As I and Matthias said, there will be no M5. After releasing (1.0.0-M4), the next release will be 1.0.0.
Matthias, I think it is reasonable to remove M5 from release. Just stick with M4 and after that we can go ahead and release 1.0.0. Therefore, next release will be 1.0.0-M4 and then final release will be 1.0.0. After M4 release, we continue to work on 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. WDYT? --Gurkan 2010/1/21 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > I'm not sure if we need a M5. > > Current code quality is already pretty fine and 1.0.0 from my understanding > would mean being feature complete and (almost) passing the TCK. I would then > go on and quarterly release 1.0.1, 1.0.2 as bugfix versions. > > So I'd say we should stick to 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Thu, 1/21/10, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> wrote: > > > From: Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > > Date: Thursday, January 21, 2010, 11:46 AM > > 2010/1/21 Gurkan Erdogdu <cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com>: > > >>>>I feel we should not continue to use the > > "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT" version number > > >>>>Do you agree ? > > > > > > * In released artifacts we will use 1.0.0-M4. > > > * After releasing M4, we still to continue to use > > 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. > > > > > > We have not reached our 1.0.0 release yet. We will be > > there after M5. After > > > releasing 1.0.0, I think we will use 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT in > > our modules. > > > > > > Any other ideas? > > > > what about 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ? > > That makes it at least a little bit more obvious where the > > current > > direction is, IMO > > > > Regarding the 1.0.0 is out after M5, is there a roadmap or > > so ? > > > > Once the "official" 1.0.0 is out, using the 1.0.x-SNAPSHOT > > pattern is fine. > > I agree :-) > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > --Gurkan > > > > > > 21 Ocak 2010 10:22 tarihinde Matthias Wessendorf > > <mat...@apache.org> > > yazdı: > > > > > >> I agree with you. > > >> > > >> +1 on a new release. > > >> > > >> Minor things: > > >> -after the release, I feel we should not continue > > to use the > > >> "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT" version number > > >> Do you agree ? > > >> > > >> -Matthias > > >> > > >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu > > <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > Hi folks, > > >> > > > >> > It has been lots of corrections and bug > > resolutions after our M3 release. > > >> I want to release M4 version, because current code > > base is the most mature > > >> and covers lots of specification requirements. I > > would like to re-solve > > >> issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 > > release beginning of the > > >> next week. > > >> > > > >> > I am very happy that this will be the our > > first release while living as a > > >> TLP. > > >> > > > >> > WDYT? > > >> > > > >> > Thanks; > > >> > > > >> > --Gurkan > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > ___________________________________________________________________ > > >> > Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr > > >> > İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! > > Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Matthias Wessendorf > > >> > > >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Gurkan Erdogdu > > > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > > -- Gurkan Erdogdu http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
