Re: [VOTE] Establish a creation and retirement plan for plugins

+1 for the retirement part of the proposal but I'm a bit confused about icluding a creation plan (I haven't followed the discussion up to now though). The current procedure for adding new plugins IIRC is to first put it in the sandbox and then call a vote to promote it out of there. Is this

Re: [VOTE] Move Maven Changes Plugin to Java 5

+1 -Lukas Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi I have some features I'd like to work on for the Changes Plugin. To simplify the work I would like to start using Java 5 features, such as generics for collections. The last release was version 2.3 and after that no issues have been fixed, so I don't see

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.7

+1 -Lukas Kristian Rosenvold wrote: Highlights of the release: * Pluggable providers are now supported, as well as manual provider selection * 2.7 is significantly smaller and lighter than earlier 2.x versions (Only 30% of the download size) * A large chunk of the highest voted issues have bee

Re: [VOTE] Move Maven Changes Plugin to Java 5

On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:25:24 +0100 Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi > +1 (non binding) > I have some features I'd like to work on for the Changes Plugin. To > simplify the work I would like to start using Java 5 features, such as > generics for collections. > > The last release was version 2.3 and

Re: [VOTE] Establish a creation and retirement plan for plugins

I agree that the final release should be optional. I would also add that the site must be updated to say the plugin is retired whether it is moved somewhere else or not. Ralph On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > > On 16/12/2010, at 10:00 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > >> On 201

Re: [VOTE] Establish a creation and retirement plan for plugins

On Dec 15, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi > > No one objected to the proposal I made on November 1. Jason and I have > polished the proposal based on the comments that were made. The final > (?) version can be found here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Prop

Re: Cleanup to SNAPSHOT version handling

Or, 1-SNAPSHOT. Or, DO-NOT-RELEASE-1-SNAPSHOT On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Jörg Hohwiller wrote: > Hi there, > > FYI: > > I use "SNAPSHOT" as version for internal artifacts (site-configurations with > checkstyle, etc.) to denote that they will never get released. > However in such case one t

Re: Maven mirror status/problem

Hi Brian, > That page is garbage and should be dumped. The official list is > maintained in the repo itself: > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/.meta/repository-metadata.xml > thanks for clarification. I put the link on the wiki site as the wiki site itself is linked from various other sites. Rega

Re: Maven mirror status/problem

> Hi, Hi there, > > I guess I am one of those "scrapers". Could you please tell me how can I get > all pom files stored in the central repository? (I just need them for > research.) Should I setup a mirror? If so how can I do so? You can simply use a maven repository server such as nexus, artifa

Re: Cleanup to SNAPSHOT version handling

Hi there, FYI: I use "SNAPSHOT" as version for internal artifacts (site-configurations with checkstyle, etc.) to denote that they will never get released. However in such case one typically does not need real "SNAPSHOT" support by maven. I could also name the version "notversioned" or "0.0". Reg

Re: [VOTE] Establish a creation and retirement plan for plugins

On 16/12/2010, at 10:00 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > On 2010-12-15 23:03, Jesse Farinacci wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Proposal+--+A+creation+and+retirement+plan+for+plugins >> >>>

Re: Maven mirror status/problem

That page is garbage and should be dumped. The official list is maintained in the repo itself: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/.meta/repository-metadata.xml On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Jörg Hohwiller wrote: > Hi there, > > some people recommend to use a mirror for maven. Others are required t

Re: [VOTE] Establish a creation and retirement plan for plugins

On 2010-12-15 23:03, Jesse Farinacci wrote: > Greetings, > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Proposal+--+A+creation+and+retirement+plan+for+plugins > >>From the proposal: > > 2. Make one final release of the plugin

Re: Maven mirror status/problem

On 16/12/2010, at 7:32 AM, Jörg Hohwiller wrote: > 3. http://repo.exist.com/maven2/ > last_updated.txt: Tue Nov 23 22:30:45 CST 2010 > Not up-to-date... > > 4. http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2 > last_updated.txt: Tue Nov 30 22:54:22 CST 2010 > Not really up-to-date... These two wer

Re: [VOTE] Establish a creation and retirement plan for plugins

> > 2. Make one final release of the plugin before it is retired. This > allows us to make a clean break. The final release must change the POM > so that SCM URLs are removed or changed to reflect the decision made > in the vote. If the plugin is moved elsewhere a prominent notice must > be placed

Re: [VOTE] Establish a creation and retirement plan for plugins

Greetings, On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Proposal+--+A+creation+and+retirement+plan+for+plugins >From the proposal: 2. Make one final release of the plugin before it is retired. This allows us to make a clean break.

