ingle-threaded).. this
> > should be changed in 0.13.1 to fall back to OpenMP MMul.
> >
> > Note: Binary distribution is built for Tesla GPUs. My card was not
> > compatible, though out target is higher end GPUs on AWS or PowerPC
> (PowerPC
> > uses teslas) so not a blocker IMO.
> >
> > We will target a wider r
;
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 2:48:17 AM
> To: u...@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>
&g
.
From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 2:48:17 AM
To: u...@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Hashes and sigs confirmed, bin and src (viennacl and vi
Hashes and sigs confirmed, bin and src (viennacl and viennacl-omp)
artifacts run the spark shell and the sparse drm test fine, and kick off
the GPU.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of
This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Monday,
April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever
occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
[ ] +1, accept RC as the official
commits it is missing again.
>
>
> Or It possibly was only replaced in one profile, not both.
>
>
>
>
> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com>
> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 9:09:39 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] A
.
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com>
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 9:09:39 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
I will continue looking.
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com>
Sent: Frid
t.version} included.
From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 4:49:34 PM
To: u...@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
The vote will be go
This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Monday,
April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever
occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
[ ] +1, accept RC as the official
e-viennacl_2.10-0.13.0.jar the GPU viennacl jar
> > >>>
> > >>> - mahout-native-viennacl-omp_2.10-0.13.0.jar the OpenMP jar.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> With the -Pviennacl the binary (locally) is for _both_GPU and
> OpenMP
t; - mahout-native-viennacl-omp_2.10-0.13.0.jar the OpenMP jar.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> With the -Pviennacl the binary (locally) is for _both_GPU and OpenMP,
> >>> the source tree of the whole project allows for a build with both.
> >>>
> >&
OpenMP jar.
>>>
>>>
>>> With the -Pviennacl the binary (locally) is for _both_GPU and OpenMP,
>>> the source tree of the whole project allows for a build with both.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you guys for looking Andrew mentioned a hangout i'd be for that as
>>> well.
>>>
&
or a build with both.
>>
>>
>> Thank you guys for looking Andrew mentioned a hangout i'd be for that as
>> well.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>> From: Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.o
guys for looking Andrew mentioned a hangout i'd be for that as
> well.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Andy
>
> ____
> From: Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:32:21 AM
> To: mahout
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.
From: Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:32:21 AM
To: mahout
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
I think i kind'a understand what's going on, but best to cross check - on
flights today - will only be available late
gt; > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > It looks like we're missing some jars from the binary distro:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > bin
> > >
t; > >
> > > >> The line that I suggested the other day:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2
> release:prepare
> > > >> release:perform
> > >
>> mvn -Pmahout-release,apache-release,viennacl,hadoop2 release:prepare
> > >> release:perform
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> doesn't seem to have activated the viennacl profile
> > >>
> > >>
>
le
> >>
> >> ________
> >> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
> >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>
FYI
-- Forwarded message -
From: Andrew Musselman <a...@apache.org>
Date: Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:30 PM
Subject: Fwd: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
To: d...@maven.apache.org <d...@maven.apache.org>
Hi Maven team, we are having trouble getting a couple
+1
From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 11:06:29 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Okay consider this vote cancelled.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:02 PM
ofile
>>
>>
>> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>>
>>
>> off the top
to have activated the viennacl profile
>
>
> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:58:16 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>
>
> off t
10:58:16 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
off the top of my head i dont know if it is a regression. My guess is that
they were missing before. I think that this may have something to do with
activating the profile -Pviennacl at releas
;
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:48:13 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org; u...@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
Is it a regression or were they missing before, do you know?
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com> wrote:
-viennacl-omp.jar
I think that we need to try a different build command.
Andy
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 10:42:30 PM
To: u...@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
It look
t; Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:05 PM
> To: u...@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>
> I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for
> vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
>
> The spa
I've checked hashes and sigs, and run a build with passing tests for
vanilla, viennacl, and viennacl-omp profiles.
The spark shell runs the SparseSparseDrmTimer.mscala example in the binary
build and all three source profiles; I saw the GPU get exercised when
running the viennacl profile from
This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday,
April 17th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever
occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
[ ] +1, accept RC as the official
A build problem, need to make another RC, will be within the hour.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Trevor Grant
wrote:
> All look good to me.
>
> Trevor Grant
> Data Scientist
> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
>
All look good to me.
Trevor Grant
Data Scientist
https://github.com/rawkintrevo
http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
http://trevorgrant.org
*"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things." -Virgil*
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Andrew Musselman <
Hashes and sigs look good to me; please someone else confirm.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
>
> The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on
> Thursday, March
This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on
Thursday, March 30rd, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes
(whichever occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
[ ] +1, accept RC as the
your integration testing if you can?
>
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 11:11:09 AM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.
gt;
>
> Pat could you please Continue with your integration testing if you can?
>
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 11:11:09 AM
> To: d
t;p...@occamsmachete.com>
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 11:11:09 AM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
I can’t +1 because of system integration errors that have to do with scoring
that could be in Mahout. I doubt it is but don’t have time in the allotted vote
I can’t +1 because of system integration errors that have to do with scoring
that could be in Mahout. I doubt it is but don’t have time in the allotted vote
period to track it down.
My close looking tests of Mahout including the previous driver issues pass.
