On 2/04/2010, at 11:57 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>
> On Apr 3, 2010, at 7:20 AM, lekt...@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Author: lektran
>> Date: Sat Apr 3 05:20:58 2010
>> New Revision: 930477
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930477&view=rev
>> Log:
>> EditProduct's quantityUomId drop do
On Apr 3, 2010, at 7:20 AM, lekt...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: lektran
> Date: Sat Apr 3 05:20:58 2010
> New Revision: 930477
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930477&view=rev
> Log:
> EditProduct's quantityUomId drop down should display all UomTypes except
> CURRENCY_MEASURE, bug rep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853078#action_12853078
]
Rishi Solanki commented on OFBIZ-3633:
--
With reference to BJ comment;
- The calculatio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853077#action_12853077
]
Rishi Solanki edited comment on OFBIZ-3633 at 4/3/10 5:22 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853077#action_12853077
]
Rishi Solanki commented on OFBIZ-3633:
--
With reference to user list discussion here ar
I am planning to update the code written in the service
"createQuoteFromCart" - QuoteServices.xml line #693.
Right now the code present inside this service creates quote only for
Sales Order cart & I would like to change this code so that it would
work for Purchase Orders as well.
As per my un
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Deepak Dixit updated OFBIZ-3633:
Attachment: OFBIZ-3633.patch
No changes , Only remove test variable declaration. { List test = new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum closed OFBIZ-3582.
--
Resolution: Fixed
I found the problem and updated the Wiki page. The multi-tenancy works with the
corr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Heath reopened OFBIZ-3582:
---
As I have commented, this is a bug in the wiki page, one that is valid.
reopening.
> unable to intiali
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853068#action_12853068
]
Adam Heath commented on OFBIZ-3582:
---
the wiki page listed earlier does *not* mention the
Hahahaha
Oh, I almost forgot this is a dev list.
在 2010-04-02五的 14:53 -0400，Ruth Hoffman写道：
> Hi Scott:
> Thanks that has been my understanding.
>
> However, David has made a statement that the ApacheCon organization is a
> for profit organization. I want to make sure that I'm operating under
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853066#action_12853066
]
Adam Heath commented on OFBIZ-3582:
---
there are multiple databases now in ofbiz. the base
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853065#action_12853065
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-3582:
David,
There is no need for you to comment. We wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853064#action_12853064
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3582:
---
I do see one difference I did not catch till now
t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853062#action_12853062
]
BJ Freeman edited comment on OFBIZ-3582 at 4/3/10 2:49 AM:
---
my un
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853062#action_12853062
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3582:
---
my understanding is when you do a -install it includ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853058#action_12853058
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-3582:
---
Seriously, what's the big deal? If you load
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853038#action_12853038
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3582:
---
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Mul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853035#action_12853035
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-3582:
I get the same error. Maybe what is needed is an e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853023#action_12853023
]
BJ Freeman edited comment on OFBIZ-3582 at 4/3/10 12:26 AM:
I c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853023#action_12853023
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3582:
---
I clean-all
I did the defualt install which I assume
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853011#action_12853011
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3582:
---
David:
this is an install.
if the record is missing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853004#action_12853004
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-3582:
---
Actually BJ what I said was the exact cause
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853003#action_12853003
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3582:
---
since david suggestion had nothing to do with the pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-3582:
> unable to intialize tenant Database
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3582.
--
Resolution: Not A Problem
> unable to intialize tenant Database
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3582.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
I can't reproduce in the normal case. If, as
From: "Adam Heath"
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
It's better than TV :p
Like that is difficult.
Some humor never hurt
Jacques
True!
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
It's better than TV :p
Jacques
From: "Ruth Hoffman"
David:
I think this thread is just about dead.
Regardless of what others think, I found ambiguity in your original
statement concerning the profit motive of the ApacheCon organization.
I now understand what yo
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> It's better than TV :p
Like that is difficult.
It's better than TV :p
Jacques
From: "Ruth Hoffman"
David:
I think this thread is just about dead.
Regardless of what others think, I found ambiguity in your original statement concerning the profit motive of the ApacheCon
organization. I now understand what you said. No more ambiguities. Tha
Yes, there are some tabs in the patch, just have a look, not a big deal anyway,
but better to avoid of course
Jacques
From: "Robert Morley"
I thought I had tabs set to four spaces, is that what you meant or
something else?
