On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 00:42 +0300, Cristian Driga wrote:
Hi John,
It's a great idea and the draft looks good. More below...
John McCreesh wrote:
Comments please on http://why.openoffice.org/get_legal.html
Some suggested changes:
===1===
OpenOffice.org 2 is a world-class
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 00:02 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi all,
John McCreesh wrote:
Comments please on http://why.openoffice.org/get_legal.html
Please comment only on the message on this list - I'm going to look for
volunteers on the art project to turn it into a web page :-)
Good
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 09:00 +0200, Finn Gruwier Larsen wrote:
[snip]
We also have
to take into account that the effect of the slogan mainly comes from the
fact that it's actually a bit provocative. I think a marketing has to be
a bit provocative, but of course not too provocative. It's a
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 11:15 +0200, charles-h.schulz wrote:
Hello,
the get legal campaign is a very good idea. Maybe a small PR
operation would help it rise up in the media, who knows.
As for the risk that we may encounter due to the potential
agressive nature of the message, I think we
On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 10:46 +0100, John McCreesh wrote:
[snip]
I like this - let's park it for today while we finish Get Legal. Rening
me later if I forget about it :-)
d'oh - s/Rening/Remind/
This keyboard can't spell ;-)
John
On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 11:04 +0100, John McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 01:38 +0200, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi,
as nobody replies on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I show the seemingly more
interested people here, what I did from your comments. I included a
fourth draft in the website
Hi John,
John McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 00:02 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
One warning: when talking about this with some business-people (month or
so ago), it turned out that they could become offended. As if I
suggested that they would do illegal business ...
Good point - I've
On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 12:35 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi John,
John McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 00:02 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
One warning: when talking about this with some business-people (month or
so ago), it turned out that they could become offended. As if I
suggested that
Apologies for the lateness of this report. Before Easter I
mentioned that I was going to be demonstrating OOo to some
writers, editors, and publishers at a science-fiction convention
in Australia.
As often happens, things didn't work out quite as planned.
Despite that, I am quite happy with
Okay, that's a bit of an exageration, but in his security tips he did
say Look into one of the free office suites as an alternative to
Microsoft Office.
http://www.schneier.com/essay-078.html
In a similar vein, his tips include:
* Replace Windows by Linux or Mac.
* Replace IE by anything
On Saturday 29 April 2006 06:02, John McCreesh wrote:
Comments please on http://why.openoffice.org/get_legal.html
Hi John,
so you don't need to type anything in again makes sense to me, but I had to
think for a few seconds. I think it's ambiguous and would be clearer as so
you don't have to
John McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 01:38 +0200, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi,
as nobody replies on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I show the seemingly more
interested people here, what I did from your comments. I included a
fourth draft in the website linked below.
+1 for the third draft
...
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 00:14 +1000, Mike Williams wrote:
On Saturday 29 April 2006 06:02, John McCreesh wrote:
Comments please on http://why.openoffice.org/get_legal.html
Hi John,
so you don't need to type anything in again makes sense to me, but I had to
think for a few seconds. I think
John McCreesh wrote:
I've moved things about a bit on the latest version
One more suggestion.
..similar in functionality to MS-Office. OpenOffice.org 2 does
everything you need..
Obvious that some will come up with the question for e-mail or PIM (see
[EMAIL PROTECTED]).
I think it would be
14 matches
Mail list logo
