Please test your board: Some recent modification

2024-03-22 Thread Alan C. Assis
Very everyone, It seems like some recent modification in the mainline generated some bad side effects, none command is working. I'm pretty sure everything was working yesterday! If you have a Bluepill board you can try to reproduce it this way: $ git clone https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps ap

Re: [Article] Build & Test NuttX Apps in the Web Browser (TCC RISC-V Compiler)

2024-02-06 Thread Sebastien Lorquet
It would be nice if we could get TCC integrated on apps/ to run inside MCUs with much memory (like STM32 with external SDRAM), ESP32, BL808, etc. Best Regards, Alan On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 8:08 PM Lee, Lup Yuen wrote: Today we're running NuttX Emulator inside a Web Browser. What

Re: [Article] Build & Test NuttX Apps in the Web Browser (TCC RISC-V Compiler)

2024-02-04 Thread Lee, Lup Yuen
ld be nice if we could get TCC integrated on apps/ to run inside MCUs > with much memory (like STM32 with external SDRAM), ESP32, BL808, etc. > > Best Regards, > > Alan > > On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 8:08 PM Lee, Lup Yuen wrote: > > > Today we're running NuttX Emul

Re: [Article] Build & Test NuttX Apps in the Web Browser (TCC RISC-V Compiler)

2024-02-04 Thread Alan C. Assis
're running NuttX Emulator inside a Web Browser. What if we could > build and test NuttX Apps in the Web Browser? Learning NuttX becomes so > cool! > > Let's explore with TCC (Tiny C Compiler) for 64-bit RISC-V, compiled to > WebAssembly with Zig Compiler... > > (1) Zig

[Article] Build & Test NuttX Apps in the Web Browser (TCC RISC-V Compiler)

2024-02-03 Thread Lee, Lup Yuen
Today we're running NuttX Emulator inside a Web Browser. What if we could build and test NuttX Apps in the Web Browser? Learning NuttX becomes so cool! Let's explore with TCC (Tiny C Compiler) for 64-bit RISC-V, compiled to WebAssembly with Zig Compiler... (1) Zig Compiler compiles TC

Re: test

2023-05-09 Thread Alan C. Assis
Ok, finally it returned to work! I will send my email again! On 5/9/23, Tomek CEDRO wrote: > mailing list test > > -- > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info >

test

2023-05-09 Thread Tomek CEDRO
mailing list test -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info

LVGL updated to V8, please test your board

2023-01-01 Thread Alan C. Assis
Hi NuttXers, I just merged the LVGL V8 PR from Xiaomi: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/1341 https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/7268 Please test it on your board to confirm it still working for you. I tested here on SIMulator and everything worked as expected. BR, Alan

Re: Article: Auto Flash and Test NuttX on RISC-V BL602

2022-01-24 Thread Tomasz CEDRO
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 12:30 AM Lee, Lup Yuen wrote: > This article explains how I created a Linux script to flash and test NuttX > automatically on the BL602 RISC-V SoC... > https://lupyuen.github.io/articles/auto > Lup CONGRATZ! OPEN SOURCE RISC-V IS THE FUTURE! =) -- CeDeROM,

Article: Auto Flash and Test NuttX on RISC-V BL602

2022-01-24 Thread Lee, Lup Yuen
This article explains how I created a Linux script to flash and test NuttX automatically on the BL602 RISC-V SoC... https://lupyuen.github.io/articles/auto Lup

Re: ADXL372 sensor test fail

2020-12-17 Thread Bob Feretich
nsor error ouput, warning output, etc. Please advise me. Best Regards, Marlar *From:* Alan Carvalho de Assis *Sent:* Friday, December 11, 2020 7:07 PM *To:* dev@nuttx.apache.org *Cc:* Shee Cheng Yap *Subject:* Re: ADXL372 sens

Re: ADXL372 sensor test fail

2020-12-17 Thread Marlar Chan
Regards, Marlar From: Alan Carvalho de Assis Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 7:07 PM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Cc: Shee Cheng Yap Subject: Re: ADXL372 sensor test fail You need to enable the Sensors debug to see these sensor's messages: $ make menuconfig Build Setu

Re: ADXL372 sensor test fail

2020-12-11 Thread Alan Carvalho de Assis
You need to enable the Sensors debug to see these sensor's messages: $ make menuconfig Build Setup ---> Debug Options ---> [*] Enable Debug Features [*] Enable Error Output [*] Enable Warnings Output [*] Enable Informational Debug Output [*] Sensor Debug Features [*] Sensor