Bob
On 2010-04-02, at 4:33 PM, "Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)"
wrote:
I thought I had tabs set to four spaces, is that what you meant or
something else?
Bob
On 2010-04-02, at 4:33 PM, "Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)"
wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Rou
David:
I think this thread is just about dead.
Regardless of what others think, I found ambiguity in your original
statement concerning the profit motive of the ApacheCon organization. I
now understand what you said. No more ambiguities. Thanks for that
clarification.
Regards,
Ruth
David E Jo
You're right to be suspicious Ruth. The traffic volume on the private list is
at least twice the volume on the dev list. Also, you should have seen the
thread about you we had a couple of weeks ago!
Seriously though... what are you talking about? There seems to be some sort of
implied issue he
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Your point?
I asked for clarification. I got it. End of story.
Thanks for helping me out Hans. And thanks for making this mailing
list a friendlier place for all of us out here who are not privy to
all the secrets of those on the PMC.
Past or present.
Regards,
Ruth
Hans B
Your point?
I asked for clarification. I got it. End of story.
Thanks for helping me out Hans. And thanks for making this mailing list
a friendlier place for all of us out here who are not privy to all the
secrets of those on the PMC.
Regards,
Ruth
Hans Bakker wrote:
perhaps next time read mo
perhaps next time read more carefully and think again and then reply?
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 16:04 -0400, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
> Hi David:
> This says it all. No need to defend anything. My comments weren't not
> meant as an offensive move on my part. I only want to understand the
> dynamics of th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3600.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Bob,
Your patch is in trunk at r93037
Hi David:
This says it all. No need to defend anything. My comments weren't not
meant as an offensive move on my part. I only want to understand the
dynamics of the conference and the ASF.
Regards,
Ruth
David E Jones wrote:
Ruth,
Yeah, that's the point, I wrote: "ApacheCon is a for profit e
Ruth,
Yeah, that's the point, I wrote: "ApacheCon is a for profit effort with some of
the proceeds going to the foundation".
You wrote: "David has made a statement that the ApacheCon organization is a for
profit organization".
I guess my problem is I don't know how to defend a statement I did
On 2/04/2010, at 10:59 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
> Adam Heath (JIRA) wrote:
>> [
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
>> ]
>>
>> Adam Heath updated OFBIZ-3634:
>> --
>>
>>Attachment
Hello David:
I simply would like clarification on your statement: "ApacheCon is a
for profit effort." No need to get confrontational.
Regards,
Ruth
David E Jones wrote:
Ruth,
I challenge you to quote where I said that.
-David
On Apr 2, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Scot
Ruth,
I challenge you to quote where I said that.
-David
On Apr 2, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Scott:
> Thanks that has been my understanding.
>
> However, David has made a statement that the ApacheCon organization is a for
> profit organization. I want to make sure that I'm
Just to clarify:
This is different then the "Business/Community" Track call for
participation discussed previously.
Regards,
Ruth
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi PMC and other community members:
On the official "Apache Software Foundation Blog" is says per
ApacheCon NA 2010:
" ...ApacheCon's techni
Hi PMC and other community members:
On the official "Apache Software Foundation Blog" is says per ApacheCon
NA 2010:
" ...ApacheCon's technical tracks are currently being planned by their
respective Project Management Committees and will be announced in
upcoming weeks..."
Will the OFBiz PM
Hi Scott:
Thanks that has been my understanding.
However, David has made a statement that the ApacheCon organization is a
for profit organization. I want to make sure that I'm operating under
the correct assumptions when I make my decisions relative to this
conference. There is a HUGE differen
Apache is non-profit, but the foundation does "profit" from ApacheCons in the
sense that their takings exceed expenses. This "profit" goes back into the
foundation account to be used for other expenses involved in running the
foundation.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
Hi David:
Where have you seen it documented that ApacheCon is an organization with
a "for profit" tax status?
Everything I see says that ApacheCon is the "Official User Conference of
the Apache Software Foundation". This implies that it is sanctioned by
ASF and that it is a non-profit organiz
Thanks for clarifying Bob
Jacques
Bob Morley wrote:
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Done at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2586
But it seems there is still an issue...