Not sure if we use this style of
+1 binding
Verified Signatures and Verification
mvn clean install
On source compiled with `mvn clean install`, `mvn clean package -Phadoop2
-PviennaCL`, and precompiled jars; ran following in a docker contain
(constructed via maven plugin, details below)
$MAHOUT_HOME/bin/mahout
No worries; the vote is open through tomorrow (Friday), but if you need
more time than that we could push it to the weekend or roll back, no big
deal.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote:
> Before voting I’d like to run down the integration errors, which
Before voting I’d like to run down the integration errors, which are different
recs scores and could theoretically be because of different math results.
On Mar 23, 2017, at 3:34 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote:
BTW I’m getting bad integration test results, which are probably not
BTW I’m getting bad integration test results, which are probably not related to
what Mahout does since the math is tested in unit tests too.
But the test runs with no runtime errors, Mahout as a Lib and drivers
On Mar 23, 2017, at 3:32 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote:
Come to
Those are probably expected INFOs; are you not getting that from a source
build?
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote:
> using the repo build of mahout I get all sorts of errors like this:
>
> [INFO] [RootSolverFactory$] Unable to create class GPUMMul:
ess 4G LTE smartphone
Original message
From: Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com>
Date: 03/23/2017 3:05 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
using the repo build of mahout I get all sorts of errors like
-08:00)
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
using the repo build of mahout I get all sorts of errors like this:
[INFO] [RootSolverFactory$] Unable to create class GPUMMul: attempting OpenMP
version
[INFO] [RootSolverFactory$] Cr
using the repo build of mahout I get all sorts of errors like this:
[INFO] [RootSolverFactory$] Unable to create class GPUMMul: attempting OpenMP
version
[INFO] [RootSolverFactory$] Creating org.apache.mahout.viennacl.openmp.OMPMMul
solver
[INFO] [RootSolverFactory$]
Thanks for testing Dustin,
did you import the keys?
https://github.com/apache/mahout/blob/master/distribution/KEYS
Trevor Grant
Data Scientist
https://github.com/rawkintrevo
http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
http://trevorgrant.org
*"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the
+1
Environment :
MacOs Sierra 10.12.3
verified md5 checksums --> successful
mvn clean package --> successful
verified signatures --> minor issue, showing below
dustinvanstee /data/app-setup/mahout-1038 $ gpg --verify
apache-mahout-distribution-0.13.0.pom.asc
gpg: assuming signed data in
Sigs and hashes check out for me.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Andrew Musselman wrote:
> This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
>
> The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday,
> March 26th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC
This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday,
March 26th, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever
occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
[ ] +1, accept RC as the official
OK, my tests passed including the last blocker, will test again on the new RC.
On Mar 16, 2017, at 8:56 AM, Andrew Musselman
wrote:
Cancelling vote due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1955
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
Cancelling vote due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1955
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Correction, vote is until Friday, March 17th.
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
Correction, vote is until Friday, March 17th.
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
>
> The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday,
> March 3rd, 2017 or once
This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday,
March 3rd, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever
occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
[ ] +1, accept RC as the official
Yes, if we're ready I can cut another one today.
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote:
> The release was not made due to broken drivers, now fixed. I assume a new
> RC will come shortly?
>
>
> On Mar 11, 2017, at 9:54 PM, Andrew Musselman
The release was not made due to broken drivers, now fixed. I assume a new RC
will come shortly?
On Mar 11, 2017, at 9:54 PM, Andrew Musselman wrote:
This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on
This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday,
March 3rd, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever
occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
[ ] +1, accept RC as the official
This vote has been cancelled due to issues found while testing.. RC2 will be
out soon.
From: Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com>
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 4:19:51 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
s
l try to test today.
On Mar 3, 2017, at 9:19 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap@outlook.com
<mailto:ap@outlook.com>> wrote:
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
Original message
From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
Date: 03/02/
gt; >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
> >>
> >>
> >> ---- Original message
> >> From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
> >> Date: 03/01/2017 10:20 AM (GMT-08:00)
&
ill verify keys tonight.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
>>
>>
>> ---- Original message
>> From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
>> Date: 03/01/2017 10:20 AM (GMT-08:00)
>> To: u...@
ndrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
>> Date: 03/01/2017 10:20 AM (GMT-08:00)
>> To: u...@mahout.apache.org, dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>>
>> Nevermind, that was before building the src distro.
>>
>> Shell wor
e: 03/01/2017 10:20 AM (GMT-08:00)
> To: u...@mahout.apache.org, dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>
> Nevermind, that was before building the src distro.
>
> Shell works fine with src and binary distros.
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at
I will verify keys tonight.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
Original message
From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
Date: 03/01/2017 10:20 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: u...@mahout.apache.org, dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout
Nevermind, that was before building the src distro.
Shell works fine with src and binary distros.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Andrew Musselman wrote:
> I'm getting this when starting the spark-shell on a Mac:
>
> Loading
I'm getting this when starting the spark-shell on a Mac:
Loading
/Users/andrew.musselman/Downloads/mahout-testing/apache-mahout-distribution-0.13.0/bin/load-shell.scala...
:36: error: object mahout is not a member of package org.apache
import org.apache.mahout.math._
I've confirmed hashes and sigs; if someone other than me could confirm all
three sigs it'd be good, e.g.:
`gpg --verify apache-mahout-distribution-0.13.0-src.tar.gz.asc`
`gpg --verify apache-mahout-distribution-0.13.0.pom.asc`
`gpg --verify apache-mahout-distribution-0.13.0.tar.gz.asc`
I'll vote
This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday,
March 3rd, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever
occurs earlier). Please download, test and vote with
[ ] +1, accept RC as the official
67 matches
Mail list logo