hi,
have you noticed this?
http://www.javalid.org/
-M
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Gerhard Petracek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sev-en is a new jsf-extension.
sev-en allows jsf validation with annotations!
some central features:
- cross-component validation (including cross-entity
hello matthias,
yes - i had a look at it some weeks ago. i don't like the architecture of
it.
sev-en is much more extensible.
furthermore, javalid executes validation after the update model values
phase,...
- -1 for javalid
regards,
gerhard
2008/6/4 Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Gerhard Petracek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello matthias,
yes - i had a look at it some weeks ago. i don't like the architecture of
it.
sev-en is much more extensible.
furthermore, javalid executes validation after the update model values
phase,...
oh, ok.
+0 I would only like to see another subproject added under the myfaces
umbrella if there is enough developer critical mass willing to develop
and maintain it and it is not a one-man job. Otherwise, this one could
be a nice addition.
Cheers,
Bruno
2008/6/3 Kito D. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+0 I would only like to see another subproject added under the myfaces
umbrella if there is enough developer critical mass willing to develop
and maintain it and it is not a one-man job. Otherwise, this one could
be a nice
Indeed it is... let's sharpen the keyboards! :)
Bruno
2008/6/3 Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I just noticed a download link on this page:
http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=314
looks like a first ED of JSF2.0
Almost downloaded ;)
-Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
+1 (both points)
2008/6/4 Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
The code necessary to tomahawk 1.2 is ready for commit.
For do this, it is necessary to apply myfaces builder plugin on myfaces
core 1.2. The work
+1
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 (both points)
2008/6/4 Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi
The code necessary to tomahawk 1.2 is ready for commit.
For
Even if it is the early draft, I guess we could branch soon to start
implementing it - there are things that could be implemented now and
the API javadocs (from mojarra) are there...
Cheers,
Bruno
2008/6/4 Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Indeed it is... let's sharpen the keyboards! :)
Bruno
+1
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even if it is the early draft, I guess we could branch soon to start
implementing it - there are things that could be implemented now and
the API javadocs (from mojarra) are there...
Cheers,
Bruno
2008/6/4 Bruno
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12602258#action_12602258
]
Paul Spencer commented on TOMAHAWK-1022:
I have no objections on removing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12602261#action_12602261
]
Paul Spencer commented on TOMAHAWK-1023:
I have no objections to #2 as long as
I am not in a position to runthe staged release of 1.0.5 against
Tomahawk 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT. If some can this would be great. Please note
that Tomahawk only use the shale-test feature of Shale.
Paul Spencer
---BeginMessage---
A set of artifacts for Shale 1.0.5 is now ready. Please review the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12602407#action_12602407
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on TOMAHAWK-1023:
--
I see. Checking
Problems with myfaces when java2 security is enabled
Key: MYFACES-1879
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1879
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeanne Waldman reopened TRINIDAD-1104:
--
this needs to be closed as Not a Bug, not Fixed, so I am reopening it so I
can figure
Hi
Is there any objections about do this and solve TOMAHAWK-1146? I don't know
if there is any arguments about do not do this. Trinidad has its own
handler, so I think there is no problem. This mail is only to be sure of
this fact.
regards
Leonardo Uribe
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 21:57 -0500, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
Hi
I have committed the changes.
Thanks!
Reading the email again, I forget to mention my opinion about change
tagExcluded setting to ignore.
In the plugin there are several levels of ignore (only two used in
practice):
Leonardo,
Was HtmlHiddenRenderer.java add just to make the test pass, or is it
need to when Tomahawk is run with the RI?
Paul Spencer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: lu4242
Date: Wed Jun 4 11:53:57 2008
New Revision: 663341
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=663341view=rev
Log:
Leonardo,
Was HtmlHiddenRenderer.java add just to make the test pass, or is it
need to when Tomahawk is run with the RI?
Paul Spencer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: lu4242
Date: Wed Jun 4 11:53:57 2008
New Revision: 663341
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=663341view=rev
Log:
Leonardo,
HtmlHiddenRenderer.java uses Java 5 annotations. Tomahawk must work in
Java 1.4
Paul Spencer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: lu4242
Date: Wed Jun 4 11:53:57 2008
New Revision: 663341
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=663341view=rev
Log:
TOMAHAWK-1023 HtmlInputHidden fails
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:18 PM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 21:57 -0500, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
Hi
I have committed the changes.
Thanks!
Reading the email again, I forget to mention my opinion about change
tagExcluded setting to ignore.
In the plugin
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leonardo,
Was HtmlHiddenRenderer.java add just to make the test pass, or is it
need to when Tomahawk is run with the RI?
Really it is not necessary to tomahawk runs with the RI, but it is necessary
to make the test pass,
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leonardo,
HtmlHiddenRenderer.java uses Java 5 annotations. Tomahawk must work in
Java 1.4
I have checked the code but there are using doclets, not annotations, so
this is fine ;) .
Thanks for pointing this stuff.
Leonardo,
Should HtmlHiddenRenderer.java be removed when we update to Shale 1.1?
Paul Spencer
Leonardo Uribe wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leonardo,
Was HtmlHiddenRenderer.java add just to make the test pass, or is it
need to when Tomahawk is
Yes, but let it as is do not cause any problem.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Leonardo,
Should HtmlHiddenRenderer.java be removed when we update to Shale 1.1?
Paul Spencer
Leonardo Uribe wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL
On 6/4/08, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* @JSFJspProperty name = message inheritedTag=true returnType =
java.lang.String longDesc = alternate validation error message format
string
*/
public class CSVValidator extends ValidatorBase
Inheritance of properties for converters and
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 20:05 -0500, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 4:33 AM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
stuff about template vs subclass modes removed
By the way, what does the JSFComponent.parent attribute do?
In conclusion, superClass and parent are
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 6/4/08, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* @JSFJspProperty name = message inheritedTag=true returnType =
java.lang.String longDesc = alternate validation error message format
string
*/
public class
A practical use case for converter inheritance would be identical --
allowing custom converter per-instance messages properties.
Since the JSF spec does not declare validator and converter classes
final, assume that inheritance is possible and that properties will
propagate. Again, if you are
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:36 PM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 20:05 -0500, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 4:33 AM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
stuff about template vs subclass modes removed
By the way, what does the
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
A practical use case for converter inheritance would be identical --
allowing custom converter per-instance messages properties.
Since the JSF spec does not declare validator and converter classes
final, assume that
Avoid usage of @JSFComponent parent=org.., correcting the hierarchy of
components
---
Key: TOMAHAWK-1265
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1265
+1 Highly desiderable :)
2008/6/4 Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi
Is there any objections about do this and solve TOMAHAWK-1146? I don't know
if there is any arguments about do not do this. Trinidad has its own
handler, so I think there is no problem. This mail is only to be sure of
34 matches
Mail list logo
