Actually, the tests are fine. I was under the impression that the
and elements were related. I thought the
element checked the error list created by ,
but the two are not related.
-Adrian
On 4/28/2012 8:05 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
What tests are failing.
Regards,
Pierre
Verstuurd vanaf
What tests are failing.
Regards,
Pierre
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
Op 28 apr. 2012 om 20:16 heeft Adrian Crum
het volgende geschreven:
> The interesting side effect of this change is it causes tests to fail -
> because errors were being ignored, so the tests passed.
>
> -Adrian
>
> On 4/28
Indeed, pretty useless OOTB
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum"
Search for "error-list-name"
-Adrian
On 4/28/2012 6:55 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
+1 to remove if really "it opens up the potential for things to not
work properly."
And of course unless the creator of this option explains the need
The interesting side effect of this change is it causes tests to fail -
because errors were being ignored, so the tests passed.
-Adrian
On 4/28/2012 12:23 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
While working on the Mini-language overhaul, I noticed that the error
message handling is a little convoluted and it
Search for "error-list-name"
-Adrian
On 4/28/2012 6:55 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
+1 to remove if really "it opens up the potential for things to not
work properly."
And of course unless the creator of this option explains the need
Also what attributes will be removed exactly?
Note: I did n
+1 to remove if really "it opens up the potential for things to not work
properly."
And of course unless the creator of this option explains the need
Also what attributes will be removed exactly?
Note: I did not find any "error-message" string in *.xml files in trunk
Jacques
From: "Adrian Cr
+1
Jacopo
On Apr 28, 2012, at 1:23 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> While working on the Mini-language overhaul, I noticed that the error message
> handling is a little convoluted and it opens up the potential for things to
> not work properly.
>
> You can specify the name of the error message list i
I've never understood the use case for it so a general +0 but if no one else
knows either then +1
Regards
Scott
On 28/04/2012, at 11:23 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> While working on the Mini-language overhaul, I noticed that the error message
> handling is a little convoluted and it opens up the p
While working on the Mini-language overhaul, I noticed that the error
message handling is a little convoluted and it opens up the potential
for things to not work properly.
You can specify the name of the error message list in the
element. You can also specify the name of the error
message l
