Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-16 Thread Andrew Palumbo
ingle-threaded).. this > > should be changed in 0.13.1 to fall back to OpenMP MMul. > > > > Note: Binary distribution is built for Tesla GPUs. My card was not > > compatible, though out target is higher end GPUs on AWS or PowerPC > (PowerPC > > uses teslas) so not a blocker IMO. > > > > We will target a wider r

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-16 Thread Trevor Grant
; > > > > > > From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 2:48:17 AM > To: u...@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate > &g

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-15 Thread Andrew Palumbo
. From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 2:48:17 AM To: u...@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate Hashes and sigs confirmed, bin and src (viennacl and vi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-15 Thread Andrew Musselman
Hashes and sigs confirmed, bin and src (viennacl and viennacl-omp) artifacts run the spark shell and the sparse drm test fine, and kick off the GPU. +1 (binding) On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Andrew Musselman < andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of

[VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-14 Thread Andrew Musselman
This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout. The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Monday, April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with [ ] +1, accept RC as the official

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-14 Thread Andrew Musselman
commits it is missing again. > > > Or It possibly was only replaced in one profile, not both. > > > > > From: Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 9:09:39 PM > To: dev@mahout.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] A

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-14 Thread Andrew Palumbo
. From: Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 9:09:39 PM To: dev@mahout.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate I will continue looking. From: Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com> Sent: Frid

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-14 Thread Andrew Palumbo
t.version} included. From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 4:49:34 PM To: u...@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout. The vote will be go

[VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-14 Thread Andrew Musselman
This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout. The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Monday, April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with [ ] +1, accept RC as the official

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-14 Thread Andrew Musselman
e-viennacl_2.10-0.13.0.jar the GPU viennacl jar > > >>> > > >>> - mahout-native-viennacl-omp_2.10-0.13.0.jar the OpenMP jar. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> With the -Pviennacl the binary (locally) is for _both_GPU and > OpenMP

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-14 Thread Suneel Marthi
t; - mahout-native-viennacl-omp_2.10-0.13.0.jar the OpenMP jar. > >>> > >>> > >>> With the -Pviennacl the binary (locally) is for _both_GPU and OpenMP, > >>> the source tree of the whole project allows for a build with both. > >>> > >&

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-13 Thread Andrew Musselman
OpenMP jar. >>> >>> >>> With the -Pviennacl the binary (locally) is for _both_GPU and OpenMP, >>> the source tree of the whole project allows for a build with both. >>> >>> >>> Thank you guys for looking Andrew mentioned a hangout i'd be for that as >>> well. >>> &

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-13 Thread Andrew Musselman
or a build with both. >> >> >> Thank you guys for looking Andrew mentioned a hangout i'd be for that as >> well. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Andy >> >> >> From: Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-13 Thread Andrew Musselman
guys for looking Andrew mentioned a hangout i'd be for that as > well. > > > Thanks, > > > Andy > > ____ > From: Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:32:21 AM > To: mahout > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-13 Thread Andrew Palumbo
From: Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:32:21 AM To: mahout Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate I think i kind'a understand what's going on, but best to cross check - on flights today - will only be available late

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-13 Thread Suneel Marthi
gt; > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > bin > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-13 Thread Andrew Musselman
t; > > > > > >> The line that I suggested the other day: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2 > release:prepare > > > >> release:perform > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-13 Thread Stevo Slavić
>> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2 release:prepare > > >> release:perform > > >> > > >> > > >> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile > > >> > > >> >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-13 Thread Suneel Marthi
le > >> > >> ________ > >> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com> > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate >

Fwd: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-12 Thread Andrew Musselman
FYI -- Forwarded message - From: Andrew Musselman <a...@apache.org> Date: Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:30 PM Subject: Fwd: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate To: d...@maven.apache.org <d...@maven.apache.org> Hi Maven team, we are having trouble getting a couple

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-12 Thread Andrew Palumbo
+1 From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 11:06:29 PM To: dev@mahout.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate Okay consider this vote cancelled. On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-12 Thread Andrew Musselman
ofile >> >> >> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate >> >> >> off the top

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-12 Thread Andrew Musselman
to have activated the viennacl profile > > > From: Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com> > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM > To: dev@mahout.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate > > > off t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-12 Thread Andrew Palumbo
10:58:16 PM To: dev@mahout.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. My guess is that they were missing before. I think that this may have something to do with activating the profile -Pviennacl at releas

