Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

The easiest way to do this would be to: 1) add run-install-demo (= run-install) 2) run-install should simply print a message explaining that now run-install-demo should be used But really, I am not very interested in spending more time to discuss this, especially because it is not an issue I (or

Re: Regarding SVN commit r892904

If you look through the dev mailing list for February you will see where Adam and I discussed the class's design. That should give you some insight into why things look the way they do. Most of the work that went into TimeDuration was the result of this Jira issue: https://issues.apache.org/jir

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859228#action_12859228 ] chris snow commented on OFBIZ-3702: --- Hi Scott/Devs, Instead of storing the text in the e

Re: Regarding SVN commit r892904

Lol of course not, I was just suggesting that strictly speaking that constructor misuses the makeNegative. With classes like this it is probably better to have a single instance variable store the ms for the duration. Just impressions when previewing; if there us no value let's ignore.

[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-3633) Minimum order quantity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-3633: -- Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya > Minimum order quantity > --

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3633) Minimum order quantity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859213#action_12859213 ] Ashish Vijaywargiya commented on OFBIZ-3633: Thanks Rishi and others for your v

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

I had the same thought, thanks Raj Jacques From: "Raj Saini" In my opinion run-install is misleading as it really does not tell that it is going to install demo data and cause confusion to new users as it has happened with me in the past. For the benefit of old and new users, I suggest to add

Re: svn commit: r936100 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/product/entitydef/ applications/product/servicedef/ applications/product/src/org/ofbiz/product/category/ applications/product/widget/catalog/ fr

From: "Adam Heath" Scott Gray wrote: On 21/04/2010, at 10:46 AM, doo...@apache.org wrote: Author: doogie Date: Tue Apr 20 22:46:14 2010 New Revision: 936100 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=936100&view=rev Log: Add a releaseDate to a product, mostly informational, intended to mean when

Re: Regarding SVN commit r892904

If you spend a little time with Work Effort's Estimated Milliseconds field, you will find that there is a lookup screen that will allow you to enter 4.5 hours. TimeDuration will encode/decode long values. You don't need to use the int constructors. If you were entering 10 months into a field, I

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

I just want to make one thing clear related to this: if _I_ make changes that are not backward compatible then it's because they are really important and no one should question them; if anyone else makes (or proposes) a change that I don't like and I can raise the backward compatibility flag th

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

as I have stated many times ofbiz is very fluid. from 2.0 up where things are and how things are done have change every 6 months of less. everybody has survived though a lot of grumbling. the change would definitely save a lot of explaining, in the future. I like the idea of keep the "run-install"

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

For now we can create new target and can keep old as it is. And as the time passes we can recommend the use of ant run-install-demo instead of ant run-install. After certain duration, lets say after 6 month or one year we can deprecate the use of ant run-install from the system. I think we can st

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 4.0

+1 Thanks and Regards Anil Patel HotWax Media Inc Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" On Apr 20, 2010, at 2:36 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 4.0 into an > official ASF release. > OFBiz 4.0 is an *old* re

Re: Regarding SVN commit r892904

Adrian Crum wrote: > > We have the TimeDuration data type for the estimated/actual time. > Are you referring to org.ofbiz.base.util.TimeDuration? The intent would seem to be that we would define fields in the entity model as (what results to a Long) and use this class for simple (manual) seri

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

+1. -- Ashish On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Raj Saini wrote: > In my opinion run-install is misleading as it really does not tell that it > is going to install demo data and cause confusion to new users as it has > happened with me in the past. For the benefit of old and new users, I > sugge

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

In my opinion run-install is misleading as it really does not tell that it is going to install demo data and cause confusion to new users as it has happened with me in the past. For the benefit of old and new users, I suggest to add new command run-install-demo and leave the run-install as it i

Re: svn commit: r936100 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/product/entitydef/ applications/product/servicedef/ applications/product/src/org/ofbiz/product/category/ applications/product/widget/catalog/ fr

Adam Heath-2 wrote: > > introductionDate is when the store actually added the product to their > catalog, and started making it available, which may be completely > different then when it was first published. > What struck me about this is that products in all sorts of enterprise verticals may

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

On Apr 21, 2010, at 1:15 AM, Ean Schuessler wrote: > Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> This is just *your* opinion and I respect it (even if comparing this to >> altering an api is ridiculous)... but please quit with the "teacher/guru" >> mode... >> > Why is it ridiculous to think of shell script pa

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3701) Errors (with visible stacktraces) in screen: Order -> Order List -> Select (a sales order) -> Edit items

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3701: - Attachment: OFBIZ-3701_order_edititems_v2.diff Added orderagreements.ftl Removed

