On Sep 29, 2012, at 8:28 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 9/29/12 8:01 PM, Alan D. Cabrera a écrit :
Seems like overkill. Anyone mind if I remove it and move
trunk/tags/branches into a new mina directory?
No, go ahead (if nobody objects -lazzy consensus, etc...).
I need to update
It seems a bit redundant. What problem is it solving?
Regards,
Alan
Should we add an exclude in the POM?
Regards,
Alan
Seems like overkill. Anyone mind if I remove it and move trunk/tags/branches
into a new mina directory?
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 29, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
I wonder if it was not just to generate the sources jar...
Le 29 sept. 2012 16:23, Alan D. Cabrera l
+1 - nonbinding
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 21, 2012, at 9:02 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi !
This is the second attempt to release new version of MINA. This is a bug fix
release, we tried to clean a lot of pending issues.
Fixed issues :
* [DIRMINA-539
I can't get
mvn rat:check
to pass. Do we care?
I randomly checked signatures and hashes and things look good.
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 21, 2012, at 9:02 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi !
This is the second attempt to release new version of MINA. This is a bug fix
release, we tried to
On Aug 21, 2012, at 10:50 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 8/22/12 6:17 AM, Alan D. Cabrera a écrit :
I can't get
mvn rat:check
mvn apache-rat:chack
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.8:check
(default-cli) on project mina-parent: Too many unapproved
Can you provide more detail as to what is needed and where?
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 4, 2011, at 10:22 PM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
Yes I know, it's badly worded. What I mean is manage this write future
in the IO loop, it's not trivial.
Julien
On Mon
There already is an implementation, org.apache.mina.util.AbstractIoFutureV.
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 4, 2011, at 3:40 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
It's a future we actually have on session.write(...) but I think we
need to think about the usefulness and the design first. Anyway I'm a
bit busy
Just curious.
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 27, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 26, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/27/11 2:04 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
simply because you can't move to the next filter unless you have transformed
what you've got from the previous filter. If we exclude all
On Aug 28, 2011, at 10:44 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/28/11 6:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 27, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I took a bit of time to start fleshing out an LDAP server and now know why
we've been back and forth so often. You are using an FSM
On Aug 26, 2011, at 4:20 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/26/11 12:57 PM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi !
I would like to use google guava for core MINA functionalities.
Possible usages :
Immutable List :
On Aug 26, 2011, at 4:14 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
I modified the API to remove IoFilterChain. Now you are supposed to
give a list of filter to the service before starting it :
// create the fitler chain for this service
ListIoFilter filters = new ArrayListIoFilter();
filters.add(new
But shouldn't branches/2.0.5 be named branches/2.0?
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 26, 2011, at 6:40 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Aug 26, 2011, at 4:14 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
I modified the API to remove IoFilterChain. Now you are supposed to
give a list of filter
On Aug 26, 2011, at 7:12 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 8/26/11 3:44 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 26, 2011, at 6:40 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Alan D. Cabreral
On Aug 26, 2011, at 7:47 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/26/11 4:28 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 26, 2011, at 7:12 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 8/26/11 3:44 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 26, 2011
...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 8/26/11 3:44 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 26, 2011, at 6:40 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Alan D. Cabreral...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
On Aug 26, 2011, at 4:14 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
I modified the API to remove
On Aug 26, 2011, at 8:12 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/26/11 4:55 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 26, 2011, at 7:47 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/26/11 4:28 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 26, 2011, at 7:12 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 4:07 PM
On Aug 26, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
De : Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com
À : dev@mina.apache.org
Envoyé le : Vendredi 26 Août 2011 17h12
Objet : Re: [MINA 3.0] filter chains
On 8/26/11 4:55 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 26, 2011, at 7:47 AM, Emmanuel
On Aug 26, 2011, at 9:10 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/26/11 6:03 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 26, 2011, at 8:12 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/26/11 4:55 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 26, 2011, at 7:47 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/26/11 4:28 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
On Aug 26, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 8/26/11 6:03 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 26, 2011, at 8:12 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/26/11 4:55 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 26
On Aug 26, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/26/11 6:16 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 26, 2011, at 9:10 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/26/11 6:03 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 26, 2011, at 8:12 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
theory
In a FSM, you transit from Si
On Aug 26, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/26/11 7:22 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 26, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
What I have in mind is much more something like :
void messageReceived( context )
{
... // do something, updating the context
On Aug 26, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/26/11 8:47 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 26, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/26/11 7:22 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 26, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
What I have in mind is much more
On Aug 24, 2011, at 6:10 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
But i'm feeling more and more confused by the fsm
On Aug 24, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
On 8/21/11 11:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
for mina 3 i indeed was wondering if somehow we could use @ to prevent
bloated FSM declaration code and found this interesting
Sounds good.