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-12 Thread Andrew Palumbo
; Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM To: dev@mahout.apache.org; u...@mahout.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know? On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-12 Thread Andrew Palumbo
-viennacl-omp.jar I think that we need to try a different build command. Andy From: Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:42:30 PM To: u...@mahout.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate It look

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-12 Thread Andrew Musselman
t; Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM > To: u...@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate > > I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for > vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles. > > The spa

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-11 Thread Andrew Musselman
I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles. The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in the binary build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised when running the viennacl profile from

[VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-04-11 Thread Andrew Musselman
This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout. The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday, April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with [ ] +1, accept RC as the official

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-27 Thread Andrew Musselman
A build problem, need to make another RC, will be within the hour. On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Trevor Grant wrote: > All look good to me. > > Trevor Grant > Data Scientist > https://github.com/rawkintrevo > http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-27 Thread Trevor Grant
All look good to me. Trevor Grant Data Scientist https://github.com/rawkintrevo http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo http://trevorgrant.org *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things." -Virgil* On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Andrew Musselman <

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-27 Thread Andrew Musselman
Hashes and sigs look good to me; please someone else confirm. On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Andrew Musselman < andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout. > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on > Thursday, March

[VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-27 Thread Andrew Musselman
This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout. The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Thursday, March 30rd, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with [ ] +1, accept RC as the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-25 Thread Andrew Musselman
your integration testing if you can? > > > Andy > > > > > > > > > > > From: Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 11:11:09 AM > To: dev@mahout.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-24 Thread Andrew Musselman
gt; > > Pat could you please Continue with your integration testing if you can? > > > Andy > > > > > > > > > > > From: Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 11:11:09 AM > To: d

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-24 Thread Andrew Palumbo
t;p...@occamsmachete.com> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 11:11:09 AM To: dev@mahout.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate I can’t +1 because of system integration errors that have to do with scoring that could be in Mahout. I doubt it is but don’t have time in the allotted vote

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-24 Thread Pat Ferrel
I can’t +1 because of system integration errors that have to do with scoring that could be in Mahout. I doubt it is but don’t have time in the allotted vote period to track it down. My close looking tests of Mahout including the previous driver issues pass. Not sure if we use this style of

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-24 Thread Trevor Grant
+1 binding Verified Signatures and Verification mvn clean install On source compiled with `mvn clean install`, `mvn clean package -Phadoop2 -PviennaCL`, and precompiled jars; ran following in a docker contain (constructed via maven plugin, details below) $MAHOUT_HOME/bin/mahout

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-23 Thread Andrew Musselman
No worries; the vote is open through tomorrow (Friday), but if you need more time than that we could push it to the weekend or roll back, no big deal. On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > Before voting I’d like to run down the integration errors, which

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-23 Thread Pat Ferrel
Before voting I’d like to run down the integration errors, which are different recs scores and could theoretically be because of different math results. On Mar 23, 2017, at 3:34 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: BTW I’m getting bad integration test results, which are probably not

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-23 Thread Pat Ferrel
BTW I’m getting bad integration test results, which are probably not related to what Mahout does since the math is tested in unit tests too. But the test runs with no runtime errors, Mahout as a Lib and drivers On Mar 23, 2017, at 3:32 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: Come to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-23 Thread Andrew Musselman
Those are probably expected INFOs; are you not getting that from a source build? On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > using the repo build of mahout I get all sorts of errors like this: > > [INFO] [RootSolverFactory$] Unable to create class GPUMMul:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-23 Thread Pat Ferrel
ess 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> Date: 03/23/2017 3:05 PM (GMT-08:00) To: dev@mahout.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate using the repo build of mahout I get all sorts of errors like

RE: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-23 Thread Andrew Palumbo
-08:00) To: dev@mahout.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate using the repo build of mahout I get all sorts of errors like this: [INFO] [RootSolverFactory$] Unable to create class GPUMMul: attempting OpenMP version [INFO] [RootSolverFactory$] Cr

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-23 Thread Pat Ferrel
using the repo build of mahout I get all sorts of errors like this: [INFO] [RootSolverFactory$] Unable to create class GPUMMul: attempting OpenMP version [INFO] [RootSolverFactory$] Creating org.apache.mahout.viennacl.openmp.OMPMMul solver [INFO] [RootSolverFactory$]

