ease process!
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> > -
> > Uwe Schindler
> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> > https://www.thetaphi.de
> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Uwe Schindler
> > > S
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
+1 9 (8 binding: Jan Høydahl, Michael Sokolov, Robert Muir, Adrien Grand,
Atri Sharma, Uwe Schindler, Anshum Gupta, Timothy Potter)
0 0
-1 0
This vote has PASSED.
eed to respin the release process!
>
> Uwe
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Uwe Schindler
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 7:27 PM
> >
process!
>
> Uwe
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> https://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Uwe Schindler
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 7:27 PM
> > To: dev@lucene
19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Schindler
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 7:27 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 RC1
>
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [1:24:00.227
> -Original Message-
> From: Atri Sharma
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:00 PM
> To: Lucene Dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 RC1
>
> +1 SUCCESS! [1:32:12.04043]
>
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 8:27 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
> >
> > +1 S
+1 SUCCESS! [1:32:12.04043]
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 8:27 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
>
> +1 SUCCESS! [1:36:12.056443]
>
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 4:26 PM Mayya Sharipova
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Robert for such detailed investigations.
>>
>> Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.9 also had 2 recent failures.
+1 SUCCESS! [1:36:12.056443]
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 4:26 PM Mayya Sharipova
wrote:
> Thanks Robert for such detailed investigations.
>
> Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.9 also had 2 recent failures. Failures are not
> reproducible on my local machine.
>
> build #13: ant test
Thanks Robert for such detailed investigations.
Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-8.9 also had 2 recent failures. Failures are not
reproducible on my local machine.
build #13: ant test -Dtestcase=SolrCloudReportersTest
-Dtests.method=testExplicitConfiguration -Dtests.seed=60FEAB39C2B47705
OK I managed to finally get this smoketester to pass on my machine, so
for THIS release I will retract my -1 and change it to a +1.
I have reset my system configuration back though, so we should really
fix these test problems for the future.
SUCCESS! [1:08:26.448122]
There were a few
The tests also aren't "timing out". They are failing.
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:21 PM Robert Muir wrote:
>
> Ishan, no, they arent running out of resources, not even close. I have
> 20GB of ram and by default it is only using 3 JVMs.
>
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:04 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>
Ishan, no, they arent running out of resources, not even close. I have
20GB of ram and by default it is only using 3 JVMs.
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:04 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
wrote:
>
> Hi Rob, could it be possible that the tests are timing out on your machine
> due to lack of resources? Can
Hi Rob, could it be possible that the tests are timing out on your machine
due to lack of resources? Can you try running them with just just one JVM
at a time?
On Sat, 12 Jun, 2021, 8:20 pm Robert Muir, wrote:
> I ran smoketester yet one more time and again numerous tests fail:
>
>[junit4]
I ran smoketester yet one more time and again numerous tests fail:
[junit4] Tests with failures [seed: A3FDDCE09965D7AE] (first 10 out of 18):
[junit4] - org.apache.solr.update.TestHdfsUpdateLog.testFSThreadSafety
[junit4] - org.apache.solr.update.TestHdfsUpdateLog (suite)
It is not depending on timing -- it just includes the timing in its
output (it basically diffs the response message with and without CBs).
Atri
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:02 PM Michael Sokolov wrote:
>
> I ran the smoketester (FWIW I always have to pass --tmp-dir /local/tmp
> because my /tmp is
After nuking all settings (i simply removed the whole
lucene.build.properties in my homedir), it still fails. Seems maybe
like less failures though?
I will upload logs to the JIRA issue.
[junit4] Completed [939/939 (4!)] on J2 in 383.02s, 2 tests, 1
failure <<< FAILURES!
[junit4]
*uwesays* if you see test failures with this shebang pattern: don't worry, just
normal!
Uwe
Am June 11, 2021 3:33:46 PM UTC schrieb Michael Sokolov :
>The whole shebang passed on round two for me: SUCCESS!
>[1:00:03.729685]. I guess I'm a +1 to release
>
>On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 10:31 AM
The whole shebang passed on round two for me: SUCCESS!
[1:00:03.729685]. I guess I'm a +1 to release
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 10:31 AM Michael Sokolov wrote:
>
> I ran the smoketester (FWIW I always have to pass --tmp-dir /local/tmp
> because my /tmp is not big enough for this thing), but it
I ran the smoketester (FWIW I always have to pass --tmp-dir /local/tmp
because my /tmp is not big enough for this thing), but it failed for
me:
[junit4] Tests with failures [seed: D9C1F978D5A8B019]:
[junit4] - org.apache.solr.util.TestCircuitBreaker.testResponseWithCBTiming
Have to say,
I nuked all my settings and am rerunning with all defaults. I'll
report back what happens/upload log when/if it finishes or fails.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 9:45 AM Michael Sokolov wrote:
>
> I tried to comment on the JIRA, but it seems to be timing out. Now
> when I go back, SOLR issues are
I tried to comment on the JIRA, but it seems to be timing out. Now
when I go back, SOLR issues are marked as "You can't view this issue
It may have been deleted or you don't have permission to view it."
Waat?
Anyway, Robert you suggested there that maybe the problem is being
surfaced by using a
Thanks very much Robert for detailed investigations, and thanks Jan for
your tests.
I will sort out the problem with my GPG key, but I am not sure what to do
with this SOLR-15473. I've run the smoker test again, and it passed on my
Mac again: SUCCESS! [1:00:03.751500]
Would appreciate more
Dude, if you can vote +1 when the smoketester passes, then I can vote
-1 when it fails. This is my vote, not your vote. You don't get to
decide about it, or change it in any way.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:04 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> Does it reproduce for you? Are you suspecting a bug in Solr
Does it reproduce for you? Are you suspecting a bug in Solr that we cannot
ship, or only a bug in the smoketester py itself? The -1 should be about the
released bits, not about other tooling?
My JVM is OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 25.292-b10, mixed mode)
Jan
> 11. jun. 2021
Jan, I'm using the same automated smoketester as everyone else. It
fails, so my vote is -1.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 7:22 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> Tested on MacOS (Intel), No other verification than smoketester done
>
> SUCCESS! [1:08:19.953492]
>
> +1
>
> Robert - not sure if one test-run
Tested on MacOS (Intel), No other verification than smoketester done
SUCCESS! [1:08:19.953492]
+1
Robert - not sure if one test-run failure should cancel the build. Our
smoketester and tests are sometimes a bit picky, and does not mean that the
artifacts are faulty.
Jan
> 11. jun. 2021 kl.
Logs available at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15473
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 11:54 PM Robert Muir wrote:
>
> Thank you Mayya for working on the release!
>
> I'm sorry, but I have a -1 as the smoke tester fails on my machine:
>
> TLDR:
>[junit4] Tests with failures [seed:
Thank you Mayya for working on the release!
I'm sorry, but I have a -1 as the smoke tester fails on my machine:
TLDR:
[junit4] Tests with failures [seed: FB8461777F8A9E7D] (first 10 out of 26):
[junit4] -
org.apache.solr.cloud.api.collections.TestHdfsCloudBackupRestore
(suite)
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.9.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.9.0-RC1-rev05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u
29 matches
Mail list logo
