Re: Oracle to end publicly available security fixes for Java 7 this month

>>> wrote: >>> Ouch! How is this going to impact the project? Should the currently >>> supported releases be upgraded to JDK 8? >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> >>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" >>> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.

Re: Oracle to end publicly available security fixes for Java 7 this month

ly supported releases be upgraded to JDK 8? - Original Message - From: "Jacques Le Roux" To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Sent: Friday, 17 April, 2015 6:40:18 PM Subject: Oracle to end publicly available security fixes for Java 7 this month http://www.infoworld.com/article/2909685/appl

Re: Oracle to end publicly available security fixes for Java 7 this month

ow is this going to impact the project? Should the currently supported releases be upgraded to JDK 8? - Original Message - From: "Jacques Le Roux" To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Sent: Friday, 17 April, 2015 6:40:18 PM Subject: Oracle to end publicly available security fixes for Java 7 t

Re: Oracle to end publicly available security fixes for Java 7 this month

ct the project? Should the currently > supported releases be upgraded to JDK 8? > > - Original Message - > > From: "Jacques Le Roux" > To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org > Sent: Friday, 17 April, 2015 6:40:18 PM > Subject: Oracle to end publicly available security fixe

Re: Oracle to end publicly available security fixes for Java 7 this month

fixes for Java 7 this month http://www.infoworld.com/article/2909685/application-development/oracle-cutting-publicly-available-security-fixes-for-java-7-this-month.html No comments Jacques

Oracle to end publicly available security fixes for Java 7 this month

http://www.infoworld.com/article/2909685/application-development/oracle-cutting-publicly-available-security-fixes-for-java-7-this-month.html No comments Jacques

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-5691) Upgrade to Commons DBCP 2 for Java 7 (JDBC 4.1)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-5691. -- Resolution: Implemented > Upgrade to Commons DBCP 2 for Java 7 (JDBC

[jira] [Reopened] (OFBIZ-5691) Upgrade to Commons DBCP 2 for Java 7 (JDBC 4.1)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-5691: > Upgrade to Commons DBCP 2 for Java 7 (JDBC

[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-5691) Upgrade to Commons DBCP 2 for Java 7 (JDBC 4.1)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux reassigned OFBIZ-5691: -- Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato > Upgrade to Commons DBCP 2 for Java 7 (JDBC

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-5691) Upgrade to Commons DBCP 2 for Java 7 (JDBC 4.1)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-5691. Resolution: Fixed Done in rev. 1612909 > Upgrade to Commons DBCP 2 for Java 7 (JDBC

[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-5691) Upgrade to Commons DBCP 2 for Java 7 (JDBC 4.1)

Jacopo Cappellato created OFBIZ-5691: Summary: Upgrade to Commons DBCP 2 for Java 7 (JDBC 4.1) Key: OFBIZ-5691 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5691 Project: OFBiz Issue

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-5567) Unit Tests Are Failing Under Java 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-5567. > Unit Tests Are Failing Under Jav

[jira] [Resolved] (OFBIZ-5567) Unit Tests Are Failing Under Java 7

der Java 7 > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-5567 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5567 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: framework >Affects Versions: Rele

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

08:48 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Thanks Adam, Very good news: the tests are now passing here using Java 7 So there is now nothing blocking us to move to Java 7 :) Jacques Le 25/06/2014 01:38, Adam Heath a écrit : Fixing On 06/24/2014 06:18 PM, Adam Heath wrote: So move them to a sep

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

good news: the tests are now passing here using Java 7 So there is now nothing blocking us to move to Java 7 :) Jacques Le 25/06/2014 01:38, Adam Heath a écrit : Fixing On 06/24/2014 06:18 PM, Adam Heath wrote: So move them to a separate suite, defined in testdefs/, or ... Since TestSui

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

If I get enough responses, I'll update macros.xml/common.xml/build.xml(s) to force the issue. On 06/25/2014 08:48 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Thanks Adam, Very good news: the tests are now passing here using Java 7 So there is now nothing blocking us to move to Java 7 :) Jacques Le

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

Thanks Adam, Very good news: the tests are now passing here using Java 7 So there is now nothing blocking us to move to Java 7 :) Jacques Le 25/06/2014 01:38, Adam Heath a écrit : Fixing On 06/24/2014 06:18 PM, Adam Heath wrote: So move them to a separate suite, defined in testdefs

