I don't know that its much worse. On GitHub you will see the forks and could track their changes if you wanted. I think the complication with handing out SVN branches is that we will end up with a lot of low quality branches in the core repository. The nice thing about GIT is that the chaff doesn't get into the wheat bucket. ----- "Jacques Le Roux" wrote: > Because it's possibly easier for committers to follow the work done and not > get a big patch at the end. > With Git you tend to receive either a burst of patches or a big one, both in > one shoot. > Then it's hard to review the work done. By steps it's easier > I don't use GitHub, I have enough to do with OFBiz patches already...
-- Ean Schuessler, CTO e...@brainfood.com 214-720-0700 x 315 Brainfood, Inc. http://www.brainfood.com
