: 1.2.10-sandbox
Reporter: Andrew Robinson
The Trinidad sandbox groupIds are sandbox-*. To be consistent with other
projects they should be trinidad-sandbox-*. This will also help with
conflicts with projects using the sandbox and helping to identify where the
jars come from
no
longer know at the point it is being rendered whether it will need to
potentially re-render itself (as opposed to partial triggers). How would a
renderer know whether it needs to render an id when partial triggers exist?
-- Blake Sullivan
Andrew Robinson (JIRA) said the following On 9/24/2008
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12633763#action_12633763
]
Andrew Robinson commented on MYFACES-1695:
--
I agree with closing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12633938#action_12633938
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1238:
---
The reason that I mention using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12633344#action_12633344
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1235:
---
If you run maven 2.0.9
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12633346#action_12633346
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1235:
---
Looking at the google cache
: Build
Affects Versions: 1.2.9-core
Reporter: Andrew Robinson
Assignee: Andrew Robinson
Priority: Minor
trinidad-examples/trinidad-demo/src/test/webapp exists, but it has legacy UIX
settings and is not setup correctly in the pom.xml
--
This message
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson resolved TRINIDAD-1237.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.10-core
Checked in for 1.2.9.1
all methods like add and remove onto UIXCollection). Then in the
future we can remove the reference from the RowKeySet to the model
completely.
Opinions, other options?
-Andrew
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Andrew Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, I have been looking at TRINIDAD-1086
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12633561#action_12633561
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1238:
---
The problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12633564#action_12633564
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1238:
---
Relevant code (svn revision
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12633567#action_12633567
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1238:
---
With 1.2 we could use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12631920#action_12631920
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1086:
---
I can reproduce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12631939#action_12631939
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1086:
---
Note that it seems to work fine
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12631956#action_12631956
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1086:
---
This only happens if the JSF RI
Hi all, I have been looking at TRINIDAD-1086 today, and see that the
problem is due to the model being transient in the implementation of
RowKeySet (RowKeySetTreeImpl). There are two problems with this:
1) The model is not restored when the tree, table and navigationTree
components are restored,
I agree with this opinion, having an iPod touch, the device may be
more like a PDA, but the browser is close on par to a desktop browser.
I can see in the future not having a PDA type at all when devices will
be more powerful.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Matt Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A component should only be created once per component tree, not every
time that the binding expression is evaluated.
I would suggest that you try to alter your code to make sure the component
is only created once (use an attribute on the parent component).
I want to recreate components
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12630592#action_12630592
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1226:
---
How is this a bug?
You
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson resolved TRINIDAD-1226.
---
Resolution: Invalid
This is not a bug, but a bug in code submitted. I'll attach
/TRINIDAD-1223
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Components
Affects Versions: 1.2.9-core, 1.0.9-core
Reporter: Andrew Robinson
Subform components do not restrict the decoding of child components. As a
result, any EditableValueHolder
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12629869#action_12629869
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1223:
---
Mailing list discussion:
http
Also what phase do you call the set?
PS - moving this to the users@ mailing list, this is not a dev@
question. Please remove the dev@ from future replies
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Max Starets [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cristiano,
I would expect setFirst() to work. Are you sure it is
Is it possible to make dev@ a private mailing list, so only commiters
and people that PMCs decide should have access to post are allowed to
send emails to this list? That way we can reduce the accidental
posting to dev@ instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Andrew
, not development with myfaces discussions.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Andrew Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to make dev@ a private mailing list, so only commiters
and people that PMCs decide should have access to post are allowed to
send emails to this list? That way we can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12626636#action_12626636
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1198:
---
This does not sound like a bug
-projecttab
Then it doesn't have to be maintained every release
-Andrew
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Andrew Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Option 3?
