On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> I just noticed these changes on issues to clear out old bug assignees. I
> recall a bunch of mystery e-mails being used and now I see issues@
> openoffice.apache.org.
>
> That's odd, since that is a mailing list. It is the mailing li
Rob Weir wrote:
We have 50 new QA volunteers, in just the first two week of January!
Really impressive!
Also, are we still using/looking at votes on bugs? Was that an
effective way of prioritizing?
Votes should still be used to prioritize, especially for external
entities, like new develo
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 01/18/2013 03:34 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Marcus (OOo)
>>> wrote:
>>>
Am 01/17/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
Thanks for the pat
I just noticed these changes on issues to clear out old bug assignees. I
recall a bunch of mystery e-mails being used and now I see issues@
openoffice.apache.org.
That's odd, since that is a mailing list. It is the mailing list that all
bugzilla issues and issue updates are reported to. It i
On 18 January 2013 22:16, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
> On 13-01-18, at 15:48 , Ian Lynch wrote:
>
>> On 18 January 2013 17:41, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>>>
It wasnt an edition more like a mode, you did $ soffice -net and you can
Am 01/18/2013 03:34 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 01/17/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
Thanks for the patch. I'll review and commit.
Even when the patch came a bit surprisingly, it looks q
Am 01/18/2013 03:30 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 01/17/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
Thanks for the patch. I'll review and commit.
Even when the patch came a bit surprisingly, it looks quite nice. And still
some space for additions like
On 13-01-18, at 15:48 , Ian Lynch wrote:
> On 18 January 2013 17:41, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>>
>>> It wasnt an edition more like a mode, you did $ soffice -net and you can
>>> have variou users conenected, there was a pertner that even
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Regina Henschel
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Rob Weir schrieb:
>
>> I just did a tally of new volunteers who introduced themselves onto
>> the QA mailing list since January 1st. It came to a nice round
>> number. We have 50 new QA volunteers, in just the first two week
janI wrote:
On 2013/01/19 00:24, Donald Whytock said:
> FWIW, my company for the longest time firewall-blocked anything of the
> form *.openoffice.org ("Freeware/shareware"). This despite the fact
> that I could reach Sourceforge, *.apache.org, etc., and despite the
> fact tha
Hi Rob,
Rob Weir schrieb:
I just did a tally of new volunteers who introduced themselves onto
the QA mailing list since January 1st. It came to a nice round
number. We have 50 new QA volunteers, in just the first two week of
January!
A good number have made it through the orientation modules
Hi
2013/1/18 Rob Weir :
> I just did a tally of new volunteers who introduced themselves onto
> the QA mailing list since January 1st. It came to a nice round
> number. We have 50 new QA volunteers, in just the first two week of
> January!
So good ! :-)
Albino
www.techbino.net
My previous reply sent separately to the OP.
I should set my email options to default to 2Reply to All".
--
Rory O'Farrell
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:40:44 +0100
Hagar Delest wrote:
> Hi,
>
> See: http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=5777
>
> Hagar
>
>
> Le 18/01/2013 21:33, Megan Pedone a écrit :
>
> >
> > I don't think it's a bug, and I don't want to subscribe to anything to
> > report it, but
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Hagar Delest wrote:
> Hi,
>
> See: http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=5777
>
Another solution is to always follow with a comma, which is called for
in many style guides, as in:
The accused was released on his personal recognizance, i.e., wi
On 18 January 2013 17:41, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
>> It wasnt an edition more like a mode, you did $ soffice -net and you can
>> have variou users conenected, there was a pertner that even did some Active
>> Directory authentication.
>> ht
Thanks for posting the link (in the forum too)!
Hagar
Le 18/01/2013 19:43, Rob Weir a écrit :
I posted the link to the EN forum as well:
http://macforester.blogspot.com/2013/01/a-shout-out-to-web-community.html
-Rob
Hi,
See: http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=5777
Hagar
Le 18/01/2013 21:33, Megan Pedone a écrit :
I don't think it's a bug, and I don't want to subscribe to anything to report it, but it's incredibly
frustrating that the only way I could use "i.e." in my document was
Am 01/18/2013 07:43 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
I posted the link to the EN forum as well:
http://macforester.blogspot.com/2013/01/a-shout-out-to-web-community.html
great find. Reads really like a big compliment to the voluteers that do
invalueable work in all user and support forums in general.
於 2013年01月19日 03:25, janI 提到:
> On 18 January 2013 19:39, imacat wrote:
>
>> On 2013/01/19 02:30, janI said:
>>> On 18 January 2013 19:25, imacat wrote:
>>>
On 2013/01/19 00:24, Donald Whytock said:
> FWIW, my company for the longest time firewall-blocked anything of the
> form *.op
Hi,
how are internal apr and apr-util and serf designed to work together? Can they
work together at all?
apr is producing apr-1-config in solver.
serf is using apr-config...
