My fix is in rev. 916608
Hans, I think that you are maintaining the demo instance at ASF; if possible
please set the new flag in service.properties to false; this will fix the
PerGem errors without requiring to increase the JVM memory settings.
Jacopo
On Feb 26, 2010, at 8:48 AM, Hans
Hi Jacopo, putting it now on the demo server.
i see however that this flag by default is set to false?
Regards,
Hans
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 09:03 +0100, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
My fix is in rev. 916608
Hans, I think that you are maintaining the demo instance at ASF; if possible
please set
Use UiLabel for required
---
Key: OFBIZ-3515
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3515
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: specialpurpose/ecommerce
Affects Versions: SVN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Deepak Dixit updated OFBIZ-3515:
Attachment: OFBIZ-3515.patch
Here is the patch for this issue.
Use UiLabel for required
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
chris snow updated OFBIZ-3500:
--
Attachment: dependencyCheck.groovy
Added initial prototype script for checking dependencies.
Copy to
Tomahawk Formatting Problem
---
Key: OFBIZ-3516
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3516
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: specialpurpose/myportal
Reporter: Sam Hamilton
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sam Hamilton updated OFBIZ-3516:
Attachment: Screen shot 2010-02-26 at 17.59.02.png
Tomahawk Formatting Problem
Ooops,
thanks Hans, I have fixed it now.
Jacopo
On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Hi Jacopo, putting it now on the demo server.
i see however that this flag by default is set to false?
Regards,
Hans
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 09:03 +0100, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
My fix is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp updated OFBIZ-3516:
---
Attachment: OFBIZ-3516_Formatting_Problem.patch
Hi Sam
thanks for Reporting. Maybe this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3516:
---
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Bug)
Parent: OFBIZ-3517
Tomahawk Formatting Problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838806#action_12838806
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3516:
Done
Tomahawk Formatting Problem
Umbrella task for Tomahawk theme
-
Key: OFBIZ-3517
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3517
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Task
Components: ALL APPLICATIONS
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838807#action_12838807
]
Sascha Rodekamp commented on OFBIZ-3516:
Ha thanks Jacques, that was fast work :-)
German Label optimization
-
Key: OFBIZ-3518
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3518
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: accounting, framework, marketing, party, product
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mirko Vogelsmeier updated OFBIZ-3518:
-
Attachment: OfbizLabels.patch
I did translate some Labels to german language.
Affecting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mirko Vogelsmeier updated OFBIZ-3518:
-
Attachment: (was: OfbizLabels.patch)
German Label optimization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Geisert reassigned OFBIZ-3518:
Assignee: Christian Geisert
German Label optimization
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erwan de FERRIERES closed OFBIZ-3303.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Erwan de FERRIERES
done at r916646
add the depend-on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mirko Vogelsmeier updated OFBIZ-3518:
-
Attachment: OfbizLabelsUpdate.patch
German Label optimization
The Buildbot has detected a restored build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2753
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838835#action_12838835
]
Sascha Rodekamp commented on OFBIZ-3518:
The changes looks good to me.
Good work!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838837#action_12838837
]
Mirko Vogelsmeier commented on OFBIZ-3418:
--
What do you think about this Patch?
Hi,
When call-service element is used in simple method and there is no error
or success message in the result, a default message is returned The
action was performed successfully
The problem is that this message is returned only in simple methods when
call-service is used, and the user gets a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838839#action_12838839
]
Deepak Dixit commented on OFBIZ-3516:
-
Hi Sascha,
Instead of adding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838843#action_12838843
]
Vasu T commented on OFBIZ-3510:
---
Sorry sir for last reply,yes i was looking for this but how
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838845#action_12838845
]
Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-3510:
---
Hi,
You may take a look at this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838847#action_12838847
]
Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-3505:
On a second thought I must say that the attached
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
Is there a reson why the sort-order block is not extended by default
when you extend a form?
I don't see any reason.
You have to duplicate it in case it's the same...
Jacques
+ 1 to extend also sort-order element.
