Re: VOTE: Begin Replacing OFBiz Framework With Moqui

I totally agree :) Le 30/04/2015 08:13, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : +1 to this proposal by David, especially if we will be inclined to listen to David's advices because he is the one who designed the architecture of OFBiz and created Moqui: David's experience, knowledge and, more generally, s

Re: VOTE: Begin Replacing OFBiz Framework With Moqui

Le 30/04/2015 07:42, David E. Jones a écrit : On 29 Apr 2015, at 00:41, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >I was rather reluctant about this but after the PoC concept has been introduced by several persons and reading the last exchange between Adam and David (where David said <>) I sort of changed my

Re: VOTE: Begin Replacing OFBiz Framework With Moqui

On Apr 28, 2015, at 10:39 AM, David E. Jones wrote: > > +1 - with the clarification that to me "begin replacing" implies a PoC effort > in a branch. > > I just saw this thread and need a little time to think over the best > approach, but off the top of my head it would look something like: >

Re: VOTE: Begin Replacing OFBiz Framework With Moqui

On Apr 29, 2015, at 5:01 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote: > What is the reason not to absorb Moqui or a fork of Moqui into OFBiz if we > decide to replace the existing framework with Moqui. It could be done but with some concerns: * incorporating an external codebase requires some paperwork, if not a for

Re: VOTE: Begin Replacing OFBiz Framework With Moqui

Thanks Jacopo, I was too fast, Jars dependencies hell :/ Jacques Le 30/04/2015 07:22, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : On Apr 29, 2015, at 9:17 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: avalon-framework(4.2.0 in ofbiz) is no longer available. avalon.apache.org is closed(!). This was introduce with http://sv

Re: VOTE: Begin Replacing OFBiz Framework With Moqui

> On 29 Apr 2015, at 08:01, Ron Wheeler wrote: > > What is the reason not to absorb Moqui or a fork of Moqui into OFBiz if we > decide to replace the existing framework with Moqui. > > Is there a reason to have Moqui as a separate Apache project? Seems like > extra overhead for no advantage.

Re: VOTE: Begin Replacing OFBiz Framework With Moqui

> On 29 Apr 2015, at 00:41, Jacques Le Roux > wrote: > > I was rather reluctant about this but after the PoC concept has been > introduced by several persons and reading the last exchange between Adam and > David (where David said < implies a PoC effort in a branch>>) I sort of changed my mi

Re: VOTE: Begin Replacing OFBiz Framework With Moqui

On Apr 29, 2015, at 9:17 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> >> avalon-framework(4.2.0 in ofbiz) is no longer available. avalon.apache.org >> is closed(!). > > This was introduce with > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=746645 and is no longer > used > Avalon is a dependency f

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6315) Add allow-multiple to Find CustRequest statusId field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14520137#comment-14520137 ] Christian Carlow commented on OFBIZ-6315: - I revised the patch so that all find dr

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6315) Add allow-multiple to Find CustRequest statusId field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christian Carlow updated OFBIZ-6315: Attachment: OFBIZ-6315.patch > Add allow-multiple to Find CustRequest statusId field >

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6315) Add allow-multiple to Find CustRequest statusId field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christian Carlow updated OFBIZ-6315: Attachment: (was: OFBIZ-6315.patch) > Add allow-multiple to Find CustRequest statusId fi

[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-6315) Add allow-multiple to Find CustRequest statusId field

Christian Carlow created OFBIZ-6315: --- Summary: Add allow-multiple to Find CustRequest statusId field Key: OFBIZ-6315 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6315 Project: OFBiz Is

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6315) Add allow-multiple to Find CustRequest statusId field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christian Carlow updated OFBIZ-6315: Attachment: OFBIZ-6315.patch > Add allow-multiple to Find CustRequest statusId field >

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6307) Add ability to change Routing statuses

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14520091#comment-14520091 ] Christian Carlow commented on OFBIZ-6307: - ROU_INACTIVE was add as a StatusItem an

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6307) Add ability to change Routing statuses

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christian Carlow updated OFBIZ-6307: Attachment: OFBIZ-6307.patch > Add ability to change Routing statuses >

Re: move to git.

On 04/29/2015 02:26 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Related to this thread but not with previous discussions, see how Github is used at the ASF https://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingGIT ; notably for "Applying Pull Requests (for svn based components)" Jacques Yeah, that's actually troubling. The

off-topic: Re: VOTE: Begin Replacing OFBiz Framework With Moqui

On 04/29/2015 02:17 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: [snip] Finally Maven proved to be useful :) [snip] Everything always has at least one use; physical things can be paper weights; virtual things can take up disk space. jk

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6271) build management with maven

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14520043#comment-14520043 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6271: One thing I don't like much with Maven is

Re: move to git.