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

ion testRemoveByCondition Jacques On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 10:03 AM Adrian Crum wrote: The tests are not passing on Java 7. I have tried it on three different computers. Does anyone else have that problem? Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 12/7/2013 7:33

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

entitytests testFindDistinct testForeignKeyRemove testStoreByCondition testRemoveByCondition Jacques On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 10:03 AM Adrian Crum wrote: The tests are not passing on Java 7. I have tried it on three different computers. Does anyone else

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

testForeignKeyRemove testStoreByCondition testRemoveByCondition Jacques On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 10:03 AM Adrian Crum wrote: The tests are not passing on Java 7. I have tried it on three different computers. Does anyone else have that problem? Adrian Crum Sandglass Software

Re: Build trunk with Java 7

This did not get through, again... Jacques Le 30/04/2014 12:03, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi, Currently when you build the trunk with Java 7 all works but you get this warning: [options] bootstrap class path not set in conjunction with -source 1.6 I suggest we change in macros.xml

Re: Build trunk with Java 7

I already have a patch to build OFBiz with Java 7, but I won't commit it until we have the tests fixed. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 4/30/2014 3:03 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi, Currently when you build the trunk with Java 7 all works but you get this wa

Build trunk with Java 7

Hi, Currently when you build the trunk with Java 7 all works but you get this warning: [options] bootstrap class path not set in conjunction with -source 1.6 I suggest we change in macros.xml to But this would also mean we begin to recommend using Java 7 for

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-5567) Unit Tests Are Failing Under Java 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christian Geisert updated OFBIZ-5567: - Component/s: framework > Unit Tests Are Failing Under Jav

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5567) Unit Tests Are Failing Under Java 7

d be using Java 7. So, the issue will remain unchanged. > Unit Tests Are Failing Under Java 7 > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-5567 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5567 > Project: OFBiz >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-5567) Unit Tests Are Failing Under Java 7

8 AM: -- Adrian, May I suggest to not implement it in the branches of the R11 and R12 releases? Java 7 came out in the second half of 2011, which is later than when we introduced the r11.x version, and only 9 months before we introduced the r12.x version. The reason I am suggesting this is

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5567) Unit Tests Are Failing Under Java 7

and r12.x versions from affected versions? Java 7 came out in the second half of 2011, which is later than when we introduced the r11.x version, and only 9 months before we introduced the r12.x version. The reason I am suggesting this is that probably most who have a r11 or r12 OFBiz setup

[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-5567) Unit Tests Are Failing Under Java 7

Adrian Crum created OFBIZ-5567: -- Summary: Unit Tests Are Failing Under Java 7 Key: OFBIZ-5567 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5567 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Affects

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

BTW noticed also this article http://www.javacodegeeks.com/2013/05/minor-gotchas-from-migration-to-java-7.html Jacques On Sunday, December 29, 2013 10:16 PM jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote > Interesting, thanks Adrian! > > Jacques > > On Sunday, December 29, 2013 9

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

testFindDistinct >>> testForeignKeyRemove >>> testStoreByCondition >>> testRemoveByCondition >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 10:03 AM Adrian Crum >>> wrote: >>>

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

Adrian Crum wrote: The tests are not passing on Java 7. I have tried it on three different computers. Does anyone else have that problem? Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 12/7/2013 7:33 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: Support for Java 6 is fading: http://java.com/en/download/faq

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

entitytests testFindDistinct testForeignKeyRemove testStoreByCondition testRemoveByCondition Jacques On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 10:03 AM Adrian Crum wrote: The tests are not passing on Java 7. I have tried it on three different computers. Does anyone else have

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

s >>> testFindDistinct >>> testForeignKeyRemove >>> testStoreByCondition >>> testRemoveByCondition >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 10:03 AM Adrian Crum >>> wrote: >>

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

ails sometimes here even with >> Java 6) >> >> and 4 failures >>entitytests >>testFindDistinct >>testForeignKeyRemove >>testStoreByCondition >>testRemoveByCondition >> >> Jacques >> >> On Wednesday,

