[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erwan de FERRIERES closed OFBIZ-3481.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Done at r910847
Thanks Abdullah for
http://www.postgresql.org/about/history
you will notice is did not start as open source.
1996 is when i started with it.
here is an excerpt that ofbiz has yet to achieve.
In 1996, Postgres95 departed from academia and started a new life in the
open source world when a group of dedicated
Also not that it has had to major revision since 1996
and it took 4yrs between revisions.
BJ Freeman sent the following on 2/17/2010 12:03 AM:
http://www.postgresql.org/about/history
you will notice is did not start as open source.
1996 is when i started with it.
here is an excerpt that
Wohoo, looks pretty awesome, for the first impression.
Like to test it in detail, thanks guys!!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erwan de FERRIERES closed OFBIZ-3407.
-
Resolution: Fixed
done at rev910871
update library iText 2.0.1 to iText 2.1.7
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12834716#action_12834716
]
Sebastian Leitner commented on OFBIZ-3453:
--
Hi *,
I just triped on this issue of
Moreover it derives from Ingres which begins in 1977...
Jacques
From: BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net
http://www.postgresql.org/about/history
you will notice is did not start as open source.
1996 is when i started with it.
here is an excerpt that ofbiz has yet to achieve.
In 1996, Postgres95
BTW, It's a moment now that I want to write an history for OFBiz. Never found
the time yet :/
Of course I'd need some help as I was interested by OFBiz only starting in
Sept. 2004 and not really involved before February 2005
Jacques
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
Moreover
Hi Anil,
Thanks for the info. I see that opentaps have built their business
around providing professional ofbiz based releases.
Cheers,
Chris
Anil Patel wrote:
Chris,
Thanks for listing important tasks for managing product release. In ofbiz
community little less has been done on this
David corrected me once and gave an overview of the beginning.
I will search my emails to see if I can find it.
it would be a good start.
Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 2/17/2010 2:28 AM:
BTW, It's a moment now that I want to write an history for OFBiz. Never
found the time yet :/
Of
On Feb 17, 2010, at 11:35 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
Hi Anil,
Thanks for the info. I see that opentaps have built their business around
providing professional ofbiz based releases.
Well, it is more accurate to say that the company OpenSourceStrategies has
built its business around the
Maybe Adempiere is a more comparable to ofbiz in the opensource
community. Adempiere community has nice features:
migration - http://www.adempiere.com/index.php/Migration
who's doing what -
http://www.adempiere.com/index.php/Feature_Development_Collaboration
The main difference with
On Feb 17, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
Maybe Adempiere is a more comparable to ofbiz in the opensource community.
Adempiere community has nice features:
migration - http://www.adempiere.com/index.php/Migration
who's doing what -
../..
Errors are still present on my machine. So, when looking deeper, it
looks like the InvoiceWorker.getInvoiceTotal method doesn't use any
locale. When returning a result via the run-tests commande, its decimals
are removed, so the results is always xxx.00, and then the test is in error.
This is interesting Erwan!
Could you please debug a bit more that method and find out where exactly is the
problem?
My guess is that the issue is in getInvoiceCurrencyConversionRate
Jacopo
On Feb 17, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
../..
Errors are still present on my machine.
On Feb 17, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
My guess is that the issue is in getInvoiceCurrencyConversionRate
Hmmm maybe not.
Jacopo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Babu Sreekanth updated OFBIZ-3484:
--
Attachment: screenshot.3.png
Field which do not show any info or cannot be edited needs to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Babu Sreekanth updated OFBIZ-3484:
--
Priority: Trivial (was: Major)
Field which do not show any info or cannot be edited needs to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12834780#action_12834780
]
Abdullah Shaikh commented on OFBIZ-3485:
I have checked this issue, the error is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12834786#action_12834786
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3485:
---
Hi Abdullah, thanks for reporting.
Before
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12834792#action_12834792
]
Abdullah Shaikh commented on OFBIZ-3485:
Hi Scott,
The error can be reproduced by
Le 17/02/2010 12:56, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Feb 17, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
My guess is that the issue is in getInvoiceCurrencyConversionRate
Hmmm maybe not.
Jacopo
Jacopo,
Here are more information :
when using pure JUnit tests, it's working great
Adam,
I do not see which other changes I need to do.
I did not remove (yet) the calGif parameter from the macro.
