Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
what matters more, IMO, would be micro releases of the core
plugins.
I agree very much here.
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yep, I understand the intent and that is good. A reasonable interval(?)
for micro releases should be fine.
I'd be quite happy about more releases of Maven in its current state.
However, what matters more, IMO, would be micro releases of the core
plugins.
Jochen
--
How fast can a year go? As f
yl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday,
January 11, 2007 1:32 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: calling vote for 2.0.5
On 11 Jan 07, at 1:16 PM 11 Jan 07, Rahul Thakur wrote:
+1 for releasing 2.0.5
+0 for micro releases. I agree with Trygve's comment that too
frequent o
Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 1:32 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: calling vote for 2.0.5
On 11 Jan 07, at 1:16 PM 11 Jan 07, Rahul Thakur wrote:
+1 for releasing 2.0.5
+0 for micro releases. I agree with Trygve's comment that too
frequent of
"Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List"
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 11:20 AM
Subject: calling vote for 2.0.5
Hi,
I want to call a vote for 2.0.5. All the issues that are going to
get done are done. We'll release and move on.
I wo
Regardless of these process issues, I should add that I'm all for
getting a release out. Congrats to the team on feeling things are
stable enough to go out and thanks for all the hard work put into
other areas of the project.
Brian
On Jan 11, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Brian Topping wrote:
I'm in
ems more realistic, but I just don't see that
more frequent releases really hurts anyone.
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 1:32 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: calling vote for 2.0.5
On 11 Jan 07, at 1:16 PM 1
e frequently in an official form so
people can use them.
Jason.
Cheers,
Rahul
- Original Message - From: "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List"
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 11:20 AM
Subject: calling vote for 2.0.5
Hi,
I want
pers List"
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 11:20 AM
Subject: calling vote for 2.0.5
Hi,
I want to call a vote for 2.0.5. All the issues that are going to get
done are done. We'll release and move on.
I would like to start building all releases from a standard machine
with the s
+1 from me. For practical purposes, we can control a single environment much
more easily (eg. removing the local repository before we build a release, or
making sure it's built on JDK 1.4) than N developer boxes. Even if the
builds are 100% reproducible, it's not a bad idea to have a clean
environ
I'm in a similar situation with patches I've provided. Some have
integration tests as well, as requested. No comments have been made
on any of the patches, they are months old.
They might not seem important, but we had to throw away our entire
Maven investment at a company I am at, after
+1
Andy
On 10 Jan 2007, at 22:20, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
I want to call a vote for 2.0.5. All the issues that are going to
get done are done. We'll release and move on.
I would like to start building all releases from a standard machine
with the same JDK. I would like to propose the m
+1
--
Regards,
Garvin LeClaire
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/11/07, Tom Huybrechts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can't you "solve" this with -Dhttps.proxyHost=xxx -Dhttps.proxyPort=... ?
On 1/11/07, Franz Fehringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will this release contain solutions to
>
> MNG-2305
>
+1
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 4:24 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: calling vote for 2.0.5
Agree to the plan.
Emmanuel
Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I want to call a vote for 2.0.5
Good Idea (tm) Jason. I'm glad you are making a "production release
environment".
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 8:42 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: calling vote for 2.0.5
On 11 Jan 07, at 8:
On 11 Jan 07, at 8:56 AM 11 Jan 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
I really don't care what machine builds the release.
Maven is supposed to be able to make reproducible builds so it
shouldn't
matter where you build from.
You know as well as I do that isn't the case quite yet. The reduction
of
I really don't care what machine builds the release.
Maven is supposed to be able to make reproducible builds so it shouldn't
matter where you build from.
The only problem will be the contents of the local repository (snapshots),
which will be a problem on any machine.
I suppose you're going to
Hello,
WAGONHTTP-6 and MNG-2066 are already resolved; the fixes only need to be
incorporated in the 2.0.5 (or 2.0.6) release.
MNG-2305 should then also be resolved.
