in Solr news now On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > The publishing process finally finished and the top-level and Lucene 5.5.2 > news items are visible now. Not sure why the Solr one isn’t yet, since > it’s on lucene.staging.apache.org... > >

Re: GIT migration date (SVN freeze)

My understanding is that squashed merges also keep the linear history. You do loose the branch commit history, but if that's not something you are interested in keeping that should be fine, right? That's the workflow that Dawid proposed and it's the one I've been using so far with git. Tomás On

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 5.4.1 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [1:27:55.987215] On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > +1 > > -Yonik > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.4.1 > > > > This release candidate

Re: Welcome Kevin Risden as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Kevin! On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Kevin Risden wrote: > Thanks for the warm welcome. Its an honor to be invited to work on > this project and with so many great people. > > Bio: > I graduated from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 2012. My >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:46:58.614256] On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote: > > > +1 > SUCCESS! [1:42:49.802039] > Ahmet > > > On Tuesday, April 5, 2016 1:09 AM, Anshum Gupta > wrote: > > > > Thanks for taking this up Nick! > > Here's my

Re: Japanese Tokenizer using User Dictionary

. > > Best regards, > > Christian Moen > アティリカ株式会社 > https://www.atilika.com > > On Apr 5, 2016, at 15:12, Tomás Fernández Löbbe <tomasflo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Thanks Christian, > I don't have a different use case, but If what I said is the expected > beh

Re: Japanese Tokenizer using User Dictionary

hem to see how we can improve things. > > Many thanks, > > Christian Moen > アティリカ株式会社 > https://www.atilika.com > > > On Apr 5, 2016, at 04:39, Tomás Fernández Löbbe <tomasflo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > If I understand correctly, the user diction

Re: Welcome Karl Wright as a Lucene/Solr committer!

Welcome Karl! On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Noble Paul wrote: > welcome Karl. > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: > >> would like to hear more on how to search GIS Objects using Lat/Long inputs >> my immediate interest is

Japanese Tokenizer using User Dictionary

If I understand correctly, the user dictionary in the JapaneseTokenizer allows users to customize how a stream is broken into tokens using a specific set of rules provided like: AABBBCC -> AA BBB CC It does not allow users to change any of the characters like: AABBBCC -> DD BBB CC (this will

Re: VOTE: RC2 Release apache-solr-ref-guide-6.0.pdf

+1 Not a blocker, but looks like many times images are broken into 2 pages (happens for example for many of the admin UI screenshot, but also with smaller images like in the Spatial Filers section). Is there a way to prevent this in Confluence? Also, we should try to prevent pasting extremely

Re: jira git bot skipping janhoy -- was: Re: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9053) Upgrade fileupload-commons to 1.3.1

I believe it may be a problem with special characters (in the author name?). I had the same issue On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:30 PM, David Smiley wrote: > Not even on master or 6x branches? That'd be weird. FYI no commits to > branches matching /(lucene|solr)-.*/ will

Re: Welcome Scott Blum as a Lucene/Solr committer!

Welcome Scott! On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Congrats Scott! Welcome aboard! > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Mike Drob wrote: > > Congrats, Scott! Well deserved! > > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Shawn Heisey

Re: Welcome Alexandre Rafalovitch as a Lucene/Solr committer!

Welcome Alexandre!! On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > Welcome Alexandre! > > Uwe > > Am 7. August 2016 00:49:50 MESZ, schrieb "Jan Høydahl" < > jan@cominvent.com>: > >I'm pleased to announce that Alexandre Rafalovitch has accepted the > >Lucene PMC's

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.4.1 RC1

+1 to release if we know it's a test issue SUCCESS! [0:48:00.183141] On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > +1 to release. > > My smoke tester also hit that same test failure, but it doesn't look > like a release stopper... > > Mike McCandless >

Re: VOTE: Apache Solr Ref Guide for 6.4

+1 eyeballed all the pages and read some random sections. Two minor things I caught (not for respin), some of the examples in LTR for some reason are very narrow (pages 355 to 365). We still talk about DismaxRequestHandler in "Overview of Searching in Solr", and we even say it's the default. I'll

Re: VOTE: Apache Solr Ref Guide for 6.4 (RC1)

+1 Thanks Cassandra On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Cassandra Targett wrote: > Please vote for the release of the Apache Solr Reference Guide for 6.4. > > Artifacts are available from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/solr/ref- >