Bilgin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838852#action_12838852
]
chris snow commented on OFBIZ-3505:
---
+1
I haven't had a chance to test the patch, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838858#action_12838858
]
chris snow commented on OFBIZ-3368:
---
Any devs interested in applying this tiny patch?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-3436.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Release Branch
+1
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 26/02/2010, at 5:00 AM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote:
Hi,
When call-service element is used in simple method and there is no error or
success message in the result, a default message is returned The action was
performed successfully
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838871#action_12838871
]
Vasu T commented on OFBIZ-3510:
---
I found only this
+1.
--
Ashish
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Bilgin Ibryam bibr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
When call-service element is used in simple method and there is no error or
success message in the result, a default message is returned The action was
performed successfully
The problem is that this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838876#action_12838876
]
Brajesh Patel commented on OFBIZ-3518:
--
Mirko you have done good work,
Please change
+1 for consistency too
Jacques
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
+1
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 26/02/2010, at 5:00 AM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote:
Hi,
When call-service element is used in simple method and there is no error or success message in the
Hi Hans,
I know it isn't a huge deal but please ask your developers to keep a closer eye
on java formatting, there are a number places where spaces have been omitted in
your recent commits.
Thanks
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 26/02/2010, at 2:15 AM, hans...@apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838885#action_12838885
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3368:
Please Chris don't put tabs in patches
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mirko Vogelsmeier updated OFBIZ-3518:
-
Attachment: OfbizLabelsUpdate2.patch
Sorry for those copy-paste mistakes.
I fixed those
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bilgin Ibryam closed OFBIZ-3368.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Bilgin Ibryam
Thanks Chris.
A modified version is committed to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838899#action_12838899
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3518:
Mirko,
To avoid these trivial (but
Slightly modified Visual Theme Resource Enums for better readability
Key: OFBIZ-3519
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3519
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vikas Mayur updated OFBIZ-3519:
---
Attachment: enum.patch
Slightly modified Visual Theme Resource Enums for better readability
Hi Hans,
On Feb 26, 2010, at 4:16 PM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/ebaystore/src/org/ofbiz/ebaystore/EbayStoreAutoPreferences.java
the formatting of the above file is very inconsistent (not limited to this
commit).
Kind regards,
Jacopo
I'm using for the first time mergefromtrunk.bat and I wonder are these
prop changes coming from it?
bibr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: bibryam
Date: Fri Feb 26 15:15:33 2010
New Revision: 916710
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916710view=rev
Log:
Applied fix from trunk for revision:
Yes it is
Jacques
From: Bilgin Ibryam bibr...@gmail.com
I'm using for the first time mergefromtrunk.bat and I wonder are these prop
changes coming from it?
bibr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: bibryam
Date: Fri Feb 26 15:15:33 2010
New Revision: 916710
URL:
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Yes it is
Jacques
ok, thanks Jacques
Bilgin
jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Fri Feb 26 08:01:21 2010
New Revision: 916608
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916608view=rev
Log:
Added flag to switch off the debug mode for services that is causing out of
memory errors for JVM PermGen space.
Warning: the default
revision 897605 breaks certain delegator.find() EntityListIterator calls
Key: OFBIZ-3520
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3520
Project: OFBiz
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Heath updated OFBIZ-3520:
--
Attachment: 897606-testcase.patch
revision 897605 breaks certain delegator.find() EntityListIterator
Adam Heath (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Heath updated OFBIZ-3520:
--
Attachment: 897606-testcase.patch
revision 897605 breaks certain
On Feb 26, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adam Heath (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Heath updated OFBIZ-3520:
--
Attachment:
David E Jones wrote:
On Feb 26, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adam Heath (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Heath updated OFBIZ-3520:
--
Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
On Feb 26, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adam Heath (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Heath updated OFBIZ-3520:
David E Jones wrote:
Did you read the discussion about this?
Do you have a link for that? We didn't see anything.
Just search for the revision number.
I believe it has already been fixed, and you'll either have to update to
something more recent or back-port the fix.