Related to this thread but not with previous discussions, see how Github is used at the ASF https://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingGIT ; notably for "Applying Pull Requests (for svn based components)" Jacques

Re: VOTE: Begin Replacing OFBiz Framework With Moqui

Le 29/04/2015 16:49, Adam Heath a écrit : On 04/29/2015 01:39 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Le 28/04/2015 16:42, Adam Heath a écrit : On 04/28/2015 03:39 AM, David E. Jones wrote: +1 - with the clarification that to me "begin replacing" implies a PoC effort in a branch. I just saw this threa

Re: Renaming OFBiz artefacts

On 29/04/2015 11:25 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Yes, I answered to Ron about "searching for modules in Maven Central a bit more sensible." But this means to use Maven to me, else I still don't see the reason Really only helpful if we follow up on the idea of distributing the framework (or other

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6271) build management with maven

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14519855#comment-14519855 ] Adam Heath commented on OFBIZ-6271: --- THANK YOU ADRIAN! So, this seems to work. All tho

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6271) build management with maven

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-6271: --- Attachment: console.log Windows 8.1 console log attached. (Sorry for the oversized comment folks.) >

Re: [jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (OFBIZ-6271) build management with maven

I assume you deleted it because you realized you hadn't yet updated the branch? Line 34 in framework/start/pom.xml is different in the latest version of that file. On 04/29/2015 12:53 PM, Adrian Crum (JIRA) wrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6271?page=com.atlassian.ji

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (OFBIZ-6271) build management with maven

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-6271: --- Comment: was deleted (was: Windows 8.1: [INFO] Scanning for projects... [WARNING] [WARNING] Some pro

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6271) build management with maven

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14519821#comment-14519821 ] Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-6271: Windows 8.1: [INFO] Scanning for projects... [WA

Re: Milestone redux: Re: svn commit: r1676613 - in /ofbiz/branches/OFBIZ-6271: assembly/LICENSE+NOTICE.xml framework/service/pom.xml pom.xml poms/assembly/ poms/assembly/LICENSE+NOTICE.xml poms/compon

On 04/29/2015 01:34 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: ok is working fine on Ubuntu 14.04 and maven 3.0.5 Thanks Hans. It's nice knowning one's code is at least working for one other person. ps: I do remember that initial report of it not working on windows; I still haven't had time to try it there

Re: java 1.8 features: Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6298) Java collection use optimized

Ha no it's already fixed with OFBIZ-6309 , I have some backlog to read... Jacques Le 29/04/2015 19:20, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Seems we have another case https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6313 I will group them under an umbrella i

Re: java 1.8 features: Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6298) Java collection use optimized

Ha no it's already fixed with OFBIZ-6309 , I have some backlog to read... Jacques Le 29/04/2015 19:20, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Seems we have another case https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6313 I will group them under an umbrella i

Re: java 1.8 features: Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6298) Java collection use optimized

Seems we have another case https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6313 I will group them under an umbrella issue Jacques Le 29/04/2015 12:46, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Ha forgot: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OFBIZ%20AND%20text%20~%20%22java%208%22%20ORDER%20

buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk

The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-trunk while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/853 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler

Re: Renaming OFBiz artefacts

Yes, I answered to Ron about "searching for modules in Maven Central a bit more sensible." But this means to use Maven to me, else I still don't see the reason Jacques Le 29/04/2015 15:12, Pierre Smits a écrit : For sure nobody wants to alienate the users. But it also about getting in line wi

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6309) Freemarker errors at lanaguge change page due to locale with no display name returned by Locale.getAvailableLocales() in UtilMisc.java#getAvailableLocaleList

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14519541#comment-14519541 ] Wai commented on OFBIZ-6309: The first line in the patch caused my patch process to fail. If

Re: VOTE: Begin Replacing OFBiz Framework With Moqui

What is the reason not to absorb Moqui or a fork of Moqui into OFBiz if we decide to replace the existing framework with Moqui. Is there a reason to have Moqui as a separate Apache project? Seems like extra overhead for no advantage. If Moqui is a separate deliverable of the OFBiz project and

Re: [DISCUSSION] Adding more flexibility to how widget elements - and others are referenced

Indeed. One workaround we have applied is the use of ${activeApp} for various references. But that can't be applied everywhere. Best eregards, Pierre On Wednesday, April 29, 2015, Adam Heath wrote: > What you are looking to define here is relativeness. If a non-absolute > path is found in a f

Re: svn commit: r1676674 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base: build.xml src/org/ofbiz/base/util/UtilMisc.java src/org/ofbiz/base/util/test/UtilMiscTests.java testdef/basetests.xml

It is the "root" locale - a concept introduced in Java 1.6. I assume the Sun/Oracle JRE excludes it from the available locales list because it is an abstract concept, not an actual locale you would use in an application. It seems other JRE manufacturers include it in the available locales list.

