Result - Re: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0

2009-10-07 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Hi Thanks to all people who vote. We have 10 +1 for jul Mario Ivankovits Simon Lessard Werner Punz Gerhard Petracek Michael Concini Grant Smith Mike Kienenberger Jan-Kees Van Andel Manfred Geiler Cagatay Civici So we can continue with this change. There is a proposal about how to do this

Re: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0

2009-10-06 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
+1 for JUL On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel jankeesvanan...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for JUL. Jan-Kees van Andel 2009/10/1 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com: +1 for jul -- it's not ideal, but it's the standard and doesn't require any dependencies. On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at

Re: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0

2009-10-06 Thread Manfred Geiler
+1 for JUL On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 17:02, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: +1 for JUL On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel jankeesvanan...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for JUL. Jan-Kees van Andel 2009/10/1 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com: +1 for jul -- it's not

Re: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0

2009-10-06 Thread Cagatay Civici
+1 for JUL. On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Manfred Geiler manol...@apache.org wrote: +1 for JUL On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 17:02, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote: +1 for JUL On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel jankeesvanan...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for JUL.

Re: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0

2009-10-03 Thread Jan-Kees van Andel
+1 for JUL. Jan-Kees van Andel 2009/10/1 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com: +1 for jul -- it's not ideal, but it's the standard and doesn't require any dependencies. On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Grant Smith work.gr...@gmail.com wrote: +1 java.util.logging.Logger On Thu, Oct 1,

Re: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0

2009-10-01 Thread Simon Lessard
+1 for jul. However, I think we should add an utility class (ServletContextListnener? This is the easiest way I know of, if it qualifies for easiest at all) in myfaces-shared or extension to make it easier to configure the logger because it's way more annoying to configure than commons-logging

Re: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0

2009-10-01 Thread Werner Punz
Again +1 for jul... One dependency less is always a good thing. Werner Leonardo Uribe schrieb: Hi Right now, facelets code added to myfaces core 2.0.x branch uses jul in this form: protected final static Logger log = Logger.getLogger(facelets.viewhandler); But the original myfaces

RE: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0

2009-10-01 Thread Mario Ivankovits
IMHO configuring the logger has to be solved by the used container. Ciao, Mario Von: Simon Lessard [mailto:simon.lessar...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 01. Oktober 2009 16:57 An: MyFaces Development Betreff: Re: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0 +1 for jul. However,

Re: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0

2009-10-01 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2009/10/1 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com: Right now, facelets code added to myfaces core 2.0.x branch uses jul in this form:     protected final static Logger log = Logger.getLogger(facelets.viewhandler); But the original myfaces code uses commons logging, (so if there is no agreement

Re: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0

2009-10-01 Thread Werner Punz
Antonio Petrelli schrieb: 2009/10/1 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com: Right now, facelets code added to myfaces core 2.0.x branch uses jul in this form: protected final static Logger log = Logger.getLogger(facelets.viewhandler); But the original myfaces code uses commons logging, (so if

Re: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0

2009-10-01 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2009/10/1 Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com: Why don't you consider using SLF4J? Probably it is the same question asked over and over again, but I try anyway :-D That would be a dependency replacement with another. Just my personal opinion regarding SLF4J Don't bother, I noticed that there

Re: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0

2009-10-01 Thread Michael Concini
+1 for JUL Antonio Petrelli wrote: 2009/10/1 Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com: Why don't you consider using SLF4J? Probably it is the same question asked over and over again, but I try anyway :-D That would be a dependency replacement with another. Just my personal opinion

Re: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0

2009-10-01 Thread Gerhard Petracek
+1 regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2009/10/1 Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com Again +1 for jul... One dependency less is always a good thing. Werner

Re: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0

2009-10-01 Thread Grant Smith
+1 java.util.logging.Logger On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for JUL Antonio Petrelli wrote: 2009/10/1 Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com: Why don't you consider using SLF4J? Probably it is the same question asked over and over again, but I try

Re: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0

2009-10-01 Thread Mike Kienenberger
+1 for jul -- it's not ideal, but it's the standard and doesn't require any dependencies. On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Grant Smith work.gr...@gmail.com wrote: +1 java.util.logging.Logger On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for JUL Antonio

RE: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0

2009-09-30 Thread Mario Ivankovits
+1 for jul reduces dependencies - and sun also use it, no? Von: Leonardo Uribe [mailto:lu4...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 01. Oktober 2009 04:06 An: MyFaces Development Betreff: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0 Hi Right now, facelets code added to myfaces core