This particular assembly descriptor is a one-time case for the assembly
plugin only. It's not the one that Brian was talking about, since that
one will have to be much more generalized to handle the variability of
other projects. In this case, I know that the build directory for the
assembly
Is this still happening with maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-4?
Barrie Treloar wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:11 AM, John Caseyjdca...@commonjava.org wrote:
I had to include these files for the recent maven-assembly-plugin release.
It was fairly simple, just take a look at this:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM, John Caseyjdca...@commonjava.org wrote:
Is this still happening with maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-4?
It was 2.2-beta-2, I'll check -4
Barrie Treloar wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:11 AM, John Caseyjdca...@commonjava.org
wrote:
I had to include these
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Barrie Treloarbaerr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM, John Caseyjdca...@commonjava.org wrote:
Is this still happening with maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-4?
It was 2.2-beta-2, I'll check -4
2.2-beta-4 behaves correctly.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Barrie Treloarbaerr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Barrie Treloarbaerr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM, John Caseyjdca...@commonjava.org wrote:
Is this still happening with maven-assembly-plugin 2.2-beta-4?
It was
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:22 AM, David Jencksdavid_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:59 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
Update:
The new assembly plugin and the regex in the source bundle seem to be
working great. I have just one thing to resolve that I had previously
overlooked: The source
I had to include these files for the recent maven-assembly-plugin
release. It was fairly simple, just take a look at this:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-assembly-plugin/src/main/assembly/source-release.xml
-john
Brian Fox wrote:
Update:
The new assembly plugin and
On Jun 11, 2009, at 4:52 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:22 AM, David
Jencksdavid_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:59 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
Update:
The new assembly plugin and the regex in the source bundle seem to
be
working great. I have just one thing to
Well, I'm not sure what to say about that. I guess I could say if it's
not on the release docs, it's not policy? It's a little frustrating to
constantly chase a standard that isn't documented and which there are
many opinions of. I'll solve this particular problem of the source
release for now. I
On Jun 11, 2009, at 9:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jun 11, 2009, at 4:52 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:22 AM, David
Jencksdavid_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:59 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
Update:
The new assembly plugin and the regex in the source bundle
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:11 AM, John Caseyjdca...@commonjava.org wrote:
I had to include these files for the recent maven-assembly-plugin release.
It was fairly simple, just take a look at this:
Update:
The new assembly plugin and the regex in the source bundle seem to be
working great. I have just one thing to resolve that I had previously
overlooked: The source archive must also contain license and notice
files, even if svn doesn't. I need to understand better the default
resource
Just to bring the thread back up in light of the recent discussions of
plugin releases:
John has taken over the assembly release that contains the fix I put in for
the ASF stuff. I've been travelling a lot the past two weeks and haven't
progressed much on the poms. Tomorrow or monday I should have
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
On 26/05/2009, at 11:11 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
We're fixing the directoryscanner to allow regular expressions in addition
to the ant syntax.
Cool, but that's another release in the chain, right?
It's already to go,
Brian Fox wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
On 26/05/2009, at 11:11 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
We're fixing the directoryscanner to allow regular expressions in addition
to the ant syntax.
Cool, but that's another release in the chain, right?
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:25 PM, John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org wrote:
Brian Fox wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
On 26/05/2009, at 11:11 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
We're fixing the directoryscanner to allow regular expressions in
addition
We're fixing the directoryscanner to allow regular expressions in addition
to the ant syntax. Then we can do (?!.*/src/.*).*/target/.*
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
How about an option excludeBuildDirectoriestrue/excludeBuildDirectories
that uses the
On 26/05/2009, at 11:11 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
We're fixing the directoryscanner to allow regular expressions in
addition
to the ant syntax.
Cool, but that's another release in the chain, right?
Then we can do (?!.*/src/.*).*/target/.*
Ew :)
What if the build directory isn't target?
On 27/05/2009, at 3:18 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 26/05/2009, at 11:11 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
We're fixing the directoryscanner to allow regular expressions in
addition
to the ant syntax.
Cool, but that's another release in the chain, right?