Re: ADXL372 sensor test fail

2020-12-10 Thread Xiang Xiao
nuttx/include/errno.h define ENODEV to 19: #define ENODEV 19 and nuttx/drivers/sensors/adxl372.c return ENODEV if id mismatch: static int adxl372_dvr_open(FAR void *instance_handle, int32_t arg) { /* Read the ID registers */ pnpid = adxl372_read_id(priv); priv->readonly = false

ADXL372 sensor test fail

2020-12-10 Thread Marlar Chan
Dear Nuttx, I'm testing with stm32f429-disco with adxl372 sensor. I tried to run sample demo adxl372_test. Device id is seen on /dev. But sensor cannot start run and i face with the following issue. Please suggest me any idea what is wrong with it. [cid:8a35bb4c-af2d-4429-bf1a-ba83816d1ac9] B

Re: Alternative Emulador to test NuttX

2020-05-10 Thread Alan Carvalho de Assis
On 5/10/20, Nathan Hartman wrote: > > This is interesting! > > Maybe it could be possible to have some cooperation between the two > projects (NuttX and Renode) to benefit both somehow? > I think it could be a good idea! The default STM32F4Discovery example is with Contiki. BR, Alan

Re: Alternative Emulador to test NuttX

2020-05-10 Thread Brennan Ashton
This is what I use to test my LiteX FPGA based RISC-V development. It works fairly well if you can represent enough of the IP which is why for the opensource RISC-V side of things it works quite well, for ARM I have seen mixed results although as you said there is a lot more emulated. They do

Re: Alternative Emulador to test NuttX

2020-05-10 Thread Nathan Hartman
> targets, both made by TI." > > I did a test and noticed that NuttX "nsh>" is not printed, but it > prints until the 'F' debug: This is interesting! Maybe it could be possible to have some cooperation between the two projects (NuttX and Renode) to benefit both somehow? Thanks for sharing. Nathan

Re: Test jobs failing due to timeouts?

2020-04-17 Thread Brennan Ashton
t; this week. > > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020, 12:26 PM Nathan Hartman > > wrote: > > > > > In my PRs I seem to get a lot of test failures, and I have to re-run > > > the tests, because of: > > > > > > [[[ > > > > > > Unable

Re: Test jobs failing due to timeouts?

2020-04-17 Thread Xiang Xiao
ould help make this more robust later > this week. > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020, 12:26 PM Nathan Hartman > wrote: > > > In my PRs I seem to get a lot of test failures, and I have to re-run > > the tests, because of: > > > > [[[ > > > > Unable to find ima

Re: Test jobs failing due to timeouts?

2020-04-16 Thread Brennan Ashton
This is an issue with GitHub unfortunately and got worse recently. I'll make some changes to the job that should help make this more robust later this week. On Thu, Apr 16, 2020, 12:26 PM Nathan Hartman wrote: > In my PRs I seem to get a lot of test failures, and I have to re-run >

Test jobs failing due to timeouts?

2020-04-16 Thread Nathan Hartman
In my PRs I seem to get a lot of test failures, and I have to re-run the tests, because of: [[[ Unable to find image 'docker.pkg.github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/nuttx-ci-linux:latest' locally /usr/bin/docker: Error response from daemon: Get https://docker.pkg.github.com/v2/

Re: Please test SmartFS

2020-01-09 Thread Gregory Nutt
I can help with these tests. Did you have a test set or suggestions about the test? There are a rather exhaustive tests at apps/testing/smart and apps/testing/smartfs. I would use the simulator with simulated FLASH to do the test. There is no existing SmartFS simulation test

Re: Please test SmartFS

2020-01-09 Thread Daniel Pereira Carvalho
Hi Alan, I can help with these tests. Did you have a test set or suggestions about the test? Thanks Daniel Pereira de Carvalho Em qui., 9 de jan. de 2020 às 10:37, Alan Carvalho de Assis < acas...@gmail.com> escreveu: > Hi Everyone, > > Please test the SmartFS for confirm i

Please test SmartFS

2020-01-09 Thread Alan Carvalho de Assis
Hi Everyone, Please test the SmartFS for confirm it still working after recent modifications (PR #66). These are good improvements introduced by Alin from Sony. But we need to confirm everything still working after these improvements. So please test it and stress it to confirm everything is

Re: Build Test Failures (so far)

2020-01-02 Thread Xiang Xiao
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 3:10 AM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > Here is the summary of build test problems that I have seen. I may > still encounter more. > > Question: Who is going to do the PRs for all of these? I will merge > the PRs an retest them, but someone else needs to su

Re: Build Test Failures (so far)

2020-01-02 Thread Gregory Nutt
Xiao Xiang, can you fix and verify this one.  I think it probably only needs to include nuttx/semaphore.h too. You understand that under the newer rules, I have to ask to make this (probably) small change.  I cannot cannot (or should not) contribute the change as a PR then also merge it. 