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

It means OFBiz should run on Java 7. Since Oracle will not be updating 6 anymore, servers running on 6 might become vulnerable to attacks. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 12/16/2013 7:55 AM, Christian Geisert wrote: With Java 1.6.0_38-b05 the tests are running

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

With Java 1.6.0_38-b05 the tests are running successful on my Ubuntu 12.10. Under OpenJDK "1.7.0_25" I get 5 Failures and 2 error (errors are testRemoveValue and testEntityCache in entitytests) But what does the subject "Moving to Java 7" mean? Just that OFBiz should

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

Using Ubuntu 13.10 with last Oracle Java 7 (45) in a VirtualBox on Win7, I still get 4 failures and 1 errors Error: a NPE on testDeposit Failures: testWithdraw testForeignKeyRemove testStoreByCondition testRemoveByCondition Not sure what to think... Jacques On Friday, December 13, 2013 5:59

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

testSOAPSimpleService (this one fails sometimes here even with >> Java 6) >> >> and 4 failures >>entitytests >>testFindDistinct >>testForeignKeyRemove >>testStoreByCondition >>testRemoveByCondition >&

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

testRemoveByCondition > > Jacques > > On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 10:03 AM Adrian Crum > wrote: >> The tests are not passing on Java 7. I have tried it on three different >> computers. Does anyone else have that problem? >> >> Adrian Crum >&

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

entitytests testFindDistinct testForeignKeyRemove testStoreByCondition testRemoveByCondition Jacques On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 10:03 AM Adrian Crum wrote: > The tests are not passing on Java 7. I have tried it on three different > computers. Does anyon

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

The tests are not passing on Java 7. I have tried it on three different computers. Does anyone else have that problem? Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 12/7/2013 7:33 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: Support for Java 6 is fading: http://java.com/en/download/faq/java_6.xml

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

+1 Regards, ** Ankit Jain | 9717930151 On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > +1 > > I am also running Java 7 in my local (dev) box without problems since a > couple of months. > I think we shoul

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

+1 I am also running Java 7 in my local (dev) box without problems since a couple of months. I think we should "migrate" the trunk but also the 13.07 release branch because we will issue releases until 2016. Jacopo On Dec 7, 2013, at 1:33 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: > Support

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

I've also had good luck running on Java 7. - "Jacques Le Roux" wrote: > I think it's safe to move over to Java 7 without any changes. > I have run OFBiz locally - dev mode - for a long time using Java 7, > until recently where I moved back to Java 6 for other

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

ugh! > > Taher Alkhateeb > > - Original Message - > From: "Scott Gray" > To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org > Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2013 5:30:42 PM > Subject: Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7 > >> Then much more changes can be envisionned... > > Su

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

using lambda functions which avoids ugly "for" loops - vm is much smaller I think migration would be a pain though! Taher Alkhateeb - Original Message - From: "Scott Gray" To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2013 5:30:42 PM Subject: Re: Discussion: Movi

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

> Then much more changes can be envisionned... Such as? Regards Scott On 7/12/2013, at 1:39 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > I think it's safe to move over to Java 7 without any changes. > I have run OFBiz locally - dev mode - for a long time using Java 7, until > recently wher

Re: Discussion: Moving to Java 7

I think it's safe to move over to Java 7 without any changes. I have run OFBiz locally - dev mode - for a long time using Java 7, until recently where I moved back to Java 6 for other reasons. What will be quite interesting is moving to Java 8, which IMO, we should consider ASAP as it wi

Discussion: Moving to Java 7

Support for Java 6 is fading: http://java.com/en/download/faq/java_6.xml We need to discuss moving OFBiz over to Java 7. I have been building and running OFBiz R13 on Oracle Java 7 for over a month, and there were some minor compilation problems, but they were easy to fix. What do you

Re: Java 7

mand... Did someone test locally? Could someone install a CI for it on its own? Jacques Sam Hamilton wrote: +1 on making sure that OFBiz runs without problems on Java 7 before trying to add any new features that means it only runs on Java 7. Is it worth asking infra to setup buildbot, demo syste

Re: JavaFX in Java 7 now

I have wondered it too! I hope that experts on this list could find some time to research this brilliant sounding idea. -- Jussi Lehto On Wednesday, August 15, 2012, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi, > > https://blogs.oracle.com/java/**entry/oracle_releases_java_se_**7

