On 6/28/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig McClanahan schrieb:
I'm on the expert group for WebBeans[1], along with a bunch of other
people. There will definitely be some functional overlap on what
Shale calls the dialog manager -- you will really really really want
to pick one
On 6/26/07, Dr. Duong BaTien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 13:47 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 6/26/07, Dr. Duong BaTien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anything in shale-goodies yet?
The beginnings of a Clay based port of the Petstore app, and a few
related
On 6/26/07, Dr. Duong BaTien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 22:18 +, Gary VanMatre wrote:
From: Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/26/07, Dr. Duong BaTien wrote:
Is there anything in shale-goodies yet?
The beginnings of a Clay based port of the Petstore app
On 6/26/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mario Ivankovits schrieb:
Hi!
code.google.com is fine for that.
I'd like to start a project at code.google.com to host any code not
allowed (or not easily allowed) by the policy of ASF. e.g. when
depending on (L)GPL code. I reserved a name
On 6/26/07, Dr. Duong BaTien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anything in shale-goodies yet?
The beginnings of a Clay based port of the Petstore app, and a few
related experiments.
Craig
Thanks
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 00:47 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 6/26/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL
On 3/2/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arash Rajaeeyan schrieb:
and may be thats because shale has chosen a different approach?
No...
Actually I think the fusion conversation system is one level lower than
shale dialog.
While shale dialog basically follows the approach -
On 2/28/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arash Rajaeeyan schrieb:
oh yes, also conversation scope of Trinidad
does you (or any one one else) have access to JSR 299 info?
do you which approach are they going to standardize for
conversation/dialog/(or what ever they name it)?
Btw.
On 2/27/07, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mario Ivankovits schrieb:
I thought you were simply playing around with the fusion framework,
not trying to use it for real work :-)
He is really enthusiastic and an adventurer ;-)
It has less to do with adventure more along the lines of
On 2/27/07, Arash Rajaeeyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am more interested in ORM control part.
I prefer to stay neutral between seam and shale in the book :)
Don't forget about the conversation scope implementation in Trinidad, too :-).
Craig
On 2/27/07, Arash Rajaeeyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oh yes, also conversation scope of Trinidad
does you (or any one one else) have access to JSR 299 info?
do you which approach are they going to standardize for
conversation/dialog/(or what ever they name it)?
EG discussions on JSR-299 have
On 2/26/07, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 non-binding
Just as a procedural note, the only votes that PMC members have
binding votes on is releases. For technical issues (like this one),
all committer votes are not only binding, but a -1 (supported by
adequate reasoning) is a
I was attempting to build a quick demo application for Shale and Tomahawk
interoperability, and was surprised to not be able to find it at the Maven
central repository (at least under groupId org.apache.myfaces.tomahawk and
artifactId tomahawk). The only thing I can find is snapshots at the
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Tabbed Pane
Affects Versions: 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: Craig McClanahan
Among other places, the documentation at
http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/extensionsFilter.html tells you to map the
extension filter to the URL pattern
Components: Tabbed Pane
Affects Versions: 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: Craig McClanahan
The TLD docs for the t:panelTabbedPane have these definitions for two of the
style class overrides:
activeTabStyleClassStyle class of the active tab cell
inactiveTabStyleClass Style class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12472070
]
Craig McClanahan commented on TOMAHAWK-894:
---
It should go without saying that, if this kind of change
On 1/5/07, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A patch release certainly would be a good idea but it takes time and
resources to pull off each release. Its probably worth the effort
since we tend to shoot ourselves in the foot when we release a whole
set of features that sometimes contain
On 12/21/06, lightbulb432 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the detailed response.
How would the server generally tell which came from which window using
jsf_sequence?
Because each window would postback the id rendered in that page, telling
the server which ViewState to associate to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig McClanahan schrieb:
One of the architectural approaches that MyFaces developers seem
to do
pretty often, even when they don't have to, is think of everything
as
needing a component. To me, this involves the person building the
view
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig McClanahan schrieb:
One of the architectural approaches that MyFaces developers seem
to do
pretty often, even when they don't have to, is think of everything
as
needing a component. To me, this involves the person building the
view
in decisions
On 12/19/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Our plan was to implicit start a conversation as soon as a conversation
been will be created through spring.
Well, to know which conversationContext we are currently working in
(this context is required for multiple window awareness)
On 12/19/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Craig!
