I think this is the issue I was referring too. I just know that I
can't use a snapshot dependency that has a timestamp in its filename
or I won't get the last version. I remember Brett couple of months ago
saying this feature wasn't implemented yet. I'll try to find the JIRA
issue.
This is
Here's the issue I am speaking about :
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2289
On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this is the issue I was referring too. I just know that I
can't use a snapshot dependency that has a timestamp in its filename
or I won't get the last
Oops wrong one, forget the last email.
On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's the issue I am speaking about :
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2289
On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this is the issue I was referring too. I just know that
That's the real one :
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1908
On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops wrong one, forget the last email.
On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's the issue I am speaking about :
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2289
That's the opposite to what you keep saying. It's when you *don't*
have a timestamp in the version number.
I could have sworn John fixed this recently, though...
On 19/09/2006, at 1:16 AM, Alexandre Poitras wrote:
That's the real one :
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1908
On 9/18/06,
Oh sorry I was sure it was when you have a timestamp in your filename.
Maybe I should test it again. Anyway, I just think there should a big
note on the web site about this issue somewhere until the new version
is released because it's really confusing at first. I spent a lot of
time figuring out
Alexandre Poitras wrote:
I think this is the issue I was referring too. I just know that I
can't use a snapshot dependency that has a timestamp in its filename
or I won't get the last version. I remember Brett couple of months ago
saying this feature wasn't implemented yet. I'll try to find the
Yup it works now but I remember it took me a lot of time to make it happen.
On 9/18/06, David J. M. Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexandre Poitras wrote:
I think this is the issue I was referring too. I just know that I
can't use a snapshot dependency that has a timestamp in its filename
Another thing I would like to see fixed is the snapshot apache
repository. Nighlty builds are still deployed using a unique version
identifier. This feature doesn't work and this is why a lot of people
have trouble when it's come to snapshot dependencies. It should be
written very big somewhere
On 18/09/2006, at 12:40 AM, Alexandre Poitras wrote:
Another thing I would like to see fixed is the snapshot apache
repository. Nighlty builds are still deployed using a unique version
identifier. This feature doesn't work and this is why a lot of people
have trouble when it's come to snapshot
On 9/17/06, Alexandre Poitras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another thing I would like to see fixed is the snapshot apache
repository. Nighlty builds are still deployed using a unique version
identifier. This feature doesn't work and this is why a lot of people
have trouble when it's come to
On 30/08/2006, at 6:10 AM, Wendell Beckwith wrote:
For my team, I have been using, with minor adaptations, the eclipse
dev
process and in general I think it has the right amount of
agility. We
post our plan early with our commited, proposed, deferred and
rejected items
for the next
On 9/4/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/08/2006, at 6:10 AM, Wendell Beckwith wrote:
For my team, I have been using, with minor adaptations, the eclipse
dev
process and in general I think it has the right amount of
agility. We
post our plan early with our commited,
(Since you didn't mention it) CruiseControl works really well for us, if you
need something now.
-Original Message-
From: Wendell Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 11:41 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [RANT] Maven is both heaven and hell
Sorry, I did walk away there for a little bit.
On 8/27/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28/08/2006, at 7:14 AM, Wendell Beckwith wrote:
Take toady's latest example, say you want to remove an ant build
file and do
things the maven way, so you decide to use the dependency
Good day,
About a couple of months ago, the documentation site of the maven 2
plugins have been revised [1]. Though most have already been reviewed,
they are still not yet out for release.
However, now that the documentation issue have been raised again, I am
wondering of how we are going to go
I primarily deal with 2 open source organizations, Apache and Eclipse. To a
lesser degree, I also interact with tigris.org for subversion and subclipse,
springframework.org for more and more each week it seems and a few other
.org organizations. I like to think I grok open source software and
Wendell Beckwith wrote:
You're like
original band members, but it hurts to say that you all are getting your
asses handed to you by orgs like Spring and Eclipse. There just doing a
far
better job on the dcomentation and website.
Having used maven1 for a long time (and having been blown
I'm curious... what key maven1 features are you referring to that
have not been completed in maven2?
--jason
On Aug 27, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Wendell Beckwith wrote:
You're like
original band members, but it hurts to say that you all are
getting your
asses handed to
Jason Dillon wrote:
I'm curious... what key maven1 features are you referring to that have
not been completed in maven2?
Some specific ones that bit us were the inability to embed dependencies
into EJBs, and the EAR plugin's inability to handle Jboss specific
artifacts, like HAR files. We
On 28/08/2006, at 7:14 AM, Wendell Beckwith wrote:
Take toady's latest example, say you want to remove an ant build
file and do
things the maven way, so you decide to use the dependency plugin.
The web
site examples have the group and artifactId being
21 matches
Mail list logo
