I thought GIT does this automatically on Windows.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:30 AM Lyor Goldstein
wrote:
> I have just fetched the latest master branch and built it on my Windows
> machine and am getting as if all files have been changed - the change has
> to do with LF -> CRLF change in all
Yes, sorry for the noise. I must have used a not clean repo before
building or maybe not rebuild from root, not sure. Anyway, I can confirm
that it's working for me too.
Le lun. 20 avr. 2020 à 15:37, Lyor Goldstein a
écrit :
> >> I think your forgot to commit the changes to a few files:
>> I think your forgot to commit the changes to a few files: KeyUtils,
KeyPairProvider
I don't think so - I have used the cloned repository commits rather that
the PR + the code compiles and passes all tests.
I think your forgot to commit the changes to a few files: KeyUtils,
KeyPairProvider
Le dim. 19 avr. 2020 à 18:00, a écrit :
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> lgoldstein pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository
>> Unless there's a strong objection, i'll soon commit the changes in
I have no strong objection, but I am a bit confused why this is better than
checkstyle. Please bear in mind that checkstyle is not only about
indentations but also imposes what are currently considered good practices
(e.g.,
The socket buffers don’t do anything with listening TCP sockets nor do
accepted sockets automatically inherit any settings therefore it isn’t
necessary.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 5:09 AM Marcin L (Jira) wrote:
> Marcin L created DIRMINA-1123:
> -
>
>
>> unfortunately our servers are staying in corporate network which desnt
have access to outside sftp server and we wanted to use proxy over to
transfer the file.
>> Could you please help us with any java sample on sshd connection over
proxy for sftp or any documentation to use proxy would be
Hi Emmanuel,
Things are definitely moving smoothly; I can say the migration already has been
completed and
mina.a.o is served from git now.
One thing that may be good to do is add a MOVED_TO_GIT here [1]. MINA has
already been
disabled from the CMS. Also, the Jenkins job [2] seems to do its
Hi Roy,
are things moving smoothly ? When do you think we would be able to done
? (just wondering, no urgence).
Thanks a lot !
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Thanks Guillaume! The Jenkins job for building the site has been created [1],
and a PR for moving
over is created as well [2]
Last chance to say goodbye to the CMS :P
[1] https://builds.apache.org/job/mina-site/
[2] https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/pull/1730
On 2020/02/24
I've pushed the 4 branches.
Thx !
Le lun. 24 févr. 2020 à 16:41, Roy Lenferink a
écrit :
> Thanks Emmanuel! Requesting repositories is selfservice, so indeed they
> will be available pretty
> quick :)
>
> I have everything available in my copy of the mina-site repository here
> [1]
>
> The
Hey Emanuell,
I missed the vote… but I am +1 too…
Jeff
> On Feb 24, 2020, at 8:41 AM, Roy Lenferink wrote:
>
> Thanks Emmanuel! Requesting repositories is selfservice, so indeed they will
> be available pretty
> quick :)
>
> I have everything available in my copy of the mina-site
Thanks Emmanuel! Requesting repositories is selfservice, so indeed they will be
available pretty
quick :)
I have everything available in my copy of the mina-site repository here [1]
The repository contains the 4 needed branches:
- asf-site => contains the generated content which will be
On 24/02/2020 09:38, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi,
On 22/02/2020 16:21, Roy Lenferink wrote:
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following results:
+1 Guillaume Nodet (binding)
+1 Emmanuel Lécharny (binding)
+1 Jeff Maury (binding)
+1 Roy Lenferink (non-binding)
No -1 votes have been cast.
Hi,
On 22/02/2020 16:21, Roy Lenferink wrote:
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following results:
+1 Guillaume Nodet (binding)
+1 Emmanuel Lécharny (binding)
+1 Jeff Maury (binding)
+1 Roy Lenferink (non-binding)
No -1 votes have been cast.
To continue I'll need some help from a PMC member
Adding my +1 (non-binding) as well.
On 2020/02/19 13:45:51, Roy Lenferink wrote:
> Hi MINA community,
>
> After last weeks proposal [1] I'd like to start a formal vote for moving over
> from the current Apache
> CMS (and SVN) to use Hugo and git.