--
Pavel Janík
On 18 January 2013 19:39, imacat wrote:
> On 2013/01/19 02:30, janI said:
> > On 18 January 2013 19:25, imacat wrote:
> >
> >> On 2013/01/19 00:24, Donald Whytock said:
> >>> FWIW, my company for the longest time firewall-blocked anything of the
> >>> form *.openoffice.org ("Freeware/shareware")
I just did a tally of new volunteers who introduced themselves onto
the QA mailing list since January 1st. It came to a nice round
number. We have 50 new QA volunteers, in just the first two week of
January!
A good number have made it through the orientation modules, have a
Bugzilla account and
I posted the link to the EN forum as well:
http://macforester.blogspot.com/2013/01/a-shout-out-to-web-community.html
-Rob
On 2013/01/19 02:30, janI said:
> On 18 January 2013 19:25, imacat wrote:
>
>> On 2013/01/19 00:24, Donald Whytock said:
>>> FWIW, my company for the longest time firewall-blocked anything of the
>>> form *.openoffice.org ("Freeware/shareware"). This despite the fact
>>> that I could reach Sourc
On 18 January 2013 19:25, 依瑪貓 wrote:
> On 2013/01/19 00:24, Donald Whytock said:
> > FWIW, my company for the longest time firewall-blocked anything of the
> > form *.openoffice.org ("Freeware/shareware"). This despite the fact
> > that I could reach Sourceforge, *.apache.org, etc., and despite
On 2013/01/19 00:24, Donald Whytock said:
> FWIW, my company for the longest time firewall-blocked anything of the
> form *.openoffice.org ("Freeware/shareware"). This despite the fact
> that I could reach Sourceforge, *.apache.org, etc., and despite the
> fact that we use pieces of OO.
>
> So my
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>
> On 1/17/2013 2:45 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
>> orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have finished the renaming from "OpenOffice.org" to "Apache OpenOffice"
>>> - se
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> Hi Kay,
>
>
> On 17.01.2013 21:15, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> On 01/17/2013 04:39 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
>>
>>> On 17.01.2013 00:42, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>
A week or so ago, fisheye6 just tanked. Now, it's up again, but given
the siz
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> It wasnt an edition more like a mode, you did $ soffice -net and you can
> have variou users conenected, there was a pertner that even did some Active
> Directory authentication.
> http://openofficetechnology.com/products/OpenOffice-En
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:03:09 +0100
Pavel Janík wrote:
> > It should be Presenter Screen. Presenter Console was an early working
> > title.
>
> So we need something like this:
>
> Index: configure.in
> ===
> --- configure.in
> It should be Presenter Screen. Presenter Console was an early working title.
So we need something like this:
Index: configure.in
===
--- configure.in(revision 1435113)
+++ configure.in(working copy)
@@ -516,8 +516,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Alfonso Émbriz wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm Alfonso Émbriz from León, México. I'm new to ASF but willing to help in
> OO project in all the tasks given to me. I've already added my info to the
> volunteers page.
> I'm interested in user oriented chores such as documentation,
Does VNC allow multiple clients to a single server? That's one thing
a webapp would be good for. Plus, with a webapp, you don't need
anything installed on the client machine. That means you can walk
into a situation with dubious/no network, set up a server and a wifi
hub, and get a bunch of tota
FWIW, my company for the longest time firewall-blocked anything of the
form *.openoffice.org ("Freeware/shareware"). This despite the fact
that I could reach Sourceforge, *.apache.org, etc., and despite the
fact that we use pieces of OO.
So my personal preference would be to at least keep a means
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 1/18/13 4:36 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Joost Andrae wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> maybe you're looking for this link instead:
>>>
>>> http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/index.html
>>>
>>
>> The origin
On 2013/01/15 21:19, Rob Weir said:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> The next weeks will see a release, two conferences and the 4.0 preparations.
>>
>> With so many topics to talk about, I suggest that everybody who may want to
>> blog about OpenOffice on our official b
On 1/18/13 4:36 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Joost Andrae wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> maybe you're looking for this link instead:
>>
>> http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/index.html
>>
>
> The original poster sent a note to me directly. Start from this page:
>
> h
Considering forums.openoffice.org altogether, I would vote for
wiki.openoffice.org instead of wiki.openoffice.apache.org.
1. The existing community is built on this current host name. It would
only confuse the community to change it. This is especially true that
we have changed it just rece
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Joost Andrae wrote:
> Hi,
>
> maybe you're looking for this link instead:
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/index.html
>
The original poster sent a note to me directly. Start from this page:
http://www.openoffice.org/product/index.html
The lin
Hi,
Yes, and you can do that with an html5/ajax version hosted "somewhere"
-you´d need a web server-, or also by logging into your AOO copy at
home with a VNC client for Android/iPad...
but I don't want to render the application. It's better to work on the
document by using an API of it's f
Hi,
maybe you're looking for this link instead:
http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/index.html
Am 18.01.2013 15:44, schrieb Michael Aquino:
This link is bad
http://www.openoffice.org/product/development/releases/index.html
Kind regards, Joost
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Joost Andrae wrote:
> More important is the ability to modify documents on the go eg. from a
> mobile.