Add links to the URLs to produce the JIRA release notes
what do
In 1.2.9.1, the GlobalConfiguratonImpl has the function:
public void beginRequest(final ExternalContext externalContext)
This checks to see if the this has already be called once
If it is called a second time the following code is executed:
else
{
_LOG.fine(BeginRequest called
Versions: 1.0.9-core
Environment: Fedora Core 8, JDK 1.5.0_11 Tomcat 5.5.26
Reporter: Andrew Robinson
Assignee: Matthias Weßendorf
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 1.0.10-core
Deployed the examples web app for Trinidad 1.0.9 on a clean install
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson resolved TRINIDAD-1175.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicate of TRINIDAD-1175
1175 has more documentation so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12621830#action_12621830
]
arobinson74 edited comment on TRINIDAD-1175 at 8/12/08 7:24 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson resolved TRINIDAD-1177.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0.10-core
Just to make mine official:
+1 for xmlTransform
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12615328#action_12615328
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1109:
---
Do you all think that a possible
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12615376#action_12615376
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1109:
---
The use case for @agent unknown
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12615388#action_12615388
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1109:
---
Right, it would be handled
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1
2008/7/11 Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1, and I would think it could benefit from a name change.
XmlTransform sounds better? At least in the documentation it says it
transforms, so IMO that would be a much more fitting name
On 2008-07-10, Leonardo Uribe
+1, and I would think it could benefit from a name change.
XmlTransform sounds better? At least in the documentation it says it
transforms, so IMO that would be a much more fitting name
On 2008-07-10, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
This is the last proposal of vote before release
I can see the point of that argument, but worry that putting heavy 3rd
party JS libraries into Tomahawk will steer people away from using it.
IMO, Dojo based components should either be (1) in a new MyFaces top
project, or in (2) a subproject of Tomahawk (i.e.
myfaces-tomahawk-dojo).
#2 has its
Does pprPanelGroup have external dependencies - like dojo?
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Leonardo,
I will dig at the s:pprPanelGroup .../ issues in the nearest free time
slot to promote it.
Thanks!
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:39 AM, Mario Ivankovits
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12611597#action_12611597
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1144:
---
This is not a bug, bug you should
Sorry as well, I have a bad habit of being very defensive.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Marinschek schrieb:
@Simon, Andrew: can we please _not_ write aggressive mails on this
list.
You're quite right. I'm sorry about that.
I'm doing about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12611655#action_12611655
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1144:
---
By any chance, have you recently
All tables are created by the same facelet component.
If the var is overwritten in the request map, it can than be used again, but
not with the previous value. That is obvious.
What now happens is that the execution order may have changed, because var
is assigned to row object of the new
, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Robinson schrieb:
You must have had a real use case that pushed you to write this
component.
Can you please describe it?
The same as all usages of c:choose /. The index based or more than
one are just added benefits I threw in. I can provide
SVN merge takes -x -w arguments to ignore whitespace. I am not sure
about updating.
-Andrew
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:39 PM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, but I think conflicts are now being reported when updating a
checkout dir for files where *all* of these were true:
* contains tabs
Andrew, can you give an example of when it could be used?
Check the documentation and the demo
http://example.irian.at/example-sandbox-20080702/limitRendered.jsf
http://myfaces.apache.org/sandbox/tlddoc/s/limitRendered.html
It states its purpose as a JSF substitute for
You must have had a real use case that pushed you to write this component.
Can you please describe it?
The same as all usages of c:choose /. The index based or more than
one are just added benefits I threw in. I can provide examples, but I
shouldn't have to. Just because someone can't think of
+1
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Checking the code, examples, documentation and previous discussions, the
functionality of s:limitRendered component is complete,
so we can propose it to be upgraded to tomahawk.
So please vote in the following
Curious since this guy doesn't actually print any HTML and has no
renderer if we would rather put it in commons?
I'm okay either way, just thought it would be worth considering.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Andrew Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:32 PM
JSR 252 (JSF 1.2) was finalized on 2006-05-11
Java 1.5 released 2004-09-30
I don't mind people maintaining JSF 1.1, but I do think that there is
very good cause to have 1.1 moved to branches and the latest JSF
specification as the trunk for each project. Over 2 years is plenty of
time to adopt
] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Andrew Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about moving the JSF version to a folder?
commons-utils/
commons-11/myfaces-commons-converters
commons-11/myfaces-commons-validators
commons-12/myfaces-commons-converters
commons-12/myfaces-commons
only.
