On 9 May 2013 18:59, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> janI schrieb:
>
> On 9 May 2013 14:40, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:05 AM, janI wrote:
>>>
>> [..]
>
> It might make sense to make a list: What are all the things that a
>>> new dev volunteer needs to know or do before
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Donald Whytock
> wrote:
>
> > Is there a larger version of the orb graphic? Something, say, big enough
> > to use as a CD label background?
> >
> > Don
> >
>
> The svg file for the "flat orb" can be found at:
>
Em 6 de maio de 2013 19:23, Albino B Neto escreveu:
> 2013/5/6 Rob Weir :
>> Email me directly, please.
Here:
http://br-linux.org/2013/voce-esta-usando-com-sucesso-o-openoffice-pode-compartilhar-seu-caso/
Albino
-
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
> Is there a larger version of the orb graphic? Something, say, big enough
> to use as a CD label background?
>
> Don
>
The svg file for the "flat orb" can be found at:
http://www.openoffice.org/images/AOO_logos/svg/orb.svg
and resized.
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Rui Camacho wrote:
>
>
> Dear Sirs
>
>
>
> I’m interested to help to improve the open office.
>
>
>
> On the impress program I have detected a few fails, but I’m open to any
> suggestions from you
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> ***
Yuzhen Fan wrote:
Thanks for your comment, here is the updated process based on the feedback
1. Get candidate bugs by query: severity = blocker, critical and status =
unconfirmed, confirmed, reopened OR keyword includes "crash".
Regressions are also candidates for fixing in the next release. S
Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:50 PM, janI wrote:
we should consider having the license en+local for national versions, with
a note that the local version is a translation and the en version dominates.
reasoning, our translators are not laywers and may unvolunterely change the
meaning
Rob Weir wrote:
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=results_of_apache_openoffice_4
I was able to get comments from each designer except from Chris R (no
contact info available)
Assuming it was submitted through the wiki, any cwiki administrator
(like Dave) will be able to extrac
On 9 May 2013 20:59, Donald Whytock wrote:
> This is a lazy-concensus proposal to add me (Donald Whytock,
> dwhyt...@apache.org) as a blog editor. If there are no objections by
> Monday I'll open a JIRA.
>
+1 Welcome
rgds
jan I.
>
> Thanks...
>
> Don
>
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Yes, build time of course. Otherwise 4.0 could be a current version
> forever. ;-)
>
>
> Marcus
>
Might yet be if no one gets around to putting out 4.1...
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 02:11:31PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> > It can still have some meaning: suppose someone in the ecosystem is
> > building custom versions of AOO for their customers, they may want to
> > configure with --with-vendor; they can even change the images in the
> > dialog to whatever
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> The above steps could take a week, or if you have any comments in the
>> current draft, best to send them along via email.
>
>
> Kevin Grignon's paragraph:
> "submissions where enhanced" -
Is there a larger version of the orb graphic? Something, say, big enough
to use as a CD label background?
Don
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Jörg Schmidt
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >> From: Chris Maffey [mailto:ch...@maffey.com]
> >
> >> I ha
This is a lazy-concensus proposal to add me (Donald Whytock,
dwhyt...@apache.org) as a blog editor. If there are no objections by
Monday I'll open a JIRA.
Thanks...
Don
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> The above steps could take a week, or if you have any comments in the
> current draft, best to send them along via email.
Kevin Grignon's paragraph:
"submissions where enhanced" -> "submissions were enhanced", though this is
from a designer's qu
Here's BZ issue for the copyright statement update to 2013:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122265
-Rob
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> I wonder if we can make this be more rational?
>
> For example, the About box currently says: "Copyright © 2012 Apache
> Softw
Am 05/09/2013 08:11 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 12:34:25PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
I wonder if we can make this be more rational?
For example, the About box currently says: "Copyright © 2012 Apache
Softwar
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
> Couple minor typos...Is there anything I need to do to get access to the
> blogs page? Is it something other than my Apache ID?
>
1) Start a new thread and propose your self as a blog editor. If
there are no objections after 72-hours then
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 12:34:25PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>> I wonder if we can make this be more rational?
>>
>> For example, the About box currently says: "Copyright © 2012 Apache
>> Software Foundation.
>> All rights res
Am 05/09/2013 07:33 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 07:21:49PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 05/09/2013 06:34 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
I wonder if we can make this be more rational?
For example, the About box currently says: "Copyright © 2012 Apache
Software Foundation.
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 07:21:49PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 05/09/2013 06:34 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
> >I wonder if we can make this be more rational?
> >
> >For example, the About box currently says: "Copyright © 2012 Apache
> >Software Foundation.
> >All rights reserved."
> >
> >That needs t
Hi Rob,
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 12:34:25PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> I wonder if we can make this be more rational?