>
> Short recap about Hugo: Hugo is a static
+1
Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 16:56, Emmanuel Lécharny a
écrit :
> +1 too.
>
> On 19/02/2020 16:03, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Thx for pushing that. The change will be a huge gain.
> >
> > Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 14:45, Roy Lenferink a
> > écrit :
> >
> >> Hi MINA community,
> >>
> >>
+1 too.
On 19/02/2020 16:03, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
+1
Thx for pushing that. The change will be a huge gain.
Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 14:45, Roy Lenferink a
écrit :
Hi MINA community,
After last weeks proposal [1] I'd like to start a formal vote for moving
over from the current Apache
CMS
+1
Thx for pushing that. The change will be a huge gain.
Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 14:45, Roy Lenferink a
écrit :
> Hi MINA community,
>
> After last weeks proposal [1] I'd like to start a formal vote for moving
> over from the current Apache
> CMS (and SVN) to use Hugo and git.
>
> Short recap
Apologies if I missed something!
This is about moving the source for the mina.apache.org site, which is
currently served from SVN [1],
to a new mina-site git repository (to be created after vote passes). This
repository will be synced
between gitbox.a.o and GitHub. After this, I will create a
Just to clarify - is this about moving to Git on GitHub, or is it
about moving to Git using a different host for the upstream
repository?
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 7:52 AM Roy Lenferink wrote:
>
> Hi MINA community,
>
> After last weeks proposal [1] I'd like to start a formal vote for moving over
Hi all,
Any further thoughts on this? Otherwise I'll start a (lazy) vote for moving
over.
Roy
On 2020/02/13 12:35:33, Roy Lenferink wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Following up on this.
>
> After doing a bit of research I noticed Apache Beam is doing something
> similar that could be useful
> for
Hi folks,
Following up on this.
After doing a bit of research I noticed Apache Beam is doing something similar
that could be useful
for Apache MINA as well.Their generated documentation is hosted on a separate
branch, e.g.
release-docs [1] which is then propagated into the site [2].
This
Hi Emmanuel,
Thanks for your reply! See my inline comments.
On 2020/02/10 23:34:29, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Hi Roy,
>
> On 10/02/2020 16:00, Roy Lenferink wrote:
> > Hello MINA developers,
> >
> > I noticed MINA is still serving its site from SVN with help of the Apache
> > CMS.
>
> Yes.
Hi Roy,
On 10/02/2020 16:00, Roy Lenferink wrote:
Hello MINA developers,
I noticed MINA is still serving its site from SVN with help of the Apache
CMS.
Yes. It has been this way for around a decade (actually, as soon as the
CMS was proposed). before that we were using a buggy Confluence ->
Open up Wireshark and figure out what is going on.
What is the domain name on your SSL cert? Is it your IP address or is it
localhost?
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 4:10 PM Kutay C. Zorlu wrote:
> Hi - ALL,
>
> I am student, I have a master thesis project, I Integrated Apache mina to
> my Project,
The release is available on the apache distribution sites, but it has a
problem syncing to central, see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19798
I'll update the web site, but feel free to prepare an announcement email so
that we can send it when the sync is done.
Le lun. 27 janv. 2020 à
>> I'm thus closing the vote with 3 +1s and no other votes and will
publish the release and update the web site asap.
Great - let me know if you want me to publish an announcement or you will
do it.
Thanks,
Lyor
Did I miss this?
+1 from me.
Jeff
> On Jan 26, 2020, at 4:07 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
> I think we're still missing a binding vote..., we need at least 3.
>
> Le sam. 18 janv. 2020 à 09:02, Guillaume Nodet a écrit :
>
>> I've staged a release candidate:
>> * Repo:
>>
On 27/01/2020 00:07, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I think we're still missing a binding vote..., we need at least 3.
Hi Guillaume,
AFAICT, I count 3 +1 binding votes : you, Lyor and me...
Le sam. 18 janv. 2020 à 09:02, Guillaume Nodet a écrit :
I've staged a release candidate:
* Repo:
I think we're still missing a binding vote..., we need at least 3.
Le sam. 18 janv. 2020 à 09:02, Guillaume Nodet a écrit :
> I've staged a release candidate:
> * Repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1047
> * Distributions:
>
+1
Le sam. 18 janv. 2020 à 09:02, Guillaume Nodet a écrit :
> I've staged a release candidate:
> * Repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1047
> * Distributions:
>
My +1
Packages built from repository and distribution, signature checked.
