[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13123393#comment-13123393
]
Paritosh Ranjan commented on MAHOUT-825:
I agree that the features for all cluster
That patch still needs some cleanup work and refactoring. The original
author hadnt made much progress on that front. The functionality is there.
So in case you want to use it, you can patch it in and get it running.
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Josh Patterson wrote:
> Whats the status on S
Whats the status on SVM support in Mahout?
I was reading through this JIRA and it looked like this implementation
stalled out.
Is anyone still working on this?
JP
--
Twitter: @jpatanooga
Solution Architect @ Cloudera
hadoop: http://www.cloudera.com
I haven't find any MC-based open source recommender.
Does Mahout have any plan to provide some?
Thank you,
--
Colin Wang
Skype : colin.bin.wang
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13123352#comment-13123352
]
Dan Brickley commented on MAHOUT-831:
-
To Dmitriy's point re 'explicitly certified as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13123350#comment-13123350
]
Dan Brickley edited comment on MAHOUT-831 at 10/8/11 2:25 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13123350#comment-13123350
]
Dan Brickley commented on MAHOUT-831:
-
Nice to have in the Java for sure, but where e
> Everything else is likely stable but without guarantees.
>
or the lack of due diligence in rating
:)
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> I think that both are good. Stable indicates a willingness to maintain
> compatibility.
>
> Experimental is a promise that the code will l
Use gitx (for mac, anyway)
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote:
> It may get a little complicated like that at times, but commits are a
> tree, so eventually it becomes easier to navigate (use something like
> git log --time-order --graph to see what is happening, it is not ve
I think that both are good. Stable indicates a willingness to maintain
compatibility.
Experimental is a promise that the code will likely be disrupted.
Everything else is likely stable but without guarantees.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov (Commented) (JIRA) <
j...@apache.org>
Did you do git commit locally first?
One caveat is that if you don't install authors files properly, the
apache svn is going to fix it in the commit metadata. The effect of
that is that your local commit would have a different hash and dcommit
may not necessarily immediately realize that. When thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13123328#comment-13123328
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov commented on MAHOUT-831:
-
My reasoning is, I am more interested i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13123326#comment-13123326
]
Dmitriy Lyubimov commented on MAHOUT-831:
-
What about @Stable?
Maybe better yet,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeff Eastman updated MAHOUT-825:
Attachment: MAHOUT-825.patch
Modified version of canopy-radius-based-outlier-elimination. Renames t
+1 I agree with the comments below.
On Oct 7, 2011, at 19:40, Jeff Eastman wrote:
> I'm also +1 on the @experimental annotation idea. Different parts of Mahout
> are at different levels of maturity and the annotation makes it explicit
> which parts are still in motion. Trimming out things that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13123048#comment-13123048
]
Paritosh Ranjan commented on MAHOUT-825:
Nothing wrong with the patch. Tested all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13123024#comment-13123024
]
Paritosh Ranjan commented on MAHOUT-825:
I have found a scope of improvement in th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13123000#comment-13123000
]
Hudson commented on MAHOUT-798:
---
Integrated in Mahout-Quality #1085 (See
[https://builds.ap
I'm also +1 on the @experimental annotation idea. Different parts of Mahout are
at different levels of maturity and the annotation makes it explicit which
parts are still in motion. Trimming out things that are unused/unsupported is
also a good idea. I do think anything we can do to improve API
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paritosh Ranjan updated MAHOUT-825:
---
Attachment: canopy-radius-based-outlier-elimination
Here goes the compromise patch named cano
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13122970#comment-13122970
]
Jeff Eastman commented on MAHOUT-825:
-
Ok, as a compromise, if you remove the generati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13122962#comment-13122962
]
Paritosh Ranjan commented on MAHOUT-825:
hmmm, applying it in Canopy generation ph
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13122959#comment-13122959
]
Jeff Eastman commented on MAHOUT-825:
-
-2 Sorry Paritosh, but computeParameters() rese
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sebastian Schelter updated MAHOUT-831:
--
Attachment: MAHOUT-831.patch
A first attempt to create an annotation that aims to indic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sebastian Schelter updated MAHOUT-831:
--
Summary: @Experimental annotation to indicate which implementations are not
intended fo
@Experimental annotation to indicate which implementation are not intended for
production use
-
Key: MAHOUT-831
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-831
On Oct 7, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote:
> I support (and supported before) the annotations as maturity tags.
In Lucene, we use @lucene.experimental
We also should probably looking at trimming back things or moving it to a
sandbox. I think Watchmaker is a good first candidate, si
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13122944#comment-13122944
]
Paritosh Ranjan commented on MAHOUT-825:
I experimented on Canopy generation phase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13122930#comment-13122930
]
Jeff Eastman edited comment on MAHOUT-825 at 10/7/11 4:28 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13122930#comment-13122930
]
Jeff Eastman commented on MAHOUT-825:
-
-2 on incorporating clusterStrictness in the Ca
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote:
> ...
> AbstractJob as it currently exists is more a Tool than an individual step
> in
> a pipeline, perhaps historically driven by a fact that most Mahout
> pipelines
> are one step generic job agnstic of MR specific parameters passed to th
Much as i will be happy to see Mahout in cdh u2, I also support Grant in a
sense that projects are community driven per asf philosophy. If corporations
want to push something thru, the only way they should be able doing that is
thru their empoyees' individual clout in the community per asf voting.
I support (and supported before) the annotations as maturity tags.
Also command line API seems to be good. Maybe some solver apis could be
standardized in some ways.
AbstractJob as it currently exists is more a Tool than an individual step in
a pipeline, perhaps historically driven by a fact that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved MAHOUT-798.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.6
Added in examples of clustering, classification
On Oct 6, 2011, at 7:53 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> On that topic: if/when Cloudera adds a Mahout version, it will be much
> harder to change some basic things.
Why? They know how to contribute patches and how the ASF works. We move
forward as a community, not based on any one company (besides
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13122674#comment-13122674
]
Paritosh Ranjan edited comment on MAHOUT-825 at 10/7/11 10:03 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paritosh Ranjan updated MAHOUT-825:
---
Attachment: canopy-outlier-elimination
I have added the patch canopy-outlier-elimination. Thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13122590#comment-13122590
]
Paritosh Ranjan commented on MAHOUT-825:
Already did it. Thanks :).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13122591#comment-13122591
]
Paritosh Ranjan commented on MAHOUT-825:
Already did it. Thanks :).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paritosh Ranjan updated MAHOUT-825:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: Already did it. Thanks :).)
> Canopies grouping records outsi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13122589#comment-13122589
]
Ted Dunning commented on MAHOUT-825:
Don't make the parameter an integer. Make it a d
On 07.10.2011 01:59, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
>
>> if/when Cloudera adds a Mahout version,
It's a when not an if :)
> I do think that we need to make an effort here.
I totally agree. Some things we could start with:
I think Mahout is in a spe
42 matches
Mail list logo