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3701) Errors (with visible stacktraces) in screen: Order -> Order List -> Select (a sales order) -> Edit items

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3701: - Attachment: (was: OFBIZ-3701_order_edititems.diff) > Errors (with visible sta

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3701) Errors (with visible stacktraces) in screen: Order -> Order List -> Select (a sales order) -> Edit items

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3701: - Solution: editororderitems.ftl Guarded against null statusDateTime (wrong or not it

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 4.0

+1 On 20/04/2010 14:36, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 4.0 into an > official ASF release. > OFBiz 4.0 is an *old* release that will be archived (and removed from the ASF > mirrors) right after it will be released: we are doing this vote/pr

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3701) Errors (with visible stacktraces) in screen: Order -> Order List -> Select (a sales order) -> Edit items

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3701: - Attachment: OFBIZ-3701_order_edititems.diff > Errors (with visible stacktraces)

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3701) Errors (with visible stacktraces) in screen: Order -> Order List -> Select (a sales order) -> Edit items

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3701: - Attachment: OFBIZ-3701_duplicated_field.jpg > Errors (with visible stacktraces)

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (OFBIZ-3642) Internal error when rendering SFA -> Merge contacts and SFA->Merge Lead (Ofbiz Demo)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859128#action_12859128 ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza edited comment on OFBIZ-3642 at 4/20/10 8:09 PM: --

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3642) Internal error when rendering SFA -> Merge contacts and SFA->Merge Lead (Ofbiz Demo)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3642: - Fix Version/s: Release Branch 9.04 Release Candidate Br

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3642) Internal error when rendering SFA -> Merge contacts and SFA->Merge Lead (Ofbiz Demo)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3642: - Attachment: OFBIZ-3642_marketing_sfa_merge.diff The problematic forms (MergeConta

Re: svn commit: r936100 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/product/entitydef/ applications/product/servicedef/ applications/product/src/org/ofbiz/product/category/ applications/product/widget/catalog/ fr

Scott Gray wrote: > On 21/04/2010, at 10:59 AM, Adam Heath wrote: > >> Adrian Crum wrote: >>> Scott Gray wrote: On 21/04/2010, at 10:46 AM, doo...@apache.org wrote: > Author: doogie > Date: Tue Apr 20 22:46:14 2010 > New Revision: 936100 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org

Re: svn commit: r936100 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/product/entitydef/ applications/product/servicedef/ applications/product/src/org/ofbiz/product/category/ applications/product/widget/catalog/ fr

On 21/04/2010, at 10:59 AM, Adam Heath wrote: > Adrian Crum wrote: >> Scott Gray wrote: >>> On 21/04/2010, at 10:46 AM, doo...@apache.org wrote: >>> Author: doogie Date: Tue Apr 20 22:46:14 2010 New Revision: 936100 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=936100&view=rev >

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is just *your* opinion and I respect it (even if comparing this to > altering an api is ridiculous)... but please quit with the "teacher/guru" > mode... > Why is it ridiculous to think of shell script parameters as an API? You would surely be surprised if "ls" b

Re: svn commit: r936100 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/product/entitydef/ applications/product/servicedef/ applications/product/src/org/ofbiz/product/category/ applications/product/widget/catalog/ fr

Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: Scott Gray wrote: On 21/04/2010, at 10:46 AM, doo...@apache.org wrote: Author: doogie Date: Tue Apr 20 22:46:14 2010 New Revision: 936100 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=936100&view=rev Log: Add a releaseDate to a product, mostly informational, inte

Re: svn commit: r936100 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/product/entitydef/ applications/product/servicedef/ applications/product/src/org/ofbiz/product/category/ applications/product/widget/catalog/ fr

Adrian Crum wrote: > Scott Gray wrote: >> On 21/04/2010, at 10:46 AM, doo...@apache.org wrote: >> >>> Author: doogie >>> Date: Tue Apr 20 22:46:14 2010 >>> New Revision: 936100 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=936100&view=rev >>> Log: >>> Add a releaseDate to a product, mostly informat

Re: svn commit: r936100 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/product/entitydef/ applications/product/servicedef/ applications/product/src/org/ofbiz/product/category/ applications/product/widget/catalog/ fr

Scott Gray wrote: On 21/04/2010, at 10:46 AM, doo...@apache.org wrote: Author: doogie Date: Tue Apr 20 22:46:14 2010 New Revision: 936100 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=936100&view=rev Log: Add a releaseDate to a product, mostly informational, intended to mean when the product was first

Re: svn commit: r936100 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/product/entitydef/ applications/product/servicedef/ applications/product/src/org/ofbiz/product/category/ applications/product/widget/catalog/ fr