Good to go !
On 18/01/2020 09:02, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've staged a release candidate:
* Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1047
* Distributions:
So I've removed the md5 and sha1 files for the distributions:
https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/orgapachemina-1047/content/org/apache/sshd/apache-sshd/2.4.0/
Le lun. 20 janv. 2020 à 14:09, Guillaume Nodet a écrit :
> I think we're fine, we do provide the .asc PGP armored
I think we're fine, we do provide the .asc PGP armored signatures.
I'll remove the .md5 and .sha1 files from the repository.
Le lun. 20 janv. 2020 à 13:47, Emmanuel Lécharny a
écrit :
> Hi guys,
>
>
> I'm sorry, but new release *MUST* be signed using something stronger
> than MD5 or SHA1 :
>
>
Hi guys,
I'm sorry, but new release *MUST* be signed using something stronger
than MD5 or SHA1 :
https://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution.html#sigs-and-sums :
"SHOULD NOT supply a MD5 or SHA-1 checksum file (because these are
deprecated)"
On 18/01/2020 09:02, Guillaume Nodet
Thanks Guillaume...
+1
I've staged a release candidate:
* Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1047
* Distributions:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1047/org/apache/sshd/apache-sshd/2.4.0/
* Git Tag:
>> Some of the tests do consistently fail on my laptop during the release
process
Strange but not surprising - the MINA and NETTY tests do have inconsistent
intermittent failures . Usually if I run `mvn -rf :sshd-mina` (or whatever
failed) a few times they succeed. Note that it can happen
dump files (if any exist) [date].dump,
[date]-jvmRun[N].dump and [date].dumpstream.*
*[ERROR]* -> *[Help 1]*
*[ERROR]*
*[ERROR]* To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the
*-e* switch.
*[ERROR]* Re-run Maven using the *-X* switch to enable full debug logging.
*[ERRO
Great - then we can proceed
Yes, it seems to fix the issue.
Le ven. 17 janv. 2020 à 09:04, Lyor Goldstein a
écrit :
> I have downgraded the plexus.archiver.version back to 4.1.0 and now I
> believe it works (have not committed or pushed to master). Please check
it,
> and if it works make the
Yes, it seems to fix the issue.
Le ven. 17 janv. 2020 à 09:04, Lyor Goldstein a
écrit :
> I have downgraded the plexus.archiver.version back to 4.1.0 and now I
> believe it works (have not committed or pushed to master). Please check it,
> and if it works make the necessary commit in the master
I have downgraded the plexus.archiver.version back to 4.1.0 and now I
believe it works (have not committed or pushed to master). Please check it,
and if it works make the necessary commit in the master branch.
I have looked and there is no upgrade for javadoc plugin. A quick look at
the root pom.xml commit history shows (commit
794ebd83f931c15c4343480cc393c5f2cc486416)
previous
-3.4.0
-4.1.0
upgraded
+3.5.0
+4.2.1
I suggest you try the older combination and see if it
>> Sorry for the late reply.
>> I did start the release process 2 days ago but hit the following
problem.
>> Any idea ?
I will look into it and let you know shortly - I do have some ideas -
basically either try to see if there is a more recent version of the
javadoc plugin or
f foreign imports: 1
[ERROR] import: Entry[import from realm
ClassRealm[project>org.apache.sshd:sshd:2.4.0, parent:
ClassRealm[maven.api, parent: null]]]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] -
[ERROR]
[ERROR] -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] To see the full st
Gentle reminder..
From: Riyas K K
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 1:05 PM
To: dev@mina.apache.org
Subject: Reg: Bypassing Proxy with SSHD SFTP Connection
Importance: High
Hi,
Could you please help me out with setting up Proxy connection in SSHD to upload
file to SFTP.
An early response
I’ll look at this tomorrow
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 8:37 PM Srikanth Chadalavada (Jira)
wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16965529#comment-16965529
> ]
>
> Srikanth Chadalavada edited comment
Hi Bruce,
the difference between MINA 2.0 and 2.1 is explained on this page :
http://mina.apache.org/mina-project/2.1-vs-2.0.html
I don't think that impacts SSHd, as sshd-mina module does not check if
the session is secured, it is supposed to be secured anyway !