Re: Lucene/Solr 7

I think it would be great if we could use 7.0 to make point fields the default in Solr (i.e. change the example/default schemas to make "int", "long" etc use point fields implementation), but in order to do that, there are a number of point-related Jiras that need to be solved (MultiValued DV

Re: Language Detection Individual Field Mapping Bug

Thanks Will, This does look like a bug and I also couldn't find a Jira issue for it. Feel free to create one. Tomás On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Will Martin wrote: > Hello, > > While using Solr 6.0.4 I noticed that the org.apache.solr.update. >

Re: Lucene/Solr 7

> The other solution, delaying removal until 8.0, doesn't sound like a bad idea either. I think that's what everyone is saying here, legacy numeric types will be supported in Solr at least until 8.0. It could happen that they are moved from Lucene to Solr, but will for sure be supported during the

Re: Welcome Toke Eskildsen as a Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Toke! On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote: > Thank you for the invitation and the warm welcome. > > > I am a 43 year old Danish man, with a family and a job at the Royal Danish > Library, where I have been working mostly with search-related technology >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.4.0 RC?

The Core Plugin/Stats section of the Solr UI seems broken to me in 6.4 (and master). A bunch o new sections added that are empty. On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Kevin Risden wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:07:22.678114] > > Kevin Risden > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:54

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.4.0 RC?

I did not see an entry in CHANGES.txt that could be related so I suspect this was not intentional. I created SOLR-9982 to investigate. On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe < tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote: > The Core Plugin/Stats section of the Solr UI seems broken to

Re: Proposal to Move Solr Ref Guide off Confluence

Thanks for taking time for looking at these options Casandra. I specially agree with the third of the painful points you mentioned, the fact that we can't maintain online documentation for different versions. I like that we have a released PDF version for every minor version, but 99.9% of the time

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.2.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:59:36.664736] On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 6:15 PM, David Smiley wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:54:37.401807] > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:08 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar > wrote: > >> Please vote for the first release candidate for

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.2.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:59:19.038459] On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Timothy Potter wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:48:41.677282] > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Jan Høydahl > wrote: > > +1 > > > > SUCCESS! [1:29:00.305991] > > > > -- > > Jan Høydahl,

Re: [VOTE] - Release Lucene/Solr 6.3.0 RC3

+1 SUCCESS! [1:03:34.743909] On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > +1 SUCCESS! [1:02:33.485442] > > Le jeu. 3 nov. 2016 à 00:19, Steve Rowe a écrit : > >> +1 >> >> Smoke tester passed (lost the timing in a closed terminal window, it was >>

Re: Collection API for performance monitoring?

If you only need query/update performance you could aggregate the logs too. If you need more information, I like what was proposed in SOLR-9641, that would allow you do collect and aggregate metrics for internal components too. Tomás On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Walter Underwood

Re: VOTE: Apache Solr Ref Guide for Solr 6.3, RC3

LGTM. +1 On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > +1 > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > > > On Nov 9, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Cassandra Targett > wrote: > > > > Please VOTE for the 3rd release candidate of the Apache Solr Reference > > Guide for

Re: Welcome Varun Thacker to the Apache Lucene/Solr PMC

Congrats Varun! On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:14 PM, David Smiley wrote: > Congrats & Welcome Varun! > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 4:33 PM Anshum Gupta > wrote: > >> I am pleased to announce that Varun Thacker has accepted the PMC's >> invitation

Re: Welcome Cao Manh Dat as a Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Dat! On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Dawid Weiss wrote: > Welcome Dat! > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:21 PM, Mike Drob wrote: > > Congratulations! > > > > > > On Monday, January 9, 2017, Uwe Schindler wrote: > >> > >> Welcome

Re: Welcome Ishan Chattopadhyaya as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Ishan! On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > Welcome Ishan! > > Regards, > Tommaso > > Il giorno mar 29 nov 2016 alle ore 19:33 Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ > LONDON) ha scritto: > >> Welcome Ishan! >> >>

Re: Welcome Christine Poerschke to the PMC

Welcome Christine! On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > Congrats Christine! > > -Yonik > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > I am pleased to announce that Christine Poerschke has accepted the PMC's > > invitation

Re: Welcome Mikhail Khludnev to the PMC

Welcome Mikhail! On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Welcome Mikhail! > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > I am pleased to announce that

Re: Welcome Jim Ferenczi as a Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Jim! On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > Welcome Jim! > > Tommaso > > Il giorno lun 2 gen 2017 alle ore 02:53 Joel Bernstein > ha scritto: > >> Welcome Jim! >> >> Joel Bernstein >> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >> >>

  1   2   3   >