One of the architectural approaches that MyFaces developers seem to do
pretty often, even when they don't have to, is think of everything as
needing a component.
Hehe, yes indeed. But I'll try to move away from such approaches,
the follow through :-).
Craig
Just my $0.02
-M
On 12/20/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig McClanahan schrieb:
One of the architectural approaches that MyFaces developers seem to do
pretty often, even when they don't have to, is think of everything as
needing a component
On 10/31/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi! 1.) Seperate NavigationHandlerImplIMHO, this is a must! I think we should *not* implement stuff whichsilently changes/enhances the behaviour - especially in myfaces-impl!!The TCK might forbid this change anyway ...
2.) Configurable
On 10/31/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like the 1.2 branch [2] does not work on a fresh co because the tomcat jars have been removed from the apache repo [1].Does anyone know where they have gone to?I seem to remember the Mortbay jars working quite well for us.Is there any reason
On 10/29/06, Ernst Fastl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!At the moment when no navigation case for an outcome is foundthe navigationHandler decides to stay at the same view. I thinkan option for web.xml would be useful to tell the navigationHandlerif no navigation case for an outcome is found, but the
On 10/30/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Craig,you have been argumenting into this direction before, and I'm sorry todisagree completely. What JSF does in the standard is good forprojects where you have this necessity of different roles for page
development and back-end
On 10/30/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In reality there is a dependency between two pages, there is a silentcontract how to prepare the managed beans so that the destination pageknows what to display (and I think the f:param stuff is useless here).
So more often than not you'll use
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1383?page=comments#action_12445431
]
Craig McClanahan commented on MYFACES-1383:
---
Looking at this issue again, it seems to me that it would be better to
recreate the FacesContext
On 10/19/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no, I mean,why not just abstract isPost() method and letting the impls deal with that?It looks like the JSF 1.2 EG used this pattern a lot, when they added new methods to existing classes ... see for example
FacesContext.getELContext().
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1467?page=comments#action_12442362
]
Craig McClanahan commented on MYFACES-1467:
---
On a sidenote - I believe that it is bad to skip validation at all if the
value of a field is null.
I
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1467?page=comments#action_12442364
]
Craig McClanahan commented on MYFACES-1467:
---
what do you say to my reasoning for cases where required is either true or
false, depending
On 10/7/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/7/06, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hehe wrong list... but now that you say that, as we are using shale-test for testing, in the implementation of MyFaces
1.2 there is one test (UIComponentTagUtils) that fails, because it tries to
On 10/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we start a roll call of who is going to be at Apache Con and onwhat days?I'm posting this to both Shale and MyFaces list since Ifeel there is a lot of overlap between our two groups.I will be there Tuesday (late afternoon) - Friday (leaving
On 9/22/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/17/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think we should get rid of the wish issue type. I don't see that we're likely to have someone surfing the jira issue
tracker looking for things to do. If someone wants to wish for
On 9/12/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was a gentleman agreement that there is no commit from Tobagosto MyFaces, after the toboago incubation was done.That is exactly ***not*** the expected scenario in an Apache TLP. All committers to MyFaces should be able to commit to any
On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really.But I need a vote from 2 other pmc member.Can you encourage 2 pmc member to vote for the release.FWIW, this is the kind of thing that motivates a MyFaces committer is a MyFaces committer, as opposed to trying to segregate folks only
On 8/24/06, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,Sorry for the late reaction. Just want to say that i'm sorry about thesituation, I should have been more carefull, and this sort of things won'thappen next time. All your reactions were quite usefull and made me learn a
lot about ASF.I
On 8/24/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No I'm not proposing we deal with generating HTML rendering businessas far as dialogs are concerned.[I'll post a more detailedexplanation on the shale dev list where that belongs.]@Adam: If you're not already subscribed to shale dev we'd love to
not through Jira.Even if they had been, that would not have been sufficient in this case, for the reasons outlined above.
I mean, why ?Craig McClanahan
[1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/[2] http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
On 8/22/06, Martin Marinschek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: For a substantial
On 8/22/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One clarification: For external contributions, a jira-issue definitelymakes sense.A behavior that both the Struts and Shale communities have adopted (albeit recently in the case of Shale :-) is to have a JIRA issue for pretty much any
On 8/21/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jurgen Lust schrieb: Op ma, 21-08-2006 te 11:14 -0400, schreef Mike Kienenberger: Do we want to list out who's responsible for components on the wiki? It seems like ththis would encourage having people send email directly
an individual committer
On 8/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get lot's of direct emails, I think Mike is right, that this can (orwill) increase the number of offline emails.You'd be amazed at how many personal Tomcat questions I still get, after not having worked on that project for several years,
On 8/20/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be suprised if you found a quick and easy way to do this. MyFaces core uses digester to unmarshal the config files.It then calls the API you mention. I would start digging around in org.apache.myfaces.config .
