On 10/14/2010 12:53 PM, Raj Saini wrote:
So how this is going to work one code is deployed inside a application
server? For example as a war or ear or let us say inside the component
folder of OFBiz?
The top-level ofbiz-component.xml defines the top-level webapp. The
web.xml configured there
So how this is going to work one code is deployed inside a application
server? For example as a war or ear or let us say inside the component
folder of OFBiz?
Here is an example of what I mean by overlay:
==
doo...@host:/job/brainfood-standard-base/pages/BASE/www/account$ tree
.
├── Actions.
Adam Heath wrote:
>
>
>
> Subject:
> Re: Woop! Confluence data imported into git and displayed with webslinger!
> From:
> Adam Heath
> Date:
> Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:08:07 -0500
> To:
>
In the Early Nineties I was Hired to Take the MSDN portion of Microsoft
into a document Library type of design.
A user would give a link to a Document, the app would then parse the
document for various type of mime and store them on a files system on
the network, was well as have key word search
For me it all comes to down to a couple of basic but very important points:
- Webslinger by your own admission takes a vastly different approach from
anything else on the market and you're asking the OFBiz community to take that
risk along with you and ignore what everyone else is doing.
- Websli
I agree that databases are very, very powerful but they also introduce
fundamental limitations. It depends on your priorities.
For instance, we've found that the processes companies pursue for
editing documentation can be every bit as fluid, complex and partitioned
as source code. I'd ask you, as
--- Begin Message ---
On 10/13/2010 12:03 AM, Raj Saini wrote:
Then, with the backend code and template files stored in the
filesystem, the actual content itself is also stored in the
filesystem. Why have a different storage module for the content, then
you do for the application?
I don't th
Scott Gray wrote:
On 13/10/2010, at 8:00 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
On 13/10/2010, at 5:23 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/12/2010 11:06 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 10/12/2010 8:55 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/12/2010 10:25 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Actually, a discussion of databa
On 13/10/2010, at 8:00 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Scott Gray wrote:
>> On 13/10/2010, at 5:23 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>> On 10/12/2010 11:06 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 10/12/2010 8:55 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 10:25 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>> Actually, a discussion of datab
Scott Gray wrote:
On 13/10/2010, at 5:23 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/12/2010 11:06 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 10/12/2010 8:55 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/12/2010 10:25 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Actually, a discussion of database versus filesystem storage of content
would be worthwhile. So far th
To be honest it makes it a little difficult to take you seriously when you
completely disregard the JCR/Jackrabbit approach without even the slightest
hint of objectivity
if (!myWay) {
return highway;
}
The JCR was produced by an expert working group driven largely by Day Software
which
Then, with the backend code and template files stored in the
filesystem, the actual content itself is also stored in the
filesystem. Why have a different storage module for the content, then
you do for the application?
I don't think it is a code idea to store your code and data together.
D
On 10/12/2010 3:39 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
This is about debating why it should be included in OFBiz as a tightly
integrated CMS and how well webslinger's goals match up with OFBiz's content
requirements (whatever they are, I don't pretend to know).
I thought one of the goals was to replace OFB
This isn't about casting stones or attempting to belittle webslinger, which I
have no doubt is a fantastic piece of work and meets its stated goals
brilliantly. This is about debating why it should be included in OFBiz as a
tightly integrated CMS and how well webslinger's goals match up with OF
We think its interesting and handy to manage our web content using GIT.
Its hard to do that with JackRabbit, especially in its preferred
configuration of a database backed store. I think that is a pretty
reasoned explanation. I don't see Adam or I casting stones at your CMS
test application so plea
On 13/10/2010, at 5:23 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 11:06 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>> On 10/12/2010 8:55 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>> On 10/12/2010 10:25 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Actually, a discussion of database versus filesystem storage of content
would be worthwhile. So far there h
On 10/12/2010 04:31 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
It seems that many Programmers feel it better to have the user spend
time to learn their system, than the programmer learn their way of doing
things to reduce the learning curve for the user.
Exactly. The users of webslinger are those creating the back
It seems that many Programmers feel it better to have the user spend
time to learn their system, than the programmer learn their way of doing
things to reduce the learning curve for the user.
Adam Heath sent the following on 10/12/2010 10:21 AM:
That's the problem. Don't treat your develope
On 10/12/2010 11:50 AM, Marc Morin wrote:
All of your examples are "developer" examples. We are focused on end-users, so
we don't expect them to use vi, grep, or anything like that.
That's the problem. Don't treat your developers or users differently.
It means you end up writing *more* cod
All of your examples are "developer" examples. We are focused on end-users, so
we don't expect them to use vi, grep, or anything like that.
