Re: Moving securityext to the framework

2010-01-03 Thread Bruno Busco
When I sayd at least me I should have said To implement the framework-only distribution end-user requirements here http://cwiki.apache.org/OFBIZ/framework-only-distribution.html; We should agree or change what is written there and then work to implement it. The framework-only work should of

Re: Moving securityext to the framework

2010-01-03 Thread David E Jones
On Jan 3, 2010, at 3:53 AM, Bruno Busco wrote: When I sayd at least me I should have said To implement the framework-only distribution end-user requirements here http://cwiki.apache.org/OFBIZ/framework-only-distribution.html; We should agree or change what is written there and then work to

Re: Moving securityext to the framework

2010-01-03 Thread Adrian Crum
--- On Sun, 1/3/10, David E Jones d...@me.com wrote: One way or another if we're moving things around, especially moving higher level stuff into the framework, then we should definitely discuss it first and even try to reach a consensus around it. For example, one specific idea might be to

Re: Conditional seed data loading

2010-01-03 Thread Ean Schuessler
Hans Bakker wrote: Yes we should seriously look at this. These gadgets are based on the apache shindig (http://incubator.apache.org/shindig/) project. perhaps we can also use this in ofbiz? Shindig is an implementation of the opensocial (http://code.google.com/apis/opensocial/) standard so

Re: Moving securityext to the framework

2010-01-03 Thread David E Jones
On Jan 3, 2010, at 2:04 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: --- On Sun, 1/3/10, David E Jones d...@me.com wrote: One way or another if we're moving things around, especially moving higher level stuff into the framework, then we should definitely discuss it first and even try to reach a consensus around

Re: Moving securityext to the framework

2010-01-03 Thread Adrian Crum
--- On Sun, 1/3/10, David E Jones d...@me.com wrote: On Jan 3, 2010, at 2:04 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: --- On Sun, 1/3/10, David E Jones d...@me.com wrote: One way or another if we're moving things around, especially moving higher level stuff into the framework, then we should definitely