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 24, 2011, at 6:12 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi,
Since 2.X dev are done in specific branches, I would like to move 3.0
dev from the 3.0 branch to trunk for giving it more visibility.
WDYT ?
Julien
implementer. I think the small handful
of API interfaces is the bears this out.
Regards,
Alan
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
Wow, I totally forgot about these pages.
There's been a fair bit of discussion on this topic on the mailing list
On Aug 20, 2011, at 11:47 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/21/11 2:09 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Wow, I totally forgot about these pages.
There's been a fair bit of discussion on this topic on the mailing list
before, this being the need for dynamically modifying filter chains
On Aug 21, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/21/11 6:25 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 20, 2011, at 11:47 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
MINA 2.0 currently has a this functionality, and frankly, it kills when it
comes to debug an application. A debugging session becomes
On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
On Aug 20, 2011, at 11:47 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/21/11 2:09 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Wow, I totally forgot about these pages.
There's been a fair bit of discussion on this topic on the mailing list
before
you need to pass the local chain index because you can
store it locally in the filter chain. Perhaps there is something
smarter to do, because it's the dark point of this API.
Julien
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
Why do we pass the current
.
Julien
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
Why do we pass the current position? We also seem to pass it twice in the
method and the controller.
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 19, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Ok I committed
On Aug 20, 2011, at 4:32 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
We shouldn't systematically copy the chain in the session as imho it's not so
usual to dynamically add filters in one particular session (the first case
that comes to my mind is dynamically protecting the session with ssl but it
On Aug 20, 2011, at 3:59 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote:
On 8/19/11 2:26 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 19, 2011, at 5:19 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/19/11 2:16 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I'm wondering
On Aug 19, 2011, at 4:53 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/19/11 2:29 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 19, 2011, at 5:16 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/19/11 1:55 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 19, 2011, at 4:16 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi,
I implemented some really simple
Consensus? Really?
On Aug 20, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hmm consensus about copy on write chain is already here no ? Wanna try
to implements ? ;)
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Edouard De Oliveira
doe_wan...@yahoo.fr wrote:
We shouldn't systematically copy the chain
?
Julien
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
Consensus? Really?
On Aug 20, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hmm consensus about copy on write chain is already here no ? Wanna try
to implements ? ;)
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:32 PM
On Aug 19, 2011, at 4:16 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi,
I implemented some really simple chain for MINA 3 based on a list of
chain processed by a filter chain.
The implementation is very simple, sounded like a good idea :
I'm wondering. Do you guys think it's a good idea? It seems to make things
pretty complicated and adds another dimension to groking the behavior of your
service. I'm not sure that it's necessary.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 19, 2011, at 5:19 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/19/11 2:16 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I'm wondering. Do you guys think it's a good idea? It seems to make things
pretty complicated and adds another dimension to groking the behavior of
your service. I'm not sure that it's
On Aug 19, 2011, at 5:16 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 8/19/11 1:55 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Aug 19, 2011, at 4:16 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi,
I implemented some really simple chain for MINA 3 based on a list of
chain processed by a filter chain.
The implementation is very
Why do we pass the current position? We also seem to pass it twice in the
method and the controller.
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 19, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Ok I committed the modification, for passing a chain controller to the
filter for delegating the call to next filter.
Sounds pretty cool. Want to work on it? :)
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 11, 2011, at 11:55 AM, JOSE FELIX HERNANDEZ BARRIO wrote:
Is there any plan to support client pki authentication?
On Jul 11, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
That makes sense but wouldn't the implementation of IoFilter catch the
exception and do the required task within the context of the error? Why let
On Jul 12, 2011, at 12:55 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Niklas Gustavsson
nik...@protocol7.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
That makes sense but wouldn't the implementation of IoFilter catch
On Jul 10, 2011, at 10:23 PM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
What would a user put as an implementation to this method? I'm wondering
how useful it is.
Regards,
Alan
I use to close session
On Jul 11, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 7/11/11 7:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 10, 2011, at 10:23 PM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Alan D. Cabreral...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
What would a user put as an implementation to this method
On Jul 11, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
Is there a concrete use case where this is necessary? If a filter barfs
What would a user put as an implementation to this method? I'm wondering how
useful it is.
Regards,
Alan
What do you guys think about moving all the interfaces into an API package?
Regards,
Alan
way too many of them; an artifact of pre-generics days
I imagine. Hope that's ok with you all.
Regards,
Alan
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
General comment. I don't see the need for a class IoFilterChain. List
seems to be perfectly
There seem to be a number of ways people seem to be participating in the v3.0
version of Mina.
I have been putting my ideas in a sandbox so that people could review them
before I put them into the 3.0 branch. Others seem to be just checking their
stuff in.