- Original Message -
> On 10/12/2010 10:25 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> > Actually, a discussion of database versus filesystem storage of
> > content wo
On 10/12/2010 11:26 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 10/12/2010 9:23 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/12/2010 11:06 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 10/12/2010 8:55 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/12/2010 10:25 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Actually, a discussion of database versus filesystem storage of
content
would be w
On 10/12/2010 9:23 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/12/2010 11:06 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 10/12/2010 8:55 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/12/2010 10:25 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Actually, a discussion of database versus filesystem storage of content
would be worthwhile. So far there has been some hyperb
On 10/12/2010 11:06 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 10/12/2010 8:55 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/12/2010 10:25 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Actually, a discussion of database versus filesystem storage of content
would be worthwhile. So far there has been some hyperbole, but few
facts.
How do you edit data
On 10/12/2010 8:55 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/12/2010 10:25 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Actually, a discussion of database versus filesystem storage of content
would be worthwhile. So far there has been some hyperbole, but few facts.
How do you edit database content? What is the procedure? Can a s
On 10/12/2010 10:25 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Actually, a discussion of database versus filesystem storage of content
would be worthwhile. So far there has been some hyperbole, but few facts.
How do you edit database content? What is the procedure? Can a
simple editor be used? By simple, I mea
On 10/11/2010 06:58 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 12/10/2010, at 12:37 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/11/2010 06:26 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 12/10/2010, at 11:45 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/11/2010 04:25 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 12/10/2010, at 10:03 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/11/2010 02:37 PM, J
Actually, a discussion of database versus filesystem storage of content
would be worthwhile. So far there has been some hyperbole, but few facts.
-Adrian
On 10/12/2010 7:32 AM, Marc Morin wrote:
With all the other technologies in ofbiz, seems like webslinger just adds more
stuff onto the pile
With all the other technologies in ofbiz, seems like webslinger just adds more
stuff onto the pile. I don't want to argue the technical merits of database or
file system persistence for a CMS, but it appears like ofbiz would benefit from
reducing the number of technologies used, and increase th
On 10/11/2010 10:07 PM, Nico Toerl wrote:
On 10/12/10 01:41, Adam Heath wrote:
Now, here it comes. The url to the site.
http://ofbizdemo.brainfood.com/.
Things to note. There are *no* database calls *at all*. It's all
done with files on disk. History browsing is backed by git, using
jgit
On 10/12/10 01:41, Adam Heath wrote:
> Now, here it comes. The url to the site.
> http://ofbizdemo.brainfood.com/.
>
> Things to note. There are *no* database calls *at all*. It's all
> done with files on disk. History browsing is backed by git, using
> jgit to read it directly in java. CSS
On 12/10/2010, at 12:37 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 10/11/2010 06:26 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
>> On 12/10/2010, at 11:45 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/11/2010 04:25 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 12/10/2010, at 10:03 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 10/11/2010 02:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
On 10/11/2010 06:26 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 12/10/2010, at 11:45 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/11/2010 04:25 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 12/10/2010, at 10:03 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/11/2010 02:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Impressive, now I know what Webslinger is and what it is capable of!
On 12/10/2010, at 11:45 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 10/11/2010 04:25 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
>> On 12/10/2010, at 10:03 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/11/2010 02:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Impressive, now I know what Webslinger is and what it is capable of!
>>>
>>> Actually, this is jus
Scott Gray wrote:
> The main question in my mind is what does all this mean for OFBiz?
> Obviously because webslinger is currently in the framework you
> envisage it playing some sort of role in the ERP applications, but
> what exactly?
We see knowledge sharing as an important ERP function.
> I thi
On 10/11/2010 04:25 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 12/10/2010, at 10:03 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/11/2010 02:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Impressive, now I know what Webslinger is and what it is capable of!
Actually, this is just one application. Webslinger(-core) is an enabling
technology, t
On 12/10/2010, at 10:03 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 10/11/2010 02:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> Impressive, now I know what Webslinger is and what it is capable of!
>
> Actually, this is just one application. Webslinger(-core) is an enabling
> technology, that enables anything to be written q
On 10/11/2010 02:37 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Impressive, now I know what Webslinger is and what it is capable of!
Actually, this is just one application. Webslinger(-core) is an
enabling technology, that enables anything to be written quickly. As
I said, I've only spent probably 2 actual
Impressive, now I know what Webslinger is and what it is capable of!
Thanks
Jacques
From: "Adam Heath"
On 10/11/2010 12:41 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
So, about a month ago, people on this list wanted to see an example
website implemented in webslinger. At the time, I had a preliminary
version of
On 10/11/2010 12:41 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
So, about a month ago, people on this list wanted to see an example
website implemented in webslinger. At the time, I had a preliminary
version of specialpurpose/ofbizwebsite converted. I mentioned that I
would finish that up, and make it available.
Howe
39 matches
Mail list logo