Yes, and you can do that with an html5/ajax version hosted "somewhere"
-you´d need a web server-, or also by logging into your AOO copy at
home with a VNC clien
Hi Gianluca;
The older italian version is here:
http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/ooo-myspell/
The Croatian dictionary was also relicensed but was dropped
with all the dictionaries.
Ultimately we really don't do dictionaries here in AOO so
grabbing them from other places, as long as
Not working
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Michael Aquino
> wrote:
> > This link is bad
> >
> > http://www.openoffice.org/product/development/releases/index.html
>
> Do you recall what page had the link to this?
>
> -Rob
>
--
Best Re
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Michael Aquino wrote:
> This link is bad
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/product/development/releases/index.html
Do you recall what page had the link to this?
-Rob
This link is bad
http://www.openoffice.org/product/development/releases/index.html
Hi,
I for one don´t ´need´ an AJAX / HTML5 version of AOO... GDocs is fine...
I personally think browser based apps are a pig, and doing apps in
JScript is insane. I had Chrome open the other day just with GMail and
it was using over 150 MB of RAM
A thin client virtualized version on the o
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Ian Lynch wrote:
> Swimming against global trends is not a sensible idea when you have
> very limited resources and very little time.
Never implied that. Just said it´d be cool to have the current AOO
edition repurposed -or extended- to also serve thin clients ov
On 18 January 2013 13:18, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Ian Lynch wrote:
>> What we really need is a cloud version of AOO like Google Docs.
>
> We don´t *need* ONE thing. That´s the beauty of open source, ´we´
> could do *several* things.
Well yes, but it is more effi
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 6:12 AM, harry steven
wrote:
>
> Hello Rory, you are MY HERO!
> Followed your instructions and selected the PDF, but it did not work, the
> printer did not recognise what to do.
> Tried again and noticed that on the choices although the pull down menu
> showed PDF there w
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Ian Lynch wrote:
> What we really need is a cloud version of AOO like Google Docs.
We don´t *need* ONE thing. That´s the beauty of open source, ´we´
could do *several* things.
I for one don´t ´need´ an AJAX / HTML5 version of AOO... GDocs is fine...
I personally
On 18 January 2013 09:16, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Joost Andrae wrote:
>> Oracle Cloud Office cannot be compared with developments like StarPortal or
>> Sun ONE Webtop that needed office processes to run on client side. Oracle
>> Cloud Office used the ODF file for
Il 18/01/2013 1.01, Andrea Pescetti ha scritto:
We did have at least one license change (Russian?) but the bundling
mechanism is actually designed to retrieve external OXT files at build
time.
An old Italian dictionary version was changed to Apache license too. Ask
Pedro Giffuni for details.
Hello Rory, you are MY HERO!
Followed your instructions and selected the PDF, but it did not work, the
printer did not recognise what to do.
Tried again and noticed that on the choices although the pull down menu showed
PDF there was another box showing JPG.
I changed this box to PDF and the Pri
Hi,
I will start to build the next snapshot build for our upcoming AOO 3.4.1
respin release based on revision 1435053 on the AOO34 branch.
The new build will contain dictionaries for all new languages and we add
a dictionary for Hungarian now.
This is a change regarding the last build, we will i
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Joost Andrae wrote:
> Oracle Cloud Office cannot be compared with developments like StarPortal or
> Sun ONE Webtop that needed office processes to run on client side. Oracle
> Cloud Office used the ODF file format to render it by using JavaScript. OTOH
> bulk docum
>Can't you just unpublish it? In the new dictionaries I uploaded today, I
>made a mistake and had to unpublish a release. But I believe you already
>found the solution, since I can't see version 1.2.1 any longer at
Yes, I unpublished this release but I can't recreate it with same release.
If I
Hi,
this server based StarOffice version was called StarPortal
(StarDivision). Later it was called Sun ONE Webtop (Sun Microsystems).
The client protocol was "VCL remote", a protocol that was removed before
Sun opensourced the StarOffice code base to OpenOffice.org. With VCL
remote the VCL re
On 18.01.2013 04:05, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
I now have an user profile which causes constantly crashes.
It had been "created" on a Windows 7 machine where I had OOo 3.3, AOO 3.4
and now AOO 3.4.1 installed.
I did not remember what I did in
Hi Kay,
On 17.01.2013 21:15, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 01/17/2013 04:39 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 17.01.2013 00:42, Kay Schenk wrote:
A week or so ago, fisheye6 just tanked. Now, it's up again, but given
the size of our svn repository (this includes all branches and web
sites), I am informed this
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 23:29:48 +
harry steven wrote:
> I have just downloaded this Version of Open Office.Now my Printer will not
> print anything in Open Office and refers me to check my Printer
> configuration.At 74 years of age, this is all a mystery to me, so please tell
> me how I can g
62 matches
Mail list logo