Re: Build Test Failures (so far)

2020-01-02 Thread Gregory Nutt
Nathan fixed the problems with icmp/icmp_poll.c.  Only this problem remains (so far). Xiao Xiang, can you fix and verify this one.  I think it probably only needs to include nuttx/semaphore.h too. Configuration:  spresense:lte Recommended Fixer:  Xiao Xiang Error: modem/altair/altmdm_sys.c:

Re: Build Test Failures (so far)

2020-01-02 Thread Gregory Nutt
Here is the UPDATED summary of build test problems that I have seen (Updated). Some of the previously reported errors have been fixed and I had a configuration problem in apps/ so only these remain for today.   I may still encounter more. later. Question:  Who is going to do the PRs for all

Build Test Failures (so far)

2020-01-02 Thread Gregory Nutt
Here is the summary of build test problems that I have seen.  I may still encounter more. Question:  Who is going to do the PRs for all of these?  I will merge the PRs an retest them, but someone else needs to submit them.  I have suggested those committers most reponsible for the the bad

FW: [PX4/Firmware] To test [PX4/NuttX] [BACKPORT] STM32F7 and STM32H7 SDMMC internal pull up usage fixed (#78) (#13787)

2019-12-31 Thread David Sidrane
FYI *From:* modaltb [mailto:notificati...@github.com] *Sent:* Monday, December 30, 2019 4:13 PM *To:* PX4/Firmware *Cc:* David Sidrane; Author *Subject:* Re: [PX4/Firmware] To test [PX4/NuttX] [BACKPORT] STM32F7 and STM32H7 SDMMC internal pull up usage fixed (#78) (#13787) Tested over 300

Re: Test Repository

2019-12-20 Thread David Sidrane
Hi Justin, Great points. See below On 2019/12/21 00:42:58, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > You may need to think how this fits into releases. some things to consider: > - Do you want the release to contain test information or not? A lot of Apache > project do include that but

RE: Test Repository

2019-12-20 Thread David Sidrane
Greg, -Original Message- From: Gregory Nutt [mailto:spudan...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 4:32 PM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: Test Repository > Looking at https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/, I see several projects, > perhaps most projects, that have a s

RE: Test Repository

2019-12-20 Thread David Sidrane
+1 -Original Message- From: Gregory Nutt [mailto:spudan...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 4:29 PM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Test Repository Looking at https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/, I see several projects, perhaps most projects, that have a special repository just

Re: Test Repository

2019-12-20 Thread Gregory Nutt
You may need to think how this fits into releases. some things to consider: - Do you want the release to contain test information or not? A lot of Apache project do include that but some don’t - it may be size dependant. - Do you wan users to be able to easy test releases? (Not providing test

Re: Test Repository

2019-12-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, You may need to think how this fits into releases. some things to consider: - Do you want the release to contain test information or not? A lot of Apache project do include that but some don’t - it may be size dependant. - Do you wan users to be able to easy test releases? (Not providing

Re: Test Repository

2019-12-20 Thread Gregory Nutt
repository to hold testing data... Things like yml files and the like.  I would much prefer to a have a separate repository to hold test files than to contaminate the incubator-nuttx and incubator-nuttx-apps repositories with test data. Another thing that I note by googling ".gitmodules te

Test Repository

2019-12-20 Thread Gregory Nutt
repository to hold testing data... Things like yml files and the like.  I would much prefer to a have a separate repository to hold test files than to contaminate the incubator-nuttx and incubator-nuttx-apps repositories with test data. Another thing that I note by googling ".gitmodules te

Re: Attachment test Photo

2019-12-20 Thread Alan Carvalho de Assis
Lookin in the site archive, his PNG was just a white square. On 12/20/19, Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 1:32 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: >> > How about this >> > >> Looks fine > > Was there a picture attachment? Hmm, I don't see it for some reason. >

Re: Attachment test Photo

2019-12-20 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 1:32 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > How about this > > > Looks fine Was there a picture attachment? Hmm, I don't see it for some reason.

Re: [PATCH] This is a test! Please DON'T commit!