One aggressive approach you
doing this (probably over the weekend at some point)?Craig McClanahan[1] https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-249
On 8/4/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If sb. is interested in staying the weekend () in Austin, lemme know. For me it's pretty fine to fly back to San Francisco on Sunday, instead of Friday. That one I'm going to pass on :-).I do enough travelling that leaving
Friday night
On 8/4/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,anyone already planing her/his trip to Austin?I *think* I'll arrive on Oct 10 in the evenings. If you already know,when you arrive etc, please update this wiki page [1]. Bill and Ispoke about it during the flight to Dublin; so it's
On 7/14/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi! I noticed that there are only some tests for components in Tomahawk. Wouldn't it be great to have a test-case as a requirement for promoting a component ? Sure, if we can decide what reasonable test cases are.
I would like to see more
On 7/14/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/14/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Deliberately releasing components that don't work with the RI does not seem like something that will increase the market acceptance of MyFaces
components.Well, let's not make this more
On 7/14/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/14/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can tell you from years of painful experience, supporting some JSP tag libraries that rendered complex output, that the golden file approach can be
really fragile and I'd never do
On 7/13/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dennis, when and what are you testing?Shouldn't we tag and build it as 1.1.4 first?why tagging, when the *snapshot* might be crap ?:-)I agree with Wendy. Release votes should be about here is a bunch of bits that I propose we release as
I temporarily modified the Shale build environment to use 1.1.4 instead of 1.1.1, and was able to successfully build and run all the unit tests and integration tests (meaning I could deploy apps and run through some basic exercises on some of the standard components).
One thing I would note in the
and root for your favorites.
Craig McClanahan
-- as a result, I can't build anything that depends on 1.1.2 unless I happened to have it in my local repository already.
SeanCraig
On 6/16/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This POM (possibly among others) has a repository element pointing at
http://cvs.apache.org that needs to be changed
This POM (possibly among others) has a repository element pointing at http://cvs.apache.org that needs to be changed to point at http://people.apache.org
. Without doing so, you can't use Maven to build with 1.1.2 as a dependency unless you happened to have it in your local Maven repository prior
Is there a reason that the 1.1.3 core release advertised on the MyFaces website[1] has not been synched over to the ibiblio Maven2 repository?Also, when I download the .tar.gz version of this, I get an error tar: a lone zero block at 8130 from a tar zxvf
myfaces-core-1.1.3-bin.tar.gz on SUSE
On 6/8/06, Chris Dadej [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Within JIRA, go to Administration - Permission Schemes and edit theparticular scheme to which the ADFFACES project belongs.Just a matter of setting the appropriate permissions for Add Commentsto not include everyone.
Thanks Chris. I've got admin
with the jira permissions. currently it is possible to add comments as anonymous. This is a
fact, we don't like for some reasons. thanks for your help, Matthias On 6/8/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/8/06, Chris Dadej [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Within JIRA, go to Administration
On 6/9/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a vote to release Tomahawk 1.1.3 (and its dependencies:MyFaces Shared 2.0.2 and MyFaces Maven 1.0.3.)I should have spoken up earlier on, but I have a problem with this approach to release votes.
In the Struts world, the release
include such a URL (and perhaps instructions on how to temporarily modify your Maven settings to download and test this version) instead of just assuming that everyone knows where the bits are, and what to do.
-MatthiasCraig
[1] http://tinyurl.com/mu4t9On 6/9/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 6/8/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried tomahawk_1_1_3 and JSF 1.1._01(I just removed myfaces-xxx and added jsf-xxx)I didn't changed any of the dependencies. No idea, what RI needs :-)You'd know if you pointed at the RI's POM :-). It's in a Maven1 (
i.e. legacy format)
/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=176 On 6/6/06, Craig McClanahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:CONVERTER_ID =javax.faces.DoubleTimeLooks like a spec bug due to a cut-n-paste error in the RI's API classes.
