Provide a jdk1.4 version of tobago-facelets with retrotranslator
Key: TOBAGO-126
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-126
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type:
Hi Mike, Wendy,
I only have a minute on the net - but yes, your last sentence is correct.
regards,
Martin
On 9/15/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/15/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've added a draft release announcement to the release plan wiki page.
(link
Wendy thanks for helping out on the release.
Go ahead and announce it!
On 9/15/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/11/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The MyFaces Core 1.1.4 build is available for evaluation:
http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/core-1.1.4/
...
Wendy Smoak schrieb:
On 9/14/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for now we have the pressing issue, that I need
dojo down from the sandbox so that we can move on.
The Tobago people also want to use dojo...
The dojo binding code I use uses some myfaces-tomahawk specific helper
and
Mike Kienenberger schrieb:
If it's from June 21, then I think we need to rebranch.
I suspect we have made incompatible changes since then.
Ok sorry for posting this in the Togago thread off topic.
Since the entire shared thing will be an ongoing discussion for longer
and Mike only has a
Hi i'm tryng an example
found on the site http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2005/07/13/jsfupload.html?page=1
so i'Im using
Jbuilder 2006 IDE and jboss 3.2.7 AS.
In my application i've added a folder with this libraries:
tomahawk1.1.3.jar (myfaces-extensions.jar is old, and i don't have
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-671?page=all ]
Stan Laufik updated TOMAHAWK-671:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Tree2 fails with NumberFormat Exception or Null Pointer Exception when
ExpandAll button is placed in the same form
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-671?page=all ]
Stan Laufik updated TOMAHAWK-671:
-
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
Tree2 fails with NumberFormat Exception or Null Pointer Exception when
ExpandAll button is placed in the same form
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-521?page=comments#action_12434926
]
Bjørn Stenfeldt commented on TOMAHAWK-521:
--
I had to find a work around too. Its a bit of work, but the best I could come
up with. Here is a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-119?page=comments#action_12434943 ]
Bernd Bohmann commented on TOBAGO-119:
--
It should be possible to define the supported markup in a theme.
May be a theme has some configuration with the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-126?page=all ]
Bernd Bohmann resolved TOBAGO-126.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Provide a jdk1.4 version of tobago-facelets with retrotranslator
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-125?page=all ]
Bernd Bohmann resolved TOBAGO-125.
--
Resolution: Fixed
tc:date missing attribute focus
---
Key: TOBAGO-125
URL:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-412?page=comments#action_12434959
]
eric commented on TOMAHAWK-412:
---
Try to change your web.xml file : add or change this setting
context-param
On 9/15/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to become slightly OT again since this affects both threads
Ok since the components core will be an ongoing discussion...
following, is there going to be a refork for 1.1.4?
If not I would love to have this weekend to push dojo at least
On 9/15/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok sorry for posting this in the Togago thread off topic.
Since the entire shared thing will be an ongoing discussion for longer
and Mike only has a negative vote as the only one as I saw in case of a
refork of 1.1.4.
Darn, and I answered over
PanelNavigation2 multiplication on post back
Key: TOMAHAWK-673
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-673
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Examples,
Hello Wendy,
can we add the Tobago Announcement to the Core Announcement?
Regards
Bernd
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Wendy thanks for helping out on the release.
Go ahead and announce it!
On 9/15/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/11/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The
[Changing the subject to keep it out of the vote thread]
On 9/15/06, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can we add the Tobago Announcement to the Core Announcement?
IMO, it should be a separate announcement email.
But if you want to mention that Core 1.1.4 is compatible with Tobago
On 9/15/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. And you don't need to wait for the re-branch to actually happen,
because with Subversion we can copy it from any revision.
Infrastructure wise, IMO it's fine to go ahead with the Dojo upgrade
on the Tomahawk 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT trunk, and start
On 9/15/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there was something I changed to the branch in june/july to be able
to have 114 working with tomahawk 113.
Sean, you and I were discussing that.
Now you say it's not working w/ core 114.
Why ?
I think we were talking about getScrolling
Hello,
I didn't found any problem with Core and Tobago. I would prefer to add
the announcement to the Core announcement. If you don't like it you can
delete the Tobago part from the announcement.
Regards
Bernd
Wendy Smoak wrote:
[Changing the subject to keep it out of the vote thread]
On
A *huge* thank you to Wendy for taking the lead on the release.
sean
On 9/15/06, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Wendy,
can we add the Tobago Announcement to the Core Announcement?
Regards
Bernd
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Wendy thanks for helping out on the release.
Go ahead
There was a gentleman agreement that there is no commit from Tobagos
to MyFaces, after the toboago incubation was done. Bernd and Volker
are committers of MyFaces.
This was only during the incubation period since the decision was made
to host the incubated Tobago at MyFaces. Now that they are
Bernd, I don't have a problem with the MyFaces announcement containing
a statement about Tobago, but Tobago also needs its own release
announcement, just like Tomahawk needs its own release announcement.
On 9/15/06, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Wendy,
can we add the Tobago
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-672?page=comments#action_12434996
]
Mike Kienenberger commented on TOMAHAWK-672:
As a temporary workaround, you can remove the phaselistener declaration from
the
Ok,
the real reason for adding the tobago announcement to the core
announcemnt is: 'I don't like sending announcement'
Ask Arvid for sending it.
Regards
Bernd
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
Bernd, I don't have a problem with the MyFaces announcement containing
a statement about Tobago, but
Hehe.
All part of the fun of being an equal partner :-)
Copy what you had into a wiki page and we'll work on both
announcements until they look good enough to send out.