-Bruno
2010/2/17 Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com:
bus...@apache.org wrote:
Author: buscob
Date: Wed Feb 17 17:17:52 2010
New Revision: 911079
URL:
Bruno Busco wrote:
Adam,
I do not see which other changes I need to do.
I did not remove (yet) the calGif parameter from the macro.
When I investigated this, I found several hard-coded matches to
foo.gif stuff; there are 3 implementations of output methods for widgets.
-Bruno
2010/2/17
Adam Heath wrote:
doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Wed Feb 17 17:23:39 2010
New Revision: 911089
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=911089view=rev
Log:
Rename millis parameters everywhere to milliseconds. Also rename the
millis method.
At this point, I'm mostly done with
Adam Heath wrote:
doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Wed Feb 17 17:23:39 2010
New Revision: 911089
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=911089view=rev
Log:
Rename millis parameters everywhere to milliseconds. Also rename the
millis method.
At this point, I'm mostly done with
Adrian Crum wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Wed Feb 17 17:23:39 2010
New Revision: 911089
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=911089view=rev
Log:
Rename millis parameters everywhere to milliseconds. Also rename the
millis method.
At this point,
Adrian Crum wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Wed Feb 17 17:23:39 2010
New Revision: 911089
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=911089view=rev
Log:
Rename millis parameters everywhere to milliseconds. Also rename the
millis method.
At this point,
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Wed Feb 17 17:23:39 2010
New Revision: 911089
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=911089view=rev
Log:
Rename millis parameters everywhere to milliseconds. Also rename the
millis method.
Hi all,
while taking a new look to code coverage, will it be hard to use emma
instead of cobertura ?
In this case, we could include the library to OFBiz, as it is under a
CPL license.
Cheers,
--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz
Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Hi all,
while taking a new look to code coverage, will it be hard to use emma
instead of cobertura ?
In this case, we could include the library to OFBiz, as it is under a
CPL license.
Not super hard, no; I wrote the interface to be extensible with other
tools.
Adam Heath wrote:
Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Hi all,
while taking a new look to code coverage, will it be hard to use emma
instead of cobertura ?
In this case, we could include the library to OFBiz, as it is under a
CPL license.
Not super hard, no; I wrote the interface to be extensible
Adam Heath wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Hi all,
while taking a new look to code coverage, will it be hard to use emma
instead of cobertura ?
In this case, we could include the library to OFBiz, as it is under a
CPL license.
Not super hard, no; I wrote the interface
On 17/02/2010 20:53, Adam Heath wrote:
../..
Actually, emma doesn't look like it's maintained anymore. Last
download available was made back in 2005.
It's why I saw too...
--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz
adri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: adrianc
Date: Wed Feb 17 20:10:53 2010
New Revision: 911164
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=911164view=rev
Log:
Hand-ported TimeDuration.java bug fixes from trunk:
1. Fixed a bug in TimeDuration.java reported by Adam Heath on the dev mailing
adri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: adrianc
Revision: 911164
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Wed Feb 17 20:27:26 2010
--
--- svn:log (original)
+++ svn:log Wed Feb 17 20:27:26 2010
@@ -3,3 +3,5 @@
Adam,
What would be great would be a section about best practices using Git in
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/FAQ+-+Tips+-+Tricks+-+Cookbook+-+HowTo
Then we would not have to scrutinize the ML later...
Jacques
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
adri...@apache.org wrote:
It is generally good to have a test suite per class that is being
tested. Then, a single test method for each method in the orignal
class. All code blocks need to be tested, including error conditions.
Sometimes this might entail writing support classes to inject
errors, and cause exceptions
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Adam,
What would be great would be a section about best practices using Git in
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/FAQ+-+Tips+-+Tricks+-+Cookbook+-+HowTo
Yeah, I've been thinking about writing up a document.
The major thing that I haven't yet mentioned
Adam Heath wrote:
adri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: adrianc
Date: Wed Feb 17 21:40:41 2010
New Revision: 911182
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=911182view=rev
Log:
Added a test for TimeDuration pre-epoch elapsed time, plus added SVN properties.
I was just talking to Ean that there
Adrian Crum wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
adri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: adrianc
Date: Wed Feb 17 21:40:41 2010
New Revision: 911182
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=911182view=rev
Log:
Added a test for TimeDuration pre-epoch elapsed time, plus added SVN
properties.
