Re: Adopting Github Workflow

2020-03-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
You are all invited to review, discuss in comments and possibly add pro and cons on this page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/GITHUB+plus+GIT+VS+JIRA+plus+GIT It would else become unreadable here... Hopefully we will get to a consensus... Jacques Le 12/03/2020 à 13:40,

Re: Adopting Github Workflow

2020-03-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 12/03/2020 à 13:32, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Le 12/03/2020 à 12:17, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:47 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: As I see no Jira references in "Release Distribution Policy" I guess it's not an issue to no longer use

Re: Adopting Github Workflow

2020-03-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 12/03/2020 à 12:17, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:47 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: As I see no Jira references in "Release Distribution Policy" I guess it's not an issue to no longer use Jira to manage versions and releases numbers, ie

Re: Adopting Github Workflow

2020-03-12 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:47 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > As I see no Jira references in "Release Distribution Policy" I guess it's > not an issue to no longer use Jira to manage versions and releases numbers, > ie using > > [1.5] >

Re: Adopting Github Workflow

2020-03-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 12/03/2020 à 11:46, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Le 12/03/2020 à 10:30, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Pro:  1. More devs know GH than Jira and it has been created for them (when using Git). They like it, we need them.  2. Simple things are easy to directly push with the PR commit button (w/

Re: Adopting Github Workflow

2020-03-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 12/03/2020 à 10:30, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Pro: 1. More devs know GH than Jira and it has been created for them (when using Git). They like it, we need them. 2. Simple things are easy to directly push with the PR commit button (w/ forced rebase and merge). For large or complicate

Re: Adopting Github Workflow

2020-03-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 12/03/2020 à 11:40, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:32 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: [...] 6. GH has intrinsically tools to version and release (it's a dev tool not a reporting tool). Please Jacopo confirm since you are the release

Re: Adopting Github Workflow

2020-03-12 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:32 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > [...] > 6. GH has intrinsically tools to version and release (it's a dev tool not > a reporting tool). Please Jacopo confirm since you are the release > manager[1.5] > Jacques, I am not sure what kind

Re: Adopting Github Workflow

2020-03-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 12/03/2020 à 10:30, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : It then offers the same possibilities than Jira (which adapted) It then offers the same possibilities than Jira (which adapted during its evolution) Jacques

Re: Adopting Github Workflow

2020-03-12 Thread Samuel Trégouët
> I think you cannot make the tool responsible for how it is used in this > particular case. of course the tool is responsible! Jira is not a tool to review code! "Jira: Issue & Project Tracking Software" so nothing to do with code ;) Just imagine how it would be possible with another tool.

Re: Adopting Github Workflow

2020-03-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 12/03/2020 à 09:53, Samuel Trégouët a écrit : Hi Michael, To justify the need of making a change, to me the question is quite the opposite: what does GitHub offer which Jira does not in the domain of contributing/ project management/ issue tracking? Jira review process is awfull! I tried

Re: Adopting Github Workflow

2020-03-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 12/03/2020 à 09:12, Michael Brohl a écrit : Hi Jacques, I will just pick out one topic here, see inline: Am 12.03.20 um 08:32 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: The most important question to answer is: what does Jira offers that GH does not? To justify the need of making a change, to me the

Re: Adopting Github Workflow

2020-03-12 Thread Michael Brohl
Samuel, I think you cannot make the tool responsible for how it is used in this particular case. The issue was opened for review only after the feature branch from Jacques was opened, before the exchange was meant to be just between Jacques and James. The contributors could have created a

Re: Adopting Github Workflow

2020-03-12 Thread Samuel Trégouët
Hi Michael, > > To justify the need of making a change, to me the question is quite the > opposite: what does GitHub offer which Jira does not in the domain of > contributing/ project management/ issue tracking? Jira review process is awfull! I tried to review OFBIZ-11306 and give up after 3

Re: Adopting Github Workflow

2020-03-12 Thread Michael Brohl
Hi Jacques, I will just pick out one topic here, see inline: Am 12.03.20 um 08:32 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: The most important question to answer is: what does Jira offers that GH does not? To justify the need of making a change, to me the question is quite the opposite: what does GitHub

Re: Adopting Github Workflow

2020-03-12 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 11/03/2020 à 16:29, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit : Jacques Le Roux writes: Le 11/03/2020 à 12:33, Mathieu Lirzin a écrit : This said you certainly saw this thread started by Pierre Smits: https://markmail.org/message/so7ljoqxzuq7jplz and the related wiki document