Scott Gray wrote: > On 21/04/2010, at 10:46 AM, doo...@apache.org wrote: > >> Author: doogie >> Date: Tue Apr 20 22:46:14 2010 >> New Revision: 936100 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=936100&view=rev >> Log: >> Add a releaseDate to a product, mostly informational, intended to mean >> wh

Re: svn commit: r936100 - in /ofbiz/trunk: applications/product/entitydef/ applications/product/servicedef/ applications/product/src/org/ofbiz/product/category/ applications/product/widget/catalog/ fr

On 21/04/2010, at 10:46 AM, doo...@apache.org wrote: > Author: doogie > Date: Tue Apr 20 22:46:14 2010 > New Revision: 936100 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=936100&view=rev > Log: > Add a releaseDate to a product, mostly informational, intended to mean > when the product was first asse

Re: Regarding SVN commit r892904

Set up and tear down would each be a separate work effort in my opinion. We have the TimeDuration data type for the estimated/actual time. -Adrian Bob Morley wrote: I had accidentally replied via nabble to the Ofbiz - Commits sub-form; so I am going to move my response to Ofbiz - Dev. If anyo

Regarding SVN commit r892904

I had accidentally replied via nabble to the Ofbiz - Commits sub-form; so I am going to move my response to Ofbiz - Dev. If anyone saw that, I am going to rework my response here because after some consideration and discussion in our office, I think we have a better proposal. -- Part of this r

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 4.0

+ 1 Bilgin +1 Cheers, Ruppert On Apr 20, 2010, at 8:46 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: +1 -Adrian Jacopo Cappellato wrote: This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 4.0 into an official ASF release. OFBiz 4.0 is an *old* release that will be archived (and removed from the

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

On Apr 20, 2010, at 9:05 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > Adrian Crum wrote: >> Those are user issues, not software issues. I agree with Adam - this >> behavior has always existed, and changing it now will cause more >> problems than it fixes. > > To be fair, I hear everyone's points. However, the right

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859052#action_12859052 ] Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3702: --- Hi Chris, sorry by user I meant developer-user rathe

Re: [jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

On 20 Apr 2010 20:41, "Bruno Busco (JIRA)" wrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859039#action_12859039] Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-3702: Cou

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 4.0

+1 2010/4/20 Jacopo Cappellato > This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 4.0 into an > official ASF release. > OFBiz 4.0 is an *old* release that will be archived (and removed from the > ASF mirrors) right after it will be released: we are doing this vote/process > just to be

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859039#action_12859039 ] Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-3702: Could we think to have the tooltip help shown putt

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3670) TestCase base classes providing ability to execute unit tests in Eclipse in "standalone" mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859037#action_12859037 ] Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3670: --- I've tried this already :-) I extended the GenericD

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

Adrian Crum wrote: > Those are user issues, not software issues. I agree with Adam - this > behavior has always existed, and changing it now will cause more > problems than it fixes. To be fair, I hear everyone's points. However, the right way to do this, is to *not* change existing functionality

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859019#action_12859019 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3702: >From a tooltip content POV here is IMO [a

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

I like adams proposal better than the one I was going to propose +1 = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation Specialtymarket.com

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3442) Replace popup lookups by layer lookups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858985#action_12858985 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3442: Thanks Sascha, Your patch is in trunk at

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3692) The minimize/enlarge buttons (+ -) blocks the layer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858982#action_12858982 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3692: A Sascha's patch commited in trunk at r936

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

Those are user issues, not software issues. I agree with Adam - this behavior has always existed, and changing it now will cause more problems than it fixes. -Adrian chris snow wrote: Based on my experiences the current run-install is dangerous. It is the first target an inexperienced user w

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

Based on my experiences the current run-install is dangerous. It is the first target an inexperienced user will run. If this is done on an internet host, the host can easily be rooted by an attacker if the default passwords are not changed. On 20 Apr 2010 17:55, "Adam Heath" wrote: chris snow

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3727) Create migration service for ProductionRun cloning of work effort cost calc entities

Create migration service for ProductionRun cloning of work effort cost calc entities Key: OFBIZ-3727 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3727 Project: O

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3724) Copying WorkEffortCostCalc as part of a ProductionRun

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858964#action_12858964 ] Bob Morley commented on OFBIZ-3724: --- Will do -- I have created a new ticket that will ult

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

chris snow wrote: > Yes please! > > On 20 Apr 2010 16:41, "Jacopo Cappellato" > wrote: > > Wouldn't be better to make the ant target "run-install" equivalent to > "run-install-seed"? Instead if the user wants to load also demo data they > should be explicitly mentioned in the ant target: run-ins