On 9/15/06, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok,
the real reason for adding the tobago announcement to the core
Sounds like there's another version of Tomahawk or MyFaces Core in
your classpath somewhere. Try removing that. Some versions of JBoss
ship with MyFaces already installed.
On 9/15/06, Fabio Di Biase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi i'm tryng an example found on the site
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-168?page=comments#action_12435039
]
Mike Kienenberger commented on TOMAHAWK-168:
Hello, it is a Blocker bug and you don't want to assigned it ?
I think it would be nice to solve the
Ok. I've went through the Tomahawk issue tracker and looked at all
Blocker and Critical issues. I find three that appear to be
regressions (no patches), and one that appears to affect other
frameworks (includes a patch).
Everything else I changed to major priority.
But this did bring up
Mike Kienenberger schrieb:
Ok. I've went through the Tomahawk issue tracker and looked at all
Blocker and Critical issues. I find three that appear to be
regressions (no patches), and one that appears to affect other
frameworks (includes a patch).
Everything else I changed to major priority.
Werner, sorry if you took the sweeping changes comment as directed
at you. I wouldn't expect the dojo code to impact many files. I
don't consider the addition of files as a change that has any impact.
I was thinking more of the proposed common jar changes (and other
changes in general that
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-592?page=comments#action_12435079
]
Mike Kienenberger commented on TOMAHAWK-592:
Hey John,
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. The last month was busy for me.
Yes, your
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-530?page=all ]
Mike Kienenberger updated TOMAHAWK-530:
---
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
imageLocation of inputCalendar does not work
JS oamSubmitForm() params order incorrect
-
Key: MYFACES-1407
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1407
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1407?page=all ]
DIego Ballve updated MYFACES-1407:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
JS oamSubmitForm() params order incorrect
-
Key:
Mike,
Please add a description, or link to one, about the following statement
in in the announcement.
Core 1.1.4 is not backwards-compatible with Tomahawk 1.1.3.
The description should include instruction on what a developer must
change for 1.1.4 to work with their 1.1.3 application.
Paul
Hey Paul.
Maybe you can help rewrite it so it's more obvious.
Apparently the problem is that some of the javascript generated by
1.1.3 isn't compatible with the JSF RI. So in 1.1.4, those javascript
methods have been renamed. No application-level code needs to change
(provided you're not
Ah no worries, I didnt take it directed at me.
I just wanted to clear things up.
Ok lets sum things up from my side.
Since there was no objection from anyone
(now that the entire 1.1.4 situation is cleared up)
I will start to go ahead with the push
of the dojo core from the sandbox down into
On 9/15/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe it's just as simple as saying that
MyFaces Core 1.1.4 is not backwards-compatible with Tomahawk 1.1.3.
On 9/14/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I only have a minute on the net - but yes, your last sentence is
I don't see it as being cleared up.
The points that we need to have a new 1.1.4 branch, and that branch
needs to include at least 3 blocker fixes still hasn't been addressed.
If you make your changes now, we either have to accept them as part
of the 1.1.4 branch, accept the blocker issues as
Mike Kienenberger schrieb:
I don't see it as being cleared up.
The points that we need to have a new 1.1.4 branch, and that branch
needs to include at least 3 blocker fixes still hasn't been addressed.
If you make your changes now, we either have to accept them as part
of the 1.1.4 branch,
On 9/15/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Paul.
Maybe you can help rewrite it so it's more obvious.
Apparently the problem is that some of the javascript generated by
1.1.3 isn't compatible with the JSF RI. So in 1.1.4, those javascript
methods have been renamed.
This
On 9/15/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, to help users figure out what can be expected to work together:
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/CompatibilityMatrix
(It could be expanded to show which component libraries work together, as well.)
Great idea. I don't know how
Yeah, I also have some changes that I want to commit that I've been
holding off on. So you're not alone in the desire for things to get
going. It may be as you hint below that we simply have to maintain
the patches in two branches.
On 9/15/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike
Wendy,
I added a link to the matrix. I also made some minor visual changes to
the matrix. Feel free to back them out if you do not like them.
Paul Spencer
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 9/15/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Paul.
Maybe you can help rewrite it so it's more
The following page has been changed by PaulSpencer:
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/CoreRelease114
The comment on the change is:
Added Mike Kienenberger's descriptive text to the announcement
The only problem I see with this is that it's far too verbose.
The section which basically says we're
On 9/15/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following page has been changed by PaulSpencer:
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/CoreRelease114
The comment on the change is:
Added Mike Kienenberger's descriptive text to the announcement
The only problem I see with this is that
On 9/15/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed. I'm having trouble boiling it down to a single sentence, though.
Due to changes related to compatibility with the reference
implementation, MyFaces Core 1.1.4 cannot be used with Tomahawk
1.1.3.
Maybe Due to changes required for
I move the warning to the matrix page and placed Wendy's text in the
announcement.
Paul Spencer
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 9/15/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following page has been changed by PaulSpencer:
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/CoreRelease114
The comment on the
Done.
Paul Spencer
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
On 9/15/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed. I'm having trouble boiling it down to a single sentence, though.
Due to changes related to compatibility with the reference
implementation, MyFaces Core 1.1.4 cannot be used with Tomahawk
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-508?page=comments#action_12435178
]
Abhilash Kumar commented on TOMAHAWK-508:
-
This issue is duplicated by me (sorry.. i didn't see this post ) as
TOMAHAWK-673. In my post, i have written
52 matches
Mail list logo
