hat all considerations can be addressed.
>
> - Dennis
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Damjan Jovanovic [mailto:dam...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2015 00:58
>> To: Apache OO
>> Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Getting to AOO for Java (AOO4J)?
&
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 2:10 AM, toki wrote:
> On 15/11/2015 20:06, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
> > Please be more specific. I can't tell from the previous post what you
> mean by deserializing untrusted code.
>
> There are a string of known zero day exploits that Oracle, for whatever
> reason,
On 15/11/2015 20:06, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> Please be more specific. I can't tell from the previous post what you mean
> by deserializing untrusted code.
There are a string of known zero day exploits that Oracle, for whatever
reason, has not released patches for, despite exploits having be
tions can be addressed.
- Dennis
> -Original Message-
> From: Damjan Jovanovic [mailto:dam...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2015 00:58
> To: Apache OO
> Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Getting to AOO for Java (AOO4J)?
>
> Let's examine porting AOO to Java in mo
Patricia:
> -Original Message-
> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
> Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2015 11:46
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Getting to AOO for Java (AOO4J)?
>
> I would be strongly opposed to deserializing untrus
I would be strongly opposed to deserializing untrusted code - it is full
of problems.
On 11/8/2015 11:14 AM, toki wrote:
On 08/11/2015 14:32, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I am just getting started on AOO, and don't know the history of this
discussion,
Pretty much since Sun purchased StarWriter,
On 08/11/2015 14:32, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>I am just getting started on AOO, and don't know the history of this
discussion,
Pretty much since Sun purchased StarWriter, there have been proposals to
make OpenOffice.org Java only. If one considers NeoOffice to be a Java
fork, then it is the only
On 11/08/2015 05:19 AM, #PATHANGI JANARDHANAN JATINSHRAVAN# wrote:
> Hi, I am pretty much a noob and have only started out
> contributing, but may I ask why moving to Java from C++ is being
> considered? This migration will take effort and time, and I was
> of the understanding that C++ code runs
On 07/11/2015 Marcus wrote:
All nice, but with a short of developers that could do any of the points
you listed below, it's just a theoretical idea what could be done. ;-)
While Damjan brought a somewhat more pragmatic approach here, I'm still
skeptical: not even coming to whether it is desira
"C++ code runs faster than Java" is, to some extent, a hold-over from
the early days of Java, when JVMs where pure Bytecode interpreters.
These days, it gets compiled, and optimized, as it is running. The
optimizer has more data than a C++ optimizer, because it can see what
flows are being used
Hi,
I am pretty much a noob and have only started out contributing, but may
I ask why moving to Java from C++ is being considered? This migration will take
effort and time, and I was of the understanding that C++ code runs faster than
Java.
Thanks
Jatin
On 11/8/15, 8:48 PM, "Fernando
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> There has been suggestion, and some expressed support, for AOO becoming a
> Java application.
>
+1 I think it would be nice. Previous work on Java based office suites show
promise and that this is possible.
Cases in point:
1. ThinkFre
Using some combination of general and special purpose tools to do the
bulk of the conversion makes sense to me.
In addition, once we have functionally correct Java code, refactoring
for maintainability becomes easier. I am most familiar with the tools
built into Eclipse: See
http://help.eclip
Let's examine porting AOO to Java in more detail.
Java can easily call C code with JNA and also easily call even C++ with
BridJ (https://github.com/nativelibs4java/BridJ) (with its sister project
JNAerator even generating Java code to compile/link yours against by
examining C/C++ header files), an
On 11/7/2015 11:41 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
There has been suggestion, and some expressed support, for AOO becoming a
Java application.
I don't want to discuss the merits of this, but how it might be undertaken.
...
2. FORKING TO MAKE AOO4J? One could consider making a project fork.
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2015 11:57
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Getting to AOO for Java (AOO4J)?
>
> All nice, but with a short of developers that could do an
All nice, but with a short of developers that could do any of the points
you listed below, it's just a theoretical idea what could be done. ;-)
My 2 ct.
Marcus
Am 11/07/2015 08:41 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
There has been suggestion, and some expressed support, for AOO becoming a
Java
17 matches
Mail list logo