Re: Maven repository is down

2019-04-03 Thread Antonio Vieiro
That’s a problem with the legacy Oracle server (the bits.netbeans.org redirects there). There’s nothing we can do from within the ASF Infra... El El mié, 3 abr 2019 a las 13:49, Jaroslav Tulach < jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com> escribió: > Hi. > My build >

Re: [VOTE] Apache NetBeans graduation to Top Level Project

2019-03-11 Thread Antonio Vieiro
+1 Congratulations, everybody!! El El lun, 11 mar 2019 a las 11:48, Geertjan Wielenga escribió: > Hi all, > > After a discussion amongst the Apache NetBeans community on the dev mailing > list[1], voting on a PMC chair[2], checking the podling status page[3], and > working through the maturity

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans (incubating) parent pom 1

2019-02-23 Thread Antonio Vieiro
+1 Thank you very much, Eric! El vie., 22 feb. 2019 15:42, Eric Barboni escribió: > Dear members of the Apache NetBeans community. > > > > In order to prepare release of Apache NetBeans (incubating) maven Artefacts > (RELEASE100 and RELEASE090) as well as Apache NetBeans (incubating) >

Re: PMC chair for Apache NetBeans

2019-01-31 Thread Antonio Vieiro
+1 for Geertjan as PMC Chair! El El jue, 31 ene 2019 a las 14:57, Geertjan Wielenga escribió: > Hi all, > > Here's the page describing what is needed for an incubating project to > become a top level project: > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html > > In there is stated: > >

Re: Javadoc for 9 and 10

2019-01-20 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Credit must go to Eric Barboni and Daniel Gruno! I just had to join the dots! Thanks for reporting the Jira! El dom., 20 ene. 2019 16:17, Laszlo Kishalmi escribió: > Wow! Great progress! Thank you Antonio! > > Firefox actually Ok with the certificate, the only issue I see is that > the favicon

Re: bits.netbeans.org web server

2018-12-07 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Yep, that’s step d) we need a), b) and c) first... El El vie, 7 dic 2018 a las 21:04, Eduardo Quintanilla < equintani...@bnext.mx> escribió: > HTTPS not supported ☹. > > Best regards, > Eduardo Quintanilla > Software Developer > Block Networks > > -Original Message- > From: Antonio >

Re: using tools repository for holding jenkins build script

2018-11-13 Thread Antonio Vieiro
I use http://infra.chat Cheers, Antonio El mar., 13 nov. 2018 18:27, Eric Barboni escribió: > Hi Antonio, > I’m not sure how you communicate with INFRA (chat or ticket). > > I was wondering if it’s possible to ask INFRA if it'is possible to have a > Jenkins user that is allowed to do stuff

Re: NetBeans javadoc at Apache (Re: Options, options (was Re: NetBeans javadoc at Apache))

2018-10-06 Thread Antonio Vieiro
I was thinking we could merge to another branch instead of to master. For 9.0 we could use a branch named "9.0-vc3" (same as the tag in incubator-netbeans). In fact we could update the jenkins release job to push the javadoc to this new repo as well. And so on with the rest of releases. We then

Re: Cleanup of old pending PRs

2018-08-17 Thread Antonio Vieiro
+1 to close abandoned PRs. I may set up a Jenkins job or something like that by next week or so. El El vie, 17 ago 2018 a las 8:57, Tim Boudreau escribió: > Perhaps an automated warning a couple of days before closure? > > -Tim > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 2:35 AM Jaroslav Tulach > > wrote: > >

Re: ApacheCon Montreal NetBeans Presentation Suggestions

2018-08-10 Thread Antonio Vieiro
The more the merrier, as Emilian once said (I think) El El mié, 8 ago 2018 a las 10:39, mark stephens < marksteph...@idrsolutions.com> escribió: > > > > On 7 Aug 2018, at 21:39, Antonio Vieiro wrote: > > > > So we can update our events page at > >