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3442) Replace popup lookups by layer lookups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sascha Rodekamp updated OFBIZ-3442: --- Attachment: LayoutFixes.patch OK Jacques here we go :-) LayoutFix.patch update against the la

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

+1 ! Jacques From: "chris snow" Yes please! On 20 Apr 2010 16:41, "Jacopo Cappellato" wrote: Wouldn't be better to make the ant target "run-install" equivalent to "run-install-seed"? Instead if the user wants to load also demo data they should be explicitly mentioned in the ant target: run-

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 4.0

+1 Cheers, Ruppert On Apr 20, 2010, at 8:46 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: > +1 > > -Adrian > > Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 4.0 into an >> official ASF release. >> OFBiz 4.0 is an *old* release that will be archived (and removed from the >>

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

Yes please! On 20 Apr 2010 16:41, "Jacopo Cappellato" wrote: Wouldn't be better to make the ant target "run-install" equivalent to "run-install-seed"? Instead if the user wants to load also demo data they should be explicitly mentioned in the ant target: run-install-demo The risk is that, a use

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3724) Copying WorkEffortCostCalc as part of a ProductionRun

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858951#action_12858951 ] Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-3724: -- Bob, your patch is in rev.935969 I ha

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3670) TestCase base classes providing ability to execute unit tests in Eclipse in "standalone" mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858946#action_12858946 ] Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-3670: Bob, Your ideas kind of tie into the dual build p

What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

Wouldn't be better to make the ant target "run-install" equivalent to "run-install-seed"? Instead if the user wants to load also demo data they should be explicitly mentioned in the ant target: run-install-demo The risk is that, a user upgrading a production server could type "run-install" inst

[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-3724) Copying WorkEffortCostCalc as part of a ProductionRun

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-3724: Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato > Copying WorkEffortCostCalc as part of a ProductionRun

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3670) TestCase base classes providing ability to execute unit tests in Eclipse in "standalone" mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858934#action_12858934 ] Bob Morley commented on OFBIZ-3670: --- I dug in a little bit further based on your directio

Re: CSS for TextArea too small font Trunk

it is the tomahawk theme. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation Specialtymarket.com Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist C

CSS for TextArea too small font Trunk

https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/webtools/control/entityImport have not been able to find the commit to this. I needed a magnifying glass to read it (joking) = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 4.0

+1 -Adrian Jacopo Cappellato wrote: This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 4.0 into an official ASF release. OFBiz 4.0 is an *old* release that will be archived (and removed from the ASF mirrors) right after it will be released: we are doing this vote/process just to be a

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858879#action_12858879 ] chris snow commented on OFBIZ-3702: --- Hi Scott, many thanks for the feedback. I will use

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3442) Replace popup lookups by layer lookups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858878#action_12858878 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3442: Hi Sascha, Yes I agree, I figured out yes

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3726) Pagination in Layered Lookups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3726. -- Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Resolution: Fixed Thanks Sascha, Your patch is in trunk at r93

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3442) Replace popup lookups by layer lookups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sascha Rodekamp updated OFBIZ-3442: --- Attachment: LayoutFixes.patch Layout Fix for the issue you posted above. The min/max button

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3726) Pagination in Layered Lookups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sascha Rodekamp updated OFBIZ-3726: --- Attachment: OFBIZ-3726_PaginationFix.patch Here the patch to fix the pagination error. > Pag

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3726) Pagination in Layered Lookups

Pagination in Layered Lookups - Key: OFBIZ-3726 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3726 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Sascha Rodekamp

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3633) Minimum order quantity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858847#action_12858847 ] Rishi Solanki commented on OFBIZ-3633: -- Hi, Here are the solutions suggested and summa

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3719) Include DOCTYPE at the begining of CMS driven html page.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858841#action_12858841 ] Deepak Dixit commented on OFBIZ-3719: - Thanks Scott for valuable comments. And Thanks A

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3719) Include DOCTYPE at the begining of CMS driven html page.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-3719. -- Resolution: Fixed Thanks Deepak & Rishi for the contribution - Your changes are committ

[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-3719) Include DOCTYPE at the begining of CMS driven html page.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-3719: -- Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya > Include DOCTYPE at the begining of CMS driven h

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3719) Include DOCTYPE at the begining of CMS driven html page.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858832#action_12858832 ] Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3719: --- Oh sorry yeah it sounds fine, at least until we can

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3719) Include DOCTYPE at the begining of CMS driven html page.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858829#action_12858829 ] Deepak Dixit commented on OFBIZ-3719: - Hi Scott, Do you have more concern on this or th