Greetings
Franz
Tom Huybrechts schrieb:
Can't you "solve" this with -Dhttps.proxyHost=xxx -Dhttps.proxyPort=... ?
On 1/11/07
In M2_OPTS (or where else?)?
Franz
Tom Huybrechts schrieb:
Can't you "solve" this with -Dhttps.proxyHost=xxx -Dhttps.proxyPort=... ?
On 1/11/07, Franz Fehringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Will this release contain solutions to
MNG-2305
MNG-2066
WAGONHTTP-6
?
These issues mean, that it is
Can't you "solve" this with -Dhttps.proxyHost=xxx -Dhttps.proxyPort=... ?
On 1/11/07, Franz Fehringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Will this release contain solutions to
MNG-2305
MNG-2066
WAGONHTTP-6
?
These issues mean, that it is impossible to access HTTPS (SSL)
repositories from behind proxi
Agree to the plan.
Emmanuel
Jason van Zyl a écrit :
Hi,
I want to call a vote for 2.0.5. All the issues that are going to get
done are done. We'll release and move on.
I would like to start building all releases from a standard machine with
the same JDK. I would like to propose the maven.o
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
I want to call a vote for 2.0.5. All the issues that are going to get
done are done. We'll release and move on.
I would like to start building all releases from a standard machine with
the same JDK. I would like to propose the maven.org machine which is
monitored 24
Will this release contain solutions to
MNG-2305
MNG-2066
WAGONHTTP-6
?
These issues mean, that it is impossible to access HTTPS (SSL)
repositories from behind proxies/firewalls (i.e. from corporate networks).
Thanks and greetings
Franz
Jason van Zyl schrieb:
Hi,
I want to call a vote fo
Ralph Goers wrote on Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:38 AM:
> Well, if you absolutely positively promise to release 2.0.6 when
> MNG-1577 is applied ;-) . Seriously, it has been rather frustrating
> as I can't even use Maven 2 without that fix.
Yeah, not another 9 months please, I've reported this
On 11 Jan 07, at 12:37 AM 11 Jan 07, Ralph Goers wrote:
Well, if you absolutely positively promise to release 2.0.6 when
MNG-1577 is applied ;-) . Seriously, it has been rather
frustrating as I can't even use Maven 2 without that fix.
I'm sure if you and Mike work together then I can hel
Well, if you absolutely positively promise to release 2.0.6 when
MNG-1577 is applied ;-) . Seriously, it has been rather frustrating as
I can't even use Maven 2 without that fix.
Ralph
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
I want to call a vote for 2.0.5. All the issues that are going to get
done are d
+1 from me.
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 5:20 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: calling vote for 2.0.5
Hi,
I want to call a vote for 2.0.5. All the issues that are going to get
done are done. We'll release and move on
will have the benefit of being setup and ready to go so new
releasers won't have as high a hurdle to jump in and help.
+1 from me.
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 5:20 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: calling vote
Agreed to the plan - thanks for getting this moving.
(Presuming this is not an actual vote though)
- Brett
On 11/01/2007, at 9:20 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
I want to call a vote for 2.0.5. All the issues that are going to
get done are done. We'll release and move on.
I would like to s
I haven't called the vote yet, just wanted to settle on picking a
machine to dispatch it from.
It's coming, it's coming :-)
jason.
On 10 Jan 07, at 5:20 PM 10 Jan 07, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
I want to call a vote for 2.0.5. All the issues that are going to
get done are done. We'll rele
+1
I'm all for more frequent releases. I believe the 2.0.5 snapshot
works ok with our build. Ship it!
On 1/10/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I want to call a vote for 2.0.5. All the issues that are going to get
done are done. We'll release and move on.
I would like to star
Hi,
I want to call a vote for 2.0.5. All the issues that are going to get
done are done. We'll release and move on.
I would like to start building all releases from a standard machine
with the same JDK. I would like to propose the maven.org machine
which is monitored 24/7 running Linux. I
32 matches
Mail list logo