Should I just start checking
General comment. I don't see the need for a class IoFilterChain. List seems
to be perfectly acceptable.
On Jul 3, 2011, at 10:05 PM, Ashish wrote:
Minor comments
1. Do we want to have a check if the filter is already added or we just
leave it to user?
One may want to put
On Jun 30, 2011, at 4:13 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 6/30/11 9:52 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jun 30, 2011, at 2:42 AM, Ashish wrote:
snip/
This does meet some of our requirements, but not all. We can have something
similar to this and instead of returning true/false
from Filters
On Jul 1, 2011, at 8:04 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 7/1/11 4:59 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jun 30, 2011, at 4:13 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 6/30/11 9:52 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jun 30, 2011, at 2:42 AM, Ashish wrote:
snip/
This does meet some of our requirements
On Jul 1, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 7/1/11 5:47 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 1, 2011, at 8:04 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
But all in all, in this case, the chain of filters will *be* a state
machine.
And here is my point. They all are really state machines
On Jun 30, 2011, at 12:17 AM, Ashish wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny
elecha...@gmail.comwrote:
On 6/30/11 8:11 AM, Ashish wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Julien
Vermillardjvermillard@gmail.**comjvermill...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi !
Just a few heads
to decide who gets called next.
Regards,
Alan
thanks
ashish
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.comwrote:
On Dec 15, 2009, at 4:30 AM, Emmanuel LŽcharny wrote:
Hi,
there is another approach if we switch to a SM : actions don't need to
know about the next
On Jun 16, 2011, at 1:23 PM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi,
Answer inline
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
Very cool! I have a few questions.
Why have a class for WriteQueue and not simply use QueueWriteRequest?
Was my first thought
On Jun 6, 2011, at 2:46 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi !
Just a few heads up on current work on MINA 3.
As stated before, we are re-writing from scratch (but using MINA well
know interface/concepts) a simple NIO TCP server for experimenting
different strategy around NIO selector.
The
Makes sense to me.
Regards,
Alan
On May 23, 2011, at 3:20 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi,
It's not a formal vote :)
Should we release 2.0.4 or you see some forgotten bug to squizz ?
Julien
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Oct 22, 2010, at 10:19 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi,
a serious regression has been found in MINA 2.0.0. It has been fixed in 2.0.1
and I suggest we vote a release.
Here is the regression description :
* [DIRMINA-803
Rat fails. I also don't see the fix in trunk.
Regards,
Alan
On Oct 22, 2010, at 10:19 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi,
a serious regression has been found in MINA 2.0.0. It has been fixed in 2.0.1
and I suggest we vote a release.
Here is the regression description :
*
Rat fails on this release.
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 27, 2010, at 1:12 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
Hi
I've fixed the bug discovered by Sai and the license header reported
by Emmanuel. New binaries at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-016
These are based
Odd, I get
[INFO] Too many unapproved licenses: 13
but when I look at the report I see the same thing you claim. Odd.
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Alan
On Oct 1, 2010, at 1:32 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
Rat fails
+1 (yay!)
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 21, 2010, at 3:55 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi,
After Alan found that there were some missing ASL headers in the last
released version, the latest vote has been reverted, and I just released MINA
again (after having checked that we don't have any
Rat complains:
Too many unapproved licenses: 613
Should we be concerned?
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 17, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi,
The last version of MINA (2.0.0) has been released !
Here are the complete release notes from JIRA:
Bug
* [DIRMINA-539
On Sep 20, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 9/20/10 8:18 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Rat complains:
Too many unapproved licenses: 613
Should we be concerned?
Rat must be drunk like a rat. We only have 561 java files, plus a few .xml
files.
Do you have a log ?
All I
On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 9/20/10 9:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Sep 20, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
All I did was
mvn rat:check -fn
To get the full report, one should do mvn site and get the report from
target/site/rat-report.html
Here's the Jira link for this version if you'd like to review issues in more
details:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10670styleName=Htmlversion=12313701
A temporary tag has been created (it can be removed if the vote is not
approved):
+1
Regards,
Alan
On May 31, 2010, at 12:11 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi guys,
we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing
on windows. Maarten has provided a working version of this test, I'm
now wondering if we should not release 2.0, instead of waiting
On May 31, 2010, at 9:38 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi guys,
I don't know how possibly we were able to release MINA in the past,
but I must admit it's a nightmare. I spent the full afternoon trying
to get the packages generated and the 2.0.0 tags to be created, with
no success.
Not
The project can definitely be cleaned up.
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 1, 2010, at 9:33 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi guys,
we have a parent module which is most certainly useless. I suggest
we get rid of it.
I will also create a 'distribution' module in charge to build the
assembly.
--
On Mar 24, 2010, at 1:22 PM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
Hi
Bernd has updated the out-of-date text files and I've uploaded a
new build.