If so, the correct thing
On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CONVERTER_ID =javax.faces.DoubleTimeLooks like a spec bug due to a cut-n-paste error in the RI's API classes. If so, the correct thing to do would be to report feedback via the website on the spec cover (
, I'm a customer :-) about the kinds of areas you would like to see a
2.0 spec cover.-MatthiasCraig
[1] https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=176On 6/6/06, Craig McClanahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@Craig: We can certainly release a not TCK tested version - we canjust not call it TCK compliant.You'd better read the spec license again A package that implements some of the javax.* APIs from a spec needs to implement *all* of them.
On 5/25/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'd better read the spec license again A package that implements some of the javax.* APIs from a spec needs to implement *all* of them.@ Craig: Is this different the the 1.1 spec license?I seem to recall
a compromise solution where we released
On 5/24/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I can see, we never ever try to release a version out of the 1.2tc6 branch. So no need to do any special maintainance with this branch - just an archive.This part confuses me.I was under the impression that Stan was 90%
of the way
On 5/21/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok,one more addition to the discussion - I'll want to branches. One forJSF1.2 things which cannot be used together with Tomcat 5.5 and, onefor JSF1.2 things which can be used with Tomcat 5.5. I'd love trunk to
be the JSF1.2/Tomcat 5.5 branch,
On 5/15/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ps. Look at the shale test stuff.We're using more of it each day in MyFaces.Here's a link to the website docs about the Shale Test Framework:
http://struts.apache.org/struts-shale/features-test-framework.htmlCraig
On 5/10/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dennis Byrne schrieb: Also, JBoss has decided to use the RI instead of MyFaces for JBoss 5. The decision was purely one of time and resources.By shipping the RI we will be able to pass the JEE 5 TCK sooner.
We need to branch for 1.2 and get
On 5/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added: myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/sandbox/core/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/custom/pagelet/resource/cpaint2.inc.jsURL:
On 4/27/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig McClanahan schrieb: On 4/26/06, *Sean Schofield* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Is there something like this in ADF faces?I haven't looked at the donation yet with all of the other stuff going on but they have a pretty
On 4/27/06, Gethin Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am urgently trying to find out how and where Facelet file
handles are assigned. I am hitting a problem with java IOExceptions for having
too many files open on my system. Upon inspection it appears as I navigate around
my web
On 4/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the approaches of the blueprint components are highly faulty-- especially with the use of dojo.bind. You are dealing with pure URI negotiation which is orthogonal to the communication capabilities of JSF. Example, the autocomplete
On 4/26/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there something like this in ADF faces?I haven't looked at thedonation yet with all of the other stuff going on but they have apretty complete set of widgets in there.I agree it would besomething nice to have.
It would definitely be nice to
On 4/26/06, Stan Silvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In addition to the dinner, we are also having a MyFacescommitters/contributors meeting.Anyone interested in the developmentof the MyFaces project is welcome.It will be held on Tuesday, June 17 at 1pm.We have the room until 5pm.
I hope that June 17
On 4/15/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know where to get crude numbers such as X # of downloads a day, Y # of subsrcibers to users@ ?Download counts are hard to come by, because the majority of them come from Apache mirror sites. Buf for the user list subscriber count, the
On 4/14/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally the release has passed the TCK.Lets start the vote so we canrelease ASAP.This is a vote to release myfaces-core-1.1.2.Its alsoimplicitly a vote to release myfaces-shared-2.0.0 since that is adependency.The shared dependency will only be
On 4/14/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally the release has passed the TCK.Lets start the vote so we canrelease ASAP.This is a vote to release myfaces-core-1.1.2.Its alsoimplicitly a vote to release myfaces-shared-2.0.0 since that is adependency.The shared dependency will only be
Jonas Jacobi wrote:
Hi Craig,
It is now three weeks since the announcement of the new adffaces-xxx
mailing lists. I know you are busy, but do you have a status update on
the creation of the Subversion repository for these components?
