Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
DefaultJavaToolChain? you mean the implementation? Can you give me pointers to the Tycho sources that use this API? (that's clearly not expected) I'm in favor of introducing deprecated DefaultJavaToolChain that extends the new implementation, which is easy to do: just need to understand how it

Re: https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-plugins/

2014-12-13 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Hervé, On 12/13/14 8:57 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: done as told in the doc [1] $ list_appgroups.pl hudson-jobadmin | grep marba khmarbaise This will give you more karma, but perhaps not everything you expected This is more than i expected ;-)...Thanks... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise

Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I can't reproduce the problem: see the logs in attachment can you give me more details? notice that from every changes we did on toolchains, the only expected visible change was on MNG-5718: custom toolchains need to be enhanced. MNG-5719 wasn't supposed to have any impact on Tycho or any

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Assembly Plugin version 2.5.3

2014-12-13 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Hi, We solved 21 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=20790styleName=HtmlprojectId=11126 This release is mostly focused on regressions and minor issues in the 2.5.X range. There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Assembly Plugin version 2.5.3

2014-12-13 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
As somewhat of an assembly-plugin tradition, there is a small error in the vote mail. We solved 9 issues. 21 issues was 2.5.2 :) Kristian 2014-12-13 10:33 GMT+01:00 Kristian Rosenvold krosenv...@apache.org: Hi, We solved 21 issues:

Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Igor Fedorenko
Are you able to run mvn validate on the attached project with staged maven 3.2.4 or current master? The log you attached is from maven 3.2.3. I've attached log from current master. -- Regards, Igor On 2014-12-13, 3:32, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: I can't reproduce the problem: see the logs in

Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
uh, stupid me, I answered too early in the morning ;) The problem is in pom.xml: the config is wrong configuration toolchains vendorfake/vendor /toolchains /configuration the result can be seen in the INFO message [INFO] Type:vendor With previous

Fwd: ApacheCon NA 2015 Travel Assistance Applications now open!

2014-12-13 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi to all, for you information about ApacheCON 2015...Travel Assistance Applications... Forwarded Message Subject:ApacheCon NA 2015 Travel Assistance Applications now open! Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 13:59:15 +0100 From: jan i j...@apache.org Reply-To: Maven

Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Igor Fedorenko
I just wanted to point out there was a change in behaviour between 3.2.3 and 3.2.4. If you this was expected/desired, I have no objections. -- Regards, Igor On 2014-12-13, 8:33, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: uh, stupid me, I answered too early in the morning ;) The problem is in pom.xml: the config is

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Igor Fedorenko
I've reintroduced DefaultJavaToolChain as deprecated extension of JavaToolchainImpl. All Tycho ITs pass now and I am not aware of any other regressions in maven 3.2.4. -- Regards, Igor On 2014-12-13, 3:13, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: DefaultJavaToolChain? you mean the implementation? Can you give me

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
ok, I had a look at Tycho sources: this is something introduced recently (10/10/2014): IIUC, Tycho 0.22.0 was released since then I'm surprised of tycho-core's ToolchainProvider: IIUC, that's a rewrite of a part of maven-toochains-plugin, depending on ToolchainManagerPrivate which is not part

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
MNG-5724 was pushed to 3.2.5 in Jira, but it was already modified in the code: either the Jira issue is copmpletely fixed, or code reverted, but the issue can't be postponed like this Regards, Hervé Le vendredi 12 décembre 2014 16:54:39 Jason van Zyl a écrit : Hi, Time to release Maven

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Igor Fedorenko
I've already reintroduced DefaultJavaToolChain and Tycho is happy now [1]. Tycho needs access to DefaultJavaToolChain#getJavaHome() which, to the best of my knowledge, is not available from any other API, is not available through ToolchainManager. I don't believe Tycho references JavaToolChain

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Assembly Plugin version 2.5.3

2014-12-13 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, tested with Maven 2.2.1, 3.0.5, 3.1.1, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3 and with the following combinations JDK-1.5-u22, JDK-1.6-u45, JDK-1.7-u40, JDK-1.8-u25 whereas Maven 3.2.X has not been tested with JDK 1.5...cause it needs at least Java 1.6. mvn -Prun-its clean verify no issues found so +1

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Jason van Zyl
The fixes have been made, I'll recut the release. On Dec 13, 2014, at 9:44 AM, Igor Fedorenko i...@ifedorenko.com wrote: I've already reintroduced DefaultJavaToolChain and Tycho is happy now [1]. Tycho needs access to DefaultJavaToolChain#getJavaHome() which, to the best of my knowledge, is

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
we need to choose what we do with http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5724 it is done, since we have Wagon 2.8, but it seems there is a debate if we need to remove commons-io, commons-lang, and jsoup jars, and possibly wagon- http-shared from maven distribution I don't have precise opinion

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I finally had a second deeper look at the issue, and chose to close it as fixed in Maven 3.2.4: details in the comments then there is no problem now to re-cut the release thanks Hervé Le samedi 13 décembre 2014 21:14:08 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : we need to choose what we do with