The release was built from:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/sandbox/vysper/tags/0.5/
The release files are staged at:
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Mar 16, 2010, at 2:43 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
Hi
Since no-one objected on the discussion thread, here's the formal vote
to move our releases to repository.apache.org.
[ ] +1, do it
[ ] 0
[ ] -1, don't do it because...
/niklas
On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ashish wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm reviewing the IoFuture interface and all the depending
interfaces and
classes. This is a complete mess. Looks like it has been built
layer after
layer,
On Mar 1, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 3/1/10 4:38 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ashish wrote:
Thoughts ?
Unless it breaks the system, i would say lets not loose our sleep
over this.
While I share the same opinion about the IoFuture
On Mar 1, 2010, at 9:20 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 3/1/10 6:10 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Mar 1, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 3/1/10 4:38 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ashish wrote:
Thoughts ?
Unless it breaks the system, i would
/10 6:30 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Mar 1, 2010, at 9:20 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 3/1/10 6:10 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Mar 1, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 3/1/10 4:38 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ashish wrote:
Thoughts ?
Unless
On Feb 23, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
On 2/23/10 5:25 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Julien was kin enough to generate jars :
http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/2.0.0-RC2/
The source in these
On Feb 22, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, let's start a vote and see what happens :
I would prefer for us to vote on a defined set of code, a minimum a
revision, even better on some
Congrats!
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 19, 2010, at 5:38 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi,
After 1 year of being the MINA chairman I resigned for rotating the
chair.
Niklas Gustavsson was elected unanimously as the new chairman.
Congrats, it is well deserved !
All hails the new report monkey :)
On Feb 10, 2010, at 11:31 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
On Feb 4, 2010, at 1:26 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm looking with the listener Interface. Listeners can be attached
to a
IoService in order
On Feb 10, 2010, at 11:38 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@archean.frwrote:
I tried to follow the code for IoProcessor and my brain hurts. :)
Did I read correctly that the sessions are partitioned between N
IoProcessors? If so,
, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO]
[
On Feb 9, 2010, at 8:04 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Another simple
On Feb 4, 2010, at 4:53 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
I have reviewed the way we use the Selector in MINA 2.0. Here are
some of the thoughts I have about teh way we use them for Sockets :
We currently have a system built on top of three elements :
- IoAcceptor on the server side
-
On Feb 4, 2010, at 5:20 AM, Emmanuel Lcharny wrote:
Ashish a écrit :
Just thought it would be good if we can consider JCA stuff here. I
believe there was a discussion long ago, of using MINA under that
spec.
Not a master on JCA, but if we can consider this aspect as well,
would be great.
On Feb 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi,
some more thoughts, as I'd like to define precisely what is an
IoService.
Looking at the existing code, I would define an IoService as a base
Interface for Acceptor and Connector, describing the relationship
between all their
On Feb 4, 2010, at 4:43 AM, Ashish wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny
elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
some more thoughts, as I'd like to define precisely what is an
IoService.
Looking at the existing code, I would define an IoService as a base
Interface for Acceptor
On Feb 10, 2010, at 2:08 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 2/10/10 10:42 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Feb 4, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi,
some more thoughts, as I'd like to define precisely what is an
IoService.
Looking at the existing code, I would define
On Feb 10, 2010, at 2:05 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 2/10/10 10:28 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
each of those tasks can be processed by a separate thread selected
in a thread pool. IMO, it may be better than the current
architecture where we have a pool of IoProcessor, each one of them
On Jan 26, 2010, at 4:18 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
http://mina.apache.org/mina2/sources.html
(you'll need a proxy or to wait one hour).
I'm migrating the new documentation Ashish has provided atm.
Looking good.
Should we cut the 2.0 branch and update this page?
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 27, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera a écrit :
On Jan 26, 2010, at 4:18 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
http://mina.apache.org/mina2/sources.html
(you'll need a proxy or to wait one hour).
I'm migrating the new documentation Ashish has provided atm
On Jan 25, 2010, at 5:24 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:04, Emmanuel Lecharny
elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera a écrit :
On Jan 21, 2010, at 7:28 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 18:42, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote
On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:41 AM, Ashish wrote:
Had picked this form one the discussion threads and added to the MINA
3.0 design page, so that we don't loose this.
had some initial thoughts around this, like we can some kind of
visualization tool build around MINA, which can help us see/debug
the
On Jan 25, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Ashish wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera a écrit :
On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:41 AM, Ashish wrote:
Had picked this form one the discussion threads and added to the
MINA
3.0 design page, so
On Jan 25, 2010, at 9:27 AM, Emmanuel Lcharny wrote:
Julien Vermillard a écrit :
Le Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:09:41 -0700,
Jeff Genender jgenen...@savoirtech.com a écrit :
On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi,
IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