Then we can do (?!.*/src/.*).*/target/.*
Ew
How about an option excludeBuildDirectoriestrue/
excludeBuildDirectories that uses the list of build directories from
all projects in the reactor an applies that to the fileset excludes?
It could be either descriptor-wide, or per-fileset I guess.
Short of that, I'd say to get it off the
Introducing the configurability in the descriptor itself requires more
changes to the assembly code than I think we should tackle right now. I also
think we should strive to build a descriptor that works for all projects to
the extent possible. That said, I'll make a property in the plugin config
Brian Fox wrote:
It's been a little slow going, but here's an update of where I'm at:
I branched assembly 2.2-beta-4-SNAPSHOT[1] from the 2.2-beta-3 tag and
renamed the trunk to 2.2-beta-5. The runOnlyOnExecutionRoot flag has been
added to 2.2-beta-4 (MASSEMBLY-406). I created a custom
On 18/05/2009, at 10:57 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
The current descriptor produces tar.gz and zip, does anyone have
strong
feelings if this is ok or should we go with only one of them? (and
which
one?)
Why drop .bz2 in the first place?
We have been using .bz2, .tar.gz and .zip based distro
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
Brian Fox wrote:
It's been a little slow going, but here's an update of where I'm at:
I branched assembly 2.2-beta-4-SNAPSHOT[1] from the 2.2-beta-3 tag and
renamed the trunk to 2.2-beta-5. The runOnlyOnExecutionRoot flag has
Brian Fox wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
Brian Fox wrote:
It's been a little slow going, but here's an update of where I'm at:
I branched assembly 2.2-beta-4-SNAPSHOT[1] from the 2.2-beta-3 tag and
renamed the trunk to 2.2-beta-5. The
It's been a little slow going, but here's an update of where I'm at:
I branched assembly 2.2-beta-4-SNAPSHOT[1] from the 2.2-beta-3 tag and
renamed the trunk to 2.2-beta-5. The runOnlyOnExecutionRoot flag has been
added to 2.2-beta-4 (MASSEMBLY-406). I created a custom descriptor bundle[2]
to be
Could I ask what's going to happen after you get the assembly plugin
improved? Will there be an apache 7 pom or, how else would we get
this new functionality?
thanks
david jencks
On May 7, 2009, at 8:13 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
I just need to finish the ITs.
--Brian (mobile)
On May 7,
My plan is to implement the packaging in the maven pom and then later
promote it to the apache pom once any kinks are worked out.
--Brian (mobile)
On May 8, 2009, at 8:17 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
Could I ask what's going to happen after you get the assembly plugin
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
On 05/05/2009, at 11:01 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
To make this happen relatively quickly, I'll take finish my patch by
adding tests, and then stage a release of the assembly plugin 2.2-beta-3.1
by applying only this patch to
I just need to finish the ITs.
--Brian (mobile)
On May 7, 2009, at 10:45 PM, Stephane Nicoll
stephane.nic...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
On 05/05/2009, at 11:01 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
To make this happen relatively quickly, I'll
. Mai 2009, 03:01:25 Uhr
Betreff: Update on ASF Release requirements
There have been a few threads spawned on various ASF lists lately about the
release process at the ASF and Maven projects and other Apache projects that
use
Maven being compliant.
A documentation patch for the release page
: Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu
An: dev@maven.apache.org
Gesendet: Dienstag, den 5. Mai 2009, 03:01:25 Uhr
Betreff: Update on ASF Release requirements
There have been a few threads spawned on various ASF lists lately about the
release process at the ASF and Maven projects and other Apache projects
There have been a few threads spawned on various ASF lists lately about
the release process at the ASF and Maven projects and other Apache
projects that use Maven being compliant.
A documentation patch for the release page at
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html is pending, but it's close
On 05/05/2009, at 11:01 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
To make this happen relatively quickly, I'll take finish my patch by
adding tests, and then stage a release of the assembly plugin 2.2-
beta-3.1 by applying only this patch to the existing beta-3 tag so
we can cut a release without a bunch of
34 matches
Mail list logo