>
> For example, the About box currently says: "Copyright © 2012 Apache
> Software Foundation.
> All rights reserved."
>
> That needs to be changed to 2013, right?
Yes, please open
Couple minor typos...Is there anything I need to do to get access to the
blogs page? Is it something other than my Apache ID?
Don
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=results_of_apache_openoffice_4
>
> I was able to get comment
Am 05/09/2013 06:34 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
I wonder if we can make this be more rational?
For example, the About box currently says: "Copyright © 2012 Apache
Software Foundation.
All rights reserved."
That needs to be changed to 2013, right?
If you aren't happy to change this every year, just
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:50 PM, janI wrote:
> On May 9, 2013 6:34 PM, "Rob Weir" wrote:
>>
>> I wonder if we can make this be more rational?
>>
>> For example, the About box currently says: "Copyright © 2012 Apache
>> Software Foundation.
>> All rights reserved."
>>
>> That needs to be changed t
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=results_of_apache_openoffice_4
I was able to get comments from each designer except from Chris R (no
contact info available) and Robin (no response to emails).
Regards,
-Rob
-
Hi,
janI schrieb:
On 9 May 2013 14:40, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:05 AM, janI wrote:
[..]
It might make sense to make a list: What are all the things that a
new dev volunteer needs to know or do before they can make their first
patch?
+1
A new developer can help already
On May 9, 2013 6:34 PM, "Rob Weir" wrote:
>
> I wonder if we can make this be more rational?
>
> For example, the About box currently says: "Copyright © 2012 Apache
> Software Foundation.
> All rights reserved."
>
> That needs to be changed to 2013, right?
+1
>
> It also says, "This product was cr
I wonder if we can make this be more rational?
For example, the About box currently says: "Copyright © 2012 Apache
Software Foundation.
All rights reserved."
That needs to be changed to 2013, right?
It also says, "This product was created by Apache Software Foundation,
based on Apache OpenOffice
On 9 May 2013 14:40, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:05 AM, janI wrote:
> > On 9 May 2013 09:07, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> >
> >> janI wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 9 May 2013 00:23, Rob Weir wrote:
> >>>
> 5) Development is also made more difficult by the intrinsic complexity
> of t
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:05 AM, janI wrote:
> On 9 May 2013 09:07, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> janI wrote:
>>
>>> On 9 May 2013 00:23, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
5) Development is also made more difficult by the intrinsic complexity
of the code base, the build system and the poor state of the
Hi Anrea,
Andrea Pescetti schrieb:
janI wrote:
On 9 May 2013 00:23, Rob Weir wrote:
5) Development is also made more difficult by the intrinsic complexity
of the code base, the build system and the poor state of the developer
documentation.
yes because we try to tell people to grasp the whole
Thanks for your comment, here is the updated process based on the feedback
1. Get candidate bugs by query: severity = blocker, critical and status =
unconfirmed, confirmed, reopened OR keyword includes "crash".
2. For every candidate bug above, set field " 4.0 release blocker" to "?"
to propose it
Copy to Oliver Trautmann - Non-Subscribed Poster
Original Message
From: janI
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 11:12:46 +0200
> On 9 May 2013 11:05, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 9 May 2013 01:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
>> Oliver Trautmann wrote:
>>
>>> I don'
hi,all
When I execute testcase in testlink ,three points to be notice:
1. If you execute testcase and it fail ,welcome to create defect and
provide detailed information in BZ (search whether duplicate defect exist
in BZ before you submit defect ) and add defect id in notes in this
testcase in Testl
On 9 May 2013 11:05, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Thu, 9 May 2013 01:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
> Oliver Trautmann wrote:
>
> > I don't know enough about computers to figure it out on my own and
> nothing at your website helps; my English (US) spellchecker marks every
> word as misspelled and that's annoyi
On Thu, 9 May 2013 01:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
Oliver Trautmann wrote:
> I don't know enough about computers to figure it out on my own and nothing at
> your website helps; my English (US) spellchecker marks every word as
> misspelled and that's annoying on so many levels.
>
> Help
>
> Oliver
Delet
On 9 May 2013 09:07, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> janI wrote:
>
>> On 9 May 2013 00:23, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> 5) Development is also made more difficult by the intrinsic complexity
>>> of the code base, the build system and the poor state of the developer
>>> documentation.
>>>
>> yes because we try
I don't know enough about computers to figure it out on my own and nothing at
your website helps; my English (US) spellchecker marks every word as misspelled
and that's annoying on so many levels.
Help
Oliver
janI wrote:
On 9 May 2013 00:23, Rob Weir wrote:
5) Development is also made more difficult by the intrinsic complexity
of the code base, the build system and the poor state of the developer
documentation.
yes because we try to tell people to grasp the whole system in one-go
"start by build AOO
40 matches
Mail list logo