Here was the result vote for JSF 1.2 being the trunk:
Vote summary
+1:
Andrew Robinson
Mike Kienenberger
Simon Lessard
Bruno Aranda
Cagatay Civici
Grant Smith
Mario Ivankovits
Scott O'Bryan
Paul Spencer
-0.9:
Volker Weber (not official vote)
Bernd Bohmann (was -1, but then got a I'm fine
How about moving the JSF version to a folder?
commons-utils/
commons-11/myfaces-commons-converters
commons-11/myfaces-commons-validators
commons-12/myfaces-commons-converters
commons-12/myfaces-commons-validators
Just makes for a cleaner structure IMO and makes it look less like 1.2
support is
Congratulations Matt!
On 6/6/08, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear MyFaces community,
please welcome our new MyFaces PMC member Matt Cooper.
Matt is working on the Apache MyFaces and Trinidad stuff.
Therefore last week there was a vote to invite him to the MyFaces
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603077#action_12603077
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-:
---
I already applied the patch
Isn't Tomahawk already a commons set of components? It works with
other render kits, besides some incompatibilities do to the filter
design. I am wondering if we are attempting to put too much into
commons.
My take would be if this is a component that does any rendering it
fits well in Tomahawk,
+1 for myfaces-extensions-validator
+0 for myfaces-extensions-seven
-0.5 for myfaces-extensions-jack
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for myfaces-extensions-seven, IMO it rocks.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Gerhard Petracek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson updated TRINIDAD-:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.2.8-core
What is this myfaces-metadata.xml that tomahawk needs? Seems odd to me
to have core required to generate a non-JSF spec output that tomahawk
requires.
1. Apply myfaces-builder-plugin on myfaces core 1.2 (necessary for build
correct myfaces-metadata.xml for tomahawk 1.2)
-0.9
2. Add two
One more point, I'd like to see the new tool burned in for at least a
couple of Tomahawk releases before moving it to other projects. It
seems a bit too much to hurry this into core, especially when AFAIK,
there is no new functionality that core requires from this.
On 6/3/08, Andrew Robinson
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson resolved TRINIDAD-1102.
---
Resolution: Invalid
Please ask the user list and do not file bugs until
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson resolved TRINIDAD-1094.
---
Resolution: Invalid
This does not look like a Trinidad bug. If you wish to re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12599406#action_12599406
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-930:
--
-1 on applying the patch. Form
Looks like I messed up. I changed this as I wanted to remove the
deprecation warnings produced from using ValueBinding in JSF 1.2 based
code.
Sorry about this.
I have limited internet connectivity this week, so if someone can
cover this faster than me, please do so.
-Andrew
On Tue, May 20,
again.
Current results for 1.2.8:
+1 Scott O'Bryan, Matthias Wessendorf
+.5 Andrew Robinson
-1 Paul Spencer because the Chart component doesn't work.
Current results for 1.0.8
+1 Scott O'Bryan, Matthias Wessendorf, Andrew Robinson
I'll go ahead and keep votes open for one more day
We can relatively easily create a tomcat profile that could be used to
deploy onto tomcat by changing the dependency scope from to provided
to compile right?
Just as we have the jetty profile and the jetty plugin registered, we
can do the same for tomcat I think.
The drawback of course is
Welcome!
Sent from my iPod
On May 16, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats!
Welcome to the team, hazem!
Sent from my iPod.
Am 16.05.2008 um 21:56 schrieb Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The Myfaces PMC is proud to announce a new addition to our
/07, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got it to work with a custom component. I created a component that
doesn't render, that simply houses children. In the queueEvent method
of that component, if the type of the event is ActionEvent, I then use
it to add components as partial targets
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12597538#action_12597538
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-697:
--
@Blake - That would only be partial
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson updated TRINIDAD-1015:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.9-core
Status: Resolved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12597543#action_12597543
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-89:
-
Isn't this what aliases
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson updated TRINIDAD-656:
-
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
tr:table contents should be in tbody element
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12597547#action_12597547
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-89:
-
If this were implemented
+0.5 (not +1 as I didn't do a complete review)
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Simon Lessard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+0, eternal lack of time, I'm very sorry.
