hortly.
>> >
>> >
>> > And these ran w/o issue for you in cluster mode, correct?
>> >
>> >
>> > Andy
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Raviteja Lokineni
>> > Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 9:01:08 PM
>> > To: m
> > Someone will review the PR shortly.
> >
> >
> > And these ran w/o issue for you in cluster mode, correct?
> >
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
> > From: Raviteja Lokineni
> > Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 9:
e PR shortly.
>
>
> And these ran w/o issue for you in cluster mode, correct?
>
>
> Andy
>
>
> From: Raviteja Lokineni
> Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 9:01:08 PM
> To: mahout
> Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
>
mode, correct?
>
>
> Andy
>
>
> From: Raviteja Lokineni
> Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 9:01:08 PM
> To: mahout
> Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
>
> Submitted another PR with Lucene 5.5.2 and Java 7 compatibility. Based on
&g
Thanks Raviteja,
Someone will review the PR shortly.
And these ran w/o issue for you in cluster mode, correct?
Andy
From: Raviteja Lokineni
Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 9:01:08 PM
To: mahout
Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
Submitted another
sed in legacy
>>>> components. Admittedly though, one useful legacy component.Were you
>>>> able to get the examples to run in pseudo-cluster mode with lucene 6?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>&g
t;>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Andrew Palumbo
>>> Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2016 5:03:45 PM
>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re:
eudo-cluster mode with lucene 6?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>> ____
>> From: Andrew Palumbo
>> Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2016 5:03:45 PM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
>>
>&g
: Andrew Palumbo
> Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2016 5:03:45 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
>
> Thank you Raviteja, this is something that we will have to discuss.
>
>
> From: Raviteja Lokineni
to get the
examples to run in pseudo-cluster mode with lucene 6?
Thanks,
Andy
From: Andrew Palumbo
Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2016 5:03:45 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
Thank you Raviteja, this is something that
Thank you Raviteja, this is something that we will have to discuss.
From: Raviteja Lokineni
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 11:41:09 PM
To: mahout
Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
Guys, found an issue lucene 6.x is compatible only with Java 8. What&#
luster.html#
> Pseudo-Distributed_Operation
>
>
> Thanks very much,
>
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
> From: Andrew Palumbo
> Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 2:38 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
>
> Ahh- yes I think we
y much,
Andy
From: Andrew Palumbo
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 2:38 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
Ahh- yes I think we started removing MAHOUT_LOCAL capability I see the check
for MAHOUT_LOCAL was removed in this
.
From: Raviteja Lokineni
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 2:28:08 PM
To: mahout
Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
Nope in a Linux environment.
On Aug 5, 2016 2:21 PM, "Suneel Marthi" wrote:
> r u running this on windows prompt or in Cygwin.
>
> Suggest
t; > > > it would good to ensure that some of the examples are working in
> the
> > > > > $MAHOUT_HOME/examples/bin dir. Could you try running
> > > > > classify-wikipedia.sh option (2), cluster-reuters.sh option (1) pr
> > (2)
r mode if
> possible?
> > > >
> > > > This would to ensure that seq2sparse is working correctly which
> relies
> > > > heavily on lucene.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks again for the great contribution.
> > > >
> > > >
ectly which relies
> > > heavily on lucene.
> > >
> > > Thanks again for the great contribution.
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > >
> > > Original message
> > > From: Raviteja Lokineni
> > > Date: 08/05/2
heavily on lucene.
> >
> > Thanks again for the great contribution.
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
> > Original message
> > From: Raviteja Lokineni
> > Date: 08/05/2016 12:42 PM (GMT-05:00)
> > To: mahout
>
gt; Thanks again for the great contribution.
>
> Andy
>
>
> Original message
> From: Raviteja Lokineni
> Date: 08/05/2016 12:42 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: mahout
> Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
>
> Just a FYI, all the tests are suc
again for the great contribution.
Andy
Original message
From: Raviteja Lokineni
Date: 08/05/2016 12:42 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: mahout
Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
Just a FYI, all the tests are successful on windows too ;)
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Andrew
Just a FYI, all the tests are successful on windows too ;)
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Andrew Palumbo wrote:
> +1
>
>
> From: Raviteja Lokineni
> Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 12:14:24 PM
> To: mahout
> Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 -
+1
From: Raviteja Lokineni
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 12:14:24 PM
To: mahout
Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
Yay! for the heads up on merging.
FYI, I take back my word on failure on windows though. I had to include the
hadoop.dll file on PATH
running the tests, please go ahead and
> let
> > >> me know.
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Andrew Palumbo
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Maven >= 3.3.3,
> > >>> java >= 1.7,
>
gt; >>
> >>> Maven >= 3.3.3,
> >>> java >= 1.7,
> >>> MAHOUT_HOME=/path/to/install,
> >>>
> >>> also MAHOUT_LOCAL=true
> >>>
> >>> If ur not running against a hadoop cluster. (Looks like ur not)
> >&g
ToolRunner.java:70)
>>> at org.apache.mahout.cf.taste.hadoop.item.RecommenderJob.
>>> run(RecommenderJob.java:168)
>>> at org.apache.mahout.cf.taste.hadoop.item.RecommenderJobTest.
>>> testCompleteJobWithFiltering(RecommenderJobTest.java:881)
>>>
>>>
path/to/install,
>>
>> also MAHOUT_LOCAL=true
>>
>> If ur not running against a hadoop cluster. (Looks like ur not)
>>
>> Upgrading this dep is not a trivial task.
>>
>>
>> ---- Original message
>> From: Raviteja Lokineni
>
trivial task.
>
>
> Original message
> From: Raviteja Lokineni
> Date: 08/04/2016 6:09 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: mahout
> Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
>
> Are there any pre-requisites to run tests on local machines?
>
> Most of th
00)
To: mahout
Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
Are there any pre-requisites to run tests on local machines?
Most of the MR module tests failed with:
java.lang.NullPointerException: null
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([C8C254E3D9D80CC9:845EFDB07D41873E]
ssage
> From: Raviteja Lokineni
> Date: 08/04/2016 4:01 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: mahout
> Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene compatibility
>
> All the tests are successful even with my code change and upgrade to
> Lucene. (The test failure that I reported above was on my lo
Actually, Travis CI is not set up to test all mahout modules. Could you please
test again on your local machine, and report any errors.
Andy
Original message
From: Raviteja Lokineni
Date: 08/04/2016 4:01 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: mahout
Subject: Re: MAHOUT-1876 - Lucene
All the tests are successful even with my code change and upgrade to
Lucene. (The test failure that I reported above was on my local machine, I
guess you can ignore that.)
So is this pull request good to merge?
https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/247
https://travis-ci.org/apache/mahout/builds/
Most of the MR tests are failing with:
java.lang.NullPointerException: null
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([C8C254E3D9D80CC9:845EFDB07D41873E]:0)
at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:1012)
at org.apache.hadoop.util.Shell.runCommand(Shell.java:445)
at org.apache.hadoop.util.S
Hi Devs,
Issue link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1876
Problem statement: Mahout should be compatible with the latest lucene
version. I was trying to solve a text clustering problem and I stumbled
upon the error that the lucene version in use is not supported. That's when
I raised
33 matches
Mail list logo