Re: NetBeans javadoc at Apache

2018-08-08 Thread Antonio Vieiro
What about https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-website/tree/master/bits.netbeans.org ? We have a basic setup there. I think we should try to keep the existing bits.netbeans.org domain. We can host the api documentation wherever we want, not in bits.netbeans.org necessarily, (say in

Re: ApacheCon Montreal NetBeans Presentation Suggestions

2018-08-07 Thread Antonio Vieiro
So we can update our events page at http://netbeans.apache.org/community/events.html, right? That page requires some love... El El mar, 7 ago 2018 a las 18:33, Kenneth Fogel escribió: > This year ApacheCon is happening here in my home town of Montreal. I will > be presenting “What Makes

Re: Determine the "current" project from module code

2018-07-31 Thread Antonio Vieiro
http://netbeans.apache.org/wiki/ May prove useful. El El lun, 30 jul 2018 a las 22:53, georgetrou...@gmail.com < georgetrou...@gmail.com> escribió: > > > On 2018/07/30 19:42:59, Svata Dedic wrote: > > Dne 30.7.2018 v 21:05 georgetrou...@gmail.com napsal(a): > > > Hi, I'm developing a module

Re: Podling website checks failing :-(

2018-04-10 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Which is in place, actually, and in all pages, but split in different paragraphs for better readability... > El 10 abr 2018, a las 14:28, Daniel Gruno escribió: > >> On 04/10/2018 02:27 PM, Antonio wrote: >> Hi all, >> It seems we're failing some podling website checks.

Re: New committer and PPMC member: John McDonnell

2018-03-03 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Congratulations John! > El 3 mar 2018, a las 14:18, Emilian Bold > escribió: > > The Podling Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache NetBeans has > invited John McDonnell to become a committer and PPMC member and we are > pleased to announce that he has

Re: A NetBeans website proposal

2018-02-23 Thread Antonio Vieiro
AFAIK Oracle has few resources doing IP clearance, so we can't really set the timelines. But maybe we can help them chunking the current website in smaller, more easy to process parts. I can't tell which parts/sections are more important. Should we start with the tutorials? The plugin portal? A

Re: A NetBeans website proposal

2018-02-23 Thread Antonio Vieiro
If nobody argues against the branch I think we could merge it into master in, say, 72 hours or so. After that all merges are indeed welcome. A NetBeans features page is indeed missing. Some nice screenshots of the IDE and some more from other products built on top of the platform would be most

Re: A NetBeans website proposal

2018-02-23 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Thanks, for the links, I'll send a PR against incubator-netbeans-website (multisite-test) branch later on with some updates. We do need this kind of help at the beginning: finding out what the "Apache way" is is important. The sooner we adhere to the conventions the better. Thanks again, Antonio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

2018-02-06 Thread Antonio Vieiro
+1 (binding) Congratulations & thanks all for this release. Special thanks to Jan & Matthias for this effort. Checksums OK LICENSE & NOTICE seem OK. They're getting fat :-) Build success with java version "1.8.0_161" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_161-b12) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit

Re: Apache NetBeans Update Center through mirrors?

2018-01-29 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Oh, and Apache has also a parent POM at http://maven.apache.org/pom/asf/ 2018-01-29 10:10 GMT+01:00 Antonio : > > > On 29/01/18 09:41, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: >> >> >> Yes, NBMs shall be hosted on Apache infra. Rather than having them on >> dist.apache.org, my preferred

Re: DevFaq wiki update

2018-01-10 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Hi Neil, I think these are all sensible ideas. Just two comments: 1. Which “NetBeans Github Repo” are we talking about? The website or the source code? Maybe the website is more appropriate, right? 2. I just did this experiments with the DevFaq as I thought that would be more useful, maybe we

Re: DevFaq wiki update

2018-01-10 Thread Antonio Vieiro
If nobody argues against this I´ll suspend the infra request within a few hours. Thanks, Antonio. > El 10 ene 2018, a las 11:46, Bertrand Delacretaz > escribió: > >> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Antonio wrote: >> ...I think we should make a

Re: jdk-javac exceptions how to report?

