Re: svn commit: r935923 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/common: ./ data/ webcommon/WEB-INF/ webcommon/WEB-INF/actions/includes/ webcommon/portal/ widget/

2010-09-18 Thread BJ Freeman
like to see this in the commit log Bruno Busco sent the following on 9/18/2010 12:46 PM: I think there are already too many generic portlets. The portlet attributes were not thought to be used to change the actual form a generic portlet will render, the actual menu, etc. They were supposed to be

Re: svn commit: r935923 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/common: ./ data/ webcommon/WEB-INF/ webcommon/WEB-INF/actions/includes/ webcommon/portal/ widget/

2010-09-18 Thread Bruno Busco
I think there are already too many generic portlets. The portlet attributes were not thought to be used to change the actual form a generic portlet will render, the actual menu, etc. They were supposed to be used by the end user to customiza the portlet just like JIRA does. In any case I will start

Re: svn commit: r935923 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/common: ./ data/ webcommon/WEB-INF/ webcommon/WEB-INF/actions/includes/ webcommon/portal/ widget/

2010-09-18 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Erwan, Bruno, Do you agree on Nicolas's proposition, other opinions? Jacques From: "Nicolas Malin" I think they are to different visions between you and erwan. With a developper POV it's really easy to define new portlets as you do. With a more functionnal POV, I know many person that prefer

Re: svn commit: r935923 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/common: ./ data/ webcommon/WEB-INF/ webcommon/WEB-INF/actions/includes/ webcommon/portal/ widget/

2010-09-14 Thread Nicolas Malin
I think they are to different visions between you and erwan. With a developper POV it's really easy to define new portlets as you do. With a more functionnal POV, I know many person that prefer create small portlets by reusing existing code definition in database to design customer sites instea

Re: svn commit: r935923 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/common: ./ data/ webcommon/WEB-INF/ webcommon/WEB-INF/actions/includes/ webcommon/portal/ widget/

2010-09-13 Thread Bruno Busco
I would simply write: And I could add more like groovy script calling, specific UILabel resources loading etc. It is not so much code... -Bruno 2010/9/13 Bruno Busco > I do

Re: svn commit: r935923 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/common: ./ data/ webcommon/WEB-INF/ webcommon/WEB-INF/actions/includes/ webcommon/portal/ widget/

2010-09-13 Thread Bruno Busco
I do not see the benefit if you still need to add entity definition in the XML data file. 2010/9/13 Erwan de FERRIERES > Le 13/09/2010 15:11, Bruno Busco a écrit : > >> I connot see what is the purpose of a portlet like this: >> >> >> >> >> >>

Re: svn commit: r935923 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/common: ./ data/ webcommon/WEB-INF/ webcommon/WEB-INF/actions/includes/ webcommon/portal/ widget/

2010-09-13 Thread Bruno Busco
Wow! We should say Adam we do not need webslinger any more! ;-) 2010/9/13 Nicolas Malin > I just understand it :) > > When you define a portlet you can use GenericScreenlet to locationScreen > and pass formLocation and formName by portletAttribute. I think it's really > useful for customer site

Re: svn commit: r935923 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/common: ./ data/ webcommon/WEB-INF/ webcommon/WEB-INF/actions/includes/ webcommon/portal/ widget/

2010-09-13 Thread Erwan de FERRIERES
Le 13/09/2010 15:11, Bruno Busco a écrit : I connot see what is the purpose of a portlet like this: could you please help me? Thank

Re: svn commit: r935923 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/common: ./ data/ webcommon/WEB-INF/ webcommon/WEB-INF/actions/includes/ webcommon/portal/ widget/

2010-09-13 Thread Nicolas Malin
I just understand it :) When you define a portlet you can use GenericScreenlet to locationScreen and pass formLocation and formName by portletAttribute. I think it's really useful for customer site when you want to add quickly form in PagePortlet without develop new specific file. Nicolas L

Re: svn commit: r935923 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/common: ./ data/ webcommon/WEB-INF/ webcommon/WEB-INF/actions/includes/ webcommon/portal/ widget/

2010-09-13 Thread Bruno Busco
I connot see what is the purpose of a portlet like this: could you please help me? Thank you. 2010/9/13 Erwan de FERRIERES > Le 13/09/2010 11:

Re: svn commit: r935923 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/common: ./ data/ webcommon/WEB-INF/ webcommon/WEB-INF/actions/includes/ webcommon/portal/ widget/

2010-09-13 Thread Erwan de FERRIERES
Le 13/09/2010 11:19, Bruno Busco a écrit : Erwan, the portlet Attributes can already be edited by the user. When you go in the Admin portal pages there is a little icon on each portlet (the pencil with Hi, technical parameters are today used in portletAttributes, but this should be improv

Re: svn commit: r935923 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/common: ./ data/ webcommon/WEB-INF/ webcommon/WEB-INF/actions/includes/ webcommon/portal/ widget/

2010-09-13 Thread Bruno Busco
Erwan, the portlet Attributes can already be edited by the user. When you go in the Admin portal pages there is a little icon on each portlet (the pencil with the paper) that allows the user to access the parameter edit form. The icon is only visible if the portlet has the edit form registered. All

Re: svn commit: r935923 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/common: ./ data/ webcommon/WEB-INF/ webcommon/WEB-INF/actions/includes/ webcommon/portal/ widget/

2010-09-13 Thread Erwan de FERRIERES
Le 12/09/2010 10:37, Bruno Busco a écrit : Sorry to comment this commit very late. I am looking into the PortalPortlet system how it is now. IMO it is now too complicated with the portlet attribute feature not used as supposed by the original design. The generic portlets added with this commit u

Re: svn commit: r935923 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/common: ./ data/ webcommon/WEB-INF/ webcommon/WEB-INF/actions/includes/ webcommon/portal/ widget/

2010-09-12 Thread Bruno Busco
Sorry to comment this commit very late. I am looking into the PortalPortlet system how it is now. IMO it is now too complicated with the portlet attribute feature not used as supposed by the original design. The generic portlets added with this commit use the Portlet Attribute system to actually r