Dear all,
This is the voting candidate for the 12.0 update 2 release of Apache
NetBeans. This release is identical to 12.0-u1 except for the following
backported fixes for -
[NETBEANS-5336] Replace jcenter() to mavenCentral() in Gradle Projects
[NETBEANS-3342] Fix Netbeans Installer on macOS to
Dne úterý 9. února 2021 22:02:14 CET, Brad Walker napsal(a):
> Hey Jaroslav,
>
> I have a question related to this.
>
> What would be the proper, accepted way to build Netbeans using JDK11?
Hello Brad,
[in November](https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
r94d421ce16f609687c769125425b46f2322033879
Just my 2 cents: consider how currently the build instructions for each
release on the website
(https://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb122/nb122.html), and the build
from source instructions on the daily builds page
(https://netbeans.apache.org/download/dev/index.html), are fairly
different. N
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 8:56 PM Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> Dne úterý 9. února 2021 10:04:57 CET, Clement Levallois napsal(a):
> > Dear all,
> >
> > This is my first message to this list, happy to join!
> >
> > Gephi (www.gephi.org / https://github.com/gephi/gephi) is a successful
> > opensource desk
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 7:54 PM Eric Bresie wrote:
> So from an initial plan perspective I would assume part of the "table or
> work" would involve
>
I'd like to point out one thing: currently, the oldest JDK on which
NetBeans runs is JDK 8, but that does not mean it does not run on newer
JDKs. Q
Hey Jaroslav,
I have a question related to this.
What would be the proper, accepted way to build Netbeans using JDK11?
-brad w.
ps: I changed the subject line since the question is not directly related..
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 12:19 PM Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> Hi.
> I knew the time for a dis
Dne úterý 9. února 2021 10:04:57 CET, Clement Levallois napsal(a):
> Dear all,
>
> This is my first message to this list, happy to join!
>
> Gephi (www.gephi.org / https://github.com/gephi/gephi) is a successful
> opensource desktop app built on top of the NetBeans platform (release82).
Great,
Hi.
I knew the time for a discussion like this is going to come when I wrote my
"Compile with JDK-11 javac --release flag" in November. I have just been trying
to find the email in archives, but no luck! I had to resend it. Here is it for
your reference:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
r9
Has anyone seen this email? I haven't received any replies and I cannot find it
in the mailing list archive...
-jt
Sent on Nov 28, 2020:
> Hi.
> The release is successfully over, long live the next release!
>
> Since the [failure of modern code](https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/
> 2369)
So from an initial plan perspective I would assume part of the "table or
work" would involve
1. For Netbean codebase, for applicable Java version, updated to reflect
removed (and deprecated) APIs (see (1); the ticket may be a "starter point"
(epic) with children or follow up items as app
Would some place like here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Proposals be where
something like that would be added? Or is there a better place for that to
be done (i.e. netbeans-docs project, etc.)?
Unless I'm not at the right location, I don't appear to have write access
there
All,
My only concern about JDK8 is that I deploy my J2EE application on a Payara
server, and there seems to be some dependencies on JDK8. I know that I should
be able to run Netbeans on one JDK while developing my application to deploy on
another version, but whenever I do that I end up with we
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 09.02.2021, 07:42 -0600 schrieb Eric Bresie:
> I’m not sure why working in Netbeans git should take any significant
> time
> more than command line version.
I had a look at the profile and it is dominated by hashing and io
operations.
I saw a time difference of around 30s clo
Hi Eric,
Am Dienstag, den 09.02.2021, 07:48 -0600 schrieb Eric Bresie:
> I appreciate the mirroring of the binaries (based on recent GitPackages
> discussion)however this still makes me wonder why is are these mirrored
> binaries needed and why not just use another existing (maven) repository
DId you check your Windows Defender Settings? Maybe you can add the NetBeans
Folder as an exclusion.
Cheers
Chris
Von: Eric Bresie
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. Februar 2021 14:42
An: dev@netbeans.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Netbeans Git Performance
I’m on Windows 10 (Home) using Netbeans 12.2.