2017-12-21 Thread Antonio Vieiro
And since this is a very active branch I imagine the commit tag should also help. Thanks, Antonio > El 21 dic 2017, a las 18:09, Geertjan Wielenga > escribió: > > JIRA would be best I think. Steps to repoduce very important. > > Gj > > On Thursday,

Re: Logo contest (was: NetBeans Logo (SVG))

2017-11-16 Thread Antonio Vieiro
:58, Bertrand Delacretaz > <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Antonio Vieiro <anto...@vieiro.net> wrote: >>> ...I created #issue 145 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-145 >>> ... >> >> I have added s

Re: Logo contest (was: NetBeans Logo (SVG))

2017-11-16 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Thanks for the links! I created #issue 145 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-145 Contest ends on Nov. the 30th. Good luck, everybody! 2017-11-16 11:24 GMT+01:00 Bertrand Delacretaz : > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Christian Lenz

Re: AW: NetBeans Logo (SVG)

2017-11-16 Thread Antonio Vieiro
contest Needs to be in JIRA, I think as I can > remember. > > Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10 > > Von: Antonio Vieiro > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. November 2017 09:50 > An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org > Betreff: Re: NetBeans Logo (SVG) > > I see, > > I thi

Re: NetBeans Logo (SVG)

2017-11-16 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Toni > > Am 16.11.17, 09:49 schrieb "Antonio Vieiro" <anto...@vieiro.net>: > > I see, > > I think we could start a NetBeans logo contest. > > The winner will be treated to a beer and a "tapa" of "queso con > anchoas" [1]

Re: NetBeans Logo (SVG)

2017-11-16 Thread Antonio Vieiro
to create a > ticket for a vote, someone sent around some instructions whether this is the > official way or not, because I don’t know it. He sent an example of an other > logo. So creating a ticket is the official way I think? > > Can someone help here again? > > > Cheers &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

2017-11-16 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Was about to post an email with the link to issue 144 when I saw that Lars had already sent it X^D https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-144 2017-11-16 9:21 GMT+01:00 Lars Bruun-Hansen : > Was about to create this when I saw that Antonio had already created it in

NetBeans Logo (SVG)

2017-11-15 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Hi, I'm attaching a SVG version of the most voted Apache NetBeans Logo at [1] I uploaded the SVG image there, but does not render properly (you have to click on it). I'll try to add 256/128/64/32/16 pngs in a few days. Cheers, Antonio

Re: Small application for demoing the platform?

2017-11-13 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Well, that’s a great and useful idea! > El 14 nov 2017, a las 0:05, Geertjan Wielenga > escribió: > > Good plan. > > Maybe something that parses, e.g., our JIRA into a node hierarchy with a tc > for displaying basic details... > > Gj > >> On Mon, 13 Nov

Re: Give JavaHelp a chance! was: Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)

2017-11-08 Thread Antonio Vieiro
So, what about using DocBook Web Help [1]? After all nowadays all users have a web browser, don't they? They even have a maven plugin[2]. This is BSD licensed. The results [3] look acceptable to me. We could even try to fork the project (maybe it's unmaintained)? Cheers, Antonio [1]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)

2017-11-08 Thread Antonio Vieiro
-1, until we resolve these issues reported by Ate. Thanks, Ate, for reporting them, Antonio P.S.: I'll have some time tonight (EU time) to help solve them. 2017-11-08 0:04 GMT+01:00 Ate Douma : > I get a different build error: > > BUILD FAILED >

Are all modules reviewed?

2017-11-06 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Hi all, I'm taking a look at the list of modules to review [1] and it's not clear whether all modules have been reviewed or not. Are we already done? Or are there any more modules to be reviewed? Thanks, Antonio [1]

Re: 3rd party bundled binaries - what can we do and cannot do?