FTR, the mechanism is
Hi All,
I have a diferent problem now
I want to use the scpclient tp upload and download files
Is there a way to upload and download as a different user
e.g connect as user A and upload as user B using different passwords
Please let me know
Thanks
Prajwal
On 10/16/2019 9:12 PM, Prajwal
Hi Prajwal,
Did you see and try something like this?
https://mina.apache.org/sshd-project/tips.html
---
*Thanks & Regards*,
Vijay Shanker |*Software Architect*
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:15 PM Prajwal M wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am currently trying to migrate from JSCH to MINA sshd api's
>
>
We do not have any current PKCS11 support in MINA SSHD. We do support SSH
agents in general, so one could add the necessary support - Java even seems
to have some PKCS11 support in it (
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/security/p11guide.html)
but I have never looked into it.
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the clarification. Then is there a way to restrict the growth of
the buffer size? Say not to exceed 65k or so?
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 6:04 PM Thomas Charron wrote:
> Umm, it resizes itself, 1024 is just the initial size.
>
>Thomas
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 7:49 PM
Umm, it resizes itself, 1024 is just the initial size.
Thomas
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 7:49 PM Gokkulasudan Rathnakumar <
gokkulasudan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Is there a way to change the buffer size in SftpSubsystem under apache sshd
> 2.1.0?
>
> Note: I see it as *protected final
Hello everyone,
Thank you Emmanuel !
I hope I will be up to the task
Réda Housni Alaoui
> Le 17 août 2019 à 09:26, Emmanuel Lécharny a écrit :
>
> Hi !
>
>
> I'm glad to announce that we have a new MINA committer : Réda Housni Alaoui,
> who is going to revive the Vysper project !
>
>
>
Only people with special permissions can edit comments. Don’t worry about
it.
Are you saying that this issue should be closed because it’s not an issue?
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:12 AM Christoph John (JIRA)
wrote:
>
> [
>
protecting it
> SftpSubsystem.destroy() will terminate external FixedThreadPool
> ExecutorService - preventing re-connects
>
>
> Key: SSHD-931
>
the {{shutdown}} does not invoke the wrapped executor shutdown method -
thus protecting it
> SftpSubsystem.destroy() will terminate external FixedThreadPool
> ExecutorService - preventing re-co
ate external FixedThreadPool
> ExecutorService - preventing re-connects
>
>
> Key: SSHD-931
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/ji
ies(Collections.singletonList(factory));
{code}
> SftpSubsystem.destroy() will terminate external FixedThreadPool
> ExecutorService - preventing re-connects
>
>
>
ool
> ExecutorService - preventing re-connects
>
>
> Key: SSHD-931
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-931
> Project: MINA SSHD
>
ervice - preventing re-connects
>
>
> Key: SSHD-931
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-931
> Project: MINA SSHD
> Issu
I am not sure I understand exactly what you mean - however, it seems that
you are on the right track. Assuming indeed that SFTPMinaClientConnector
is a prototype bean all you need to do is initialize a session + SFTP on
connect and tear them down on close. From what you describe though, it
seems
ool
> ExecutorService - preventing re-connects
>
>
> Key: SSHD-931
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-931
>
I've asked infra to delete it since it's read-only, I can't even merge any
PR...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18795
Le jeu. 25 juil. 2019 à 08:42, Réda Housni Alaoui a
écrit :
> I created https://github.com/apache/vysper/pull/3 to inform of the old
> repository deprecation.
> I
I created https://github.com/apache/vysper/pull/3 to inform of the old
repository deprecation.
I think it should be useful since it is currently the only one found via a
Google search.
Le jeu. 25 juil. 2019 à 08:33, Réda Housni Alaoui a
écrit :
> Done =>
Done => https://github.com/apache/mina-vysper/pull/1
Le jeu. 25 juil. 2019 à 08:29, Réda Housni Alaoui a
écrit :
> Yeah of course.
> Doing it right now
>
> Le jeu. 25 juil. 2019 à 08:25, Guillaume Nodet a
> écrit :
>
>> I think the correct repository is
>>
Yeah of course.
