Re: JAXBContext - JDK 11

2023-12-05 Thread Karl Wright
nd.JAXBContext.newInstance(JAXBContext.java:632) >>> > at >>> > >>> org.apache.manifoldcf.authorities.authorities.generic.GenericAuthority$FetchTokensThread.run(GenericAuthority.java:717) >>> > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: >>

Re: JAXBContext - JDK 11

2023-12-05 Thread Karl Wright
orities.authorities.generic.GenericAuthority$FetchTokensThread.run(GenericAuthority.java:717) >> > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: >> > com.sun.xml.internal.bind.v2.ContextFactory >> > at >> > >> org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoaderBase.loadClass(WebappClassLoaderBase.

Re: JAXBContext - JDK 11

2023-12-05 Thread Karl Wright
lina.loader.WebappClassLoaderBase.loadClass(WebappClassLoaderBase.java:1220) > > at > > > javax.xml.bind.ServiceLoaderUtil.nullSafeLoadClass(ServiceLoaderUtil.java:92) > > at > > > javax.xml.bind.ServiceLoaderUtil.safeLoadClass(ServiceLoaderUtil.java:125) > > at > javax.xml.bind.ContextF

AW: JAXBContext - JDK 11

2023-12-05 Thread Wolfinger Uwe
. Dezember 2023 12:11 An: dev@manifoldcf.apache.org Betreff: Re: JAXBContext - JDK 11 Hi Uwe, Thank you for sharing this issue and I think that the jaxb library is needed to solve this problem. I didn't tested it yet but probably adding these dependencies should solve it: - jaxb-core:2.3.1

Re: JAXBContext - JDK 11

2023-12-05 Thread Piergiorgio Lucidi
:92) > at > javax.xml.bind.ServiceLoaderUtil.safeLoadClass(ServiceLoaderUtil.java:125) > at javax.xml.bind.ContextFinder.newInstance(ContextFinder.java:230) > ... 4 more > > We are using JDK 11 as our runtime envirnoment. As far as i understood, > support for jaxb was removed in JDK 11. So my qu

JAXBContext - JDK 11

2023-12-05 Thread Wolfinger Uwe
) at javax.xml.bind.ServiceLoaderUtil.safeLoadClass(ServiceLoaderUtil.java:125) at javax.xml.bind.ContextFinder.newInstance(ContextFinder.java:230) ... 4 more We are using JDK 11 as our runtime envirnoment. As far as i understood, support for jaxb was removed in JDK 11. So my question is, does anybody

Re: JDK 11

2020-12-12 Thread Karl Wright
terms, I cannot imagine the situation changing. Karl On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 7:20 AM Piergiorgio Lucidi wrote: > Hi Karl, > > I think that we should consider only OpenJDK edition of JDK 11 without > considering the Oracle version. > > Probably we could be lucky with OpenJDK, an

Re: JDK 11

2020-12-12 Thread Piergiorgio Lucidi
Hi Karl, I think that we should consider only OpenJDK edition of JDK 11 without considering the Oracle version. Probably we could be lucky with OpenJDK, anyway we have to go in deep also with OpenJDK investing more time on this. Hope to find some time soon to understand more details

JDK 11

2020-12-12 Thread Karl Wright
Hi, Whereas I was under the impression that one of our committers had addressed the JDK 11 problem in ManifoldCF, upon detailed inspection and trial I have determined that this is in fact quite false. The reason is that the relatively new csws connector used a ton of J2EE classes

[jira] [Resolved] (CONNECTORS-1646) Notification Connector JDK > 11

2020-06-26 Thread Karl Wright (Jira)
ion Connector JDK > 11 > --- > > Key: CONNECTORS-1646 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-1646 > Project: ManifoldCF > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Email conn

[jira] [Commented] (CONNECTORS-1646) Notification Connector JDK > 11

2020-06-25 Thread Uwe Wolfinger (Jira)
putting the jars in connector-common-lib, lib-proprietary,... but with no success. only when you put them on the classpath, the email connector will work > Notification Connector JDK > 11 > --- > > Key: CONNECTORS-1646 >

[jira] [Commented] (CONNECTORS-1646) Notification Connector JDK > 11

2020-06-25 Thread Karl Wright (Jira)
into the connector-common-lib folder instead (and make no changes to the *.env files) that this still works for you. > Notification Connector JDK > 11 > --- > > Key: CONNECTORS-1646 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira

[jira] [Assigned] (CONNECTORS-1646) Notification Connector JDK > 11

2020-06-25 Thread Karl Wright (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-1646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Karl Wright reassigned CONNECTORS-1646: --- Assignee: Karl Wright > Notification Connector JDK &

[jira] [Created] (CONNECTORS-1646) Notification Connector JDK > 11

2020-06-25 Thread Uwe Wolfinger (Jira)
Uwe Wolfinger created CONNECTORS-1646: - Summary: Notification Connector JDK > 11 Key: CONNECTORS-1646 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-1646 Project: ManifoldCF Is

Re: ElasticSearch-literate volunteers needed for JDK 11 port

2020-03-22 Thread Michael Cizmar
We can take a look. Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> From: Karl Wright Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2020 10:05:40 AM To: dev Subject: ElasticSearch-literate volunteers needed for JDK 11 port Hi All, The version of ElasticSearch we support appa

Re: ElasticSearch-literate volunteers needed for JDK 11 port

2020-03-22 Thread Irindu Nugawela
to help you all with this. Irindu Nugawela. On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 at 20:36, Karl Wright wrote: > Hi All, > > The version of ElasticSearch we support apparently is incompatible with JDK > 11. We therefore will need to update that connector and the associated > tests as well. S

ElasticSearch-literate volunteers needed for JDK 11 port

2020-03-22 Thread Karl Wright
Hi All, The version of ElasticSearch we support apparently is incompatible with JDK 11. We therefore will need to update that connector and the associated tests as well. See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-1624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment

Tackling JDK 11+

2019-12-26 Thread Karl Wright
Hi folks, Now that 2.15 is out, it's time to think what to do about JDK 11 and after. The transition from JDK 8 to JDK 11 will require significant work and testing, because between JDK 11 *removed* many JDK classes that used to exist in JDK 8. The classes can be reincluded as specific