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-23 Thread Trevor Grant
Thanks for testing Dustin, did you import the keys? https://github.com/apache/mahout/blob/master/distribution/KEYS Trevor Grant Data Scientist https://github.com/rawkintrevo http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo http://trevorgrant.org *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-23 Thread dustin vanstee
+1 Environment : MacOs Sierra 10.12.3 verified md5 checksums --> successful mvn clean package --> successful verified signatures --> minor issue, showing below dustinvanstee /data/app-setup/mahout-1038 $ gpg --verify apache-mahout-distribution-0.13.0.pom.asc gpg: assuming signed data in

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-21 Thread Andrew Musselman
Sigs and hashes check out for me. On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Andrew Musselman wrote: > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout. > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday, > March 26th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC

[VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-21 Thread Andrew Musselman
This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout. The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday, March 26th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with [ ] +1, accept RC as the official

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-16 Thread Pat Ferrel
OK, my tests passed including the last blocker, will test again on the new RC. On Mar 16, 2017, at 8:56 AM, Andrew Musselman wrote: Cancelling vote due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1955 On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-16 Thread Andrew Musselman
Cancelling vote due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1955 On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman < andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Correction, vote is until Friday, March 17th. > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Andrew Musselman < > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-15 Thread Andrew Musselman
Correction, vote is until Friday, March 17th. On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Andrew Musselman < andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout. > > The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday, > March 3rd, 2017 or once

[VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-14 Thread Andrew Musselman
This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout. The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday, March 3rd, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with [ ] +1, accept RC as the official

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-14 Thread Andrew Musselman
Yes, if we're ready I can cut another one today. On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > The release was not made due to broken drivers, now fixed. I assume a new > RC will come shortly? > > > On Mar 11, 2017, at 9:54 PM, Andrew Musselman

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-14 Thread Pat Ferrel
The release was not made due to broken drivers, now fixed. I assume a new RC will come shortly? On Mar 11, 2017, at 9:54 PM, Andrew Musselman wrote: This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout. The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on

[VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-11 Thread Andrew Musselman
This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout. The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday, March 3rd, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with [ ] +1, accept RC as the official

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-04 Thread Andrew Palumbo
This vote has been cancelled due to issues found while testing.. RC2 will be out soon. From: Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 4:19:51 PM To: dev@mahout.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate s

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-03 Thread Pat Ferrel
l try to test today. On Mar 3, 2017, at 9:19 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com <mailto:ap@outlook.com>> wrote: Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> Date: 03/02/

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-03 Thread Trevor Grant
gt; >> > >> > >> > >> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone > >> > >> > >> ---- Original message > >> From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> > >> Date: 03/01/2017 10:20 AM (GMT-08:00) &

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-03 Thread Pat Ferrel
ill verify keys tonight. >> >> >> >> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone >> >> >> ---- Original message >> From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> >> Date: 03/01/2017 10:20 AM (GMT-08:00) >> To: u...@

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-02 Thread Andrew Musselman
ndrew.mussel...@gmail.com> >> Date: 03/01/2017 10:20 AM (GMT-08:00) >> To: u...@mahout.apache.org, dev@mahout.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate >> >> Nevermind, that was before building the src distro. >> >> Shell wor

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-01 Thread Andrew Musselman
e: 03/01/2017 10:20 AM (GMT-08:00) > To: u...@mahout.apache.org, dev@mahout.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate > > Nevermind, that was before building the src distro. > > Shell works fine with src and binary distros. > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at

RE: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-01 Thread Andrew Palumbo
I will verify keys tonight. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> Date: 03/01/2017 10:20 AM (GMT-08:00) To: u...@mahout.apache.org, dev@mahout.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-01 Thread Andrew Musselman
Nevermind, that was before building the src distro. Shell works fine with src and binary distros. On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Andrew Musselman wrote: > I'm getting this when starting the spark-shell on a Mac: > > Loading

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-01 Thread Andrew Musselman
I'm getting this when starting the spark-shell on a Mac: Loading /Users/andrew.musselman/Downloads/mahout-testing/apache-mahout-distribution-0.13.0/bin/load-shell.scala... :36: error: object mahout is not a member of package org.apache import org.apache.mahout.math._

Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-03-01 Thread Andrew Musselman
I've confirmed hashes and sigs; if someone other than me could confirm all three sigs it'd be good, e.g.: `gpg --verify apache-mahout-distribution-0.13.0-src.tar.gz.asc` `gpg --verify apache-mahout-distribution-0.13.0.pom.asc` `gpg --verify apache-mahout-distribution-0.13.0.tar.gz.asc` I'll vote

[VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

2017-02-28 Thread Andrew Musselman
This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout. The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday, March 3rd, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with [ ] +1, accept RC as the official