Re: [VOTE] Run-off for mascot's name

2014-12-13 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
H, K Regards, Hervé Le mardi 9 décembre 2014 10:52:14 Stephen Connolly a écrit : This is a run-off vote to select the top two options for our new mascot's name. The entries with the highest number of votes will be selected for the final round. If there is only one entry with the highest

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Stephen Connolly
Iirc we said not reusing version numbers after a .0 so this will be 3.2.5, yes? On Saturday, December 13, 2014, Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io wrote: The fixes have been made, I'll recut the release. On Dec 13, 2014, at 9:44 AM, Igor Fedorenko i...@ifedorenko.com javascript:; wrote: I've

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Jason van Zyl
No, it will be 3.2.4. On Dec 13, 2014, at 3:52 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: Iirc we said not reusing version numbers after a .0 so this will be 3.2.5, yes? On Saturday, December 13, 2014, Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io wrote: The fixes have been made, I'll

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Igor Fedorenko
Why? How will we tell the original broken binaries from the new ones? On December 13, 2014 4:01:31 PM EST, Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io wrote: No, it will be 3.2.4. On Dec 13, 2014, at 3:52 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: Iirc we said not reusing version numbers

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Paul Benedict
We agreed that each new recut is a new point release. Cheers, Paul On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Igor Fedorenko i...@ifedorenko.com wrote: Why? How will we tell the original broken binaries from the new ones? On December 13, 2014 4:01:31 PM EST, Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io wrote: No,

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Jason van Zyl
Have the thread handy? I honestly forget having to agreed to that. On Dec 13, 2014, at 5:05 PM, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote: We agreed that each new recut is a new point release. Cheers, Paul On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Igor Fedorenko i...@ifedorenko.com wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Jason van Zyl
I don't because it's inconsistent for external users who will be confused about where a release has gone. To date I have never skipped versions, for consistency I don't want to start now. I consider the staged releases not contributing to the public version pool. For your case I think you're

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Paul Benedict
When the 3.2.0 build had a regression, we jumped to 3.2.1: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/201402.mbox/%3cdf2f7f9e-9334-43d9-aa01-03733604b...@takari.io%3E Sorry I didn't provide this thread up front. It took a while to find it. However, I am pretty sure we did this again with

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Jason van Zyl
Sure, I never wanted to do it which is why I forgot and will likely continue to forget so I'll change the docs because I always have to look at them to figure out how to publish the site. I still think it's a inconsistent practice for the few it would inconvenience in a minor way. On Dec 13,

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Jason van Zyl
Documentation updated. On Dec 13, 2014, at 5:32 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io wrote: Sure, I never wanted to do it which is why I forgot and will likely continue to forget so I'll change the docs because I always have to look at them to figure out how to publish the site. I still think

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Paul Benedict
I can see your point. However, I don't think it's all that unusual for people to see skipped versions during upgrading anymore. For example, when a security issue is found in a GA product, the affected version is instantly pulled from distribution sites and a new version is published. Whether a

Releasing Maven Project Info Reports Plugin

2014-12-13 Thread Michael Osipov
Hi folks, I have been working recently on Maven Project Info Reports Plugin and fixed a bunch of issues. Those which are still open I requested participants to respond whether the issues are still valid. If no one responds, I will won't fix them. Has anyone of you an open issue he would

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2014-12-13 um 23:46 schrieb Paul Benedict: I can see your point. However, I don't think it's all that unusual for people to see skipped versions during upgrading anymore. For example, when a security issue is found in a GA product, the affected version is instantly pulled from distribution

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Paul Benedict
Not Maven central, distribution (download) sites like Apache's. Cheers, Paul On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Michael Osipov micha...@apache.org wrote: Am 2014-12-13 um 23:46 schrieb Paul Benedict: I can see your point. However, I don't think it's all that unusual for people to see skipped

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, we are here in a complete different situation. During the VOTE the artifacts are stored in a stage repository which can simply being dropped (Which is the idea of those staged repository). The only thing which is needed to be fixed is the SCM Tag (Git, SVN...). This can be done If

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2014-12-13 um 23:52 schrieb Paul Benedict: Not Maven central, distribution (download) sites like Apache's. I am aware of that but if something has gone GA, it is on Central. Otherwise the term 'GA' wouldn't hold true. Michael

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Paul Benedict
Apache uses GA to mean a classification of a release; I don't mean it in some sort of generalized sense. You can revoke the status of a release. Whether you can erase it from everywhere it's been, that's another matter (and not possible from Central, right). Cheers, Paul On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Jeff Jensen
While I agree with your assessment Paul, the problem with upgrading non-sequential release numbers that I encounter with some of my customers (the larger organizations or ones with regulated products [think medical]) is it usually causes some confusion (we're on version n.2 and I see n.8 but

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.2.4 Release

2014-12-13 Thread Benson Margulies
If people really don't want to end up skipping numbers, and also people also don't want to recreate tags, there are solutions. For example, Lucene recognizes that serious testing of snapshots just never happens. So, the release manager starts by doing the full release process for X.Y.Z-RC1. And