2017-11-02 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Hi, > El 2 nov 2017, a las 10:15, Bertrand Delacretaz > escribió: > > I don't think that's a hard requirement, but grabbing binaries from > non-standard places is not a good thing in general and might raise > questions from release reviewers. > > However, IIUC the

Re: Do we want multiple download servers

2017-11-01 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Hi all, I know I’ve been raising lots of questions about binary dependencies lately. The fact is that I don’t feel comfortable having them stored in hg.netbeans.org/binaries knowing this is going away. I’d prefer having as a solid build system as we can get. I’d prefer not having to

Re: Downloading from other Maven repositories was: Integrating with complex third-party software

2017-10-30 Thread Antonio Vieiro
> El 30 oct 2017, a las 20:47, Matthias Bläsing <mblaes...@doppel-helix.eu> > escribió: > > Hey, > > Am Montag, den 30.10.2017, 20:02 +0100 schrieb Antonio Vieiro: >>>> On the other hand during review of HTML/Java API I had to remove download >>>

Re: No more modules to review?

2017-10-30 Thread Antonio Vieiro
> El 30 oct 2017, a las 16:15, Lars Bruun-Hansen <lbruunhan...@gmail.com> > escribió: > > I've done 5-6 modules. > Now - for the first time - all modules have a name next to them. (except a > few o.eclipse but I'm under that Antonio Vieiro is looking at those?). Nope.

Re: Downloading from other Maven repositories was: Integrating with complex third-party software

2017-10-30 Thread Antonio Vieiro
> El 30 oct 2017, a las 18:35, Matthias Bläsing <mblaes...@doppel-helix.eu> > escribió: > > Hey, > > Am Montag, den 30.10.2017, 13:58 +0100 schrieb Jaroslav Tulach: >> 2017-10-25 6:21 GMT+02:00 Antonio Vieiro <anto...@vieiro.net>: >> >>>

Re: Centralized external-binary versions?

2017-10-30 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Thanks for this, Yaroslav. This is exactly the kind of explanation I was looking for. >From my point of view this is a very important architectural decision and it is important to a) state it clearly, b) adhere to it and c) make sure everybody adheres to it. Cheers, Antonio 2017-10-30 9:53

Re: Centralized external-binary versions?

2017-10-29 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Ok. Then let’s go ahead. Expect a PR for netbinox/o.eclipse.equinox.*/o.eclipse.core.* in a few days. Probably upgraded to the latest Eclipse 4.7 binaries. I imagine this is going to require some thorough testing. Cheers, Antonio > El 29 oct 2017, a las 12:11, Geertjan Wielenga >

Re: Integrating with complex third-party software

2017-10-24 Thread Antonio Vieiro
e-7.0-wildfly-9.0.1.Final/pom.xml > > > On 24/10/17 21:30, Matthias Bläsing wrote: >> Hey, >> Am Dienstag, den 24.10.2017, 19:35 +0200 schrieb Antonio Vieiro: >>> I’m currently reviewing one of the “o.eclipse.core.*” modules and I >>> can’t find

Re: Apache NetBeans Blog

2017-10-24 Thread Antonio Vieiro
> El 24 oct 2017, a las 17:12, Geertjan Wielenga > escribió: > > You need to be a committer to Apache NetBeans first, i.e., you need to have > an Apache ID, which means you not only need to have sent in your iCLA, but > you also need to have been invited to

Integrating with complex third-party software

2017-10-24 Thread Antonio Vieiro
I’m currently reviewing one of the “o.eclipse.core.*” modules and I can’t find a binary, so I should either upgrade or downgrade it. I was wondering if we should either upgrade or downgrade the binaries of _all_ of the “o.eclipse.core.*” modules at once. In order to avoid subtle bugs that may

Re: Build fails without "patch" tool

2017-10-24 Thread Antonio Vieiro
e is used > in the IDE. > -jt > > > 2017-10-24 13:10 GMT+02:00 Antonio Vieiro <anto...@vieiro.net>: > >> Hi all, >> >> The build fails if "patch" is not available on the command line (see [1]) >> >> AFAIK all the build system req