Jacques
Hey -- It seems that the ticket we pointed INFRA to had a original request
for the "Patch Available" workflow
It would be nice if it were that way, but that's just not the case.
ApacheCon is a for profit effort with some of the proceeds going to the
foundation (in theory). In other words, the ASF gets money from ApacheCon and
does not generally invest any money in ApacheCon. In 2009 I think the
founda
Hi Ean:
Nice, but I think you might be missing my point.
ApacheCon is all about telling the world about OFBiz and using the
immense resources available to the Foundation to do that.
IMHO it isn't really about socializing with the small and (getting
smaller by the hour) OFBiz community. Apache
Hi David:
Sorry you had such bad experiences.
I guess what you are saying here is that I need to forge ahead with my
own proposals to the organizers and not expect any backing from you.
That is ok with me. I know how much time and effort you spent in the
past coordinating these things and I fo
Ean Schuessler wrote:
Given the relatively small size of our community, we have a lot of
flexibility about where we choose to meet. In my mind, the
accommodations should be purposefully modest yet interesting and fun.
There are lots of options like that in all kinds of places. We can think
of
I think DebConf is a good example that this can be done and done right.
I know HP helps out with the expenses of DebConf but part of that is
helping fly in developers from countries where the currency exchange
rates make attendance impractically high. We may simply not be able to
do that or we
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
> Done at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2586
> But it seems there is still an issue...
>
> Jacques
>
Hey -- It seems that the ticket we pointed INFRA to had a original request
for the "Patch Available" workflow status to be added, but through the
comment
I'm not sure if you meant this or not Ruth, but as it was addressed to me I
should clarify: I did speak up here, but I am not taking a role in organizing
anything as I did in previous years. In other words, I'm not committing to
anything on behalf of the project and I'm not trying to recruit sp
hans...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: hansbak
> Date: Thu Mar 25 02:28:25 2010
> New Revision: 927256
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=927256&view=rev
> Log:
> when exporting all data, an error message in the log advices to put the the
> function in a transaction. also added extra commits
Adam Heath wrote:
I'd talk about git svn workflows with ofbiz.
I could do something on one of these:
- the Open Source for America website
- a scheme for dynamically allocating warehouse bins and releasing
them based on order item flow
- QuickBooks integration via SOAP/QBXML
- F
Let's build an app to manage this on top of OFBiz. We can build all the
expenses into a project and have the price of the ticket dynamically
calculated off the gross cost plus some safety margin.
I also have a Condorcet voting rig that I built on top of the survey
system that would allow us to
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
> Hi David:
>
> I would be very interested in hosting sessions similar to last
> November's ApacheCon in Oakland. I'm prepared to commit to at least (3)
> 50 minute sessions. If someone wants to organize something out side of
> ApacheCon, then, depending on the venue, I may be
I've felt this same frustration Jacopo.
OFBiz is a large project with a long history and the community has been mostly
focused on making it easy for developers to get involved (ie inviting all sorts
of contributions and the people with them in order to hopefully get more
contributions). This h
Hi Erik:
Are you talking about ApacheCon as a "for profit" endeavor?
Regards,
Ruth
Erik Schuessler wrote:
I would agree, it is interesting to have a "for profit" event on free
or open software, it is kinda self defeating. I understand if they
were just covering costs, but that seems to be more
Hi David:
I would be very interested in hosting sessions similar to last
November's ApacheCon in Oakland. I'm prepared to commit to at least (3)
50 minute sessions. If someone wants to organize something out side of
ApacheCon, then, depending on the venue, I may be able to commit to
participa
I would agree, it is interesting to have a "for profit" event on free or
open software, it is kinda self defeating. I understand if they were
just covering costs, but that seems to be more focused on being a money
maker.
E
On 4/2/2010 11:30 AM, David E Jones wrote:
In the last thread about t
Adam Heath (JIRA) wrote:
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
> ]
>
> Adam Heath updated OFBIZ-3634:
> --
>
> Attachment: PROMO_GWP_inventory_check.patch
>
>> ProductPromoWo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Heath updated OFBIZ-3634:
--
Attachment: PROMO_GWP_inventory_check.patch
> ProductPromoWorker PROMO_GWP hard-codes a required invent
ProductPromoWorker PROMO_GWP hard-codes a required inventory check
--
Key: OFBIZ-3634
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3634
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Glad to know that they liked OFBiz site.
