I agree with you.
+1 on a new release.
Minor things:
-after the release, I feel we should not continue to use the
1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number
Do you agree ?
-Matthias
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi folks,
It has been lots of corrections
I feel we should not continue to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number
Do you agree ?
* In released artifacts we will use 1.0.0-M4.
* After releasing M4, we still to continue to use 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
We have not reached our 1.0.0 release yet. We will be there after M5. After
releasing 1.0.0, I
2010/1/21 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com:
I feel we should not continue to use the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT version number
Do you agree ?
* In released artifacts we will use 1.0.0-M4.
* After releasing M4, we still to continue to use 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
We have not reached our 1.0.0 release yet.
I'm not sure if we need a M5.
Current code quality is already pretty fine and 1.0.0 from my understanding
would mean being feature complete and (almost) passing the TCK. I would then go
on and quarterly release 1.0.1, 1.0.2 as bugfix versions.
So I'd say we should stick to 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
what about 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ?
That makes it at least a little bit more obvious where the current
direction is, IMO
Yes, it is so reasonable. Actually M5 contains 2 bullets that we can move
them to 1.0.0 release. But as a common pattern with old releases, I want to
releas e artifacts as 1.0.0-M5
As I and Matthias said, there will be no M5. After releasing (1.0.0-M4), the
next release will be 1.0.0.
Matthias, I think it is reasonable to remove M5 from release. Just stick
with M4 and after that we can go ahead and release 1.0.0.
Therefore, next release will be 1.0.0-M4 and then final
2010/1/21 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com:
what about 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ?
That makes it at least a little bit more obvious where the current
direction is, IMO
Yes, it is so reasonable. Actually M5 contains 2 bullets that we can move
them to 1.0.0 release.
nice, sounds good.
But as a
2010/1/21 Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com:
As I and Matthias said, there will be no M5. After releasing (1.0.0-M4), the
next release will be 1.0.0.
+1 TCK work is looking very good, so 1.0.0 is a reasonable target for
the release
after M4.
Matthias, I think it is reasonable to remove
Hi Gurkan,
Thank you for your detailed response. It was very helpful.
Thanks again,
David
Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
Hi David;
Answers are detailed under each of your question.
Thanks;
--Gurkan
From: David Ezzio dez...@apache.org
To:
Thank you David!
Btw, Pete yesterday released the CDI TCK.
I will update the TCK package to this version.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 1/21/10, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com wrote:
From: David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com
Subject: Re: Interceptor API changes
To:
10 matches
Mail list logo
