GitHub user vieiro opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/113
[NETBEANS-54] Module Review libs.xerces
- Updated maven coordinates for Xerces 2.8.0 (Apache 2).
- Added xerces notice from
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-82
On 09/10/17 22:04, Antonio wrote:
Hi all,
The "libs.jvyamlb" module wraps Ola Bini's JvYAMLb library, version
0.2.7, but in maven central only version 0.2.6 is available.
Ola Bini keeps a github page [1] with the library, and it seems he
Hi,
> In fact this is already the case in the codebase. The review of the
> hibernate module done by Illya Kysil revealed one such file:
FYI:
The templates of html module also have it.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/tree/master/html/src/org/netbeans/modules/html/templates
I
Github user junichi11 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/73
@varaghar If you come from @emilianbold 's repo
(https://github.com/emilianbold/incubator-netbeans), please send your PR there.
i.e. not `apache:master` but `emilianbold:master`.
---
> On Oct 9, 2017, at 9:45 AM, Emilian Bold wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> For websvc.saas.api/ I see that 2 xsd files, which have the original GPL w/
> CPE + CDDL NetBeans dual license have been moved into an external
> dependency,
Hi all,
The "libs.jvyamlb" module wraps Ola Bini's JvYAMLb library, version
0.2.7, but in maven central only version 0.2.6 is available.
Ola Bini keeps a github page [1] with the library, and it seems he
pushed v0.2.7 to the "codehaus-jruby-repository" maven repository.
So, what should we
If they are NB specific files that seems exactly like what should happen…the
files be donated. Is that what you are saying Emi?
Wade
> On Oct 9, 2017, at 12:45, Emilian Bold wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> For websvc.saas.api/ I see that 2 xsd files, which have the original
GitHub user vieiro opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/112
[NETBEANS-54] Module Review libs.lucene
- Added lucene notice file from
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/releases/lucene-solr/3.5.0/lucene/NOTICE.txt
- Added the maven
On 09/10/17 08:47, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
Unit tests shall be unit tests - e.g. not require special network setup to
succeed.
That's a sentence that should be engraved in many foreheads... :-)
I don't know what the NetBeans qa/functional testing infrastructure
would require. Maybe some
Github user matthiasblaesing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/107
Wouldn't it be better to disable the test instead of deleting them? Even if
they are not executed right now, the next one working on the modules might be
supported by the code
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/103
---
Github user krichter722 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/54
---
Github user krichter722 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/54
> @krichter722 thank you for your interest. I'm sorry, but this PR was
overlooked, and another travis.yml was already merged. Please close this PR,
but stay with the project, there
Github user matthiasblaesing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/104#discussion_r143545978
--- Diff: libs.osgi/external/binaries-list ---
@@ -14,5 +14,5 @@
# KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
#
Github user matthiasblaesing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/54
@krichter722 thank you for your interest. I'm sorry, but this PR was
overlooked, and another travis.yml was already merged. Please close this PR,
but stay with the project, there
Github user matthiasblaesing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/111
A different approach to deleting the test would be to fix it. The keystore
and the jars could be created at test time and then used.
In anycase I would not delete it -
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> >
> > Jan, I suggest naming it 18.3 for now. As much as I don't like it, I
> don't
> > see it becoming 10... :-(
> >
>
> I was mostly trying to avoid dealing with a '.' in the branch name :-). So
> jdk18_3, OK?
Ah, I lost
Github user matthiasblaesing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/97
Merged - thanks for looking into this.
@vieiro @geertjanw you both asked for it - the change is now in master.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/97
---
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Michael Nascimento
wrote:
> Well, IDEA already has support for it. So I guess we really need a release
>
Right:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/amber-dev/2017-September/002150.html
for 9 so we can be the first stable IDE with support
Github user ebarboni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/70#discussion_r143516562
--- Diff: nbbuild/build.xml ---
@@ -1946,30 +1946,41 @@ It is possible to use -Ddebug.port=3234
-Ddebug.pause=y to start the system in d
No problem, I understand all this and the GitHub Travis integration is
pretty handy!
What I found odd was that you had to ask INFRA about Travis. But I guess it
has something to do with they premium plan Apache is under vs the free plan
which has more limits.