I notic
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 13:48, Eric Bresie wrote:
> I appreciate the mirroring of the binaries (based on recent GitPackages
> discussion)however this still makes me wonder why is are these mirrored
> binaries needed and why not just use another existing (maven) repository
> with the artifacts?
I thought initial attempts to “mavenize” Netbeans had already been
attempted (I believe by Tim) although maybe that was the contrib projects.
Are there any plans to switch over to that (i.e. add all the Pom.xml files,
updated any build documentation, etc.)? Seems that would help some with
dependen
I appreciate the mirroring of the binaries (based on recent GitPackages
discussion)however this still makes me wonder why is are these mirrored
binaries needed and why not just use another existing (maven) repository
with the artifacts?
Using these repositories could address having newer alrea
I’m on Windows 10 (Home) using Netbeans 12.2.
I noticed there may be an update to git libraries coming in 12.3 timeframe
so maybe this will help on this.
I’m not sure why working in Netbeans git should take any significant time
more than command line version.
Other than older git dependencies, I
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 22:00, Josh Juneau wrote:
>
> Hi Neil,
>
> Thanks for preparing for the release. I'd like to get PR 2684 on the list to
> merge for 12.3, if possible. This PR will add Jakarta EE 9 project support.
> I will try to get this reviewed and merged if it is okay to add to thi
On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 at 18:10, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> We could aim for:
>
> - beta1 -- Wednesday, 27 January
> - beta2 -- Wednesday 3 February
> - voting candidate -- Wednesday, 10 February
>
> It's probably a long shot we can keep to that schedule, but we might
> as well try!
OK, we said this
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 09:30, Clement Levallois
wrote:
> The support for loading / offloading of java modules at runtime has emerged:
> https://github.com/moditect/layrry
Well, the support for doing this was always there within JPMS, obviously.
A more interesting thing to look at given NetBeans
Hi Clement and everyone,
First of all, thanks Geertjan and all maintainers of Netbeans platform for
their past and current work.
Of course, we have and will update Gephi to use recent versions of the
netbeans platform, the latest Gephi release uses 8.2 which is old, but we
will use an up to date
Great, understood, and excellent to 'meet' again, Eduardo.
However, the specific requirements that Gephi has can only be added to
Apache NetBeans if Gephi itself is involved in doing so and, in fact, leads
these developments.
Gj
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:02 AM Eduardo Ramos Ibáñez
wrote:
> Hi
The Gephi engineers are welcome to introduce Layrry to Apache NetBeans,
which appears to imply that all of Apache NetBeans needs to be Mavenized as
well, which the Gephi engineers are also welcome to contribute. Anyone else
here are welcome to do the same, it does appear to be a lot of work, though
The support for loading / offloading of java modules at runtime has emerged:
https://github.com/moditect/layrry
For the compatibility with recent JDKs, I was referring to:
- nbm-maven-plugin relies on pack200, which has been removed from the JDK
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/netbeans
Moreover, when are developers from Gephi going to start contributing code
to Apache NetBeans?
Gj
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:22 AM Neil C Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, 09:05 Clement Levallois,
> wrote:
>
> > Gephi (www.gephi.org / https://github.com/gephi/gephi) is a successful
> > opensour
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, 09:05 Clement Levallois,
wrote:
> Gephi (www.gephi.org / https://github.com/gephi/gephi) is a successful
> opensource desktop app built on top of the NetBeans platform (release82).
> ...
> If I understand correctly, it seems that NetBeans (release82) is not
> compatible with t
What does it mean "it is not entirely compatible with recent JDKs"?
Of course, NetBeans uses the NetBeans module system. Let's move to the Java
module system once it supports updates at runtime, i.e., you cannot plug
new Java modules into a running Java application, can you?
Gj
On Tue, Feb 9, 20
Dear all,
This is my first message to this list, happy to join!
Gephi (www.gephi.org / https://github.com/gephi/gephi) is a successful
opensource desktop app built on top of the NetBeans platform (release82). I am
not the maintainer of Gephi but I support its community of users (8.4k Facebook
30 matches
Mail list logo
