Because it's possibly easier for committers to follow the work done and not get
a big patch at the end.
With Git you tend to receive either a burst of patches or a big one, both in
one shoot.
Then it's hard to review the work done. By steps it's easier
I don't use GitHub, I have enough to do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-5119.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Praveen,
Your patch is in R10.04 at
Why were the label files changed in this commit? This commit makes the
order component dependent on a special purpose component.
-Adrian
On 1/5/2013 8:34 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Sat Jan 5 08:34:12 2013
New Revision: 1429234
URL:
Nope, they did not change, just a try-catch block around
We could do better like was done with OFBIZ-3969 (see my comment in
OFBIZ-5119), but it's enough for me today
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
Why were the label files changed in this commit? This commit makes
Please look again:
-uiLabelMap.addBottomResourceBundle(CommonUiLabels);
+ uiLabelMap.addBottomResourceBundle(EcommerceUiLabels);
-Adrian
On 1/5/2013 11:26 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Nope, they did not change, just a try-catch block around
We could do better like was done with
They are just reversed
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
Please look again:
-uiLabelMap.addBottomResourceBundle(CommonUiLabels);
+ uiLabelMap.addBottomResourceBundle(EcommerceUiLabels);
-Adrian
On 1/5/2013 11:26 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Nope,
Okay, now I see. Sorry.
-Adrian
On 1/5/2013 12:06 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
They are just reversed
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
Please look again:
-uiLabelMap.addBottomResourceBundle(CommonUiLabels);
+
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-2761.
--
Resolution: Later
Add inventory items used for the task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4937.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Raghavendra,
Your patch is in R10.04 at r1429273
Interesting, notably the numbers of committers
https://www.ohloh.net/p/compare?project_0=Open+For+Business+Project+%28Apache+OFBiz%29project_1=OpenERP
Of course quantity is not quality, but it seems OpenERP has a better momentum
than OFBiz, at the business level, I mean...
Jacques
Some confusing things there. Most strangely, 4,909,882 lines added in the last
30 days yet 679,749 lines total project size? Something seems to be amiss.
To me, we should be creaming these guys on the AGPL license alone. I understand
that many businesses are small enough to just not care.
I don't know that its much worse. On GitHub you will see the forks and could
track their changes if you wanted. I think the complication with handing out
SVN branches is that we will end up with a lot of low quality branches in the
core repository. The nice thing about GIT is that the chaff
From: Ean Schuessler e...@brainfood.com
I don't know that its much worse. On GitHub you will see the forks and could
track their changes if you wanted.
I think the complication with handing out SVN branches is that we will end up
with a lot of low quality branches in the core repository.
From: Ean Schuessler e...@brainfood.com
Some confusing things there. Most strangely, 4,909,882 lines added in the
last 30 days yet 679,749 lines total project size? Something seems to be
amiss.
It's not quite clear indeed, maybe it does not represent well the activity.
This is certainly
On Jan 5, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
From: Ean Schuessler e...@brainfood.com
I don't know that its much worse. On GitHub you will see the forks and could
track their changes if you wanted.
I think the complication with handing out SVN branches is
On Jan 5, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
I'm not quire sure what you mean, but anyway I don't sell OpenErp ;)
My primary intention was just to note that they have much more committers(?)
doing much more commits(?)
When you look into details numbers
Agreed. One thing that immediately jumps out is how much of their codebase is
in Javascript. That may imply at least two functional teams right there. It
makes me wonder if they are approach things as more of a REST/HTTP-RPC server
written in Python that services a client written in JavaScript.
17 matches
Mail list logo