--emi
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 7:01
Github user JaroslavTulach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/70#discussion_r143515489
--- Diff: nbbuild/antsrc/org/netbeans/nbbuild/RatHtmlReportTask.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,345 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
I tend to agree… GitLab being very GitHub-ish in nature, but runnable on your
own infrastructure. GitLab-CI is very similar to Travis-CI, but yet on-par
with the reporting and visualizations you can get from Jenkins. Just my
opinion though.
--
Richard
On 10/9/17, 10:45 AM, "Emilian Bold"
Well, I also find it odd how much Apache depends on GitHub. I'm OK with
Hudson / Jenkins since it's open source and you may (and I have) run it
yourself. AFAIK Travis is a pure service, no way to run it on my own server
and compile it from source code.
--emi
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Wade
GitHub user juneau001 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/110
[NETBEANS-54] Module Review j2ee.metadata.model.support
- no external libraries
- checked Rat report, added license header on Table.javax which
unfortunately also changed
+1
> On Oct 8, 2017, at 9:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Graduation is a measure of the community, not any specific repository. The
> entire Apache Netbeans community graduates together.
>
> The key things we look for:
>
> - Understand the Apache Way
> - Understand
Github user ebarboni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/70#discussion_r143476986
--- Diff:
nbbuild/antsrc/org/netbeans/nbbuild/reporting/RatHtmlReportTask.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,295 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user ebarboni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/70#discussion_r143460566
--- Diff: nbbuild/antsrc/org/netbeans/nbbuild/reporting/ModuleInfo.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/109
---
Github user jlahoda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/109
Seems OK.
---
Github user martypowell closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/105
---
Github user martypowell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/105
@junichi11 thanks wasn't paying attention...will do
---
All,
Below is the current draft of the board report. Much of the header info is
missing, still in flight. We are missing two podling reports and four
reports are presently not signed off on. Podling's on CC please make sure
you've reviewed.
Incubator PMC report for October 2017
The Apache
GitHub user JaroslavTulach opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/109
Not all tests can be compiled right now. Compile them as part of travis run.
I've noticed that there are some modules with too wide test dependencies.
Such modules cannot be
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/108
---
Guys, if you like Travis, please approve:
github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/108
On pondělí 9. října 2017 12:17:41 CEST Emilian Bold wrote:
> Is this part of builds.apache.org or is Travis doing the build in some
> remote corner of the Cloud?
>
> I really like the GitHub integration and
Is this part of builds.apache.org or is Travis doing the build in some
remote corner of the Cloud?
I really like the GitHub integration and the sanity check on PRs but I'm
not entirely cool with it being a commercial service after all.
--emi
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Jaroslav Tulach
Hi.
I've just requested
issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15249
It should help us verify essential aspects of NetBeans are preserved. For
example that the code will remain buildable after merging a PR.
-jt
I have tested with 10.2.6 and JDK 1.8.0_121 and Maven 3.5.0.
The build hangs after this, i.e., the build does not continue and does not
complete:
Running TestSuite
Configuring TestNG with: TestNG652Configurator
java.lang.Exception: Error
at
On neděle 8. října 2017 11:27:57 CEST Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Yes, I saw that -- reported it and it's being looked at.
>
> Note though that this is unrelated to Apache, i.e., if you want to use
> Apache NetBeans, use the Apache NetBeans GitHub repo:
> github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans
Github user JaroslavTulach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/97
Feel free to proceed with integration. +1
---
Github user JaroslavTulach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/97#discussion_r143400960
--- Diff: nbbuild/antsrc/org/netbeans/nbbuild/extlibs/DownloadBinaries.java
---
@@ -415,16 +406,113 @@ private String hash(InputStream is)
I think something deeper than that is needed, much more detailed, on what
the modules each provide and how they relate to each other.
Gj
On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 at 07:56, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> We've been doing this
>
We've been doing this
https://netbeans.org/features/platform/certified-training.html for years. We
certainly have a lot material ready.
-jt
Dne 6. 10. 2017 8:46 Ryan Cuprak napsal(a):
>
> Hello,
> I have been poking around the NetBeans code and had a request/idea.NetBeans
Hello Jaroslav,
+1
I have tested with 10.2.6 and JDK8 u131 and the build succeeds here as well.
--Toni
Am 09.10.17, 05:37 schrieb "Jaroslav Tulach" :
Hello William.
Thanks for testing.
>> William Beebe : 08.10.17 @ 21:27 <<
46 matches
Mail list logo