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott,
Based on my simple application, which also uses
/5vdb57
http://tinyurl.com/5mrm8k
http://tinyurl.com/56zk8f
-Andrew
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Blake Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Robinson said the following On 5/14/2008 6:40 PM PT:
In the past, I created 2 new components to make PPR easier from a
declarative stand point
+1 (but I haven't done a full review of the bits)
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.0.8 release of the Apache
MyFaces Trinidad out. The artifacts are deployed to my private
. All we need to do is lean slightly on that code
to reuse it for inserting server-side messages, and this'll work fine
without any architectural changes at all.
-- Adam
Solve
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-697
at the framework level?
-- Blake Sullivan
Andrew Robinson
, provide a patch for the framework fix.
Thanks,
Andrew
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Blake Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Robinson said the following On 5/15/2008 12:08 PM PT:
Taking one use case and putting it at the framework level will not
address all possible use cases
In the past, I created 2 new components to make PPR easier from a
declarative stand point. At the time, Adam Winer disagreed with their
inclusion. Now, I wanted to see if there would be any objections to
such components.
I was thinking that that they would go in the sandbox first, then if
Out of curiosity, will this be able to be extensible to support Jython
as well? (some ppl like me prefer the jython syntax over groovy's)
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone
I just wanted to give notification that I took a small break from my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson reopened TRINIDAD-799:
--
AFAIK the current implementation is not the one discussed as the desired
implementation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12596440#action_12596440
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-799:
--
Taking this over as it is holding up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson resolved TRINIDAD-799.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Added support for the following syntax:
@agent ie and (version: 6
in the middle of something else right
now.. Cristi, can you ping me on this thread when TRINIDAD-799 is
done and committed? I'll try to monitor it, but just in case I
miss it... :)
I'll try not to forget ;)
Andrew Robinson wrote:
+1 for the release to wait
, as a result, the jar names are really vague.
-Andrew
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe offtopic: Could trinidad-sandbox be included in the release? or there
is a procedure for this?
On 5/13/08, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TRINIDAD
Thanks, fixed it.
-A
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The work Overview is misspelled in
/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/src/site/site.xml. It is currently on the page as
Overwie
Paul Spencer
I am getting some horrid SVN performance, is there another hardware
issue going on?
-Andrew
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson updated TRINIDAD-1062:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.0.8-core
Status: Resolved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson updated TRINIDAD-1054:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Patch applied
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson updated TRINIDAD-1064:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.8-core
1.0.8-core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12594621#action_12594621
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1062:
---
I am looking into this, and I do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12594723#action_12594723
]
Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-1062:
---
I tested several different
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson resolved TRINIDAD-1056.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.7-plugins
Fixed on trunk and 1.2.6.1
Trinidad
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Build
Affects Versions: 1.2.6-plugins
Reporter: Andrew Robinson
Assignee: Andrew Robinson
Support mfp:hidden to hide properties and facets from the tag documentation so
that facets and properties
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson resolved TRINIDAD-1065.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.7-plugins
Support mfp:hidden to hide
+1 for the release to wait on TRINIDAD-799
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Cristi Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys...
There is an issue still opened reagarding TRINIDAD-799
I resolved it, but the guys here didn't agree with the api and also
changed the requirements.
There was a long
I disabled the default and nightly schedules at
http://myfaces.zones.apache.org:8080/continuum/schedules.action
I am not sure if that stops any commit-triggered builds, but hopefully it helps
-Andrew
I tried SLF4J for a project and found it better than commons as well.
The pain is that maven has a lot of dependencies with commons logging
and it is a little hard to remove. Apparently 1.1.1 is supposed to
have a better pom file.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Manfred Geiler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Andrew Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at the many of the renderers for Trinidad components I do not
see a lot of skinning selectors that would enable rounded corners. For
example, the panelTabbed has some nice selectors for the tabs
401 - 500 of 924 matches
Mail list logo