On a side note, so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838969#action_12838969
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-3520:
---
When you write 897606 do you mean 897605, ie
On Feb 26, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
On Feb 26, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adam Heath (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838972#action_12838972
]
Adam Heath commented on OFBIZ-3520:
---
Yeah, sorry, 897605 is the one that I am talking
David E Jones wrote:
On Feb 26, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
On Feb 26, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adam Heath (JIRA) wrote:
[
jone...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jonesde
Date: Fri Feb 26 18:41:11 2010
New Revision: 916781
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916781view=rev
Log:
Changed to not try to do a distinct count by a specific column, which was
introduced in rev 897605, as it seems to cause a number of
Adam Heath wrote:
jone...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jonesde
Date: Fri Feb 26 18:41:11 2010
New Revision: 916781
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916781view=rev
Log:
Changed to not try to do a distinct count by a specific column, which was
introduced in rev 897605, as it seems to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838978#action_12838978
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-3520:
---
In rev 916781 this COUNT(DISTINCT stuff has
Bruno has a patch that will allow us to run ofbiz standalone - without
breaking anything!
This is a small but important step towards framework independence...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3505
Many thanks in advance,
Chris
What exactly are you requesting that people vote on?
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 26/02/2010, at 12:15 PM, Christopher Snow wrote:
Bruno has a patch that will allow us to run ofbiz standalone - without
breaking anything!
This is a small but important step
Rename temporal DAYOFWEEK_01 to DAYOFWEEK_SUN
-
Key: OFBIZ-3521
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3521
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: workeffort
Bruno's question:
So could we please review the patch?
Does it make sense?
If there are no major objections, then I guess he will commit it?
Scott Gray wrote:
What exactly are you requesting that people vote on?
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 26/02/2010, at 12:15
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838988#action_12838988
]
Adam Heath commented on OFBIZ-3505:
---
This patch is broken. It contains changes to config
Christopher Snow wrote:
Bruno's question:
So could we please review the patch?
Does it make sense?
If there are no major objections, then I guess he will commit it?
See my comments in the issue.
Have you even looked at the patch? It is certainly not intended to be
committed.
Are you in favor of the patch? If so, could you please explain why you would
like to see the party and content application components included in a
framework only release?
Thanks
Scott
HotWax Media
Yes, I have looked at the patch. I am in favor of it. My reasoning:
help would be important functionality for the framework. Help depends
on some content tables which in turn depend on some party components.
By moving entities in a similar hack, I have managed to get a standalone
I asked if you had looked at the patch because it cannot be committed as is
since it will disable all components except for the framework ones and party +
content.
The only piece that has a place in a framework only release is the framework,
anything else will get constant push back because it
I rather see it differently.
Framework components should core ones that compare to similar things out there.
I will rather have help move out of framework instead of moving content and
Party into framework.
I think we should do
/framework, /baseapps, /applications
We can put all those core
I am against moving party in the framework; we can discuss if a portion of the
content should be moved there.
Jacopo
On Feb 26, 2010, at 8:53 PM, Anil Patel wrote:
I rather see it differently.
Framework components should core ones that compare to similar things out
there. I will rather
Hi Anil,
I believe a standalone application development framework should have all
the functionality a developer needs to create an application, i.e.
- persistence
- services
- presentation tier
- reporting
- help
- security management
- job scheduler
- audit trail
Cheers,
Chris
Anil Patel
Me too, however with the current dependencies ,framework effectively
depends on applications anyway.
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
I am against moving party in the framework; we can discuss if a portion of the
content should be moved there.
Jacopo
On Feb 26, 2010, at 8:53 PM, Anil Patel wrote:
Chris,
I agree with your list except for help. Help system should be a plugin that can
be added to system. Delivery of Help should be controlled by screen design.
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword ofbiz
On Feb 26, 2010, at
Hi Anil,
I suppose you could argue that birt should be a plugin too? Not every
app needs reporting and birt does add a lot of overhead.
Cbeers,
Chris
Anil Patel wrote:
Chris,
I agree with your list except for help. Help system should be a plugin that can
be added to system. Delivery of
I've already tried with my only one alias (fjs...@laposte.net). So I
think that the best is to ask the mail list admin to remove me from the
database. Do you know the mail address of an administrator of the
mailing list that should be able to help me ?
Thanks.
Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
In fact Yes, I think birt should not be in framework as well. But its ok,
because a) because it does not really have any database dependency b) Its third
party library integration so the code in Ofbiz framework will not change as
much.