Re: [DISCUSSION] Adding more flexibility to how widget elements - and others are referenced

What you are looking to define here is relativeness. If a non-absolute path is found in a file, then resolve the full path against the absolute path of the file it was found in. I'm for this, btw. On 04/29/2015 05:02 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: Currently many widgets are referenced in other widg

Re: VOTE: Begin Replacing OFBiz Framework With Moqui

On 04/29/2015 01:39 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Le 28/04/2015 16:42, Adam Heath a écrit : On 04/28/2015 03:39 AM, David E. Jones wrote: +1 - with the clarification that to me "begin replacing" implies a PoC effort in a branch. I just saw this thread and need a little time to think over the

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6309) Freemarker errors at lanaguge change page due to locale with no display name returned by Locale.getAvailableLocales() in UtilMisc.java#getAvailableLocaleList

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14519458#comment-14519458 ] Michael Brohl commented on OFBIZ-6309: -- What's wrong with it? It's already committed

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6309) Freemarker errors at lanaguge change page due to locale with no display name returned by Locale.getAvailableLocales() in UtilMisc.java#getAvailableLocaleList

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14519449#comment-14519449 ] Wai commented on OFBIZ-6309: The patch is not in the proper format. Cannot be used as is. > F

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6313) change language cause exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14519437#comment-14519437 ] Wai commented on OFBIZ-6313: $ java -version java version "1.8.0_31" Java(TM) SE Runtime Envir

Re: Renaming OFBiz artefacts

For sure nobody wants to alienate the users. But it also about getting in line with the policies of the ASF, e.g. branding. Given that we are considering a lot of impacting changes in the near future (see other threads), the opportunity to rename the artefacts becomes evident when these intended c

Re: move to git.

Yeah Jacques, i got your point, but clarification was needed to avoid the assimilation of Nereide and OFBiz-France association (no lobbying or so). Clearly if Git is adopted (even if not I guess, there is a workaround) there will be a new way to share/maintain solution around OFBiz. Like i s

Re: move to git.

Thanks for taking the time to clarify Gil, I was in a hurry and did not put enough information, let me clarify my point. I only wanted to speak about the tool used to create, maintain and share extensions. For the moment the "OFBiz-France solution" (actually more Nereides one) is based on the p

Re: VOTE: Begin Replacing OFBiz Framework With Moqui

Apache LABS could be utilised for such. That way persons can work on it, without hindrance of the projects by-laws and policies and without crowded our repository with branches having a limited lifespan (such as PoCs normally are intended). See http://labs.apache.org/ Best regards. Pierre Smits

Re: [DISCUSSION] Adding more flexibility to how widget elements - and others are referenced

What are the potential issues that this won't work? Best regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM * Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Pierre Smits wrote: > When t

Re: [DISCUSSION] Adding more flexibility to how widget elements - and others are referenced

When talking about the 'same component' I meant everything in the same folder structure, as in: component |-> /widget |->/ widget/forms |-> /scripts |-> etc Anything outside that structure is - with current definitions - outside the component. Think of a screen of component A referencing a script

Re: [DISCUSSION] Adding more flexibility to how widget elements - and others are referenced

I don't think this will work - for a number of reasons. Using the screen widgets as an example, what does "widgets in the same component" mean? Widgets are reused everywhere. If a component reuses a widget in another component, what is "the same component?" The component referencing the reused

Re: [DISCUSSION] Adding more flexibility to how widget elements - and others are referenced

A way to have it in a SystemProperty entity record could be: - - - - And in the 'componentname.properties file: - - location.screens=component://widget - location.forms=component://widget/forms - location.menus=component://widget - location.scripts=component

Re: java 1.8 features: Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6298) Java collection use optimized

That can be a switchover for the Next Branch. Given the many refactorings going on. Best regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM * Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:44 P

Re: java 1.8 features: Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6298) Java collection use optimized

Ha forgot: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OFBIZ%20AND%20text%20~%20%22java%208%22%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC So with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6300 patch committed we should be OK Jacques Le 29/04/2015 12:44, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : BTW we s

