Hi Alexandro,
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
For the past few weeks there has been a very big discussion about
reasons and what and why not does OOo doesn't come with a PIM. The
OK ...
issue has extended a bit too much and I realize this is really puting a
lot of pressure on prooject such as
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 21:53 -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
For the past few weeks there has been a very big discussion about reasons
and what and why not does OOo doesn't come with a PIM. The issue has
extended a bit too much and I realize this is really puting a lot of
pressure on
Alexandro Colorado skrev:
For the past few weeks there has been a very big discussion about
reasons and what and why not does OOo doesn't come with a PIM. The issue
has extended a bit too much and I realize this is really puting a lot of
pressure on prooject such as the marketing list to
Actually that seems to have been part of the strategy all along:
As long as they are going to steal it, we want them to steal
ours. They'll get sort of addicted, and then we'll somehow
figure out how to collect sometime in the next decade.
On Tue, May 2, 2006 10:09, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
Actually that seems to have been part of the strategy all along:
As long as they are going to steal it, we want them to steal
ours. They'll get sort of addicted, and then we'll somehow
figure out how to collect sometime in the
On Tue, 02 May 2006 03:20:52 -0500, Finn Gruwier Larsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Alexandro Colorado skrev:
For the past few weeks there has been a very big discussion about
reasons and what and why not does OOo doesn't come with a PIM. The
issue has extended a bit too much and I realize
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 07:21 -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
I think the OOo Marketing project truely has a challenge in
communicating this issue and pointing end users to good alternatives to
Outlook.
Finn
Ok so the next step is how do we comunicate. I think puting an open
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Tue, 02 May 2006 03:20:52 -0500, Finn Gruwier Larsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexandro Colorado skrev:
For the past few weeks there has been a very big discussion about
reasons and what and why not does OOo doesn't come with a PIM. The
issue has extended
On Tue, 02 May 2006 07:35:43 -0500, Ian Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 07:21 -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
I think the OOo Marketing project truely has a challenge in
communicating this issue and pointing end users to good alternatives
to
Outlook.
Finn
Ok so
Ok so the next step is how do we comunicate. I think puting an open
letter explaining the reason why we don't have these might at least
prove a stance on the issue. Not doing it will just be failing to
communicate. I think the best option is to start working on mockups on
how this
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 07:47 -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
What happens if we do this and Sun then decides an E-mail client is a
good idea and starts the work to incorporate it in version 3? Would be a
bit embarrassing.
I dont think it will, we would have done our job at the moment.
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 07:53 -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Ok so the next step is how do we comunicate. I think puting an open
letter explaining the reason why we don't have these might at least
prove a stance on the issue. Not doing it will just be failing to
communicate. I
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Ok so the next step is how do we comunicate. I think puting an open
letter explaining the reason why we don't have these might at least
prove a stance on the issue. Not doing it will just be failing to
communicate. I think the best option is to start
Alexandro,
On Tuesday May 02 2006 08:53, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Ok so the next step is how do we comunicate. I think puting an open
letter explaining the reason why we don't have these might at least
prove a stance on the issue. Not doing it will just be failing to
communicate. I
I have long time ago stopped trying to find out what the development
priorities for OOo/SO are, who controls them (probably someone at Sun)
and how these priorities are matched against any analysis of market
demands (if any such analysis are ever made). There is no bitterness in
this - it's
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
For the past few weeks there has been a very big discussion about
reasons and what and why not does OOo doesn't come with a PIM. The
issue has extended a bit too much and I realize this is really puting
a lot of pressure on prooject such as the marketing list to
Steven Shelton skrev:
For that matter, it should be a relatively simple matter to put a PIM
into OOo: just download the Mozilla Thunderbird code, tweak it a bit to
add the OOo graphics and look and feel, and badda-boom, badda-bing,
you got yourselves a simple PIM/email client. IIRC, Mozilla's
Alexandro,
I've started the following page:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Open_Letter_Re:_OOo_PIM
It includes a (very, very) rough outline of a letter to address the many
requests for a PIM. I'll keep working on it, but it is going to take me some
time to go back through the many
Hi Jeff,
Jeffrey G. Causey, CPA wrote:
Alexandro,
I've started the following page:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Open_Letter_Re:_OOo_PIM
Good to see your start, Jeff. In the mean time I was working on this:
Cor Nouws wrote:
The only thing we do know, ist that OOo 2.x doesn't have one. So giving
good info for people standing up with their hands up in the air 'what to
do now' is very usefull.
Pls see this for a start:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Marketing--ToDo#Marketing_Material
Hi Cor, Jeffrey, all,
Cor Nouws wrote:
Cor Nouws wrote:
The only thing we do know, ist that OOo 2.x doesn't have one. So
giving good info for people standing up with their hands up in the air
'what to do now' is very usefull.
Pls see this for a start:
On Tue, 02 May 2006 08:23:56 -0500, Jeffrey G. Causey, CPA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexandro,
On Tuesday May 02 2006 08:53, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Ok so the next step is how do we comunicate. I think puting an open
letter explaining the reason why we don't have these might at least
On Tue, 02 May 2006 08:28:06 -0500, Steven Shelton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Along the lines of the What's the roadmap because we want to spread
accurate information query, I remember a year or two ago when this
topic came up there was a great deal of movement to
On Tue, 02 May 2006 09:08:45 -0500, Jeffrey G. Causey, CPA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexandro,
I've started the following page:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Open_Letter_Re:_OOo_PIM
It includes a (very, very) rough outline of a letter to address the many
requests for a PIM.
Hi Finn,
Finn Gruwier Larsen wrote:
Violation of the Danish law of copyright can result in prison in up to
one year.
People who can read Danish can find further information here:
http://www.antipirat.dk/
Thanks for looking it up!
Best,
Cristian
Finn
Digg it -
http://digg.com/software/Microsoft_knows_Windows_and_Office_won_t_grow_their_company
On 5/2/06, Cristian Driga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(2 days old but...)
Microsoft knows Windows and Office can't deliver growth:
http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/4077/106/
[...]however, Office
Hi all,
I'm giving a talk to the Westchester PC User's Group about OpenOffice
on Thursday, May 4 at 7:00pm local time. (Westchester is the county
just north of New York City.)
I'm on the front page of their website: http://www.wpcug.org/
After the talk (or before, if I am organized), I'll
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Simon Phipps wrote:
I've posted a Digg for the Get Legal campaign; you may wish to go
Digg it to get it up into the front page...
http://digg.com/software/_Get_Legal_-_OpenOffice.Org_Spins_Microsoft_FUD
S.
Looks great. One thing about the why.openoffice.org page
28 matches
Mail list logo