Build fails without "patch" tool

2017-10-24 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Hi all, The build fails if "patch" is not available on the command line (see [1]) AFAIK all the build system requires little external tools. Are we ready for requiring an external "patch" command or should we roll back that change? Thanks Antonio [1]

Re: Introduction

2017-10-17 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Thank you, Ghader, and welcome. Let us know if you have any questions. Kind regards, Antonio > El 17 oct 2017, a las 18:41, Ghader Arkani escribió: > > Hello. > > My name is Ghader Arkani living in Tehran, Iran. > I have 5 years of java development exprince(j2ee,

Re: add "-notice.txt" if needed with any required notices?

2017-10-17 Thread Antonio Vieiro
> El 17 oct 2017, a las 21:42, Jan Lahoda <lah...@gmail.com> escribió: > > Hi Antonio, > > On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Antonio Vieiro <anto...@vieiro.net> wrote: > >> I understand, thanks for the info. >> >> I think that once we have mave

Re: Linking GitHub account to

2017-10-16 Thread Antonio Vieiro
t voting, you'll > be a committer -- you've been an absolute rockstar over the past weeks. > > Gj > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Antonio Vieiro <anto...@vieiro.net> wrote: > >> Wow. That requires an Apache id. I didn’t know I had one! Do I? Ummm... I >> don

Re: Linking GitHub account to

2017-10-16 Thread Antonio Vieiro
up > > Gj > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Antonio Vieiro <anto...@vieiro.net> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I won’t be able to submit many PRs this week, I’m afraid. >> >> Anyway I’d appreciate you telling us when this GitBox thingy is ready

Re: Linking GitHub account to

2017-10-16 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Hi all, I won’t be able to submit many PRs this week, I’m afraid. Anyway I’d appreciate you telling us when this GitBox thingy is ready for use. Instructions would be also appreciated. Thanks, Antonio > El 16 oct 2017, a las 9:56, Geertjan Wielenga >

Re: Should we use Eclipse Maven Repository too?

2017-10-15 Thread Antonio Vieiro
> El 15 oct 2017, a las 15:50, Emilian Bold escribió: > > It's part of the Apache IP clearance. We need to know our dependencies. A > binary JAR won't do, specifically because we patch stuff too. We can't just > go through classes and add small license headers when we

Re: How to handle patches for external binaries?

2017-10-14 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Or 3. Build a small ant project that downloads sources from Maven, applies patches as required and recreates the binaries. > El 14 oct 2017, a las 9:15, Antonio Vieiro <anto...@vieiro.net> escribió: > > Hi all, > > Some modules contain patches that must be applied

How to handle patches for external binaries?

2017-10-14 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Hi all, Some modules contain patches that must be applied to third-party source projects in order to generate external binaries (an example at [1]). 1. What’s the license of these patches? Same as the original project? Or Apache 2? 2. I will not add maven coordinates for these, right? Shall I

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

2017-10-13 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Hi Martin, Thanks for your feedback. Good to know you’re still using NetBeans. By “Eclipse’s dependency tree tool” what do you mean? Something like [1] or like [2]? Should we move these kind of emails to the user list? Thanks, Antonio [1]

Re: Request for clarification on review process on NetBeans with pngs and other odd files found

2017-10-13 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Hi, - Just ignore image files (png/jpg/gif). - Add a comment to the xml files (you can copy it from nproject/project.xml). Greetings & thanks, Antonio > El 13 oct 2017, a las 16:15, mark stephens > escribió: > > I have reviewed my first module (performance),

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

2017-10-13 Thread Antonio Vieiro
> El 13 oct 2017, a las 12:41, Martin Dindoffer escribió: > >> What are those small things? Providing a list of those small things, for >> others to implement, is precisely the very significant role that you can >> play in this project. > > Hi there, fellow Java developer