JavaFX in Java 7 now

Hi, https://blogs.oracle.com/java/entry/oracle_releases_java_se_7 Someone has some experience with JavaFX? I wonder about it. I have no time yet, but it could be a good replacement for XUI in OFBiz POS... a long outstanding issue... Then we could even replace the webPOS, using only the POS for

Re: Java 7

At the moment (and actually at any moment ;o), I don't think infra has the resources for this kind of demand... Did someone test locally? Could someone install a CI for it on its own? Jacques Sam Hamilton wrote: +1 on making sure that OFBiz runs without problems on Java 7 before tryi

Re: Java 7

Not sure if everyone saw this but this page has a nice graphic showing the JDK roadmap http://blogs.oracle.com/java/entry/moving_java_forward_java_strategy On 5 Oct 2011, at 23:20, Sam Hamilton wrote: > +1 on making sure that OFBiz runs without problems on Java 7 before trying to > a

Re: Java 7

+1 on making sure that OFBiz runs without problems on Java 7 before trying to add any new features that means it only runs on Java 7. Is it worth asking infra to setup buildbot, demo system etc up for testing against both 6 & 7? Also wondering if there is any rule of thumb about when the

Re: Java 7

OpenJDK IS the official JDK this time around. So while a particular platform may not be built/completed yet, its open source so anyone can contribute. On the timing, I would suggest that making sure that ofbiz is Java 7 tolerant is the first priority, then when you want new features think

Re: Java 7

OK, no hurry, we will see again during 2010 then... Jacques Scott Gray wrote: You can't even get Java 7 for OSX currently (and no I'm not talking OpenJDK), as far as I can tell it's not expected until sometime in 2012. Regards Scott On 6/10/2011, at 12:47 AM, Jacques Le R

Re: Java 7

You can't even get Java 7 for OSX currently (and no I'm not talking OpenJDK), as far as I can tell it's not expected until sometime in 2012. Regards Scott On 6/10/2011, at 12:47 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > It seems to me that standard support (not payable) for Java 6 bug fix

Re: Java 7

an keep continuing to support Java 6 for all development and production deployments purpose. Thanks! -- Ashish On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Scott Gray wrote: -1 When is the EOL for java 6? What is the rush? By switching to Java 7 you are telling everyone who wants to use the latest OFBiz th

Re: Java 7

1 > > When is the EOL for java 6? What is the rush? By switching to Java 7 you > are telling everyone who wants to use the latest OFBiz that they MUST use > Java 7, there needs to be a good reason for that. > > Regards > Scott > > On 5/10/2011, at 9:26 PM, Jacques Le Roux

Re: Java 7

-1 When is the EOL for java 6? What is the rush? By switching to Java 7 you are telling everyone who wants to use the latest OFBiz that they MUST use Java 7, there needs to be a good reason for that. Regards Scott On 5/10/2011, at 9:26 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Since, with java.nio.f

Re: Java 7

Since, with java.nio.file, most important changes introduced by Java 7 are syntactic sugar (Coin project), I was more thinking about a continued effort, not limited in time, hence no need for a branch. It would just require a decision and to turn OFBiz development to Java 7. But of course this

Re: Java 7

Hi, +1 for java 7 But i think when updating the java version there are some parts of the code we can improve with the new java features. I.e the try catch with resources or the new diamond operator for generics ... So why not creating a jira ticket and a separate branch, do some changes testing

Re: Java 7

As soon as we change things maybe. Not even sure it's really needed, at least last updated were done in trunk. Java 7 does not introduce much changes anyway... Jacques From: "BJ Freeman" I think a branch would be appropriate Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 10/3/2011 3:5

Re: Java 7

I think a branch would be appropriate Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 10/3/2011 3:50 AM: > Hi, > > One day or another we will have to move to Java 7, I believe. > http://www.eclipse.org/jdt/ui/r3_8/Java7news/whats-new-java-7.html > > Opinions? > > Jacques >

Java 7

Hi, One day or another we will have to move to Java 7, I believe. http://www.eclipse.org/jdt/ui/r3_8/Java7news/whats-new-java-7.html Opinions? Jacques