2019-12-20 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 1:41 PM David Sidrane wrote: > > https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@nuttx.apache.org > > LOL - the list does list nor archive attachments. Attachments sent to the mailing list are archived. See Alan's above message with test attachment here: https:/

Re: [PATCH] This is a test! Please DON'T commit!

2019-12-20 Thread David Sidrane
https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@nuttx.apache.org LOL - the list does list nor archive attachments. On 2019/12/20 17:56:42, Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > Testing attachments. > > Greg, please confirm you can receive attachments. > > BR, > > Alan >

Re: [PATCH] This is a test! Please DON'T commit!

2019-12-20 Thread Gregory Nutt
Greg, please confirm you can receive attachments. Got it!

Re: Attachment test Photo

2019-12-20 Thread Gregory Nutt
How about this Looks fine

Attachment test Photo

2019-12-20 Thread David Sidrane
December 20, 2019 9:57 AM To: dev Subject: [PATCH] This is a test! Please DON'T commit! Testing attachments. Greg, please confirm you can receive attachments. BR, Alan

[PATCH] This is a test! Please DON'T commit!

2019-12-20 Thread Alan Carvalho de Assis
Testing attachments. Greg, please confirm you can receive attachments. BR, Alan From 05eadfbfb75074c97390d6625c1c226f356b4ae4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alan Carvalho de Assis Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 14:54:46 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] This is a test! Please DON'T commit! --- testing.tx

Re: [TEST]

2019-12-13 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 1:40 PM David S. Alessio wrote: > Testing… I’ve joined. Yup, received. Note that with gmail you probably won't see your own email echoing back from the group.

[TEST]

2019-12-13 Thread David S. Alessio
Testing… I’ve joined.

Re: [Test] Joined

2019-12-10 Thread Disruptive Solutions
[Test] Joined Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 10 dec. 2019 om 01:00 heeft david.sidr...@gmail.com het volgende > geschreven: > >  [Test] Joined > > Is it alive? > > David

Re: [TEST] Joined

2019-12-09 Thread Ishikawa, Masayuki (SHES)
hink if we still doing it here, Apache people will think we are Nut! > > Hehehe > > BR, > > Alan > >> On Monday, December 9, 2019, wrote: >> [TEST] Joined >> >> Hi Group, >> >> Is

Re: [TEST] Joined

2019-12-09 Thread Disruptive Solutions
>> On Monday, December 9, 2019, wrote: >> [TEST] Joined >> >> Hi Group, >> >> Is this thing live yet? >> >> *David Sidrane* >> >> >> *david.sidr...@gmail.com * >>

Re: [TEST] Joined

2019-12-09 Thread Alan Carvalho de Assis
David, I think if we still doing it here, Apache people will think we are Nut! Hehehe BR, Alan On Monday, December 9, 2019, wrote: > [TEST] Joined > > Hi Group, > > Is this thing live yet? > > *David Sidrane* > > > *david.sidr...@gmail.com * >

[TEST] Joined

2019-12-09 Thread david . sidrane
[TEST] Joined Hi Group, Is this thing live yet? *David Sidrane* *david.sidr...@gmail.com *

Re: [Test] Joined

2019-12-09 Thread Abdelatif Guettouche
It is! On Tue, Dec 10, 2019, 00:50 wrote: > [Test] Joined > > Is it alive? > > David >

[Test] Joined

2019-12-09 Thread david . sidrane
[Test] Joined Is it alive? David

Re: [Test] Joined

2019-12-09 Thread Adam Feuer
I'm here too. -adam On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 3:41 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > Confirmed! > > On Monday, December 9, 2019, Gregory Nutt wrote: > > On 12/9/2019 5:37 PM, Abdelatif Guettouche wrote: > >> > >> Reply if you get this message. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > > I joined too! > > > > >

Re: [Test] Joined

2019-12-09 Thread Alan Carvalho de Assis
Confirmed! On Monday, December 9, 2019, Gregory Nutt wrote: > On 12/9/2019 5:37 PM, Abdelatif Guettouche wrote: >> >> Reply if you get this message. >> >> Thanks. >> > I joined too! > >

Re: [Test] Joined

2019-12-09 Thread Disruptive Solutions
Reply Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 10 dec. 2019 om 00:37 heeft Abdelatif Guettouche > het volgende geschreven: > > Reply if you get this message. > > Thanks.

[Test] Joined

2019-12-09 Thread Abdelatif Guettouche
Reply if you get this message. Thanks.

Re: [Test] Joined

2019-12-09 Thread Gregory Nutt
On 12/9/2019 5:37 PM, Abdelatif Guettouche wrote: Reply if you get this message. Thanks. I joined too!