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3725) Brazilian Portuguese Translation for Manufacturing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3725. -- Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Resolution: Fixed Thanks Luís Alfredo, Your patch is in trunk

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3663) Re-executing the tests cause unit test failures

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Gray closed OFBIZ-3663. - Resolution: Fixed Thanks for the report Bob, fixed in r935869. Thanks for not taking my word on the cau

[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-3663) Re-executing the tests cause unit test failures

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Gray reassigned OFBIZ-3663: - Assignee: Scott Gray > Re-executing the tests cause unit test failures >

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3670) TestCase base classes providing ability to execute unit tests in Eclipse in "standalone" mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858809#action_12858809 ] Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3670: --- For #1, transaction rollbacks only work for simple u

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3523) Send a Confirmation email content doesn't generate correct URL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858804#action_12858804 ] Ashish Vijaywargiya commented on OFBIZ-3523: Thanks for taking care of it. Cou

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 4.0

+1. Keeping this release in the list of all official release shows the consistency in the process and attracts new comers becoming part of OFBiz project. The preferable release would be 9.04 if somebody ask on the ML. And very soon 10.04 would be preferable one IMO :-) Thanks! -- Ashish On Tue,

[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-3670) TestCase base classes providing ability to execute unit tests in Eclipse in "standalone" mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Gray reassigned OFBIZ-3670: - Assignee: Scott Gray > TestCase base classes providing ability to execute unit tests in Eclipse i

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3724) Copying WorkEffortCostCalc as part of a ProductionRun

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858762#action_12858762 ] Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-3724: -- I am going to review (and commit) your

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3725) Brazilian Portuguese Translation for Manufacturing

Brazilian Portuguese Translation for Manufacturing -- Key: OFBIZ-3725 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3725 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: manufact

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3725) Brazilian Portuguese Translation for Manufacturing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luís Alfredo Harriss Maranesi updated OFBIZ-3725: - Attachment: OFBIZ-3725_BR_Portuguese__Manufacturing.patch Brazili

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chris snow updated OFBIZ-3702: -- Attachment: entity_field_tooltip_screenshot.png Attached example screenshot showing tooltip generate fr

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858789#action_12858789 ] Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3702: --- You need to go back to multiple lines when building

Re: user help

Le 20/04/2010 11:17, Chris Snow a écrit : Hi Hans, Thanks for the feedback - I will work more on this in my freetime. The help icon is from: http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/silk/ The icons are under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 / 3.0 license. Is that license permissable with Apache

Re: user help

I did try the help.gif, but it didn't look very good at all. > Le 20/04/2010 10:54, Hans Bakker a écrit : >> Sorry i did not react earlier we are very busy here hoping other people >> would react. I had a quick look at the patch and it looks very >> promising. >> >> I am willing to put some time i

Re: user help

Hi Hans, Thanks for the feedback - I will work more on this in my freetime. The help icon is from: http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/silk/ The icons are under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 / 3.0 license. Is that license permissable with Apache 2.0? Many thanks, Chris > Sorry i did no

Re: user help

Le 20/04/2010 10:54, Hans Bakker a écrit : Sorry i did not react earlier we are very busy here hoping other people would react. I had a quick look at the patch and it looks very promising. I am willing to put some time into this to get it in the trunk if you correct the points you already mentio

Re: user help

Sorry i did not react earlier we are very busy here hoping other people would react. I had a quick look at the patch and it looks very promising. I am willing to put some time into this to get it in the trunk if you correct the points you already mentioned yourself. The picture can be used free?

user help

Hi devs, Am I heading in the right direction with this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702 Any alarm bells ringing? Many thanks...

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 4.0

+1 just to get it into the archive, this confusion will be no less than others ofbiz does, like file structure changes on the fly, or moving seed data around with not documentation. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 4.0

-1 I see no benefit in doing so and think it could increase the confusion that sometimes surrounds our release strategy. Let's just accept where we are and move forward with 9.04 and 10.04. Regards Scott On 20/04/2010, at 6:36 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is the vote thread to transfo

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 4.0

Hi Michael, On Apr 20, 2010, at 9:04 AM, Michael Xu (xudong) wrote: > hi Jacopo, > > +1 > > Just one question. Why still stick to the version 4.0. I think it is very > confusing for users. And also, after a long waiting, users are expecting at > least a new version no. > yes, I understand you

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 4.0

hi Jacopo, +1 Just one question. Why still stick to the version 4.0. I think it is very confusing for users. And also, after a long waiting, users are expecting at least a new version no. -- Regards, Michael Xu (xudong)

  1   2   >