First things first,
Big shout out to you (Aaron) and the team for laying a strong foundation
for the new website! We all knew that our original website needed
improvements and it's criticality for user adoption and growth. But doing
it well and in a timely manner. Great job, keep it up.
Those 3
Hen writes:
> Are you saying that trademarks for MXNet has been registered by other
> companies?
Yes, though not for the purpose of machine learning frameworks.
So I suppose there is no concern?
These are the active / pending registrations:
- Minimax GmbH & Co. KG trademarked MXNet it in
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 3:01 AM Leonard Lausen wrote:
> Anton Chernov writes:
> > As a physicist I would like to point out that "Gluon" means: An
> elementary
> > particle that acts as the exchange particle for the strong force between
> > quarks [1].
> > As a general scientific term it can
The former is a trademark question to ask when deciding to use a brand.
Something Amazon would have considered but as Gluon isn't an Apache brand
it's not something Apache have considered. If the brand was 'transferring'
to Apache then it is something we should do.
Are you saying that trademarks
> @Lin, I notice there is a revert on the v1.5.x [1]. Was it supposed to fix
> the GPU OOM issue on v1.5.x but caused other problems?
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/33f4de13d3909fc356ace8ff7a5c9665a651fc63
was
meant to fix a memory misalign issue introduced to master branch by
Thank you for the details, Hen.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:18 PM Hen wrote:
> Amazon. Amazon created the brand. They own the first repository to use the
> term in this conext ( https://github.com/gluon-api ). There was some
> involvement from Microsoft, so Microsoft's opinion may also be
Anton Chernov writes:
> As a physicist I would like to point out that "Gluon" means: An elementary
> particle that acts as the exchange particle for the strong force between
> quarks [1].
> As a general scientific term it can barely be seen as a candidate for
> trademark registration.
This
>
> 5) is not a bug. It's just a large tensor support requirement. The PR was
> to fix a memory alignment issue introduced in master but not in 1.5.1
> (since you did not cherry pick that PR). So, I have crossed out 5) in the
> doc and I don't think we need to mention it in release note.
>
@Lin,
Progress since the last update:
1. 2 more fixes [1] [2] were picked to v1.5.x;
2. 1 cherry pick PR [3] was opened for TensorRT;
3. The nightly build issue [4] was removed from the scope of 1.5.1;
4. GPU OOM issue [5] was removed from the scope of 1.5.1.
5. So far, nightly test shows the release
As a physicist I would like to point out that "Gluon" means: An elementary
particle that acts as the exchange particle for the strong force between
quarks [1].
As a general scientific term it can barely be seen as a candidate for
trademark registration.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluon
On
Carin recently noted that gluonhq.com already uses the Gluon brand for
end-to-end enterprise mobile solution and Marco found that they do so
apparently since at least 2015. Do you see any impact on the Gluon brand
for deep learning models?
The MXNet brand is currently also unregistered by Apache
11 matches
Mail list logo