Doing it right now
Le jeu. 25 juil. 2019 à 08:25, Guillaume Nodet a écrit :
> I think the correct repository is
>https://github.com/apache/mina-vysper
> Could you please recreate your PR on that one ?
>
> Le dim. 21 juil. 2019 à 13:47, Réda Housni Alaoui a
> écrit :
>
> > I
I think the correct repository is
https://github.com/apache/mina-vysper
Could you please recreate your PR on that one ?
Le dim. 21 juil. 2019 à 13:47, Réda Housni Alaoui a
écrit :
> I created the pull request:
> https://github.com/apache/vysper/pull/2
>
> Le dim. 21 juil. 2019 à 13:37, Réda
Le dim. 21 juil. 2019 à 13:37, Réda Housni Alaoui a
écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> I recently discovered Vysper. I think this is exactly what I need as I want
> to use it to expose an existing chat application through XMPP.
> I need to add non jetty webapp support to Vysper.
> The project does not
I created the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/vysper/pull/2
Le dim. 21 juil. 2019 à 13:37, Réda Housni Alaoui a
écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> I recently discovered Vysper. I think this is exactly what I need as I
> want to use it to expose an existing chat application through XMPP.
> I
Missed this one ! Thanks for having forwarded it !
On 15/07/2019 13:45, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
-- Forwarded message -
De : Jeff Genender
Date: mer. 10 juil. 2019 à 16:51
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mina SSHD 2.3.0
To: Guillaume Nodet
+1
Jeff
On Jul 9, 2019, at 3:22
Hi Guillaume,
sorry to bother you with that, but I count only 2 +1 binding votes :/
I tried the build this morning, but I still have the same 8 errors when.
doing so:
[INFO] Running org.apache.sshd.common.forward.PortForwardingTest
[ERROR] Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 8, Skipped: 0,
+1
Le mar. 9 juil. 2019 à 11:22, Guillaume Nodet a écrit :
> I've staged a release candidate:
> * Repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1046
> * Distributions:
>
Alla Gofman created SSHD-931:
Summary: SftpSubsystem.destroy() will terminate external
FixedThreadPool ExecutorService - preventing re-connects
Key: SSHD-931
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-931
+1
The change list is completed - CHANGES.md shows the latest changes as of
last release - 2.2.0 in this case - i.e. all changes from 2.2.0 towards
2.3.0. The 2.2.0 file shows the changes from 2.1.0 to 2.2.0. Once you
release 2.3.0, I will create a separate file for the 2.2.0 to 2.3.0
changes
I think the change list has not been updated yet.
If I read SSHD-872 correctly, we're now using one file per version, which
is fine, but I don't see any file for 2.3.0, nor any file pointing to the
existing one for 2.2.0.
Also, I see that ~/CHANGES.md still exists and contains the 2.2.0 changes ?
>> I'll put that on my todo list ;-) I should be able to find some time
before
the end of the week.
Great, thanks...
I'll put that on my todo list ;-) I should be able to find some time before
the end of the week.
Le dim. 30 juin 2019 à 18:49, Lyor Goldstein a
écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I believe we have reached a respectable number of bug fixes, features and
> improvements to warrant a new release of SSHD.
>> Do you have an example for such implementation ?
What do you mean ? The code is simple:
// Do this ONCE in 'main'
SshClient client = setup..and..initialize
client.start();
// wherever in the code and as many times a necessary - including
concurrently
try (ClientSession session =
>> When you are saying multiple sessions, you mean, I can have one
instance with > 1 different sessions to different linux instances with
different credentials ?
A single SshClient instance can create virtually infinite number of
sessions each with a different server (including different ports),
>> Wanted to advice with you. I have couple of linux instances and I want
to hold or keep in memory couple of sshclient
Not sure I understand what you mean - basically, unless extremely special
requirements/circumstances one needs only one SshClient instance per
application. One instance can be
Goldstein
Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2019 7:00 PM
To: dev@mina.apache.org
Subject: RE: channel request
>> How do I set it? Is it better solution then the idletimeout ?
See
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/blob/master/docs/client-setup.md#keeping-the-session-alive-while-no-traffic
Also:
l" channel
You are right. What shall I do?