Re: java 1.8 features: Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6298) Java collection use optimized

BTW we should focus on switching to Java 8 before anything else. In 2 days Java 7 will no longer be supported, think security... It's should be OK now, but must be done officially Jacques PS: my last call was http://markmail.org/message/fs36a4tkwfm42vhk Le 24/04/2015 17:02, Adam Heath a écrit

[DISCUSSION] Adding more flexibility to how widget elements - and others are referenced

Currently many widgets are referenced in other widgets (e.g. forms, etc) by incorporating the location to the widget. e.g. In a screen file following the following can occur: - - - And in controller.xml: - - And in the ofbiz-component.xml file of the component: - -

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6313) change language cause exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14518755#comment-14518755 ] Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-6313: What JRE version are you using? > change languag

Re: VOTE: Begin Replacing OFBiz Framework With Moqui

I wonder what the impact will be on the apps currently available in OFBiz. Best regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM * Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:12 AM, Hans Ba

buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-branch14

The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-branch14 while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch14/builds/109 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchSch

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6309) Freemarker errors at lanaguge change page due to locale with no display name returned by Locale.getAvailableLocales() in UtilMisc.java#getAvailableLocaleList

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14518898#comment-14518898 ] Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-6309: FYI: The JavaDoc says the getDisplayName() method

buildbot exception in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk

The Buildbot has detected a build exception on builder ofbiz-trunk while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/852 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchSchedule

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6117) Widget Refactoring: have the ability to group fields horizontally

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-6117: Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement) Parent: OFBIZ-6314 > Widget Refactoring: have the a

[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-6309) Freemarker errors at lanaguge change page due to locale with no display name returned by Locale.getAvailableLocales() in UtilMisc.java#getAvailableLocaleList

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrian Crum reassigned OFBIZ-6309: -- Assignee: Adrian Crum > Freemarker errors at lanaguge change page due to locale with no display

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6306) Widget Refactoring: should work in forms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-6306: Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement) Parent: OFBIZ-6314 > Widget Refactoring: should wo

Re: VOTE: Begin Replacing OFBiz Framework With Moqui

-1 I think plenty of people are in favor of the concept (including me) but a vote on replacing framework (and I assume eventually rewriting all of the applications) is premature. Has anyone looked into was is involved? With the level of interest from the community I think a POC of some sort is th

[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-6314) Widget Refactoring - Placeholder issue

Pierre Smits created OFBIZ-6314: --- Summary: Widget Refactoring - Placeholder issue Key: OFBIZ-6314 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6314 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug

Re: VOTE: Begin Replacing OFBiz Framework With Moqui

Le 28/04/2015 16:42, Adam Heath a écrit : On 04/28/2015 03:39 AM, David E. Jones wrote: +1 - with the clarification that to me "begin replacing" implies a PoC effort in a branch. I just saw this thread and need a little time to think over the best approach, but off the top of my head it wou

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-6309) Freemarker errors at lanaguge change page due to locale with no display name returned by Locale.getAvailableLocales() in UtilMisc.java#getAvailableLocaleList

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrian Crum closed OFBIZ-6309. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Upcoming Branch 13.07.02 14

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6034) Widget Refactoring: Refactor how links are rendered

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-6034: Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement) Parent: OFBIZ-6314 > Widget Refactoring: Refactor h

Re: VOTE: Begin Replacing OFBiz Framework With Moqui

I was rather reluctant about this but after the PoC concept has been introduced by several persons and reading the last exchange between Adam and David (where David said <>) I sort of changed my mind, unlike Nicolas I will not vote -1 but 0. Like him I don't like the idea of plugging Moqui jar

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-6301) Widget Refactoring: implement HtmlScreenWrapper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-6301: Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement) Parent: OFBIZ-6314 > Widget Refactoring: implement

Re: Milestone redux: Re: svn commit: r1676613 - in /ofbiz/branches/OFBIZ-6271: assembly/LICENSE+NOTICE.xml framework/service/pom.xml pom.xml poms/assembly/ poms/assembly/LICENSE+NOTICE.xml poms/compon

ok is working fine on Ubuntu 14.04 and maven 3.0.5 On 29/04/15 03:31, Adam Heath wrote: Ok, let's try this again. == * rm -rf ~/.m2 * mvn clean * rm -rf ~/.m2 * mvn clean * mvn package -DskipTests * rm -rf ~/.m2 * mvn package -DskipTests * rm -rf ~/.m2 * mvn install -DskipTests == These are th