Ideally, Yes I will like it to be out of the framework :)
Any moderator of the list can help you, but we do have to know the email
address that you're subscribed under. I didn't see the email header details
that I think Jacques was asking for. If you receive this message through the
mailing list you should able to view the complete headers and send
You haven't gone far enough.
Stop thinking about just what you want. Or just what Bruno wants. Or
what the guy from Timbuktu wants.
Think about what we all want.
Namely, the ability to pick and choose the parts of ofbiz that we want
to make use of.
Arbitrary assignments of components into
Christopher Snow wrote:
Hi Anil,
I believe a standalone application development framework should have all
the functionality a developer needs to create an application, i.e.
- persistence
- services
- presentation tier
- reporting
- help
- security management
- job scheduler
- audit
Hello,
I've subscribed under one of the following mails :
fabien.jalabert...@]laposte{dot]net or fjspam...@]laposte{dot]net
Thanks a lot.
David E Jones a écrit :
Any moderator of the list can help you, but we do have to know the email
address that you're subscribed under. I didn't see the
Hi Chris:
If user management is included in the following, then I agree. I don't
think I've ever created an application that didn't have at least an
administrative user.
If not I'd add (basic) user management.
Ruth
Christopher Snow wrote:
Hi Anil,
I believe a standalone application
there is a ant build target
create-admin-user-login
do a ant -p
Ruth Hoffman sent the following on 2/26/2010 12:56 PM:
Hi Chris:
If user management is included in the following, then I agree. I don't
think I've ever created an application that didn't have at least an
administrative user.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12839018#action_12839018
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-3521:
A better solution would be to add a description
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12839026#action_12839026
]
Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-3505:
Thank you Adam and Chris for reviewing my patch.
This is what I am also trying to do.
Just have the possibility to *remove* all the applications but party
and content from an OFBiz installation and have it working.
Please stop thinking about moving things in or out of the framework.
The framework, if you like how it is right now, can stay there
Bruno Busco wrote:
This is what I am also trying to do.
Just have the possibility to *remove* all the applications but party
and content from an OFBiz installation and have it working.
Please stop thinking about moving things in or out of the framework.
The framework, if you like how it is
Adam Heath wrote:
Bruno Busco wrote:
This is what I am also trying to do.
Just have the possibility to *remove* all the applications but party
and content from an OFBiz installation and have it working.
Please stop thinking about moving things in or out of the framework.
The framework, if
webtools ViewGeneric does not work with entities that have BigDecimal fields
Key: OFBIZ-3522
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3522
Project: OFBiz
Hi,
I too had a problem with this commit and had reported it on this thread,
http://n4.nabble.com/RE-svn-commit-r897605-in-ofbiz-trunk-framework-entity-src-org-ofbiz-entity-datasource-GenericDAO-java-td1013432.html#a1016339
I am not sure if we are talking exactly about the same issue here,
rohit wrote:
Hi,
I too had a problem with this commit and had reported it on this thread,
http://n4.nabble.com/RE-svn-commit-r897605-in-ofbiz-trunk-framework-entity-src-org-ofbiz-entity-datasource-GenericDAO-java-td1013432.html#a1016339
I am not sure if we are talking exactly about the
Hi Adam,
I too would like to see a more modular ofbiz (e.g. maven + osgi), but
that is a big step. For example, it would be great if people wanting to
use just the entity engine could just download the entity engine jars
and be up and running.
However, what Bruno and I are proposing is
Christopher Snow wrote:
Hi Adam,
I too would like to see a more modular ofbiz (e.g. maven + osgi), but
that is a big step. For example, it would be great if people wanting to
use just the entity engine could just download the entity engine jars
and be up and running.
Ew! You said the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12839182#action_12839182
]
Vasu T commented on OFBIZ-3510:
---
why userloginid field is not giving autocomplete output
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12839183#action_12839183
]
Vasu T commented on OFBIZ-3510:
---
why userloginid field in below link is not giving
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-3522:
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
webtools ViewGeneric does not work with entities that
Fixed it in rev. 916923
Jacopo
On Feb 26, 2010, at 4:28 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Hans,
On Feb 26, 2010, at 4:16 PM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/ebaystore/src/org/ofbiz/ebaystore/EbayStoreAutoPreferences.java
the formatting of the above file is
99 matches
Mail list logo
