Hi all,
Cristian Driga wrote:
Cor Nouws wrote:
Pls see this for a start:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Marketing--ToDo#Marketing_Material
I am glad to see you starting up documents for dealing with PIM
integration issue.
Glad I've been able to do so.
Place to display the
On Tue, 02 May 2006 11:00:32 -0500, Steven Shelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Again this is missing the point the marketing list shouldn't solve the
problem since they are not in the position to solve it. They should just
come forward with an explanation on what is going on and what is ther
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Tue, 02 May 2006 08:28:06 -0500, Steven Shelton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Along the lines of the "What's the roadmap because we want to spread
accurate information" query, I remember a year or two ago when this
topic came up there was a
On Tue, 02 May 2006 09:08:45 -0500, Jeffrey G. Causey, CPA
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alexandro,
I've started the following page:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Open_Letter_Re:_OOo_PIM
It includes a (very, very) rough outline of a letter to address the many
requests for a PIM. I'
On Tue, 02 May 2006 08:28:06 -0500, Steven Shelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Along the lines of the "What's the roadmap because we want to spread
accurate information" query, I remember a year or two ago when this
topic came up there was a great deal of movement
On Tue, 02 May 2006 08:23:56 -0500, Jeffrey G. Causey, CPA
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alexandro,
On Tuesday May 02 2006 08:53, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>> Ok so the next step is how do we comunicate. I think puting an open
>> letter explaining the reason why we don't have these might at le
Hi Cor, Jeffrey, all,
Cor Nouws wrote:
Cor Nouws wrote:
The only thing we do know, ist that OOo 2.x doesn't have one. So
giving good info for people standing up with their hands up in the air
'what to do now' is very usefull.
Pls see this for a start:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wik
Cor Nouws wrote:
The only thing we do know, ist that OOo 2.x doesn't have one. So giving
good info for people standing up with their hands up in the air 'what to
do now' is very usefull.
Pls see this for a start:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Marketing--ToDo#Marketing_Material
GRe
Hi Jeff,
Jeffrey G. Causey, CPA wrote:
Alexandro,
I've started the following page:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Open_Letter_Re:_OOo_PIM
Good to see your start, Jeff. In the mean time I was working on this:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Marketing--ToDo#Marketing_Materi
Alexandro,
I've started the following page:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Open_Letter_Re:_OOo_PIM
It includes a (very, very) rough outline of a letter to address the many
requests for a PIM. I'll keep working on it, but it is going to take me some
time to go back through the many t
Steven Shelton skrev:
For that matter, it should be a relatively simple matter to put a PIM
into OOo: just download the Mozilla Thunderbird code, tweak it a bit to
add the OOo graphics and "look and feel", and badda-boom, badda-bing,
you got yourselves a simple PIM/email client. IIRC, Mozilla'
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
For the past few weeks there has been a very big discussion about
reasons and what and why not does OOo doesn't come with a PIM. The
issue has extended a bit too much and I realize this is really puting
a lot of pressure on prooject such as the marketing list to come
I have long time ago stopped trying to find out what the development
priorities for OOo/SO are, who controls them (probably someone at Sun)
and how these priorities are matched against any analysis of market
demands (if any such analysis are ever made). There is no bitterness in
this - it's jus
Alexandro,
On Tuesday May 02 2006 08:53, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> >> Ok so the next step is how do we comunicate. I think puting an open
> >> letter explaining the reason why we don't have these might at least
> >> prove a stance on the issue. Not doing it will just be failing to
> >> communi
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Ok so the next step is how do we comunicate. I think puting an open
letter explaining the reason why we don't have these might at least
prove a stance on the issue. Not doing it will just be failing to
communicate. I think the best option is to start working
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 07:53 -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> >>>
> >> Ok so the next step is how do we comunicate. I think puting an open
> >> letter explaining the reason why we don't have these might at least
> >> prove a stance on the issue. Not doing it will just be failing to
> >> co
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 07:47 -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> > What happens if we do this and Sun then decides an E-mail client is a
> > good idea and starts the work to incorporate it in version 3? Would be a
> > bit embarrassing.
> >
>
> I dont think it will, we would have done our job at the
Ok so the next step is how do we comunicate. I think puting an open
letter explaining the reason why we don't have these might at least
prove a stance on the issue. Not doing it will just be failing to
communicate. I think the best option is to start working on mockups on
how this op
On Tue, 02 May 2006 07:35:43 -0500, Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 07:21 -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> I think the OOo Marketing project truely has a challenge in
> communicating this issue and pointing end users to good alternatives
to
> Outlook.
>
> Finn
>
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Tue, 02 May 2006 03:20:52 -0500, Finn Gruwier Larsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alexandro Colorado skrev:
For the past few weeks there has been a very big discussion about
reasons and what and why not does OOo doesn't come with a PIM. The
issue has extended
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 07:21 -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> > I think the OOo Marketing project truely has a challenge in
> > communicating this issue and pointing end users to good alternatives to
> > Outlook.
> >
> > Finn
> >
> Ok so the next step is how do we comunicate. I think puting a
On Tue, 02 May 2006 03:20:52 -0500, Finn Gruwier Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Alexandro Colorado skrev:
For the past few weeks there has been a very big discussion about
reasons and what and why not does OOo doesn't come with a PIM. The
issue has extended a bit too much and I realize
Alexandro Colorado skrev:
For the past few weeks there has been a very big discussion about
reasons and what and why not does OOo doesn't come with a PIM. The issue
has extended a bit too much and I realize this is really puting a lot of
pressure on prooject such as the marketing list to come
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 21:53 -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> For the past few weeks there has been a very big discussion about reasons
> and what and why not does OOo doesn't come with a PIM. The issue has
> extended a bit too much and I realize this is really puting a lot of
> pressure on
Hi Alexandro,
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
For the past few weeks there has been a very big discussion about
reasons and what and why not does OOo doesn't come with a PIM. The
OK ...
issue has extended a bit too much and I realize this is really puting a
lot of pressure on prooject such as
For the past few weeks there has been a very big discussion about reasons
and what and why not does OOo doesn't come with a PIM. The issue has
extended a bit too much and I realize this is really puting a lot of
pressure on prooject such as the marketing list to come forward with
document
26 matches
Mail list logo