I was just
Hi David,
In this commit you introduced some lines about groovy in the .project file. Now that I have updated to Eclipse 3.5 and Groovy plugin
2.0, I wonder if we should not better remove these lines. Because I have not the same in my .project and I find that Groovy is
working better now (no
Either way, I don't care.
-David
On Feb 17, 2010, at 3:28 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi David,
In this commit you introduced some lines about groovy in the .project file.
Now that I have updated to Eclipse 3.5 and Groovy plugin 2.0, I wonder if we
should not better remove these lines.
David E Jones wrote:
Either way, I don't care.
What happened to the license header?
-David
On Feb 17, 2010, at 3:28 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi David,
In this commit you introduced some lines about groovy in the .project file.
Now that I have updated to Eclipse 3.5 and Groovy
Adam,
Maybe you didn't notice, but this was a single commit from over a year ago.
To be honest, I don't know why Jacques brought it up except that it is where
the groovy plugin thingy was first enabled by default. IMO that is hardly
relevant to the current discussion, which is why I deflected
David E Jones wrote:
Adam,
Maybe you didn't notice, but this was a single commit from over a year ago.
What does the timeframe of the commit have to do with my question?
There was a license header, now there isn't, and I checked trunk first
before sending my question, to see if it had been
Hi,
I have a problem with the recent converter changes I guess. In a custom
application where I use a list-options I get an error
saying it's not a Map.
This is woirking if I revert to r909312. I will try to reproduce on a local update instance, I'm quite sure it's reproductible in
the trunk
Scott Gray wrote:
On 17/02/2010, at 4:09 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
Adam,
Maybe you didn't notice, but this was a single commit from over a year ago.
What does the timeframe of the commit have to do with my question?
There was a license header, now there isn't, and I
On Feb 17, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
On 17/02/2010, at 4:09 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
Adam,
Maybe you didn't notice, but this was a single commit from over a year ago.
What does the timeframe of the commit have to do with my question?
There
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with the recent converter changes I guess. In a custom
application where I use a list-options I get an error
saying it's not a Map.
This is woirking if I revert to r909312. I will try to reproduce on a
local update instance, I'm quite sure
On an Eclipse .project file?
Jacques
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
Scott Gray wrote:
On 17/02/2010, at 4:09 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
Adam,
Maybe you didn't notice, but this was a single commit from over a year ago.
What does the timeframe of the commit have to
Looking at the page source, you can see the link generated by the form
widget has an unclosed a element when used for the Calendar popup.
-Adrian
I'm workin on it :/
Just a little annoying as it's past midnight here and my wife will be waiting me tomorrow morning for our 4 vacation days she is
waiting for so long... Life...
Jacques
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with the recent
Adrian Crum wrote:
Looking at the page source, you can see the link generated by the form
widget has an unclosed a element when used for the Calendar popup.
In addition, the ul element inside the div class=view-calendar is
not closed.
-Adrian
I did not reproduce with the lists used in the trunk OOTB (I tried Party Roles
and Invoice Items)
But I can reproduce at r911227
I create a states list using (for instance)
set field=states value=${groovy: postalAddress?.countryGeoId ?
I am unable to reproduce that problem in the trunk.
-Adrian
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with the recent converter changes I guess. In a custom
application where I use a list-options I get an error
saying it's not a Map.
This is woirking if I revert to r909312. I will try
Missed the more important part, here it is
cause -
Exception: java.lang.ClassCastException
Message: Not a map
stack trace ---
java.lang.ClassCastException:
Thanks Adrian,
I did not change anything in the trunk but the theme and locales.available in
general.properties, also I use Postgres, that's all.
This is for sure reproductible with the last info I sent
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
I am unable to reproduce that problem in the
Jacques,
It looks like the list you are trying to use in the drop-down contains
something other than a Map.
-David
On Feb 17, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Missed the more important part, here it is
cause
Yes, actually it's a List of GenericValues returned by
CommonWorkers.getAssociatedStateList()
The problem is that this was working at r909312. I call this a regression,
maybe it was wrong in the middle before, but it worked.
Jacques
From: David E Jones d...@me.com
Jacques,
It looks like
--- On Wed, 2/17/10, doo...@apache.org doo...@apache.org wrote:
From: doo...@apache.org doo...@apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r911084 -
/ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/TimeDuration.java
To: comm...@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, February 17, 2010, 9:20 AM
Author:
61 matches
Mail list logo