Thanks Tim for letting us know about this communication.
--
Ashish
Sent from my iPod
On 02-Apr-2010, at 9:51 PM, Tim Ruppert
wrote:
FYI, I answered to Grant privately since he's not on the list and
hooked him up with Erik, Ean and Mike to see where
In the last thread about this it sounded like people were more interested in
doing a separate conference that would be less expensive to attend.
Either way, I haven't heard anything about anyone pushing for any sort of
conference. Has anyone else heard anything, or is anyone else interested in
FYI, I answered to Grant privately since he's not on the list and hooked him up
with Erik, Ean and Mike to see where we might be able to help these guys out as
well.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Apr 2, 2010, at 10:00 AM
Hey OFBiz Team,
Some of us Lucene people were wondering who did your landing page website and
what you are using to generate it? Feel free to reject this and just send back
a response privately, as I'm not subscribed to dev@ and don't really want to go
through all of that for just one question
Done at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2586
But it seems there is still an issue...
Jacques
From: "Tim Ruppert"
Seems like something that would make things clearer so probably not a bad way to go. If there was a way to see from the
attachments that we had an upload already, I'd p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852853#action_12852853
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-:
Hans,
First some things are worth to be s
Seems like something that would make things clearer so probably not a bad way
to go. If there was a way to see from the attachments that we had an upload
already, I'd probably go for that - but in the absence, the additional status
seems like a reasonable request to me. +1
Cheers,
Ruppert
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Deepak Dixit updated OFBIZ-3633:
Attachment: OFBIZ-3633.patch
Here is the patch for describe functionality.
I have added data for pr
Minimum order quantity
--
Key: OFBIZ-3633
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3633
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: order, specialpurpose/ecommerce
Reporter: Rishi Sola
Hi all,
so I'm coming back on this subject, but as it is said here
(https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/apachecon_na_2010_business_community),
the conference call is over at the end of the month.
so, are we making an OFBiz symposium ? Or an OFBiz camp ?
Cheers,
--
Erwan de FERRIERES
ww
Jacopo,
Actually yes, it takes some time to follow the deprecated pattern. But it's not
so huge if you have well understood what to do. It's
well documented but you have to get through one time to understand it well. So
I'm not sure we should give up. Notably on
deprecating fields or/and Entiti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3631?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erwan de FERRIERES closed OFBIZ-3631.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Done at rev 930202, thanks Bob.
> Bad
On Apr 2, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Thanks Jacopo,
>
> Is it mandatory to create a such service?
It is not mandatory of course... and I am pretty sure that my migration service
will not be used much. By the way I have expressed my opinion about the current
trend in another m
In rev. 930182 I have created also the upgrade script to migrate data from old
to new fields.
By the way, are we sure it is a good idea for the project to enforce these
rules about backward compatibility?
It seems to me that the development in OFBiz is becoming more difficult every
day and this
Thanks Jacopo,
Is it mandatory to create a such service? It was not obvious for me reading the previous commits in the migration page as their were
not referring to any services. Then I thought it was a deprecated use.
Jacques
From:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Fri Apr 2 08:22:17 2010
New Revisio
From: "Adrian Crum"
--- On Thu, 4/1/10, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
>> So each entity creation itself was a separate work
unit. Once an
>> entity was created, you could submit the primary
key creation as well.
>> That's simple enough to implement(in theory,
anyways). This design
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852744#action_12852744
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-:
Hi Hans,
What kind of problems is your cl
--- On Thu, 4/1/10, Adam Heath wrote:
> Adrian Crum wrote:
> > --- On Thu, 4/1/10, Adam Heath
> wrote:
> >> Adrian Crum wrote:
> >>> --- On Thu, 4/1/10, Adam Heath
> >> wrote:
> Adrian Crum wrote:
> > --- On Thu, 4/1/10, Adam Heath
> wrote:
> >> Adrian Crum wrote:
> >>> I
86 matches
Mail list logo