[VOTE] Establish a creation and retirement plan for plugins

Hi No one objected to the proposal I made on November 1. Jason and I have polished the proposal based on the comments that were made. The final (?) version can be found here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Proposal+--+A+creation+and+retirement+plan+for+plugins Please vote on w

Re: [VOTE] Move Maven Changes Plugin to Java 5

+1 (non-binding). Let's kill Merlin, Hopper&Mantis in the same shoot! :-). Cheers 2010/12/15 Kristian Rosenvold > +1 > > Den 15. des. 2010 kl. 20:26 skrev Dennis Lundberg : > > > Hi > > > > I have some features I'd like to work on for the Changes Plugin. To > > simplify the work I would like to

Re: Maven mirror status/problem

Hi, I guess I am one of those "scrapers". Could you please tell me how can I get all pom files stored in the central repository? (I just need them for research.) Should I setup a mirror? If so how can I do so? Thanks. On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 22:52, Jason van Zyl wrote: > The two that will alwa

Re: Maven mirror status/problem

The two that will always work are: http://uk.maven.org/maven2/ and http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/ Scrapers will definitely get blocked and stay blocked. But no normal user stays blocked if they inadvertently hit the tripwires. Only takes a short conversation, proving that the activity which c

Re: Maven mirror status/problem

On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Jörg Hohwiller wrote: > Hi there, > > some people recommend to use a mirror for maven. Others are required to as > their IP address has been blacklisted so they can not reach central > (repo1.maven.org) anymore. > > From what I know mirrors are listed here: > > h

Re: [VOTE] Move Maven Changes Plugin to Java 5

+1 On 15 December 2010 19:25, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi > > I have some features I'd like to work on for the Changes Plugin. To > simplify the work I would like to start using Java 5 features, such as > generics for collections. > > The last release was version 2.3 and after that no issues have

Maven mirror status/problem

Hi there, some people recommend to use a mirror for maven. Others are required to as their IP address has been blacklisted so they can not reach central (repo1.maven.org) anymore. >From what I know mirrors are listed here: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Mirrors+Repositories My feedb

Re: [VOTE] Move Maven Changes Plugin to Java 5

+1 2010/12/15 Dennis Lundberg : > Hi > > I have some features I'd like to work on for the Changes Plugin. To > simplify the work I would like to start using Java 5 features, such as > generics for collections. > > The last release was version 2.3 and after that no issues have been > fixed, so I do

Re: [VOTE] Move Maven Changes Plugin to Java 5

Dennis Lundberg wrote: I have some features I'd like to work on for the Changes Plugin. To simplify the work I would like to start using Java 5 features [...] +1 Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apac

Re: [VOTE] Move Maven Changes Plugin to Java 5

+1 Den 15. des. 2010 kl. 20:26 skrev Dennis Lundberg : > Hi > > I have some features I'd like to work on for the Changes Plugin. To > simplify the work I would like to start using Java 5 features, such as > generics for collections. > > The last release was version 2.3 and after that no issues ha

[VOTE] Move Maven Changes Plugin to Java 5

Hi I have some features I'd like to work on for the Changes Plugin. To simplify the work I would like to start using Java 5 features, such as generics for collections. The last release was version 2.3 and after that no issues have been fixed, so I don't see a reason to make a last Java 1.4 releas

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.7

Which clearly explains why, if we reduced the logging output level from DEBUG to WARN, the OOM did not occur with smaller values of -Xmx. That was baffling at the time... Wonderful fix. Thanks! :-) (this problem was the worst for release via parent pom; not happy to -DskipTests on release or i

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.7

Sorry for chatting on the vote thread here, but fixing the TeeStream memory leak probably also has a noticeable performance impact for users with large numbers of tests and/or lots of console output; It turned out for test number N, any stdout/stderr output would be duplicated into N tee-streams,

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.7

+1 (non-binding) We can finally run a full build with tests from the parent with this version (would OOM unless -Xmx was set to nearly 2G!). :-) On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:01 AM, chemit wrote: > On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:21:49 +0100 > Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > > +1 (none binding) > > Works fine

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.7 - No problem found, vote is still on

PEBKAC of the slightly embarrasing sort on my end. So the vote is on; happy testing! Kristian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: Regarding maven 3 integration with Hudson

take a look at Olivier blog about maven3 support on hudson http://olamy.blogspot.com/ 2010/12/15 amit pugalia > Hi, > > I'm facing issues when using Maven 3 with latest build of Hudson. > The maven plugin doesn't seem to be compatible with Maven 3. > It throws errors as, > > > C:\hudson1\home\pl

Re: Regarding maven 3 integration with Hudson

Artifactory plugin for Hudsonsupports Maven 3 builds (as free style projects). You can use it even if you're not using Artifactory. Yossi On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:32, amit pugalia wrote: > Hi, > > I'm facing issues when using Maven

Regarding maven 3 integration with Hudson

Hi, I'm facing issues when using Maven 3 with latest build of Hudson. The maven plugin doesn't seem to be compatible with Maven 3. It throws errors as, C:\hudson1\home\plugins\maven-plugin\WEB-INF\lib\maven-interceptor-1.389.jar 52039 Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.c

[VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.7; regression

I seem to have run across at least one case where failsafe does not properly fail a build with test failures. I'm looking into the problem. Although I'm not cancelling the vote right now, you may consider postponing further testing until I have determined the exact circumstances. It smells like a

Re: Simple Standalone Maven Indexer Example

One more question: Is it possible to query latest version of each distinct artifact? (Well, I can imagine how it can be done using SQL statements but not sure about Lucene and Nexus Indexer.) Regards, On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:54, Ersin ER wrote: > Thank yo very much. It's perfect! > > 2010/1

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.7

On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:21:49 +0100 Kristian Rosenvold wrote: +1 (none binding) Works fine on our project. Thanks! > Highlights of the release: > * Pluggable providers are now supported, as well as manual provider > selection > * 2.7 is significantly smaller and lighter than earlier 2.x version