Thanks
- Jonas
--
*Author*: Pro JSF and Ajax: Building
On 4/13/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/13/06, Craig McClanahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonas Jacobi wrote: Hi Craig, It is now three weeks since the announcement of the new adffaces-xxx mailing lists. I know you are busy, but do you have a status update on the creation
--
Martin CooperOn 4/13/06, Craig McClanahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/13/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/13/06, Craig McClanahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Jonas Jacobi wrote: Hi Craig, It is now three weeks since the announcement of the new adffaces-xxx mailing lists. I
On 4/13/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/13/06, Craig McClanahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/13/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I believe this is done. Your repo is at:https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/adffaces/
Note that I have not created the standard
/13/06, Adam Winer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Excellent, thanks!Once I get an apache account, karma for the SVN, and a bit of free time, I can check this puppy in and we can started for real! -- Adam
On 4/13/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/13/06, Martin Cooper
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 4/10/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacob Hookom wrote: The NavigationHandler has that default behavior. But much like WebWork allows the pluggable ActionMapper, all parts of JSF are pluggable in that manner.Seam and SWF are two examples of plugging in alternate
logic for navigation
On 4/3/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since you never answered the question in your subject line :-), I ampresuming that POJSO means Plain Old _javascript_ Object, right?Oops, yes.BTW, POJSO _javascript_ has no results in google, so this is hot stuff ;)
/me just burned my fingers on the
On 4/2/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 ( and both examples are from me )It's good that you brought this up now because both of those parameters ( and three of four more) were introduced *after* the last release.Had these ended up in the 1.1.2 release, I would bring up the backwards
On 4/2/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Craig,If I take your philosophy and apply it to the managed-bean annotation,it makes only sense for the scope-annotation. The name annotationshould (and will be changed) without changing the code itself.
Indeed. And nothing stops you from
On 4/3/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a release candidate for myfaces-core-1.1.2 available fortesting.Its in the nightly directory[1] so it will be auto-deletedafter 5 days.Lets get this tested and out the door so we can finallyget a new stable release out there.
Has this
On 4/3/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello community,There are plenty of great frameworks that allow us to marshall entities back and forth between our POJOs and the DB.Does any know of a way to marshall entities back and forth from our POJOs and the client side?What I want is to just
On 3/28/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig, the Shale Tiger extensions are a good startin point, I read thedocs, and liked what I saw. (I also highly recommend Seam which drivesannotations to the extreme)Yep ... good stuff there too.
Anyway, having had to hack components again for an
On 3/28/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dennis Byrne schrieb: XML configuration files do quite well their job and were designed to avoid coupling parametrization stuff in code. Now it seems we return to the point were we started. It seems more a response to .NET than real desirable
On 3/28/06, Travis Reeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A mixture of the two might be good, keep them in RAM for a short period of time and/or a maximum number of sessions, then write them to disk after the thresholds. Or even write them to some kind of scalable persistence mechanism like ehcache or
]To: adffaces-commits@incubator.apache.orgDate: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:22:06 -0500
Subject:On 3/27/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good news!There are now four email lists that will be specifically focused
on the ADF Faces component contribution to Apache!You can use the subscription links below
Good news! There are now four email lists that will be specifically focused on the ADF Faces component contribution to Apache! You can use the subscription links below to subscribe yourselves to the corresponding lists.
ADF Faces User List -- this is the place to ask questions about using the ADF
On 3/20/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For properly testing against both APIs and IMPLs, we'd need to have the RI be1) maven2-nized2) with a compatible license.Now, license issues have been resolved for most of the licenses wedeal with. Was the CDDL amongst the libraries we may
(Coming back from London after a couple of days out of touch, so this might be old news, but ...)On 3/17/06, Dennis Byrne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:One -- you're actually limiting or biasing the test coverage for this
particular test because you're testing against a particularimplementation rather
On 3/10/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/10/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: @Craig Any idea whether we can do another alpha release so we can use the fixed mock stuff in MyFaces?I think both Shale and MyFaces should
try to start releasing more often. @ Wendy Would you be
On 3/9/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I'd like to get in gear right now :is there a utilityout there that can do batch replacing of license files for .javaand .xml files?I'd like to get the per-file license done beforechecking in the new drop and I'm dreading doing this
On 3/9/06, John Fallows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Count me in - it was great fun last year!
I want to be there, but need to know which night to protect as quickly
as possible, so my schedule doesn't get trumped like it did last year
:-).
tc,-john.
Craig
On 3/9/06, Jonas Jacobi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/8/06, CONNER, BRENDAN (SBCSI) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do the other application servers ship with their own JSF implementation?
Glassfish ships with the JSF 1.2 reference implementation.
Supporting JSF 1.2 is required for all JavaEE 5 platforms, so this is
going to be a universal issue for
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