-Original Message-
From: Lyor Goldstein
Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2019 6:57 PM
To: dev@mina.apache.org
Subject: RE: channel request
>> I took this code
https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-engine/blob/master/backend/manager/modules/uutils/src/ma
>> How do I set it? Is it better solution then the idletimeout ?
See
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/blob/master/docs/client-setup.md#keeping-the-session-alive-while-no-traffic
Also:
https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/blob/master/docs/client-setup.md#running-a-command-or-opening-a-shell
>> I took this code
https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-engine/blob/master/backend/manager/modules/uutils/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/uutils/ssh/SSHClient.java
that
is using the sshd
The code you mention runs a single (!) command and then exits. I believe
your original question was about
>> By the way, in addition to the previous question. Can I increase the
session idle timeout ? Currently 10m, let's say I want it to be 30m ?
Easily: see FactoryManager#IDLE_TIMEOUT configuration parameter.Can be done
globally - by setting it on the SSH client/server or even per specific
Thanks Emmanuel for the quick response.
Will try that.
Regards,
Dor
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Lécharny
Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2019 5:37 PM
To: dev@mina.apache.org
Subject: Re: User session has timed out idling after 60 ms
On 16/06/2019 16:18, Dor Ben Dov wrote:
>
On 16/06/2019 16:18, Dor Ben Dov wrote:
Hi everyone,
Is it possible to increase this timeout ?
There is no session timeout in MINA: a socket remains opened as long as
it's not closed, either by your application, the client, or the OS
because it's idling for too long.
Now, your OS will
>> How or can I hold the channel open ?
Channels are auto-closeable - i.e., try-with-resource can be used. In other
words, it won't close on your end unless you close it. However:
>> It seems that once I create and open and actually use the channel, it is
being closed without my knowledge.
You
>> Suppose my scripts needs the profile to run at the beginning.
I am not sure what "profile" you mean - in the context of SSH there is no
such concept. If you mean the ".profile" file (or something similar) that
"runs" automatically when you login, then it depends on the definitions of
your
+1
Jeff
> On May 29, 2019, at 7:19 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
> Hi !
>
> I'm calling for a vote of Apache MINA 2.1.3 release.
>
> This fixes a few issues that were found since the last release, mainly a 100%
> CPU peak caused by some changes in the way we process the messageSent()
>
+1
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 9:19 AM Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I'm calling for a vote of Apache MINA 2.1.3 release.
>
> This fixes a few issues that were found since the last release, mainly a
> 100% CPU peak caused by some changes in the way we process the
> messageSent() event. The 4
On 28/05/2019 04:32, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
I would like to see DIRMINA-1110 reverted. IMHO, I do not think it fixes
any known problems and potentially introduces new deadlock opportunities.
Np. I'll do that.
I would like to see DIRMINA-1110 reverted. IMHO, I do not think it fixes
any known problems and potentially introduces new deadlock opportunities.
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 10:24 PM Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> Hi !
>
>
> I think it's time to cut a new release for MINA 2.1.X branch. We have
> some
On 20/05/2019 18:17, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
Oh, two mirrors. How do we remove the bad one?
I guess we should ask infra...
Oh, two mirrors. How do we remove the bad one?
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:16 PM Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
>
> On 20/05/2019 18:02, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
> > The GitHub Mirror of FTPSERVER is not automatically updating from Gitbox.
> > How do we fix this?
>
>
> I think it does, but there are
On 20/05/2019 18:02, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
The GitHub Mirror of FTPSERVER is not automatically updating from Gitbox.
How do we fix this?
I think it does, but there are 2 mirrors, one being ftpserver and has
stalled, and the other one being mina-ftpserver and seems to be
up-to-date with
On 10/05/2019 17:52, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
Maven commands work but Maven-Eclipse integration seems to have a problem
with the plugins.
Ok, same error for me.
Just select QuickFix and 'Mark goal check as ignored' for each project
in eclipse. That will build, and you won't see any error.
Maven commands work but Maven-Eclipse integration seems to have a problem
with the plugins.
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:32 AM Emmanuel Lécharny
wrote:
> Hi Janathan,
>
> On 10/05/2019 16:30, Jonathan Valliere wrote:
> > Emmanuel,
> >
> > I know you're busy but I would like to figure out why mvn
1001 - 1100 of 11540 matches
Mail list logo