Re: NetBeans 9 release date

2017-10-12 Thread Antonio Vieiro
> El 12 oct 2017, a las 23:56, Emilian Bold escribió: > >> I think, though this is just my opinion, that people simply using NetBeans > and not giving anything back at all, is something we need to actively move > away from. > > As a counterpart to this, I don't know

Re: Deleting stuff from the repository

2017-10-12 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Oh, no, let’s try to keep those too, please. The more stuff I have to learn from, the better :-) > El 12 oct 2017, a las 10:35, Ivan Soleimanipour > escribió: > > If you really want to lib.terminalemulator/examples/telnet/ and ../buildtool > are much better

Adding stuff to binaries-list

2017-10-07 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Hi all, I’m currently reviewing the lexer module. This depends either in “antlr" or "antlr-runtime” (I think it’s “antlr”), so I’ll need to add some stuff to the “external/binaries-list” and the proper antlr license as well (as in [1]). But I have some questions: a) How do I know what the

Re: Grep CDDL (was Re: PR #46)

2017-10-03 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Aha! I now understand :-) I’ll doublecheck that the files excluded don’t have any original license headers. Thanks, Antonio > El 3 oct 2017, a las 15:36, Jan Lahoda escribió: > > Sorry, I probably should have been more precise. > > All I meant was a check that the files

Re: Testing modules after review & licenses in test files?

2017-10-02 Thread Antonio Vieiro
I restored the xml test file to the Oracle headers but the tests keep on failing. So the Apache license headers are not the reason of the failure. I'll keep those and keep going. TIA Antonio

Testing modules after review & licenses in test files?

2017-10-02 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Hi all, A license header has already been included in an xml test file at [1] (ide cluster, editor module). If I run tests on this module (cd editor; ant test) the tests fail. My questions: a) Should I remove the license header from the test file? b) If so, the test file would have an Oracle

Licenses for user facing files & readmes?

2017-10-02 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Hi all, Sorry if this has been already answered, but I need some confirmation here: - User facing files (plain text template files such as [1] or [2], for example) don't require a license, right? - README files [3] do require a license Thanks in advance, Antonio [1]

Cannot update list of modules to review (ide/editor.lib, ide/editor.lib2)

2017-10-02 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Hi, I cannot update the list of modules to review at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/List+of+Modules+to+Review Would anyone please be so kind as to add the following entries there? Cluster (area): ide Modules: editor.lib, editor.lib2 Name: vieiro Thanks, Antonio P.S.:

Re: Introducing myself & stepping forward

2017-10-02 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Yep, these galicians are everywhere! ;-) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galicia_(Spain) Graciñas, Antonio 2017-10-02 9:44 GMT+02:00 Borxa Varela Bouzas <bo...@varelabouzas.net>: > Hi Antonio, > > Other spanish here! > > Saludos > >> El 2 oct 2017, a las 7:54, Anto

Re: Introducing myself & stepping forward

2017-10-01 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Thanks, Emilian! Thanks all! Un abrazo, Antonio 2017-10-02 7:52 GMT+02:00 Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com>: > Welcome Antonio! You have been missed! > > --emi > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Antonio Vieiro <anto...@vieiro.net> wrote: >> Great to see

Re: Introducing myself & stepping forward

2017-10-01 Thread Antonio Vieiro
.com/watch?v=Z4PBNSRp5g8 > > Does that help? > > Gj > > On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Antonio Vieiro <anto...@vieiro.net> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> This is Antonio Vieiro, an old time NetBeans enthusiast based in Madrid, >> Spain. >> >>

Introducing myself & stepping forward

2017-10-01 Thread Antonio Vieiro
Hi all, This is Antonio Vieiro, an old time NetBeans enthusiast based in Madrid, Spain. I've been keeping an eye on the NetBeans incubator process for a while. It seems there's a looong list of modules to review at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/List+of+Modules+to+Review